页岩储层孔隙类型控制因素研究——以川东焦石坝地区龙马溪组为例

耿一凯; 金振奎; 赵建华; 温馨; 汪洋

doi:10.11781/sysydz201701071

页岩储层孔隙类型控制因素研究——以川东焦石坝地区龙马溪组为例

doi: 10.11781/sysydz201701071

1.
中国石油大学(北京) 地球科学学院, 北京 102249
2. 中国石油大庆油田有限责任公司第二采油厂, 黑龙江大庆 163257

基金项目: 中国博士后科学基金“富有机质页岩中自生石英成因机制及对页岩气勘探的意义”（2016M591350）资助。

详细信息

作者简介:
耿一凯(1989-),男,博士研究生,从事沉积学与储层研究。E-mail:gyk2o12@163.com。

中图分类号: TE122.23
计量
- 文章访问数: 1205
- HTML全文浏览量: 94
- PDF下载量: 476
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2016-05-26
- 修回日期: 2016-11-18
- 刊出日期: 2017-01-28

Controlling factors of pore types in shale reservoirs:A case study from the Longmaxi Formation in Jiaoshiba area, eastern Sichuan Basin

1.
College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
2. No.2 Oil Production Plant, Daqing Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Daqing, Heilongjian 163257, China

摘要

摘要: 为了明确页岩不同岩相类型中孔隙类型的构成和垂向分布特征，选取川东龙马溪组7个页岩样品，进行氩离子抛光扫描电镜成像，对其孔隙类型进行定量分析。考虑到页岩的非均质性，每个样品选取5个区域，每个区域由100张放大倍数为14 000倍的SEM照片拼接组成（10 μm×10 μm），对每张SEM照片进行2000计点法统计各类型孔隙的面孔率，最后归纳得出每个样品中不同类型孔隙的平均百分含量。研究区可观察到3大类孔隙：粒间孔、粒内孔和有机质孔，不同岩相类型中各类型孔隙占比不同，龙马溪组自上而下页岩岩相类型变化趋势为黏土质页岩—粉砂质页岩—硅质页岩，随着黏土矿物含量逐渐减少，有机质含量和石英含量逐渐增加，其主要孔隙类型由粒内孔转变为有机质孔。脆性矿物含量对以粒缘孔为主的粒间孔数量起着控制作用；黏土矿物含量控制以片间孔为主的粒内孔发育程度；有机碳和自生石英含量决定着有机质孔的数量。龙马溪组下段的硅质页岩是页岩气最有利储层。
- 控制因素 /
- 分布特征 /
- 孔隙类型 /
- 页岩储层 /
- 龙马溪组 /
- 四川盆地东部
Abstract: Ar-ion beam scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging and the quantitative analysis of pore types were performed on 7 shale samples from the Longmaxi Formation in the eastern Sichuan Basin to define the vertical distribution characteristics of pore types in various lithofacies of shale. Five regions were selected in each sample to accommodate the heterogeneity of the shales, and each region (100 μm×100 μm) was analyzed using 100 SEM photographs which were magnified 14 000×. A 2000 point-count method was employed to count the plane porosity of various pores on each SEM photograph, and then the average percentage of various pores in each sample was obtained. The results showed that interparticle (interP) pores, intraparticle (intraP) pores and organic matter (OM) pores could be observed in the study area, and the contents of various pore types were different in various lithofacies. The lithofacies of Longmaxi Formation changed from argillaceous shale, silty shale to siliceous shale from top to bottom. The main pore type changed from intraP pores to OM pores with the increase of TOC content and the decrease of clay content. The content of brittle minerals controlled the quantity of interP pores, clay content controlled the development degree of intraP pores, while TOC and authigenic quartz contents determined the quantity of OM pores. Siliceous shale in the lower segment of Longmaxi Formation is the most favorable reservoir for shale gas.
- controlling factors distribution characteristics /
- pore type /
- shale reservoir /
- Longmaxi Formation /
- eastern Sichuan Basin /

HTML全文

参考文献(20)

[1]	Curtis J B.Fractured shale-gas systems[J].AAPG Bulletin,2002,86(11):1921-1938.
[2]	张金川,金之钧,袁明生.页岩气成藏机理和分布[J].天然气工业,2004,24(7):15-18. Zhang Jinchuan,Jin Zhijun,Yuan Mingsheng.Reservoiring mechanism of shale gas and its distribution[J].Natural Gas Industry,2004,24(7):15-18.
[3]	Hill J R,Zhang E T,Katz J B,et al.Modeling of gas generation from the Barnett shale,Fort Worth Basin,Texas[J].AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(4):501-521.
[4]	McCreesh C A,Ehrlich R,Crabtree S J.Petrography and reservoir physics Ⅱ:Relating thin section porosity to capillary pressure,the association between pore types and throat size[J].AAPG Bulletin,1991,75(10):1563-1578.
[5]	Passey Q R,Bohacs K M,Esch W L,et al.From oil-prone source rock to gas-producing shale reservoir:Geologic and petrophysical characterization of unconventional shale gas reservoirs//SPE-131350-MS,International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition.Beijing,China:Society of Petroleum Engineers,2010.
[6]	Loucks R G,Reed R M,Ruppel S C,et al.Spectrum of pore types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classification for matrix-related mudrock pores[J].AAPG Bulletin,2012,96(6):1071-1098.
[7]	Loucks R G,Reed R M,Ruppel S C,et al.Morphology,genesis,and distribution of nanometer-scale pores in siliceous mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett shale[J].Journal of Sedimentary Research,2009,79(12):848-861.
[8]	Loucks R G,Reed R M,Ruppel S C,et al.Preliminary classification of matrix pores in mudrocks[J].Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions,2010,60(2):435-441.
[9]	Desbois G,Urai J L,Kukla P A.Morphology of the pore space in claystones:Evidence from BIB/FIB ion beam sectioning and cryo-SEM observations[J].Eearth,2009,4(1):15-22.
[10]	Curtis M E,Ambrose R J,Sondergeld C H.Structural characterization of gas shales on the micro- and nano-scales//SPE-137693-MS,Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference.Calgary,Alberta,Candan:Society of Petroleum Engineers,2010.
[11]	Lu Jiemin,Milliken K,Reed R M,et al.Diagenesis and sealing capacity of the middle Tuscaloosa mudstone at the Cranfield carbon dioxide injection site,Mississippi,U.S.A.[J].Environmental Geosciences,2011,18(1):35-53.
[12]	聂海宽,边瑞康,张培先,等.川东南地区下古生界页岩储层微观类型与特征及其对含气量的影响[J].地学前缘,2014,21(4):331-343. Nie Haikuan,Bian Ruikang,Zhang Peixian,et al.Micro-types and characteristics of shale reservoir of the Lower Paleozoic in southeast Sichuan Basin,and their effects on the gas content[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2014,21(4):331-343.
[13]	王亮,陈云燕,刘玉霞.川东南彭水地区龙马溪组页岩孔隙结构特征[J].中国石油勘探,2014,19(5):80-88. Wang Liang,Chen Yunyan,Liu Yuxia.Shale porous structural characteristics of Longmaxi Formation in Pengshui area of southeast Sichuan Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2014,19(5):80-88.
[14]	曾祥亮,刘树根,黄文明,等.四川盆地志留系龙马溪组页岩与美国Fort Worth盆地石炭系Barnett组页岩地质特征对比[J].地质通报,2011,30(2/3):372-384. Zeng Xiangliang,Liu Shugen,Huang Wenming,et al.Comparison of Silurian Longmaxi Formation shale of Sichuan Basin in China and carboniferous Barnett Formation shale of Fort Worth Basin in United States[J].Geological Bulletin of China,2011,30(2/3):372-384.
[15]	王秀平,牟传龙,葛祥英,等.四川盆地南部及其周缘龙马溪组黏土矿物研究[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(11):1781-1794. Wang Xiuping,Mou Chuanlong,Ge Xiangying,et al.Study on clay minerals in the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in southern Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(11):1781-1794.
[16]	Zhao Jianhua,Jin Zhijun,Jin Zhenkui,et al.Applying sedimentary geochemical proxies for paleoenvironment interpretation of organic-rich shale deposition in the Sichuan Basin,China[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,2016,163:52-71.
[17]	刘江涛,刘双莲,李永杰,等.焦石坝地区奥陶系五峰组-志留系龙马溪组页岩地球化学特征及地质意义[J].油气地质与采收率,2016,23(3):53-57. Liu Jiangtao,Liu Shuanglian,Li Yongjie,et al. Geochemistry characteristics and its geological significance of shale in the Ordovician Wufeng Formation and Silurian Longmaxi Formation,Jiaoshiba area[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2016,23(3):53-57.
[18]	卢龙飞,秦建中,申宝剑,等.川东南涪陵地区五峰-龙马溪组硅质页岩的生物成因及其油气地质意义[J].石油实验地质,2016,38(4):460-465. Lu Longfei,Qin Jianzhong,Shen Baojian,et al.Biogenic origin and hydrocarbon significance of siliceous shale from the Wufeng-Longmaxi formations in Fuling area,southeastern Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2016,38(4):460-465.
[19]	赵建华,金之钧,金振奎,等.四川盆地五峰组-龙马溪组页岩岩相类型与沉积环境[J].石油学报,2016,37(5):572-586. Zhao Jianhua,Jin Zhijun,Jin Zhenkui,et al.Lithofacies types and sedimentary environment of shale in Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation,Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(5):572-586.
[20]	赵建华,金之钧,金振奎,等.四川盆地五峰组-龙马溪组含气页岩中石英成因研究[J].天然气地球科学,2016,27(2):377-386. Zhao Jianhua,Jin Zhijun,Jin Zhenkui,et al.The genesis of quartz in Wufeng-Longmaxi gas shales,Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2016,27(2):377-386.