Distribution and evolution of sedimentary system in different types of basin edge：A case study of peripheral regions of Bodong Buried Hill, Dongying Sag
-
摘要: 利用岩心、测井、录井和试油资料,系统研究了博东潜山周缘地区沙四段上亚段的沉积体系分布和油藏类型。结果表明:东部稳定型盆缘(广饶凸起)物源供给强,低位域时期主要发育三角洲沉积;西部活动性盆缘(博东潜山)缺乏物源供给,主要发育砂质滩坝沉积,且随着石村断层的翘倾,滩体沉积边界逐渐南移。湖侵域和高位域时期主要发育碳酸盐岩滩坝,活动性盆缘区滩体规模较小,但由于后期遭受风化淋滤储层物性较好。活动性盆缘的成藏较为复杂,勘探目标主要以早期地层油气藏、晚期构造岩性油气藏和碳酸盐岩岩性油气藏为主,而稳定型盆缘的圈闭类型相对单一,以早期的地层油气藏为主。Abstract: Based on core,logging,borehole and oil testing data,it was discussed in this paper the distribution of depositional systems and oil reservoir types in the upper subsection of the 4th member of the Shahejie Formation in the peripheral regions of the Bodong Buried Hill,the Dongying Sag.Due to strong source supply,delta sediments were widespread during the LST period in the eastern stable basin edge(the Guangrao Uplift).In the western active basin edge(the Bodong Buried Hill),sandy beach bar sediments generated as the result of source shortcoming.Meanwhile,the sedimentary boundary of beach bar moved southwards with the lifting of the Shicun Fault.During the TST and HST periods,carbonate beach bar sediments were common,and the scale of carbonate beach bar in active basin edge decreased;however,it had good physical properties because of weathering and leaching effects.The active basin edge has complex accumulation characteristics.Early stratigraphic reservoirs,late structural-lithologic reservoirs and carbonate lithologic reservoirs are the main exploration target.In the stable basin edge,only one trap type is found,indicating early stratigraphic reservoirs.
-
[1] 邱隆伟,符晶,杨勇强,等.东营凹陷博东潜山周缘沙河街组等时地层对比研究[J].石油与天然气地质,2010,31(5):552-559. [2] 张宇.渤海湾盆地东营凹陷古近系岩性圈闭分布规律[J].石油实验地质,2009,31(6):583-587. [3] 程慧,常迎梅,经雅丽.渤海湾盆地东营凹陷地层油气藏成藏阶段分析[J].石油实验地质,2009,31(1):54-57. [4] 戴朝强,张金亮.鲁北济阳坳陷东营凹陷南坡沙河街组第四段上亚段高分辨率层序地层格架[J].地质通报,2006,25(9):1 168-1 174. [5] 田继军,姜在兴.东营凹陷沙河街组四段上亚段层序地层特征与沉积体系演化[J].地质学报,2009,83(6):836-841. [6] 冯友良.东营凹陷下第三系层序地层格架及盆地充填模式[J].地质科学,1999,24(6):634-643. [7] 杨勇强,邱隆伟,姜在兴,等.东营凹陷沙四上亚段滩坝物源体系[J].吉林大学学报:自然科学版,2011,41(1):46-53. [8] 武法东,陈建渝,刘从印,等.东营凹陷第三纪层序地层格架及沉积体系类型[J].现代地质,1998,12(4):559-566. [9] 王居峰.济阳坳陷东营凹陷古近系沙河街组沉积相[J].古地理学报,2005,7(1):45-58. [10] 周自立,杜韫华.湖相碳酸盐岩的沉积相与油气分布关系:以山东胜利油田下第三系为例[J].石油实验地质,1986,8(2):124-132. [11] 李丕龙.陆相断陷盆地油气地质与勘探[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2003. [12] 杨勇强,邱隆伟,陈世悦.半咸水湖盆碳酸盐岩层序地层分析:以东营凹陷沙四上亚段为例[J].地层学杂志,2011,35(3):288-294. [13] 庄丽.东营凹陷永安镇三角洲层序地层与沉积体系[J].石油实验地质,2006,28(6):544-548. [14] 赵伟,邱隆伟,姜在兴,等.济阳坳陷民丰洼陷古近系沙河街组三段中亚段沉积相展布与演化[J].沉积学报,2011,29(2):255-267. [15] 杨勇强,邱隆伟,姜在兴,等.陆相断陷湖盆滩坝沉积模式:以东营凹陷古近系沙四上亚段为例[J].石油学报,2011,32(3):417-423. [16] 朱筱敏,信荃麟,张晋仁.断陷湖盆滩坝储积体沉积特征及沉积模式[J].沉积学报,1994,12(2):20-27. [17] 周丽清,邵德艳,房世瑜,等.板桥凹陷沙河街组滩坝砂体[J].石油与天然气地质,1998,19(4):351-355. [18] 陈世悦,杨剑萍,操应长.惠民凹陷西部下第三系沙河街组两种滩坝沉积特征[J].煤田地质与勘探,2000,28(3):1-4. [19] 王英华,周书欣,张秀莲.中国湖相碳酸盐岩[M].徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,1993. [20] 姜在兴,刘晖.古湖岸线的识别及其对砂体和油气的控制[J].古地理学报,2010,12(5):589-598.(编辑 黄 娟) -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 2363
- HTML全文浏览量: 27
- PDF下载量: 1363
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
苏公网安备32021102000780号