陆相页岩层系非泥页岩夹层发育程度定量表征

王保华; 李浩; 陆建林; 吕剑虹; 王苗; 赵琳洁

doi:10.11781/sysydz201906879

陆相页岩层系非泥页岩夹层发育程度定量表征

doi: 10.11781/sysydz201906879

中国石化石油勘探开发研究院无锡石油地质研究所, 江苏无锡 214126

基金项目:

国家油气重大专项"陆相页岩油资源潜力评价与分布规律"（2017ZX05049001-006）和"海相碳酸盐岩层系油气资源潜力评价与战略选区"（2017ZX05005001-004）联合资助。

详细信息

作者简介:
王保华(1982-),男,高级工程师,从事油气评价研究。E-mail:wangbh.syky@sinopec.com。

中图分类号: TE132.2
计量
- 文章访问数: 778
- HTML全文浏览量: 160
- PDF下载量: 100
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-03-13
- 修回日期: 2019-07-25
- 刊出日期: 2019-11-28

Quantitative characterization of development of permeable interlayers in continental shale strata

Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, SINOPEC, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China

摘要

摘要: 勘探实践表明，富有机质页岩层段中的砂岩夹层或碳酸盐岩夹层的发育程度是页岩油富集高产的关键因素之一。目前尚无针对上述夹层发育程度的定量评价模型和方法，建立页岩相对高渗夹层定量评价模型，完善该地质因素定量评价流程和方法具有重要意义。利用夹层在地层中发育、分布的位置及分散程度，建立表征夹层发育程度的数学模型。以地层岩性属性的地震反演数据体、三维构造建模数据体、钻井数据为基础，以虚拟/实际钻井岩性数据为计算单元，应用夹层厚度比临界值为约束，通过建立数学模型，对钻井开展夹层发育强度（DS）、分布位置（DP）及分散系数（DC）计算。再通过归一化处理综合计算夹层发育指数（STI），结合沉积相研究结果确定的主要物源方向，采用克里金插值计算目的层STI的平面分布。应用上述方法，对渤海湾盆地东营凹陷沙四上亚段STI进行计算，通过与现有钻井试油成果对比，高产井STI主要在0.4~0.8之间，显示STI分布范围对页岩油勘探井的部署具有参考意义。
- 页岩 /
- 夹层 /
- 分散系数 /
- 夹层发育指数(STI) /
- 东营凹陷 /
- 渤海湾盆地
Abstract: Exploration practice shows that the development of sandstone interlayers or carbonate interlayers in organic-rich shale intervals is one of the key factors for shale oil enrichment and high yield. At present, there is no quantitative evaluation model or method for the development degree of these interlayers. The quantitative evaluation model of relative hypertonic interlayers in shale is established. It is of great significance to improve the quantitative evaluation process. A mathematical model for characterizing the development of the interlayers is established by using the position and dispersion of interlayers in a formation. Based on seismic inversion data, three-dimensional structural modeling and drilling data of the lithology properties of the formation, the virtual/actual drilling lithology data is used as the calculation unit, and the sandstone thin interlayer index (STI) is used as the constraint value. The developmental strength (DS), distribution position (DP) and dispersion coefficient (DC) of the well were calculated. Then, the STI is calculated by normalization, and the main source direction is determined by the results of sedimentary facies research. The STI plane distribution of the target layer is calculated by Kriging interpolation. Using the above method, the STI of the upper part of the Shahejie Formation in the Dongying Sag was calculated. Compared with the existing drilling test results, the STI of the high-yield well is mainly between 0.4 and 0.8, indicating that the STI distribution range has a guiding significance for shale oil exploration.
- shale /
- interlayer /
- dispersion coefficient /
- STI index /
- Dongying Sag /
- Bohai Bay Basin

HTML全文

参考文献(22)

[1]	赵贤正,周立宏,蒲秀刚,等.陆相湖盆页岩层系基本地质特征与页岩油勘探突破:以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷古近系孔店组二段一亚段为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2018,45(3):361-372. ZHAO Xianzheng,ZHOU Lihong,PU Xiugang,et al.Geological characteristics of shale rock system and shale oil exploration in a lacustrine basin:a case study from the Paleogene 1st sub-member of Kong 2 Member in Cangdong Sag,Bohai Bay Basin,China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2018,45(3):361-372.
[2]	杨智,侯连华,林森虎,等.吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组致密油、页岩油地质特征与勘探潜力[J].中国石油勘探,2018,23(4):76-85. YANG Zhi,HOU Lianhua,LIN Senhu,et al.Geologic characteristics and exploration potential of tight oil and shale oil in Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2018,23(4):76-85.
[3]	EIA.Technically recoverable shale oil and shale gas resources:an assessment of 137 shale formations in 41 countries outside the United States[M].Washington DC:ARI,2013.
[4]	U.S. Energy Information Administration.Annual energy outlook 2017[R].Washington DC:U.S. Energy Information Administration,2017.
[5]	EGENHOFF S O,FISHMAN N S.Traces in the dark:sedimentary processes and facies gradients in the upper shale member of the Upper Devonian-Lower Mississippian Bakken Formation,Williston Basin,North Dakota,U.S.A.[J].Journal of Sedimentary Research,2014,83(9):803-824.
[6]	姜生玲,张金川,李博,等.中国现阶段页岩气资源评价方法分析[J].断块油气田,2017,24(5):642-646. JIANG Shengling,ZHANG Jinchuan,LI Bo,et al.Analysis of shale gas resources assessment method in China[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field,2017,24(5):642-646.
[7]	余涛,卢双舫,李俊乾,等.东营凹陷页岩油游离资源有利区预测[J].断块油气田,2018,25(1):16-21. YU Tao,LU Shuangfang,LI Junqian,et al.Prediction for favorable area of shale oil free resources in Dongying Sag[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field,2018,25(1):16-21.
[8]	周立宏,于超,滑双君,等.沧东凹陷孔二段页岩油资源评价方法与应用[J].特种油气藏,2017,24(6):1-6. ZHOU Lihong,YU Chao,HUA Shuangjun,et al.Shale oil resource estimation and application in Kong2 Member of Cangdong Sag[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2017,24(6):1-6.
[9]	谢文泉,刘招君,肖丽佳,等.柴北缘鱼卡地区中侏罗统石门沟组油页岩资源潜力[J].特种油气藏,2018,25(5):78-83. XIE Wenquan,LIU Zhaojun,XIAO Lijia,et al.Oil shale resource potential of the Middle Jurassic Shimengou Formation in Yuka of the north rim in Qaidam Basin[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2018,25(5):78-83.
[10]	高辉,何梦卿,赵鹏云,等.鄂尔多斯盆地长7页岩油与北美地区典型页岩油地质特征对比[J].石油实验地质,2018,40(2):133-140. GAO Hui,HE Mengqing,ZHAO Pengyun,et al.Comparison of geological characteristics of Chang 7 shale oil in Ordos Basin and typical shale oil in North America[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2018,40(2):133-140.
[11]	包友书.渤海湾盆地东营凹陷古近系页岩油主要赋存空间探索[J].石油实验地质,2018,40(4):479-484. BAO Youshu.Effective reservoir spaces of Paleogene shale oil in the Dongying Depression,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Petroleum Geo-logy & Experiment,2018,40(4):479-484.
[12]	包友书.济阳坳陷超压和应力场对页岩油富集的影响[J].断块油气田,2018,25(5):585-588. BAO Youshu.Influence of overpressure and stress on shale oil enrichment in Jiyang Depression[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field,2018,25(5):585-588.
[13]	崔景伟,朱如凯,杨智,等.国外页岩层系石油勘探开发进展及启示[J].非常规油气,2015,2(4):68-82. CUI Jingwei,ZHU Rukai,YANG Zhi,et al.Progresses and enlighten-ment of overseas shale oil exploration and development[J].Unconventonal Oil & Gas,2015,2(4):68-82.
[14]	王保华,陆建林,李浩,等.基于孔隙成因的泥页岩总孔隙度恢复方法研究:以渤海湾盆地东营凹陷沙三下亚段为例[J].石油实验地质,2017,39(5):724-728. WANG Baohua,LU Jianlin,LI Hao,et al.Recovery method for total porosity of shale based on porosity origin:a case study of the lower part of the third member of Shahejie Formation in the Dongying Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2017,39(5):724-728.
[15]	李红英,陈善斌,杨志成,等.巨厚油层隔夹层特征及其对剩余油分布的影响:以渤海湾盆地L油田为例[J].断块油气田,2018,25(6):709-714. LI Hongying,CHEN Shanbin,YANG Zhicheng,et al.Characte-ristics of interbeds in thick oil layer and its effect on remaining oil distribution:a case study of L Oilfield,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field,2018,25(6):709-714.
[16]	李佳欣.观音桥段地质特征及其对页岩气产量的影响:以南川地区为例[J].油气藏评价与开发,2018,8(4):68-72. Li Jiaxin.Geological features of Guanyinqiao member and its influence on the shale gas production:a case study of Nanchuan district[J].Reservoir Evaluation and Development,2018,8(4):68-72.
[17]	刘毅,陆正元,戚明辉,等.渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷沙河街组页岩油微观储集特征[J].石油实验地质,2017,39(2):180-185. LIU Yi,LU Zhengyuan,QI Minghui,et al.Microscopic characteristics of shale oil reservoirs in Shahejie Formation in Zhanhua Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2017,39(2):180-185.
[18]	王勇,宋国奇,刘惠民,等.济阳坳陷页岩油富集主控因素[J].油气地质与采收率,2015,22(4):20-25. WANG Yong,SONG Guoqi,LIU Huimin,et al.Main control factors of enrichment characteristics of shale oil in Jiyang Depression[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2015,22(4):20-25.
[19]	中华人民共和国国土资源部.页岩气资源/储量计算与评价技术规范:DZ/T 0254-2014[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2014. Ministry of Land and Resources of the People's Republic of China.Technical specification for calculating and evaluating shale gas resources/reserves:DZ/T 0254-2014[S].Beijing:China Standards Publishing House,2014.
[20]	邹才能,董大忠,王玉满,等.页岩气地质评价方法:GB/T 31483-2015[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2015. ZOU Caineng,DONG Dazhong,WANG Yuman,et al.Geological evaluation methods for shale gas:GB/T 31483-2015[S].Beijing:China Standards Publishing House,2015.
[21]	刘超英,徐旭辉,刘翠荣,等.页岩油勘探选区评价方法:Q/SH 0505-2013[S].北京:中国石化出版社,2013. LIU Chaoying,XU Xuhui,LIU Cuirong,et al.Shale oil exploration constituency evaluation method:Q/SH 0505-2013[S].Beijing:China Petrochemical Press,2013.
[22]	朱德顺,王勇,朱德燕,等.渤南洼陷沙一段夹层型页岩油界定标准及富集主控因素[J].油气地质与采收率,2015,22(5):15-20. ZHU Deshun,WANG Yong,ZHU Deyan,et al.Analysis on recognition criteria and enrichment factors of interlayer shale oil of Es₁ in Bonan Subsag[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2015,22(5):15-20.