华北板块南缘原型沉积盆地类型与构造演化

余和中; 吕福亮; 郭庆新; 卢文忠; 武金云; 韩守华

doi:10.11781/sysydz200502111

华北板块南缘原型沉积盆地类型与构造演化

doi: 10.11781/sysydz200502111

1.
中国地质大学, 能源学院, 北京, 100083
2. 中国石油, 杭州地质研究所, 浙江, 杭州, 310023

详细信息

作者简介:
余和中(1964- ),男(汉族),安徽安庆人,博士生、高级工程师,从事石油构造及石油地质工作.

中图分类号: TE121.3
计量
- 文章访问数: 1166
- HTML全文浏览量: 51
- PDF下载量: 635
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2004-09-10
- 修回日期: 2005-03-11
- 刊出日期: 2005-03-25

PROTO-SEDIMENT BASIN TYPES AND TECTONIC EVOLUTION IN THE SOUTHERN EDGE OF NORTH CHINA PLATE

1.
College of Resources, China University of Geology, Beijing 100083, China
2. Hangzhou Institute of Geology, CNPC, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310023, China

摘要

摘要: 华北板块南缘原型沉积盆地类型受构造演化控制,古生代—中三叠世华北与扬子两大板块由“开”到“合”,华北板块南缘也从被动大陆边缘(Z—O₂)到抬升剥蚀(O₃—C₁)再到前陆复理石沉积盆地(C₂—P₂);晚三叠—早侏罗世,两大板块碰撞造山形成著名的中央造山带,与造山藕合形成磨拉石沉积盆地;中侏罗—早白垩世,造山期后造山带内部拆沉的同时,造山带边缘拆离,形成后缘伸展与前缘冲断的复杂构造类型;后期受古太平洋板块(库拉、伊则奈奇板块)和太平洋板块活动控制,形成伸展断陷和坳陷盆地。不同时期原型盆地类型不同,对于油气勘探原则具有重要意义。
- 前陆复理石沉积盆地 /
- 前陆磨拉石沉积盆地 /
- 拆离构造 /
- 原型盆地 /
- 华北板块
Abstract: Type of ancestral basin in the Southern North China plate is controlled by tectonic evolution. The North China and Yangtze plates changed from open to close during the Paleozoic era to Middle Triassic epoch. The southern edge of North China Plate changed from passive continental margin(Z-O₂) to uplift denude(O₃-C₁), then to foreland flysch basin(C₂-P₂).The two plates collided and formed the famous Central Orogenic Belt(T₃-J₁) and coupled molasses sedimentary basin. From the Middle Jurassic to Early Cretaceous, postkinematic inner-orogenic belt subsided while orogenic belt margin detached, forming complex structures of backlimb thrust and front detachment. Detached fault-depression and down-warping basin came into being, controlled by activities of the Palaeo-Pacific plate and Pacific plate in late epoch. Different type of ancestral basin in different time is important for oil-gas exploration.
- foreland flysch basin /
- foreland molasses basin /
- detached structure /
- ancestral basin /
- the North China plate

HTML全文

参考文献(18)

[1]	周鼎武,张泽军,董云鹏等.东秦岭商南松树沟元古宙蛇绿岩片的地质地球化学特征[J].岩石学报,1995,11(增刊):154～164
[2]	张国伟,孙勇,于在平.北秦岭古活动大陆边缘[A].见:张国伟编.秦岭造山带的形成及其演化[M].西安:西北大学出版社,1988.48～56
[3]	张国伟,周鼎武,于在平等.秦岭造山带岩石圈组成、构造和演化特征[A].见:叶连俊编.秦岭造山带学术研讨会论文集[C].西安:西北大学出版社,1991.121～138
[4]	张国伟,张宗清,董云鹏.秦岭造山带主要构造岩石地层单元的构造性质及其大地构造意义[J].岩石学报,1995,11(2):101～114
[5]	张国伟,孟庆任,于在平等.秦岭造山带的造山过程及其动力学特征[J].中国科学,1996,26(1):193～200
[6]	胡受奚,林潜龙,陈泽铭等.华北与华南板块拼合带地质和成矿——以东秦岭-桐柏为例[M].南京:南京大学出版社,1988.1～557
[7]	董树文,孙先如,张勇等.大别山碰撞造山带基本结构[J].科学通报,1993,38(6):542～545
[8]	宋子堂.华北板块南缘壳内拆沉及对大别山北麓逆冲断层系形成的影响[J].石油实验地质,1994,16(3):250～255
[9]	Avramidis P,Zelilidis A.Interaction between tectonic activity and eustatic sea-level changes in the Pindos and Mesohellenic basins,NW Greece basin evolution and hydrocarbon potential[J].Journal of Petroleum Geology,2002,25(1):53～82
[10]	钟宁宁,曹代勇.华北地区南部晚古生代煤的变质成因——地下水热液对煤变质作用影响的进一步探讨[J].地质学报,1994,68(4):348～357
[11]	Kleinhans M G,Wilbers A W E,Swaaf A D,et al.Sediment supply-limited bedforms in sand-gravel bed rivers[J].Journal of Sedimentary Research,2002,72(5):629～640
[12]	Novoa E,Suppe J,Shaw J H.Inclined-shear restoration of growth folds[J].AAPG Bulletin,2002,84(6):787～804
[13]	赵伟卫.华北盆地济源凹陷古地温梯度的研究——凝灰石裂变径迹的应用[J].石油实验地质,2002,16(3):555～560
[14]	刘绍龙.华北地区大型三叠纪原始沉积盆地的存在[J].地质学报,1986,60(2):128～138
[15]	胡居文.华北地区中生代盆地与油气[J].石油与天然气地质,1989,10(4):378～392
[16]	陈丕基.郯庐断裂巨大平移的时代与格局[J].科学通报,1988,33(4):289～293
[17]	徐嘉炜,马国锋.剡庐断裂带研究的十年回顾[J].地质论评,1992,38(4):316～324
[18]	Lukie T D,Ardies G W,Dalrymple R W,et al.Alluvial architecture of the Horsefly unit(Basal Quartz) in southern Alberta and northern Montana: influence of accommodation changes and contemporaneous faulting[J].Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology,2002,50(1):73～91