北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷始新统流沙港组一段低渗储层特征及控制因素

邓孝亮; 杨希冰; 尤丽; 吴仕玖; 钟佳; 朱沛苑; 代龙

doi:10.11781/sysydz202104628

北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷始新统流沙港组一段低渗储层特征及控制因素

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202104628

中海石油(中国)有限公司海南分公司，海口 570100

基金项目:

国家科技重大专项 2016ZX05024-006

详细信息

作者简介:
邓孝亮(1990—)，男，硕士，工程师，从事石油地质学与储层地质学研究。E-mail: dengxl8@cnooc.com.cn

中图分类号: TE122.2
计量
- 文章访问数: 453
- HTML全文浏览量: 87
- PDF下载量: 70
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-03-30
- 修回日期: 2021-05-28
- 刊出日期: 2021-07-28

Characteristics and constrains of low-permeability reservoirs in the first member of Eocene Liushagang Formation, Weixinan Sag, Beibuwan Basin

Hainan Branch of CNOOC Ltd., Haikou, Hainan 570100, China

摘要

摘要: 为明确北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷始新统流沙港组一段储层特征及物性主控因素，综合应用壁心、薄片、物性、荧光、扫描电镜等储层分析资料，通过对储集特征、物性特征以及沉积作用、成岩作用、构造作用与油气成藏耦合等分析，表明涠西南凹陷流一段储层以长石岩屑石英砂岩和岩屑石英砂岩为主，总体成分成熟度和结构成熟度较低，储集空间主要为原生粒间残余孔和次生溶孔。涠西南凹陷北西源汇区和西部源汇区流一段多为中孔、中—高渗储层，东部源汇区主要为低孔低渗储层。沉积作用造成粒度、分选、泥质杂基等的差异，压实、碳酸盐胶结、有机酸溶蚀等成岩作用是低渗储层物性主控因素；而构造作用和油气成藏耦合所控制的早期烃类充注、异常高压可保护原生孔隙，加上断裂派生的裂缝可对低渗储层物性进行改善。涠西南凹陷北西源汇区和西部源汇区流一段储层由于埋深较浅，其水动力较强、粒度较粗、分选较好，在泥质杂基较少的区域储层物性较好；而东部源汇区在靠近生烃主洼的二号断裂附近，存在早期烃类充注、有机酸的强溶蚀以及部分高压保护，在2 500~3 500 m形成次生孔隙和高压孔隙发育带，亦发育深埋藏有利储层。
- 有机酸 /
- 油气充注 /
- 成岩作用 /
- 储层特征 /
- 流沙港组 /
- 始新统 /
- 涠西南凹陷 /
- 北部湾盆地
Abstract: Reservoir analysis data such as core, thin-section, physical property and scanning electron microscope (SEM) were applied in this paper to study the reservoir characteristics and main constrains of the first member of Eocene Liushagang Formation in the Weixinan Sag, Beibuwan Basin. Reservoir features, physical properties, sedimentation, diagenesis, and the coupling of tectonics as well as hydrocarbon generation and accumulation were analyzed. Results showed that the reservoirs of the first member of Eocene Liushagang Formation in the area of this study were mainly feldspathic debris quartz sandstones and lithic quartz sandstones with low compositional and structural maturities. The reservoir space was mainly consisted of primary intergranular residual pores and secondary dissolved pores. In the northwestern and western source areas, the reservoirs mainly had moderate porosity and medium-high permeability, while those in the eastern source area had relative low porosity and low permeability. Sedimentation caused variations in grain size, sorting and argillaceous complexes. Diagenesis such as compaction, carbonate cementation and organic acid dissolution were the main controls for the physical properties of low-permeability reservoirs. The coupling of tectonics and hydrocarbon generation and accumulation controlled early hydrocarbon charging, while abnormal high pressure protected primary pores, which, combined with fractures derived from faults, improved the physical properties of low-permeability reservoirs. In the northwestern and western source areas, the shallow-buried reservoirs in the first member of Liushagang Formation had relatively strong hydrodynamic force, coarser grain size and better sorting, and showed better properties in the area with less mud. In the eastern source area close to the No. 2 fault around the main hydrocarbon-generating depression, there exist early hydrocarbon filling, strong dissolution of organic acids and partial high-pressure protection. Secondary pores and high-pressure pores were developed at 2 500-3 500 m deep, and favorable deep-burial reservoirs were formed.
- organic acid /
- oil and gas charging /
- diagenesis /
- reservoir characteristics /
- Liushagang Formation /
- Eocene /
- Weixinan Sag /
- Beibuwan Basin

HTML全文

图 1 北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷构造位置及综合柱状图

Figure 1. Tectonic location and stratigraphic column of Weixinan Sag, Beibuwan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷始新统流一段重矿物特征及源汇分区

平面位置见图 1。

Figure 2. Heavy ore characteristics and its source and sink zone in the first member of Liushagang Formation, Weixinan Sag, Beibuwan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷始新统流一段储层孔隙类型与成岩作用典型特征

a.颗粒点接触为主，部分线接触，原生粒间孔发育，早期方解石胶结物大量溶蚀，形成次生溶孔和混合孔隙，WZ5井，2 391.8 m；b.方解石胶结充填粒间孔，颗粒悬浮状或点接触，WZ25井，2 391.5 m；c.颗粒线接触为主，部分点接触，发育原生粒间孔和次生溶孔，WZ16井，2 515.0 m；d.颗粒悬浮状或点接触为主，次生溶孔发育，WX6井，2 390.0 m；e.颗粒呈线接触和凹凸接触，粒间溶孔发育，塑性矿物云母呈弯片状，LS5井，3 575.0 m；f.颗粒溶孔、粒间溶孔和铸模孔发育，LS13井，3 249.2 m；g.构造作用派生裂缝，LS9井，3 217.5 m；h.构造作用派生裂缝，WZ22井，3 249.9 m；i.方解石胶结充填粒间孔，颗粒多为点接触，WX75井，2 474.5 m；j.晚期含铁方解石胶结物充填孔隙或交代早期方解石胶结物和长石等，LS21井，3 224.0 m；k.石英次生加大，LS5井，3 561.1 m；l.石英加大边内侧油气荧光，存在早期烃类充注，荧光薄片，LS5井，3 561.1 m；m.方解石(Cc)等碳酸盐矿物与假六边形片状高岭石(K)、片状绿泥石(Ch)等黏土矿物充填孔隙，LS15井，2 488.6 m；n.铁白云石(Ak)等碳酸盐矿物与假六边形片状高岭石(K)、片状伊蒙混层(I/S)等黏土矿物充填孔隙，LS15井，2 810.0 m；o.假六边形片状高岭石(K)、片状绿泥石(Ch)、片状伊利石(I)等黏土矿物及石英(Q)充填孔隙，LS15井，2 548.0 m

Figure 3. Pore types and typical characteristics of diagenesis of the first member of Liushagang Formation, Weixinan Sag, Beibuwan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷始新统流一段储层粒度、泥质杂基与孔渗关系

Figure 4. Relations between reservoir grain size, argillaceous matrix and porosity and permeability of the first member of Liushagang Formation, Weixinan Sag, Beibuwan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷东部源汇区储层成岩演化序列

由于东部源区缺乏有机酸资料，且二号断裂在东段活动更为剧烈，因此用靠近东部的二号断裂带中部源汇区的有机酸资料来代替。

Figure 5. Diagenetic sequence of the eastern source area, Weixinan Sag, Beibuwan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷始新统流一段储层孔隙度和渗透率剖面

Figure 6. Porosity and permeability profiles of the first member of Liushagang Formation, Weixinan Sag, Beibuwan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷始新统流一段各源汇区碎屑组分

Table 1. Clastic composition of source areas in the first member of Liushagang Formation, Weixinan Sag, Beibuwan Basin

源汇区	井名	样类	碎屑组分百分比/%					成分成熟度
源汇区	井名	样类	单晶石英	多晶石英	长石	岩屑	其他	成分成熟度
北西源汇区	WZ5	岩心	31.50	27.03	9.21	7.94	0.44	0.71
	WZ7	岩心	25.47	26.25	12.93	12.84	0.00	0.49
	WZ9	岩心	34.16	19.54	12.43	9.43	0.00	0.83
西部源汇区	WZ17	岩屑	37.06	27.63	4.94	9.25	0.56	0.89
	WZ10	壁心	40.21	16.74	11.37	7.00	0.00	1.15
	WZ6	岩屑	44.00	9.75	6.65	5.35	0.00	2.02
	WZ8	岩心	42.21	13.87	10.50	5.82	0.00	1.40
	WZ16	壁心	43.80	20.40	4.80	0.50	0.00	1.70
东部源汇区	LS8	壁心	54.85	8.30	4.00	6.80	0.00	2.87
	LS3	岩心	45.31	7.44	4.78	5.97	8.69	2.49
	LS9	壁心	51.62	11.54	5.00	10.00	0.00	1.94
	LS11	岩屑	69.00	15.00	5.67	7.67	0.00	2.44
	LS13	壁心	55.75	12.13	6.03	11.03	2.13	1.91
	LS5	壁心	55.10	8.20	10.35	13.30	0.00	1.73
	LS21	壁心	47.88	12.92	7.25	11.88	6.50	1.49
	LS12	岩屑	57.00	2.33	2.17	2.67	0.00	7.95
西南源汇区	WX5	岩心	41.21	9.50	9.77	7.90	0.00	1.52
	WX3	岩心	37.33	6.67	3.67	3.33	0.00	2.73
	WX8	壁心	46.00	18.00	5.00	24.00	0.00	0.98
	WX2	壁心	33.50	1.00	1.00	2.00	0.00	8.38
	WX11	岩心	40.98	14.37	6.02	9.88	0.00	1.35
	WX6	岩屑	50.00	10.17	3.67	6.75	0.00	2.43

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(29)

[1]	徐新德, 陶倩倩, 曾少军, 等. 基于地化—测井—地震联合反演的优质烃源岩研究方法及其应用: 以涠西南凹陷为例[J]. 中国海上油气, 2013, 25(3): 13-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHSD201303004.htm XU Xinde, TAO Qianqian, ZENG Shaojun, et al. A method to eva-luate high-quality source rocks based on geochemistry-logging-seismic joint-inversion and its application: a case of Weixinan Sag in Beibuwan Basin[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2013, 25(3): 13-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHSD201303004.htm
[2]	徐新德, 王碧维, 李旭红, 等. 北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷流沙港组隐蔽油气藏油源及成藏特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2012, 23(1): 92-98. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201201015.htm XU Xinde, WANG Biwei, LI Xuhong, et al. Oil sources of concealed reservoirs in Liushagang Formation of the Weixinan Sag and accumulation feature, Beibuwan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2012, 23(1): 92-98. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201201015.htm
[3]	高岗, 徐新德, 刘诗局, 等. 涠西南凹陷流沙港组二段优质烃源岩判别及其控油作用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(2): 339-347. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202002011.htm GAO Gang, XU Xinde, LIU Shiju, et al. Organic geochemistry identification of high-quality source rocks in the 2nd member of Liushagang Fm and its controls on petroleum occurrence in the Weixi'nan Sag, Beibuwan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(2): 339-347. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202002011.htm
[4]	裴健翔, 董贵能, 朱其. 北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷流一段强制湖退沉积体的特征及其油气地质意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(4): 520-527. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201604009.htm PEI Jianxiang, DONG Guineng, ZHU Qi. Characteristics and petroleum geological significance of lacustrine forced regressive deposits in the 1st member of Liushagang Formation in Weixi'nan Sag, Beibuwan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2016, 37(4): 520-527. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201604009.htm
[5]	董贵能, 邓勇, 盖永浩, 等. 北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷湖底扇的沉积特征[J]. 沉积学报, 2014, 32(2): 218-227. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201402004.htm DONG Guineng, DENG Yong, GAI Yonghao, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of sublacustrine fan in Weixi'nan Sag of Beibuwan Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2014, 32(2): 218-227. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201402004.htm
[6]	王健, 操应长, 李俊良. 北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷古近系层序结构与非构造圈闭[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(3): 304-312. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201203007.htm WANG Jian, CAO Yingchang, LI Junliang. Sequence structure and non-structural traps of the Paleogene in the Weixi'nan Sag, Beibuwan Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(3): 304-312. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201203007.htm
[7]	刘杰, 李茂, 杨朝强, 等. 涠西南凹陷流一段构造坡折带及其对层序、沉积相带的控制[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 29(3): 49-57. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XASY201403010.htm LIU Jie, LI Mao, YANG Zhaoqiang, et al. Control of tectonic slope-break zones in the first member of Liushagang Formation of Weixinan Sag on sequence and sedimentary systems[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition), 2014, 29(3): 49-57. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XASY201403010.htm
[8]	胡望水, 吴婵, 梁建设, 等. 北部湾盆地构造迁移特征及对油气成藏的影响[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2011, 32(6): 920-927. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201106016.htm HU Wangshui, WU Chan, LIANG Jianshe, et al. Tectonic transport characteristics and their influences on hydrocarbon accumulation in Beibuwan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2011, 32(6): 920-927. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201106016.htm
[9]	孙文钊, 王传雷, 杨希滨. 北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷始新统隐蔽油气藏类型及勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2007, 18(1): 84-88. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX200701017.htm SUN Wenzhao, WANG Chuanlei, YANG Xibin. Types and favo-rable exploration areas of Eocene subtle traps in Weixinan Sag, BBW Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2007, 18(1): 84-88. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX200701017.htm
[10]	姚光庆, 张建光, 姜平, 等. 涠西南凹陷11-7构造区流沙港组中深层有效储层下限厘定[J]. 地学前缘, 2012, 19(2): 102-109. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201202016.htm YAO Guangqing, ZHANG Jianguang, JIANG Ping, et al. The physical property lower limit of medium-deep effective clastic reservoirs in Liushagang Formation, 11-7 district of Weixinan Depression[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2012, 19(2): 102-109. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201202016.htm
[11]	刘杰, 操应长, 王健, 等. 涠西南凹陷A井区古近系流沙港组一段砂体沉积特征及分布规律[J]. 沉积学报, 2013, 31(1): 56-66. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201301008.htm LIU Jie, CAO Yingchang, WANG Jian, et al. Sedimentary characte-ristics and distribution law of sandbodies of the first member of Liushagang Formation of Paleogene of A well field in Weixinan Depression[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2013, 31(1): 56-66. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201301008.htm
[12]	王猛, 叶青, 袁丙龙, 等. 基于量化参数的储层非均质性分布规律研究: 以涠西南凹陷为例[J]. 断块油气田, 2020, 27(5): 597-602. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202005013.htm WANG Meng, YE Qing, YUAN Binglong, et al. Distribution regularity research of reservoir heterogeneity based on quantitative parameters: a case study of Weixinan Sag[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2020, 27(5): 597-602. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202005013.htm
[13]	刘景环, 王瑞丽, 尤丽, 等. 涠西南凹陷流沙港组成岩相与有效储层研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 34(6): 175-184. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY201206027.htm LIU Jinghuan, WANG Ruili, YOU Li, et al. Study on the diagenetic facies and effective clastic reservoirs in Liushagang Formation of Weixinan Sag[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2012, 34(6): 175-184. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY201206027.htm
[14]	何卫军, 甘军, 刘芳, 等. 涠西南凹陷流一段上亚段重力流沉积特征及发育模式[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(3): 31-37. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201903004.htm HE Weijun, GAN Jun, LIU Fang, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and development of gravity flow in the upper submember of the first member of Liushagang Formation in Weixi'nan Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(3): 31-37. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201903004.htm
[15]	冯佳睿, 高志勇, 崔京钢, 等. 深层、超深层碎屑岩储层勘探现状与研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2016, 31(7): 718-736. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXJZ201607009.htm FENG Jiarui, GAO Zhiyong, CUI Jinggang, et al. The exploration status and research advances of deep and ultra-deep clastic reservoirs[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2016, 31(7): 718-736. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXJZ201607009.htm
[16]	TOBIN R C, MCCLAIN T, LIEBER R B, et al. Reservoir quality modeling of tight-gas sands in Wamsutter field: integration of diagenesis, petroleum systems, and production data[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2010, 94(8): 1229-1226.
[17]	黄志龙, 朱建成, 马剑, 等. 莺歌海盆地东方区高温高压带黄流组储层特征及高孔低渗成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(2): 288-296. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201502015.htm HUANG Zhilong, ZHU Jiancheng, MA Jian, et al. Characteristics and genesis of high-porosity and low-permeability reservoirs in the Huangliu Formation of high temperature and high pressure zone in Dongfang area, Yinggehai Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36(2): 288-296. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201502015.htm
[18]	丁文龙, 王兴华, 胡秋嘉, 等. 致密砂岩储层裂缝研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2015, 30(7): 737-750. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXJZ201507001.htm DING Wenlong, WANG Xinghua, HU Qiujia, et al. Progress in tight sandstone reservoir fractures research[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2015, 30(7): 737-750. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXJZ201507001.htm
[19]	朱筱敏, 吴冬, 张昕, 等. 东营凹陷沙河街组近岸水下扇低渗储层成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2014, 35(5): 646-653. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201405011.htm ZHU Xiaomin, WU Dong, ZHANG Xin, et al. Genesis of low permeability reservoirs of nearshore subaqueous fan in Shahejie Formation in Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2014, 35(5): 646-653. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201405011.htm
[20]	周军良, 胡勇, 李超, 等. 渤海A油田扇三角洲相低渗储层特征及物性控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(1): 71-78. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201701009.htm ZHOU Junliang, HU Yong, LI Chao, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of fan delta facies low permeability reservoirs in Bohai A oilfield, the Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geo-logy, 2017, 38(1): 71-78. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201701009.htm
[21]	马羚, 李杰, 徐胜林, 等. 三塘湖盆地马朗凹陷西山窑组储层成岩作用类型及特征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41(4): 508-515. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201904508 MA Ling, LI Jie, XU Shenglin, et al. Diagenesis types and characte-ristics of Xishanyao Formation in Malang Sag, Santanghu Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41(4): 508-515. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201904508
[22]	韩志艳. 松辽盆地梨树断陷营城组—沙河子组成岩作用及对优质储层的控制[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41(3): 398-403. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201903398 HAN Zhiyan. Diagenesis controls on high-quality reservoirs of the Yingcheng-Shahezi formations in the Lishu Fault Depression, Songliao Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41(3): 398-403. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201903398
[23]	肖晖, 王浩男, 杨引弟, 等. 致密砂岩孔隙演化特征及其成岩作用对储层质量的影响: 以鄂尔多斯盆地马岭南延长组长8储层为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41(6): 800-811. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201906800 XIAO Hui, WANG Haonan, YANG Yindi, et al. Influence of diagenetic evolution on tight sandstone reservoir flow capacity: Chang 8 reservoir of Yanchang Formation in southern Maling, Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41(6): 800-811. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201906800
[24]	魏巍, 朱筱敏, 谈明轩, 等. 查干凹陷下白垩统扇三角洲相储层特征及物性影响因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(3): 447-455. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201503015.htm WEI Wei, ZHU Xiaomin, TAN Mingxuan, et al. Reservoir characteristics and influences on poroperm characteristics of the Lower Cretaceous fan-delta facies in Chagan Depression[J]. Oil & Gas Geo-logy, 2015, 36(3): 447-455. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201503015.htm
[25]	钟大康, 朱筱敏, 周新源, 等. 次生孔隙形成期次与溶蚀机理: 以塔中地区志留系沥青砂岩为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2006, 26(9): 21-24. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG200609007.htm ZHONG Dakang, ZHU Xiaomin, ZHOU Xinyuan, et al. Phases of secondary pore generation and dissolution mechanism: taking Silurian asphaltic sandstone in central Tarim Basin as an example[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2006, 26(9): 21-24. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG200609007.htm
[26]	李春荣, 张功成, 梁建设. 北部湾盆地断裂构造特征及其对油气的控制作用[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(2): 195-203. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201202004.htm LI Chunrong, ZHANG Gongcheng, LIANG Jianshe. Characteristics of fault structure and its control on hydrocarbons in the Beibuwan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(2): 195-203. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201202004.htm
[27]	朱伟林, 江文荣. 北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷断裂与油气藏[J]. 石油学报, 1998, 19(3): 6-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB803.001.htm ZHU Weilin, JIANG Wenrong. Relations between fractures and hydrocarbon reservoirs in Weixinan Sag[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 1998, 19(3): 6-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB803.001.htm
[28]	NEDKVITNE T, KARLSEN D A, BJØRLYKKE K, et al. Relationship between reservoir diagenetic evolution and petroleum emplacement in the Ula field, North Sea[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 1993, 10(3): 255-270.
[29]	SURDAM R C, CROSSEY L J, HAGEN E S, et al. Organic-inorganic interactions and sandstone diagenesis[J]. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 1989, 73(1): 1-23.