Diagenesis stage division and petroleum geologic significances of Dainan Formation in Jinhu Sag, Northern Jiangsu Basin
-
摘要: 应用显微薄片、扫描电镜、X-衍射、包裹体测温等分析化验资料,根据镜质体反射率、埋藏史曲线、粘土矿物变化特征以及各种成岩现象和标志,综合划分和确定了金湖凹陷戴南组碎屑岩储层的成岩阶段。戴南组大部分处于中成岩A阶段,少量为早成岩B和中成岩B阶段。与成岩阶段相对应,戴南组储层孔隙类型也经历了从原生到次生的演化阶段,目前戴南组大部分以次生孔隙为主,保存少量原生孔隙。根据成岩阶段和孔隙演化进一步预测新庄1井区和天X77井、关X2井等井区为有利储层发育带。另外,根据成岩阶段的划分结果,反过来预测大部分地区下伏阜宁组有机质处于成熟阶段,是戴南组有利的油气来源,并推断秦X2、天X75、天X92等井区戴南组早期经历了大的构造抬升运动和较强的剥蚀作用。Abstract: Based on the analysis and testing data of microscopic slice, scanning electron microscope (SEMP), X-ray diffraction and fluid inclusion microthermometry, the diagenesis stage of clastic reservoirs of the Dainan Formation in the Jinhu Sag has been divided and confined according to vitrinite reflectance, buried history curve, and the variation of clay mineral as well as various diagenesis phenomena and marks. Most of the Dainan Formation is in A phase of the middle diagenesis stage, and less in B phase of the early diagenesis stage and B phase of the late diagenesis stage. Corresponding to diagenesis stage, pore types in the Dainan Formation also evolve from primary to secondary ones. At present, secondary pores account for a large amount in the Dainan Formation while primary pores are seldom found. It is predicted that the areas around wells Xinzhuang 1, Tian X77 and Guan X2 are favorable for reservoir formation. Based on the division of diagenesis stage, the organism in the underlying Funing Formation in most of the study area is predicted matured as the main hydrocarbon source rocks of the Dainan Formation. And it is inferred that the Dainan Formation in the areas around wells Qin X2, Tian X75 and Tian X92 has encountered strong structural uplift and erosion during the early buried stage.
-
[1] 邱旭明.苏北盆地断块圈闭分类及油气成藏特征[J].石油与天然气地质,2003,24(4):371-374. [2] 张喜林,朱筱敏.苏北盆地高邮凹陷古近系戴南组沉积相及其对隐蔽油气藏的控制[J].古地理学报,2005,7(2):207-218. [3] 邱旭明,刘玉瑞,傅强.苏北盆地上白垩系-第三系层序地层与沉积演化[M].北京:地质出版社,2006. [4] 刘世丽,徐焕友,李翔.金湖凹陷戴南组成藏主控因素及成藏模式研究[J].小型油气藏,2009,12(3):1-5. [5] 杨立干.金湖凹陷古近系戴一段成藏条件和成藏模式研究[J].岩性油气藏,2008,20(3):34-38. [6] 吴东胜.金湖凹陷戴南组隐蔽油气藏研究[J].西南石油学院学报,2005,27(4):16-19. [7] 朱筱敏.沉积岩石学[M].4版.北京:石油工业出版社,2010. [8] 应凤祥,何东博,龙玉梅,等. SY/T5477-2003中华人民共和国石油天然气行业标准 碎屑岩成岩阶段划分[S].北京:石油工业出版社,2003. [9] 龚永杰,何胜,鲁雪松.金湖凹陷烃源岩"浅熟"原因探讨[J].特种油气藏,2008,15(1):36-39. [10] 陈安定.苏北下第三系源岩"浅"熟的构造背景[J].石油勘探与开发,1996,23(4):6-10. [11] 陈安定.苏北第三系成熟演化指标与深度关系的3种模式[J].石油实验地质,2003,25(1):58-63. [12] 牟中海,陈志勇.柴达木盆地北缘中新生界剥蚀厚度恢复[J].石油勘探与开发,2000,27(1):35-37. [13] 刘小平,杨立干,徐健.苏北盆地高邮凹陷始新统剥蚀厚度恢复[J].新疆石油地质,2004,25(2):128-130. [14] 姚合法,候建国,林承焰,等.多旋回沉积盆地地温场与烃源岩演化:以苏北盆地为例[J].西北大学学报:自然科学版,2005,35(2):195-199. [15] 鲁东升,薛建华.苏北金湖凹陷生油岩热演化研究[J].石油实验地质,1999,21(2)180-183. [16] 王良书.油气盆地地热研究[M].南京:南京大学出版社,1989. [17] Tobin R C.Diagenesis,thermal maturation and burial history of the Upper Cambrian Bonneterre dolomite, southeastern Missouri; an interpretation of thermal history from petrographic and fluid inclusion evidence[J].Organic Geochemistry,1991,17(2):143-151. [18] Tseng H Y, Pottorf R J.The application of fluid inclusion PVT analysis to studies of petroleum migration and reservoirs[J].Journal of Geochemical Exploration,2003,78-79:433-436. [19] 王果寿,邱岐,张欣国,等.松辽盆地梨树断陷十屋油田区营城组、沙河子组储层成岩作用分析[J].石油实验地质,2012,34(5):474-480. [20] Kim G Y,Yoo D G,Lee H Y,et al.The relationship between silica diagenesis and physical properties in the East/Japan Sea:ODP Legs 127/128[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2007,30(3-4):448-456. [21] Karim A,Pe-Piper G,Piper D J W.Controls on diagenesis of Lower Cretaceous reservoir sandstones in the western Sable Subbasin, offshore Nova Scotia[J].Sedimentary Geology,2010,224(1-4):65-83. [22] Umar M,Friis H,Khan A S,et al.The effects of diagenesis on the reservoir characters in sandstones of the Late Cretaceous Pab Formation, Kirthar Fold Belt, southern Pakistan[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2011,40(2):622-635. [23] 张琴,朱筱敏,陈祥,等.南华北盆地谭庄凹陷下白垩统成岩相分布及优质储层预测[J].石油与天然气地质,2010,31(4):472-480. [24] 赵欣,陈强路,孙渊,等.塔里木盆地东北部中上奥陶统致密砂岩储集性能与成因[J].石油实验地质,2012,34(5):466-473.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1841
- HTML全文浏览量: 54
- PDF下载量: 1098
- 被引次数: 0