超临界二氧化碳萃取泥页岩中可动油实验研究

王强; 李志明; 钱门辉; 蒋启贵; 曹婷婷; 刘鹏; 鲍云杰; 陶国亮

doi:10.11781/sysydz202004646

超临界二氧化碳萃取泥页岩中可动油实验研究

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004646

王强^{1, 2, 3,},
李志明^{1, 2, 3, ,},
钱门辉^{1, 2, 3},
蒋启贵^{1, 2, 3},
曹婷婷^{1, 2, 3},
刘鹏^{1, 2, 3},
鲍云杰^{1, 2, 3},
陶国亮^{1, 2, 3}

1.
中国石化石油勘探开发研究院无锡石油地质研究所, 江苏无锡 214126
2.
页岩油气富集机理与有效开发国家重点实验室, 江苏无锡 214126
3.
中国石化油气成藏重点实验室, 江苏无锡 214126

基金项目:

国家科技重大专项 2017ZX05049-001

中国石油化工股份有限公司科技开发部项目 P17027-1

详细信息

作者简介:
王强(1967-), 男, 高级工程师, 从事油气地球化学评价研究和仪器研发研制。E-mail: wangqiang.syky@sinopec.com

通讯作者:
李志明(1968-), 男, 研究员, 从事油气地球化学、页岩油气地质研究。E-mail: lizm.syky@sinopec.com

中图分类号: TE135.6
计量
- 文章访问数: 565
- HTML全文浏览量: 72
- PDF下载量: 126
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-03-07
- 修回日期: 2020-06-10
- 刊出日期: 2020-07-28

Movable oil extraction from shale with supercritical carbon dioxide

WANG Qiang^{1, 2, 3
,},
LI Zhiming^{1, 2, 3
, ,},
QIAN Menhui^{1, 2, 3},
JIANG Qigui^{1, 2, 3},
CAO Tingting^{1, 2, 3},
LIU Peng^{1, 2, 3},
BAO Yunjie^{1, 2, 3},
TAO Guoliang^{1, 2, 3}

1.
Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, SINOPEC, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China
2.
State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China
3.
SINOPEC Key Laboratory of Petroleum Accumulation Mechanisms, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China

摘要

摘要: 针对泥页岩基质型页岩油有效开发面临的问题，以渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷沾化凹陷古近系沙河街组沙三下亚段典型含油泥页岩样品为例，开展了地层温度下密闭压裂改造后一定负压和超临界二氧化碳流体在不同压力条件下吞吐萃取可动油实验研究。实验结果揭示：地层温度与一定负压下仅微量轻质组分（< C₁₅）可流动；在相同地层温度与流体压力下，随着超临界二氧化碳流体吞吐作用时间增长，可动油主要组分的碳数呈现增高趋势；随着流体压力的增大，超临界二氧化碳吞吐萃取可动油量显著提高，不仅以游离态赋存的轻质油组分和中质油组分被有效萃取出来，而且部分以束缚态（吸附—互溶态）赋存的重质组分也被萃取出来。超临界二氧化碳技术在提高泥页岩基质型页岩油采收率领域具有广阔的应用前景。
- 超临界二氧化碳 /
- 地层温度 /
- 压力 /
- 泥页岩 /
- 页岩油 /
- 沙河街组 /
- 济阳坳陷
Abstract: Movable oil extraction experiments from the lower part of third member of Paleogene Shahejie Formation (Es₃^L) in the Zhanhua Sag of Jiyang Depression of Bohai Bay Basin were made to address problems on matrix shale oil exploitation. Various negative pressure and different supercritical carbon dioxide fluid pressures at strata temperature were used after fracturing in a closed system. Only traces of light hydrocarbons (< C₁₅) can flow at strata temperature and negative pressure. The carbon number of the main components of movable oil increases with extraction time with supercritical carbon dioxide under the same strata temperature and fluid pressure, and the contents of movable oil increase with fluid pressure increase. The light and medium weight hydrocarbon components in the free state are extracted effectively and some heavy hydrocarbon components in the bound-state (adsorption and miscible state) are also extracted. It suggests that the technology of supercritical carbon dioxide has a good prospect for improving recovery efficiency of matrix shale oil.
- supercritical CO₂ /
- strata temperature /
- pressure /
- shale /
- shale oil /
- Shahejie Formation /
- Jiyang Depression

HTML全文

图 1 实验样品制备、实验仪器与主要实验结果

Figure 1. Sample preparation, apparatus and main experiment results

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 地层温度下不同流体压力、不同吞吐时间超临界二氧化碳萃取可动油全烃色谱图

Figure 2. Chromatogram of movable oil extracts from shale with supercritical carbon dioxide under different fluid pressures and huffing and puffing times

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 实验原始样品与超临界二氧化碳萃取残样中不同赋存状态油定量表征结果对比

Table 1. Quantitative characterization of different occurrence state oils of original sample and residual samples after extraction with supercritical carbon dioxide mg/g

样品性质	多温阶热解参数
样品性质	S_1-1	S_1-2	S_2-1	S_2-2	总滞留油量
原始样品	0.59	7.15	5.70	6.59	13.44
130 ℃/10 MPa条件下吞吐萃取后残样	0.35	6.03	4.70	6.35	11.08
130 ℃/20 MPa条件下吞吐萃取后残样	0.10	2.97	4.55	6.12	7.52
130 ℃/30 MPa条件下吞吐萃取后残样	0.04	0.86	3.57	5.39	4.47

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 地层温度不同流体压力下超临界二氧化碳萃取不同赋存状态油量与萃取率对比

Table 2. Extractive contents and ratios of different occurrence state oils with supercritical carbon dioxide under strata temperature and different fluid pressures

可动油萃取条件	S_1-1萃取量/(mg·g^-1)	S_1-1萃取率/%	S_1-2萃取量/(mg·g^-1)	S_1-2萃取率/%	S_2-1萃取量/(mg·g^-1)	S_2-1萃取率/%	S_2-2萃取量/(mg·g^-1)	S_2-2萃取率/%	总萃取量/(mg·g^-1)
130 ℃/10 MPa条件下吞吐萃取可动油构成	0.24	40.68	1.12	15.66	1.00	17.54	0.24	3.64	2.60
130 ℃/20 MPa条件下吞吐萃取可动油构成	0.49	83.05	4.18	58.46	1.15	20.18	0.47	7.13	6.29
130 ℃/30 MPa条件下吞吐萃取可动油构成	0.55	93.22	6.29	87.97	2.13	37.37	1.20	18.21	10.17

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(25)

[1]	邹才能, 杨智, 崔景伟, 等. 页岩油形成机制、地质特征及发展对策[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(1): 14-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201301003.htm ZOU Caineng, YANG Zhi, CUI Jingwei, et al. Formation mechanism, geological characteristics and development strategy of nonmarine shale oil in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(1): 14-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201301003.htm
[2]	杜金虎, 胡素云, 庞正炼, 等. 中国陆相页岩油类型、潜力及前景[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5): 560-568. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2019.05.003 DU Jinhu, HU Suyun, PANG Zhenglian, et al. The types, potentials and prospects of continental shale oil in China[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5): 560-568. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2019.05.003
[3]	孙焕泉, 蔡勋育, 周德华, 等. 中国石化页岩油勘探实践与展望[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5): 569-575. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201905004.htm SUN Huanquan, CAI Xunyu, ZHOU Dehua, et al. Practice and prospect of SINOPEC shale oil exploration[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5): 567-575. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201905004.htm
[4]	赵贤正, 周立宏, 赵敏, 等. 陆相页岩油工业化开发突破与实践: 以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔二段为例[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5): 589-600. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2019.05.006 ZHAO Xianzheng, ZHOU Lihong, ZHAO Min, et al. Breakthrough and practice of industrial development on continental shale oil: a case study on Kong-2 Member in Cangdong Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5): 589-600. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2019.05.006
[5]	霍进, 何吉祥, 高阳, 等. 吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组页岩油开发难点及对策[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2019, 40(4): 379-388. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD201904001.htm HUO Jin, HE Jixiang, GAO Yang, et al. Difficulties and countermeasures of shale oil development in Lucaogou Formation of Jimsar Sag[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019, 40(4): 379-388. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD201904001.htm
[6]	梅海燕, 何浪, 张茂林, 等. 页岩油注气提高采收率现状及可行性分析[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2018, 8(6): 77-82. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1426.2018.06.014 MEI Haiyan, HE Lang, ZHANG Maolin, et al. Status and feasibility analysis on improved shale-oil recovery by gas injection[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2018, 8(6): 77-82. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1426.2018.06.014
[7]	王杰. 超临界流体萃取致密介质中原油的可行性研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2015. WANG Jie. Feasibility study on supercritical fluid extraction of crude oil in the dense medium[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petro-leum University, 2015.
[8]	ZHANG Xinwei, LU Yiyu, TANG Jiren, et al. Experimental study on fracture initiation and propagation in shale using supercritical carbon dioxide fracturing[J]. Fuel, 2017, 190: 370-378. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.10.120
[9]	ZHAO Zhiheng, LI Xiao, HE Jianming, et al. A laboratory investigation of fracture propagation induced by supercritical carbon dioxide fracturing in continental shale with interbeds[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2018, 166: 739-746. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.03.066
[10]	苏建政, 李凤霞, 周彤. 页岩储层超临界二氧化碳压裂裂缝形态研究[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3): 616-625. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201903017.htm SU Jianzheng, LI Fengxia, ZHOU Tong. Hydraulic fracture propagation behavious and geometry under supercritical CO₂ fracturing in shale reservoirs[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(3): 616-625. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201903017.htm
[11]	杜玉昆, 陈晓红, 王瑞和, 等. 超临界二氧化碳粒子射流破岩性能分析[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 43(2): 85-90. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX201902010.htm DU Yukun, CHEN Xiaohong, WANG Ruihe, et al. Analysis on rock-breaking property of supercritical carbon dioxide particles jet[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2019, 43(2): 85-90. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX201902010.htm
[12]	王毅博, 王熙, 柳愿. 超临界二氧化碳在非常规油气藏开采中的应用研究[J]. 化工技术与开发, 2018, 47(11): 29-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXHG201811010.htm WANG Yibo, WANG Xi, LIU Yuan. Application of supercritical carbon dioxide in unconventional oil and gas reservoir[J]. Technology & Development of Chemical Industry, 2018, 47(11): 29-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXHG201811010.htm
[13]	王永诗, 李政, 巩建强, 等. 济阳坳陷页岩油气评价方法: 以沾化凹陷罗家地区为例[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(1): 83-91. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201301008.htm WANG Yongshi, LI Zheng, GONG Jianqiang, et al. Discussion on an evaluation method of shale oil and gas in Jiyang Depression: a case study on Luojia area in Zhanhua Sag[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(1): 83-91. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201301008.htm
[14]	王永诗, 巩建强, 房建军, 等. 渤南洼陷页岩油气富集高产条件及勘探方向[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2012, 19(6): 6-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201206006.htm WANG Yongshi, GONG Jianqiang, FANG Jiangjun, et al. Enrichment condition analysis and exploration direction of shale oilgas in Bonan Subsag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2012, 19(6): 6-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201206006.htm
[15]	王鸿升, 胡天跃. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷页岩油形成影响因素分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(S1): 141-149. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX2014S1025.htm WANG Hongsheng, HU Tianyue. Analysis of influence factors of shale oil formation in Zhanhua Depression of Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014, 25(S1): 141-149. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX2014S1025.htm
[16]	刘魁元, 孙喜新, 李琦, 等. 沾化凹陷泥质岩储层中裂缝类型及其成因研究[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 28(4): 12-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX200404003.htm LIU Kuiyuan, SUN Xixin, LI Qi, et al. Fracture pattern and genesis of mudstone reservoir in Zhanhua Depression[J]. Journal of Chinathe University of Petroleum, China, 2004, 28(4): 12-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX200404003.htm
[17]	宋梅远, 张善文, 王永诗, 等. 沾化凹陷沙三段下亚段泥岩裂缝储层岩性分类及测井识别[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2011, 18(6): 18-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201106008.htm SONG Meiyuan, ZHANG Shanwen, WANG Yongshi, et al. Lithology classification and prediction of favorable areas Sha Ⅲ mudstone-fractured reservoir in Zhanhua Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2011, 18(6): 18-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201106008.htm
[18]	蒋启贵, 黎茂稳, 钱门辉, 等. 不同赋存状态页岩油定量表征技术与应用研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2016, 38(6): 842-849. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201606842 JIANG Qigui, LI Maowen, QIAN Menhui, et al. Quantitative characterization of shale oil in different occurrence states and its application[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2016, 38(6): 842-849. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201606842
[19]	李志明, 钱门辉, 黎茂稳, 等. 中-低成熟湖相富有机质泥页岩含油性及赋存形式: 以渤海湾盆地渤南洼陷罗63井和义21井沙河街组一段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(3): 448-456, 466. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201703004.htm LI Zhiming, QIAN Menhui, LI Maowen, et al. Oil content and occurrence in low-medium mature organic-rich lacustrine shales: a case from the 1st member of the Eocene-Oligocene Shahejie Formation in well Luo-63 and Yi-21, Bonan Subsag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38(3): 448-456, 466. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201703004.htm
[20]	李志明, 芮晓庆, 黎茂稳, 等. 北美典型混合页岩油系统特征及其启示[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(4): 1060-1072. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ201504010.htm LI Zhiming, RUI Xiaoqing, LI Maowen, et al. Characteristics of typical hydbrid shale-oil system in North American and its implications[J]. Journal of Jilin University: (Earth Science Edition), 2015, 45(4): 1060-1072. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ201504010.htm
[21]	JARVIE D M. Shale resource systems for oil and gas: part 2-shale-oil resource systems[M]//BREYER J A. Shale reservoirs: giant resources for the 21st century: AAPG memoir 97. Houston: AAPG, 2012: 89-119.
[22]	LARTER S R, HUANG Haiping, BENNETT B. What don't we do not know about self sourced oil reservoirs: challenges and potential solutions[C]//SPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Confe-rence. Calgary, Alberta, Canada: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2012: 1-4.
[23]	赵清民, 伦增珉, 章晓庆, 等. 页岩油注CO₂动用机理[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(6): 1333-1338. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201906017.htm ZHAO Qingmin, LUN Zengmin, ZHANG Xiaoqing, et al. Mechanism of shale oil mobilization under CO₂ injection[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(6): 1333-1338. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201906017.htm
[24]	赵文智, 胡素文, 侯连华. 页岩油地下原位转化的内涵与战略地位[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(4): 537-545. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201804001.htm ZHAO Wenzhi, HU Suyun, HOU Lianhua. Connotation and strategic role of in-situ conversion processing of shale oil underground in the onshore China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(4): 537-545. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201804001.htm
[25]	李志明, 陶国亮, 黎茂稳, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部彬长区块三叠系延长组7段3亚段页岩油勘探前景探讨[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3): 558-570. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201903012.htm LI Zhiming, TAO Guoliang, LI Maowen, et al. Discussion on prospecting potential of shale oil in the 3rd sub-member of the Triassic Chang 7 member in Binchang block, southwestern Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(3): 558-570. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201903012.htm