Hydrocarbon generation and expulsion caused by pressure difference between source rock and reservoir during basin subsiding and uplifting
-
摘要: 含油气盆地石油地质演化史可划分为持续沉降加载增压、整体上升卸载减压和全面萎缩调整平衡3个阶段.通过不同演化阶段地层压力的调整,最终实现成烃成藏过程.利用地层孔隙热压生排烃模拟实验装置进行了4个系列不同源储压差下的生排烃模拟实验,研究表明:(1)盆地持续沉降阶段,烃类可以在与烃源岩直接互层的砂岩中聚集,有利于源内岩性圈闭的成藏,但难于远距离运聚成藏.(2)盆地抬升剥蚀阶段,源储压差促进了烃类的有效排出,有利于长距离运聚成藏,压差越大,排油效率越高;且存在源-储压差有效排烃门限值:3～6MPa,只有达到该门限值,即抬升剥蚀300～600m的厚度时烃类才能有效大量排出.(3)源储压差有利于烃类的排出和烃源转化.排烃次数和排烃动力(源储压差)具有互补性,在源岩能提供大量烃类的情况下,排烃次数越多,排烃动力越大,烃类产率越高.Abstract: The evolution history of hydrocarbon-bearing basins can be divided into 3 stages:subsiding (pressure increasing),uplifting (pressure decreasing) and withering (pressure balancing).Through different stages of energy adjustment,the process of hydrocarbon accumulation has been eventually realized.Hydrocarbon generation and expulsion simulations have been carried out with 4 different pressures between source rock and reservoir using formation pore thermocompression simulation instrument.1) During the subsiding stage,hydrocarbon accumulates in sandstones which interbed with source rocks.It is favorable for accumulation in lithologic traps,yet difficult to travel far away.2) During the uplifting stage,the pressure difference between source rock and reservoir promotes the effective discharge and the long-distance migration of hydrocarbon.The bigger the pressure difference is,the higher the discharge effect will be.3 to 6 MPa of pressure difference is the threshold for effective discharge.When uplift and erosion are 300 to 600 m thick,hydrocarbon discharges in large quantity.3) The pressure difference between source rock and reservoir is beneficial for hydrocarbon discharge and source transformation.Hydrocarbon expulsion frequency and power are complementary.If source rock can provide a large quantity of hydrocarbon,the more frequent the hydrocarbon discharges,and the greater the expulsion power is,the higher the hydrocarbon production rate will be.
-
[1] 关德范,徐旭辉,李志明,等.成盆成烃成藏理论思维与有限空间生烃模式[J].石油与天然气地质,2008,29(6):709-715. [2] 关德范,王国力,张金功,等.成烃成藏理论新思维[J].石油实验地质,2005,27(5):425-432. [3] 李仲东,张哨楠,李良,等.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界压力演化及成藏过程分析[J].中国科技论文在线,2008,3(11):841-848. [4] Osborne M J,Swarbrick R E.Mechanisms for generating overpressure in sedimentary basin:A reevaluation [J].AAPG Bull,1997,81:1023-1041. [5] 张善文,张林晔,张守春,等.东营凹陷古近系异常高压的形成与岩性油藏的含油性研究[J].科学通报,2009,54(11):1570-1578. [6] 张卫海,陈中红,查明.东营凹陷烃源岩排油机理[J].石油学报,2006,27(5):46-47,50. [7] 陈中红,查明,陈建平,等.断陷盆地烃源岩压实排烃的非均一性分析:以东营凹陷为例[J].油气地质与采收率,2004,11(2):12-14. [8] 郑伦举,秦建中,何生,等.地层孔隙热压生排烃模拟实验初步研究[J].石油实验地质,2009,31(3):296-302,306. [9] 姜振学,庞雄奇,田丰华,等.构造抬升卸压与油气成藏效应[J].石油天然气学报,2006,28(3):47-49. [10] 田丰华,姜振学.剥蚀减压过程中的砂体回弹作用及其成藏效应研究综述[J].地质科技情报,2008,27(1):64-68. [11] 田丰华,姜振学,张晓波,等.地层抬升剥蚀对油气成藏贡献初探[J].地质学报,2007,81(2):273-279. [12] 周玉琦,易荣龙,舒文培,等.中国石油与天然气资源[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,2004. [13] 谈彩萍,江兴歌,陈拥锋,等.石油运移成藏有利区预测方法研究:以渤海湾盆地东营凹陷为例[J].石油实验地质,2008,30(6):629-635. [14] 曹华,龚晶晶,汪贵峰.超压的成因及其与油气成藏的关系[J].天然气地球科学,2006,17(3):422-425. [15] 郝芳,邹华耀,方勇,等.超压环境有机质热演化和生烃作用机理[J].石油学报,2006,27(5):9-18. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1946
- HTML全文浏览量: 33
- PDF下载量: 994
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
苏公网安备32021102000780号