鄂尔多斯盆地马岭油田长8<sub>1</sub>储层不同流动单元可动流体赋存特征及其影响因素

黎盼; 孙卫; 闫健; 高永利; 折文旭; 杜堃

doi:10.11781/sysydz201803362

鄂尔多斯盆地马岭油田长8₁储层不同流动单元可动流体赋存特征及其影响因素

doi: 10.11781/sysydz201803362

1.
西北大学地质学系/大陆动力学国家重点实验室, 西安 710069
2. 西安石油大学石油工程学院, 西安 710065

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金青年基金（51404197）、国家科技重大专项“大型油气田及煤层气开发”（2011ZX05044）和陕西省青年人才基金（2016JQ4022）联合资助。

详细信息

作者简介:
黎盼(1990-),女,博士研究生,从事油气田地质与开发研究。E-mail:122078558@qq.com。

中图分类号: TE311
计量
- 文章访问数: 1245
- HTML全文浏览量: 110
- PDF下载量: 172
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2017-09-03
- 修回日期: 2018-03-05
- 刊出日期: 2018-05-28

Characteristics of movable fluids and controlling factors in different flow units of Chang 8₁ reservoir in Maling oil field, Ordos Basin

1.
Department of Geology/State Key Laboratory for Continental Dynamics, Northwest University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710069, China
2. College of Petroleum Engineering, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710065, China

摘要

摘要: 鄂尔多斯盆地马岭油田长8₁储层是典型的低孔—低渗透油藏，渗透率的强非均质性制约了油气储层品质的提高。通过开展核磁共振实验，结合恒速压汞和高压压汞、图像粒度、铸体薄片等微观实验研究储层的微观孔隙结构特征，同时选取砂厚、孔隙度、渗透率、含油饱和度、流动带指数5个参数，借助SPSS数据分析软件，将马岭油田长8₁段储层的流动单元划分为E、G、M、P等4类，进而分析不同类型流动单元微观孔隙结构特征及其对可动流体饱和度的影响，结合生产动态数据分析不同类型的流动单元产能的差异。结果表明：不同流动单元的微观孔隙结构有着明显的差异，是造成可动流体饱和度差异的主要因素。其中，喉道半径分布形态及主流喉道半径大小起了决定性作用。生产动态数据表明，在油气田勘探开发阶段E类和G类流动单元的产能最高，应根据不同流动单元的微观孔隙结构差异性特征，实施合理有效的开发方案。
- 流动单元 /
- 微观孔隙结构 /
- 可动流体 /
- 长8₁储层 /
- 马岭油田 /
- 鄂尔多斯盆地
Abstract: The Chang 8₁ reservoir of the Maling oil field in the Ordos Basin has low porosity and low permeability. The quality of oil and gas reservoirs is constrained by the strong heterogeneity of its permeability. We analyzed the characteristics of its microscopic pore structure by conducting an NMR experiment and microcosm experiments including constant speed mercury injection, high pressure mercury injection, image granularity, and casting lamella. We then divided the flow units into 4 classes E, G, M and P, using SPSS data analysis software on the basis of 5 chosen parameters, including sand thickness, porosity, permeability, oil saturation and flown zone exponent. We analyzed the microscopic pore structure characteristics in different types of flow unit and the impacts on movable fluid saturation. The results showed that there are obvious differences in the microscopic pore structure characteristics in different flow units, which are the main factors that caused different movable fluid saturation. The distribution and size of pore throat radius played a crucial role. Production performance data demonstrated that classes E and G acquired the highest capacity in the oil and gas field development. Reasonable and effective development programs should be implemented according to the microscopic pore structure characteristics of different flow units.
- flow units /
- microscopic pore structure /
- movable fluids /
- Chang 8₁ reservoir /
- Maling oil field /
- Ordos Basin

HTML全文

参考文献(25)

[1]	张浩,陈刚,朱玉双,等.致密油储层微观孔隙结构定量表征:以鄂尔多斯盆地新安边油田长7储层为例[J].石油实验地质,2017,39(1):112-119. ZHANG Hao,CHEN Gang,ZHU Yushuang,et al.Quantitative characterization of microscopic pore throat structure in tight sandstone oil reservoirs:A case study of Chang 7 reservoir in Xin'anbian oil field,Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2017,39(1):112-119.
[2]	任大忠,孙卫,雷启鸿,等.鄂尔多斯盆地华庆油田长8₁段储层物性影响因素[J].地质与勘探,2014,50(3):591-598. REN Dazhong,SUN Wei,LEI Qihong,et al.Influential factors in the physical properties of the Chang 8₁ reservoir,Yanchang Formation in the Huaqing Oilfield,Ordos Basin[J].Geology and Exploration,2014,50(3):591-598.
[3]	庞振宇,李艳,赵习森,等.特低渗储层可动流体饱和度研究:以甘谷驿油田长6储层为例[J].地球物理学进展,2017,32(2):702-708. PANG Zhenyu,LI Yan,ZHAO Xisen,et al.Study on movable fluid saturation in ultra low permeability reservoir:Taking Chang 6 reservoir in Ganguyi oil field as an example[J].Progress in Geophysics,2017,32(2):702-708.
[4]	盛军,孙卫,刘艳妮,等.低渗透油藏储层微观孔隙结构差异对可动流体的影响:以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬与板桥地区长6储层为例[J].地质科技情报,2016,35(3):167-172. SHENG Jun,SUN Wei,LIU Yanni,et al.Effect of the difference of low permeability reservoir microscopic pore structure on mova-ble fluid:A case for the Chang 6 reservoir of Jiyuan and Banqiao areas in Ordos Basin[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2016,35(3):167-172.
[5]	屈雪峰,孙卫,雷启鸿,等.华庆油田低渗透砂岩储层可动流体饱和度及其影响因素[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2016,31(2):93-98. QU Xuefeng,SUN Wei,LEI Qihong,et al.Study on saturation of movable fluid in the low-permeability sandstone reservoirs of Huaqing oilfield and its influencing factors[J].Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition),2016,31(2):93-98.
[6]	郑庆华,柳益群.特低渗透储层微观孔隙结构和可动流体饱和度特征[J].地质科技情报,2015,34(4):124-131. ZHENG Qinghua,LIU Yiqun.Microscopic pore structure and movable fluid saturation of ultra low permeability reservoir[J].Geolo-gical Science and Technology Information,2015,34(4):124-131.
[7]	曹雷,孙卫,盛军,等.低渗透致密油藏可动流体饱和度计算方法:以板桥地区长6油层组致密油储层为例[J].长江大学学报(自然版),2016,13(20):1-8. CAO Lei,SUN Wei,SHENG Jun,et al.A method to determine mova-ble fluid saturation of low-permeability and tight oil reservoirs:By taking tight oil reservoirs in sixth member of Yanchang Formation in Banqiao area as an example[J].Journal of Yangtze University (Natural Science Edition),2016,13(20):1-8.
[8]	王伟,牛小兵,梁晓伟,等.鄂尔多斯盆地致密砂岩储层可动流体特征:以姬塬地区延长组长7段油层组为例[J].地质科技情报,2017,36(1):183-187. WANG Wei,NIU Xiaobing,LIANG Xiaowei,et al.Characteristic of movable fluid for tight sandstone reservoir in Ordos basin:a case of Chang 7 oil reservoir of Yanchang Formation in Jiyuan area[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2017,36(1):183-187.
[9]	任颖惠,吴珂,何康宁,等.核磁共振技术在研究超低渗-致密油储层可动流体中的应用:以鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组为例[J].矿物岩石,2017,37(1):103-110. REN Yinghui,WU Ke,HE Kangning,et al.Application of NMr technique to movable fluid of ultra-low permeability and tight reservoir:A case study on the Yanchang Formation in Longdong area,Ordos basin[J].Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology,2017,37(1):103-110.
[10]	吴长辉,赵习森.致密砂岩油藏核磁共振T₂截止值的确定及可动流体喉道下限:以吴仓堡下组合长9油藏为例[J].非常规油气,2017,4(2):91-94. WU Changhui,ZHAO Xisen.Determination of T2 cut-off value of nuclear magnetic resonance in tight sandstone reservoir and lower limit of movable fluid:A case study of Chang 9 reservoir of Wucangbao oilfield[J].Unconventional Oil & Gas,2017,4(2):91-94.
[11]	张茜,孙卫,杨晓菁,等.致密砂岩储层差异性成岩演化对孔隙度演化定量表征的影响:以鄂尔多斯盆地华庆地区长6₃储层为例[J].石油实验地质,2017,39(1):126-133. ZHANG Xi,SUN Wei,YANG Xiaojing,et al.Quantitative calculation of tight sandstone reservoir porosity evolution based on different diagenesis:A case study of Chang 6₃ reservoir in Huaqing area,Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2017,39(1):126-133.
[12]	邹才能,陶士振,侯连华,等.非常规油气地质[M].2版.北京:地质出版社,2011. ZOU Caineng,TAO Shizhen,HOU Lianhua,et al.Unconventional petroleum geology[M].2nd ed.Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2011.
[13]	EHRENBERG S N.Assessing the relative importance of compaction processes and cementation to reduction of porosity in sandstones:Discussion;compaction and porosity evolution of Pliocene sandstones,Ventura Basin,California:Discussion[J].AAPG Bulletin,1989,73(10):1274-1276.
[14]	赵习森,畅斌,张佳琪,等.密井网条件下不同流动单元剩余油分布研究:以延长油田双河区块为例[J].非常规油气,2016,3(6):60-65. ZHAO Xisen,CHANG Bin,ZHANG Jiaqi,et al.Distribution of the remaining oil in different flow units for the infill well Networks:Taken Shuanghe Block,Yanchang oilfield as an example[J].Unconventional Oil & Gas,2016,3(6):60-65.
[15]	李跃林,段迎利,王利娟,等.基于流动单元的原始地层电阻率反演及其应用[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2016,31(4):32-37. LI Yuelin,DUAN Yingli,WANG Lijuan,et al.Inversion of original formation resistivity based on flow unit and its application[J].Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition),2016,31(4):32-37.
[16]	GAO H,LI H A.Pore structure characterization,permeability evaluation and enhanced gas recovery techniques of tight gas sandstones[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2015,28:536-547.
[17]	任颖,孙卫,张茜,等.低渗透储层不同流动单元可动流体赋存特征及生产动态分析:以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长6段储层为例[J].地质与勘探,2016,52(5):974-984. REN Ying,SUN Wei,ZHANG Xi,et al.Characteristics of movable fluids and study of production performance in different flow units of low-permeability reservoir:An example from the Chang 6 block of the Jiyuan oilfield in Ordos Basin[J].Geology and Exploration,2016,52(5):974-984.
[18]	陈大友,朱玉双,张皎生,等.鄂尔多斯盆地马岭地区长8储层成岩作用与有利成岩相带[J].石油实验地质,2015,37(6):721-728. CHEN Dayou,ZHU Yushuang,ZHANG Jiaosheng,et al.Diage-nesis and favorable diagenetic facies of the eighth member of Yanchang Formation in Maling area,the Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2015,37(6):721-728.
[19]	马春林,王瑞杰,罗必林,等.鄂尔多斯盆地马岭油田长8油层组储层特征与油藏分布研究[J].天然气地球科学,2012,23(3):514-519. MA Chunlin,WANG Ruijie,LUO Bilin,et al.Characteristics of Chang-8 oil reservoir and distribution of oil reservoirs in Maling oilfield,Ordos Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2012,23(3):514-519.
[20]	张茜.马岭油田长8₁储层微观孔隙结构特征和渗流特征研究[D].西安:西北大学,2015. ZHANG Xi.Research on micro-pore structure and seepage characteristics in Chang 8₁ sandstone reservoir in Maling Oilfield[D].Xi'an:Northwest University,2015.
[21]	大庆油田有限责任公司勘探开发研究院.油气储层评价方法:SY/T 6285-2011[S].北京:石油工业出版社,2011. Daqing Oil Field Co Exploration and Development Research Ins-titute.Evaluating methods of oil and gas reservoirs:SY/T 6285-2011[S].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2011.
[22]	MORAD S,AL-RAMADAN K,KETZER J M,et al.The impact of diagenesis on the heterogeneity of sandstone reservoirs:A review of the role of depositional fades and sequence stratigraphy[J].AAPG Bulletin,2010,94(8):1267-1309.
[23]	任晓霞,李爱芬,王永政,等.致密砂岩储层孔隙结构及其对渗流的影响:以鄂尔多斯盆地马岭油田长8储层为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2015(5):774-779. REN Xiaoxia,LI Aifen,WANG Yongzheng,et al.Pore structure of tight sand reservoir and its influence on percolation:Taking the Chang 8 reservoir in Maling oilfield in Ordos Basin as an example[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2015(5):774-779.
[24]	朱筱敏.沉积岩石学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2009. ZHU Xiaomin.Sedimentary petrology[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2009.
[25]	杨华,付金华,何海清,等.鄂尔多斯华庆地区低渗透岩性大油区形成与分布[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(6):641-648. YANG Hua,FU Jinhua,HE Haiqing,et al.Formation and distribution of large low-permeability lithologic oil regions in Huaqing,Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration & Development,2012,39(6):641-648.