CHARACTERISTICS OF THE HEFEI JURASSIC BASIN AND ITS SEDIMENTARY RESPONSE TO THE DABIESHAN OROGENIC BELT
-
摘要: 从盆—山耦合关系角度研究大别造山带与合肥侏罗纪盆地的性质,提出伴随着大别山的第二次隆升,早侏罗世大别山北缘出现了最强的沉降—沉积,形成了合肥侏罗纪前陆盆地;随后中—晚侏罗世时盆地南部沉降—沉积强度显示出变弱的趋势,期间没有再出现沉降—沉积再加强的现象。简要介绍了盆地不同地区侏罗纪地层的沉积物特征及发育特点,在此基础上,从盆地结构、沉积物碎屑骨架组分、层序结构、沉积体系等角度研究了合肥侏罗纪盆地对大别造山带的响应,指出二者之间具有较好的耦合关系。Abstract: Characteristics of the Hefei Jurassic Basin and the Dabieshan Orogenic Belt have been studied from the aspect of basin-and-range coupling in this paper.With the second uplifting of the Dabieshan Mountain,the northern fringe of the Dabieshan Mountain underwent the strongest subsidence and sedimentation in the early Jurassic and then the Hefei Jurassic Foreland Basin was formed.Afterwards,the subsidence-sedimentation process slowed down gradually in the south of the Hefei Basin in the Middle-Late Jurassic without any strengthening phenomenon.The authors also briefly introduce the sediment characteristics of the Jurassic Formation in different areas of the Hefei Basin.On this basis,the sedimentary response to the Dabieshan Orogenic Belt of the Hefei Jurassic Basin is studied thoroughly from the aspects of basin structure,clastic matrix constituents of sediments,sequence architecture and sedimentary system,and so on.The study demonstrates that these two things are coupling very well.
-
[1] 王道轩,刘因,李双应等.大别超高压变质岩折返至地表的时间下限:大别山北麓晚侏罗世砾石中发现榴辉岩砾石[J].科学通报,2001,46(9):748~753 [2] 李忠,李任伟,孙枢等.合肥盆地南部侏罗系砂岩碎屑组分及其物源构造属性[J].岩石学报,1999,15(3):438~445 [3] 王清晨,从柏林,马力.大别造山带与合肥盆地的构造耦合[J].科学通报,1997,42(6):575~580 [4] 李忠,孙枢,李任伟等.合肥盆地中生代充填序列及其对大别山造山作用的指示[J].中国科学(D辑),2000,30(3):256~263 [5] 李任伟,李忠,江茂生等.合肥盆地碎屑石榴石组成及其对源区恢复和地层对比的意义[J].中国科学(D辑),2000,30(增刊):91~98 [6] 宋明水,江来利,李学田等.大别造山带对合肥盆地的构造控制[J].石油实验地质,2002,24(3):209~215 [7] 李双应,岳书仓,王道轩等.大别造山带超高压变质岩折返隆升的地层学证据:毛坦厂组榴辉岩砾石的启示[J].地质论评,2002,48(4):345~352 [8] 徐树桐,苏文,刘贻灿.大别山北部榴辉岩的发现及其岩相学特征[J].科学通报,1999,44:1452~1456 [9] 徐春华,邱连贵,雷敏等.合肥盆地沉积构造样式与大别造山带的演化历史[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2002,22(2):91~98 [10] 刘云生,郭战峰,梁西文等.中上扬子地区晚三叠世-侏罗纪砂岩构造意义及盆山耦合关系[J].石油实验地质,2006,28(3):201~205 [11] 范小林,陈浙春.东秦岭大别造山带两侧盆地深部过程及古生界油气前景:以川东北盆地和合肥盆地为例[J].石油实验地质,2005,27(4):338~345 [12] 吴汉宁,常承法,刘椿等.依据古地磁资料探讨华北和华南块体运动及其对秦岭造山带构造演化的影响[J].地质科学,1990,(3):201~214 [13] 刘育燕,杨巍然,森永速男等.华北、秦岭及扬子陆块的若干古地磁研究成果[J].地球科学--中国地质大学学报,1993,18(5):635~641 [14] Ames L,Tilton G R,Zhou G.Timing of the Sino-Korean and Yangtze craton:U-Pb dating of coesite-bearing eclogite[J].Geology,1993,21(4):339~342 [15] Li S,Xiao Y,Liu D.Collision of the north-China and Yangtze blocks and formation of coesite-bearing eclogite:timing and processes[J].Chemical Geology,1993,109(1/4):89~111 [16] Hacker B R,Wang Q.Ar/Ar geochronology of ultrahigh-pressure metamorphism in central China[J].Tectonics,1995,14(4):994~1006 [17] 李曙光,李惠民,陈移之等.大别山-苏鲁地体超高压变质年代学:Ⅱ.锆石U-Pb同位素体系[J].中国科学(D辑),1997,27(3):200~206 [18] Rowley D B,Franz L,Tucker R D,et al.Ages of ultrahigh pressure metamorphism and protolith orthogneisses from the eastern Dabie Shan:U-Pb zircon geochronology[J].Earth Plant Sci,1997,151:191~203 [19] 李丕龙,李学田,宋明水等.合肥盆地石油地质与地球物理特征研究及进展[M].北京:地质出版社,2003 [20] Li S G,Jagoutz E,Chen Y Z.Sm-Nd and Rb Srisotopic chronology and cooling history of ultrahigh pressure metamorphic rocks and their country rocks at Shuanghe in the Dabie Mountains,Central China[J].Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta,2000,64(6):1077~1093 [21] 韩树蔡.安徽北部中新生代沉积盆地分析[M].北京:地质出版社,1996 [22] 安徽地质矿产局.安徽区域地质志[M].北京:地质出版社,1987 [23] 罗佳强,徐春华,徐佑德.合肥盆地油气地质研究及勘探前景[A].见:李丕龙.压扭性盆地勘探理论及方法论文集[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2001.134~141 [24] 周进高,李大成,易万霞等.合肥盆地性质、演化及勘探方向[A].见:李丕龙.压扭性盆地勘探理论及方法论文集[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2001.142~151 [25] 薛爱民,金维浚.合肥盆地油气地质及其与大别造山带的耦合[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2001 [26] 吉让寿,高长林.秦岭-大别造山带两侧中生代构造变格与成盆作用[J].石油实验地质,2005,27(5):449~454
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 656
- HTML全文浏览量: 32
- PDF下载量: 370
- 被引次数: 0