碎屑岩中油气初次运移输导体系分类及特征

康德江

doi:10.11781/sysydz200905455

碎屑岩中油气初次运移输导体系分类及特征

doi: 10.11781/sysydz200905455

康德江

中国石油天然气股份有限公司, 大庆油田有限责任公司, 勘探开发研究院, 黑龙江, 大庆, 163712

基金项目: 国家“973”重点基础研究项目(2006CB202300)资助

详细信息

作者简介:
康德江(1978- ),男,博士,主要从事油气藏形成与保存条件研究.E-mail:kdj78721@163.com.

中图分类号: TE122.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 1369
- HTML全文浏览量: 55
- PDF下载量: 937
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2008-10-14
- 修回日期: 2009-08-02
- 刊出日期: 2009-09-28

CLASSIFICATION AND CHARACTERISTICS OF HYDROCARBON PRIMARY MIGRATION AND TRANSPORT SYSTEM IN CLASTIC ROCKS

Kang Dejiang

Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Daqing Oil Field, CNPC, Daqing, Heilongjiang 163712, China

摘要

摘要: 油气初次输导体系对于油气二次运移有着直接影响,甚至关系到最终油气藏规模。参照、类比烃类二次运移输导体系,从微观角度分析入手,基于不同油气微观输导通道的产生和组合形式,将碎屑岩中油气初次运移输导体系分为3类,即:正常型、次生型和终结型。正常型输导体系由烃源岩颗粒孔隙喉道和干酪根网络组成,以生烃膨胀而增大的毛细管力为主要动力,油气多以混溶相排出,少量为非混溶相;次生型输导体系由大量烃源岩次生微裂缝构成,源岩内部异常高压是非混溶相油气排替的主要动力,是排烃量最大、效率最高的输导体系类型;终结型输导体系由大量颗粒破裂缝和残存的少量微裂缝构成,剩余异常压力是驱动力,但效率很低,输导作用很小,直至消失。随着盆地中烃源岩埋藏史的变化,正常型与次生型输导体系之间可以在一定程度上相互转化,但终结型输导体系意味着初次运移通道的永久闭合和输导时期的完全终结。
- 毛细管力 /
- 微裂缝 /
- 粒间破裂缝 /
- 碎屑岩 /
- 初次运移 /
- 输导体系
Abstract: Studies of hydrocarbon primary migration and transport system play an important role in secondary migration,even influencing final reservoir scale.According to researches of transport system during secondary migration,from microcosmic angle,based on generation and combination of different transport channels,the primary transport system in clastic rocks has been divided into 3 types: normal,secondary and terminative.The normal transport system is composed of pore throat and kerogen network.Hydrocarbon(most miscible phase and little immiscible phase) is expelled from source rock by capillary driving force formed from hydrocarbon bulging.The secondary transport system is formed by a large quantity of secondary microcracks.High excess pressure in source rocks is the main force for immiscible hydrocarbon expelling.In the secondary transport system,hydrocarbon expelling quantity is the largest and efficiency is the highest.The terminative system is composed of intergranular cracks and residual microcracks.The low excess pressure acts as the main force.The efficiency is low and the translocation is very weak,even down to vanish.Along with changes of burial history of source rocks in basins,the normal and the secondary transport system can transform reciprocally to certain extent,whereas the terminative system means the end of perpetual close of the primary transport canals and the complete finish of transport period.
- capillary pressure /
- microcrack /
- intergranular crack /
- clastic rock /
- primary migration /
- transport system

HTML全文

参考文献(38)

[1]	Leythaenser D,Mackenzie A,Schaefer R G,et al.A novel approach for recognition and quantification of hydrocarbon migration effects in shale-sandstone sequence[J].AAPG Bulletin,1984,68(2):196～219
[2]	田世澄,孙尚如.油气初次运移的地球化学效应及排烃类型[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,1990,15(1):75～86
[3]	李明诚.石油与天然气运移[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1994.32～89
[4]	郝石生,柳广弟,黄志龙等.油气初次运移的模拟模型[J].石油学报,1994,15(2):21～30
[5]	Rudkiewicz J L,Behar F.Influence of kerogen type and TOC content on multiphase primary migration[J].Organic Geochemistry,1994,21(2):121～133
[6]	罗晓容.油气初次运移的动力学背景与条件[J].石油学报,2001,22(6):24～29
[7]	王新洲,周迪贤,王学军.流体间歇压裂运移——石油初次运移的重要方式之一[J].石油勘探与开发,1994,21(1):20～26
[8]	张照录,王华,杨红.含油气盆地的输导体系研究[J].石油与天然气地质,2000,21(2):133～135
[9]	Palciauskas V V.Primary migration of petroleum[A].In:Merrill R K,ed.Source and migration processes and evaluation techniques[M].Tulsa:AAPG,1991.13～22
[10]	陈冬霞,庞雄奇,邱楠生等.砂岩透镜体成藏机理[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,2004,29(4):483～488
[11]	Braun R L,Burnham A K.PMOD:a flexible model of oil and gas generation,cracking,and expulsion[J].Organic Geochemistry,1992,19(1-3):161～172
[12]	向才富,解习农,庄新国等.从油气运移探讨有机质在成矿中的作用[J].地质论评,2002,48(3):273～278
[13]	廖玉宏,耿安松,卢家烂等.初次运移中的同位素分馏效应[J].沉积学报,2006,24(5):756～762
[14]	Jones R W.Role of geology and geochemistry in hydrocarbon migration[J].AAPG Bulletin,1978,65(2):198～221
[15]	Lopatin N V,Emets T P,Romanovb E A,et al.Petroleum migration and trapping mechanism in fine-grained source rock formation[J].Journal of Geochemical Exploration,2003,78～79:395～397
[16]	苗建宇,祝总祺,刘文荣等.泥岩有机质的赋存状态与油气初次运移的关系[J].沉积学报,2004,22(1):169～175
[17]	张金川,金之钧.深盆气成藏机理及分布预测[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2005.20～40
[18]	张卫彪,钟宁宁,任德贻等.三塘湖盆地侏罗系煤成油初次运移[J].中国矿业大学学报,2000,29(6):623～627
[19]	Pepper A S,Corver P J.Simple kinetic models of petroleum formation,Part III:Modelling an open system[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,1995,12(4):417～452
[20]	Tissot B P,Welte D H.Petroleum formation and occurrence:A new approach to oil and gas exploration[M].Berlin:Springer-Verlag,1971.272～284
[21]	邓荣敬,徐备,漆家福等.北塘凹陷塘沽新村地区古近系异常高压特征及其石油地质意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2005,32(6):46～51
[22]	Ritter U.Fractionation of petroleum during expulsion from kerogen[J].Journal of Geochemical Exploration,2003,78-79:417～420
[23]	Espitalié J,Maxwell J R,Chenet Y,et al.Aspects of hydrocarbon migration in the Mesozoic in the Paris Basin as deduced from an organic geochemical survey[J].Organic Geochemistry,1988,13(1-3):467～481
[24]	Leythaeuser D,Schaefer R G,Radke M.Geochemical effects of primary migration of petroleum in Kimmeridge source rocks from Brae field area,North Sea,I:Gross composition of C₁5+-soluble organic matter and molecular composition of C₁5+-saturated hydrocarbons[J].Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta,1988,52(3):701～713
[25]	关德范,王国力,张金功等.成烃成藏理论新思维[J].石油实验地质,2005,27(5):425～432
[26]	陈盛吉,魏小薇,王丽英.川东石炭系气藏烃类注入史研究[J].天然气勘探与开发,2001,24(2):21～29
[27]	俄罗斯全俄天然气研究所.地下地热状态是决定含油气盆地远景大小的主要因素之一[J].天然气地球料学,2002,13(5～6):84～87
[28]	李振宏,席胜利,刘新社.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界天然气成藏[J].世界地质,2005,24(2):174～181
[29]	杨飏,郭正权,黄锦绣.鄂尔多斯盆地西南部延长组过剩压力与油藏的关系[J].地球科学与环境学报,2006,28(2):49～52
[30]	王晓梅,王震亮,管红等.鄂尔多斯盆地延长矿区油气运移成藏研究[J].天然气地球科学,2006,17(4):485～489
[31]	张文正,杨华,李剑锋等.论鄂尔多斯盆地长7段优质油源岩在低渗透油气成藏富集中的主导作用[J].石油勘探与开发,2006,33(3):289～293
[32]	向才富,冯志强,吴河勇等.松辽盆地西部斜坡带油气运聚的动力因素探讨[J].沉积学报,2005,23(4):719～725
[33]	刘震,赵政璋,赵阳等.含油气盆地岩性油气藏的形成和分布特征[J].石油学报,2006,27(1):17～23
[34]	应凤祥,杨式升,张敏等.激光扫描共聚焦显微镜研究储层孔隙结构[J].沉积学报,2002,20(1):75～79
[35]	姜建群,胡建武.含油气系统中流体输导体系的研究[J].新疆石油地质,2000,21(3):193～196
[36]	张卫海,查明,曲江秀.油气输导体系的类型及配置关系[J].新疆石油地质,2003,24(2):118～120
[37]	陈强路,刘毅,朱美茜等.油气生成、运移模拟实验探讨[J].石油实验地质,1999,21(4):352～356
[38]	陈中红,查明.东营凹陷烃源岩超压体系特征及勘探意义[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2004,23(3):11～13