Calculating methods and assessment of stretching factor:A case study of Northern Jiangsu Basin
-
摘要: 伸展系数是张性盆地运动学分析的关键参数之一,对其计算可采用定义法、平衡剖面法和构造热演化模拟法.该文介绍了用这3种方法求取伸展系数的原理,并对苏北盆地晚白垩世伸展拉张以来的伸展系数进行了计算,综合分析后认为:定义法在获取了区域地壳厚度的基础上便能勾画出平面上的伸展系数分布图,便于区域比较,但对多期拉张的盆地而言,难以准确计算各期次具体的伸展系数;平衡剖面法能够恢复多期拉张的伸展系数,但因其自身难以做到真正的平衡,且没有考虑到地壳下部的热沉降,因而计算结果常需辅以其他手段加以对比分析;构造热演化模拟法在研究盆地构造形变的同时,综合考虑了深部构造热沉降,并且能读取不同时期任一点的地壳厚度,因而较定义法和平衡剖面法更为精确和方便.Abstract: Basin stretching factor is a key parameter of extensional basin study and it was normally calculated from definition,balanced cross-section and tectonic-thermal modeling.The principles of traditional methods were briefly introduced in this paper,and the stretching factor of extension rifting in the Northern Jiangsu Basin after the late Cretaceous was also calculated.Basin stretching factor can be acquired by definition based on crust thickness,and it can be easily compared in different regions.For multi-phases stretch basin,it is hard to determine the stretching factor in different phases.The balanced cross-section method can reconstruct the basin stretching factor of multi-phases stretch,but the real equilibrium is actually hard to reach while the tectonic-thermal subsidence of the lower crust is not taken into consideration,thus other methods are needed for better comparison.The tectonic-thermal modeling method considers tectonic-thermal subsidence,and can also read curst thickness in any period.As a result,the tectonic-thermal modeling method is regarded as the more precise and convenient approach to calculate basin stretching factor.
-
[1] McKenzie D P.Some remarks on the development of sedimentary basins[J].Earth and Planetary Science Letters,1978,40:25-32. [2] Lin Changsong,Zhang Yanmei,Li Sitian,et al.Quantitative modeling of multiphase lithospheric stretching and deep thermal history of some Tertiary rift basins in Eastern China[J].Acta Geological Sinica,2002,76(3):324-330. [3] Hantschel F,Kauerauf A I.Fundamentals of basin and petroleum system modeling[M].Berlin:Springer,2009:103-150. [4] 高长林,何将启,黄泽光,等.中国油气盆地研究新阶段:数字盆地[J].石油实验地质,2009,31(5):432-440. [5] Baur F,Littke R,Wielens H,et al.Basin modeling meets rift analysis:A numerical modeling study from the Jeanne d'Arc basin,offshore Newfoundland,Canada[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2010,27(3):585-599. [6] 李亚辉,段宏亮,邱旭明,等.苏北盆地古潜山岩溶储层形成机制探讨[J].石油实验地质,2011,33(5):495-498. [7] 赵高攀.苏北盆地海安凹陷泰州组油层识别方法研究[J].石油实验地质,2012,34(5):553-558. [8] Dahlstrom C D A.Balanced cross section[J].Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences,1969,36(6):743-759. [9] 王丹萍,许长海,焦若鸿,等.基于碎屑锆石裂变径迹记录的下扬子构造热演化史研究[J].中国矿业大学学报,2011,40(2):227-234. [10] 施泽进,张渝昌,施央申,等.苏北溱潼凹陷形成演化的运动学模拟[J].石油实验地质,1994,16(4):326-333. [11] 张世奇.平衡剖面分析技术在松辽盆地构造演化恢复中的应用[J].新疆地质,2003,21(4):489-498. [12] Chase R B,Kehew A E,Glynn M E,et al.Modeling debris slide geometry with balanced cross sections:a rigorous field test[J].Environmental and Engineering Geoscience,2007,13(1):45-53. [13] 胡望水,柴浩栋,李瑞升,等.平衡剖面技术对东海西湖凹陷正反转构造及其成藏控制的研究[J].特种油气藏,2010,17(1):15-19. [14] 张建培,唐贤君,张田,等.平衡剖面技术在东海西湖凹陷构造演化研究中的应用[J].海洋地质前沿,2012,28(8):31-37. [15] 包汉勇.下扬子区白垩纪以来的构造热演化.上海:同济大学,2011. [16] 邱旭明,刘玉瑞,傅强,等.苏北盆地上白垩统—第三系层序地层与沉积演化[M].北京:地质出版社,2006:1-153. [17] 张沛,周祖翼,许长海.苏皖下扬子区晚白垩世以来的构造—热历史:浦口组砂岩磷灰石裂变径迹证据[J].海洋石油,2009,29(4):26-32. [18] 国家地震局地学断面编委会.上海奉贤至内蒙古阿拉善左旗地学断面[M].北京:地质出版社,1992:1-66. [19] 黄耘.江苏及邻区地壳上地幔结构研究.北京:中国地震局地球物理研究所,2009. [20] Zhou Meifu,Yan Danping,Vasconcelos P M,et al.Structural and geochronological constraints on the tectono-thermal evolution of the Danba domal terrane,eastern margin of the Tibetan plateau[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2008,33(5/6):414-427.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1432
- HTML全文浏览量: 57
- PDF下载量: 709
- 被引次数: 0