Geological characteristics and exploration direction of continental shale gas in Jurassic Daanzhai Member, Sichuan Basin
-
摘要: 四川盆地海相页岩气已取得勘探开发的重大突破，建成了涪陵、威远、长宁、昭通、威荣、永川6个页岩气田。陆相页岩气资源潜力大，是重要的勘探接替领域。采用全岩X衍射、有机碳含量分析、干酪根碳同位素、有机岩石学、高压压汞—氮吸附联合测定、氩离子抛光—扫描电镜及物性等多种测试分析手段，综合评价了四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段页岩气形成条件，并探讨了页岩气富集主控因素。四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段陆相页岩具有岩相变化快，非均质性强，页岩与砂岩、灰岩频繁互层特征；有机质丰度低，TOC为0.04%~3.89%，有机质类型以Ⅱ2型和Ⅲ型为主；热演化程度低，Ro介于1.10%~1.83%，处于成熟—高成熟阶段，以凝析油和湿气为主。陆相页岩物性较好，孔隙度介于0.95%~8.42%，平均值3.21%，以无机矿物质孔为主，主要为微孔和介孔，现场含气量测试平均为0.96 m3/t。发育于半深湖相、有利的岩相组合、裂缝和保存条件是陆相页岩气富集主控因素。基于主控因素分析，突出陆相页岩品质及热演化程度，结合保存条件和工程技术条件，建立了四川盆地大安寨段页岩气有利区评价标准。采用GIS融合的空间叠合技术，评价出元坝西南部、阆中东南部、仪陇地区、涪陵西北部和建南西北部是四川盆地大安寨段陆相页岩气下一步勘探的有利区带。Abstract: Productive breakthroughs have been achieved for the exploration and development of marine shale gas in the Sichuan Basin, and 6 shale gas fields have been built including Fuling, Weiyuan, Changning, Zhaotong, Weirong and Yongchuan. Continental shale gas is an important exploration replacement layer series with great potential. By the approaches of whole rock X-ray diffraction, TOC content, carbon isotope of kerogen, organic petrology, combined determination of high-pressure mercury injection and nitrogen adsorption, argon ion polishing and scanning electron microscope, and physical property test, the formation conditions of shale gas in the Jurassic Daanzhai Member of the Sichuan Basin were discussed, and the main controlling factors of shale gas enrichment were proposed. Results show that continental shale in the Jurassic Daanzhai Member in the Sichuan Basin is featured by rapid lithofacies changes, strong heterogeneity, frequent interbedding of shale, sandstones and limestones, low organic matter abundance, TOC ranging from 0.04% to 3.89% with type Ⅱ2 and Ⅲ of organic matters, low degree of thermal evolution with Ro values ranging from 1.10% to 1.83%, producing both condensate oil and wet gas. Continental shale has high porosity, ranging from 0.95% to 8.42%, There are mainly inorganic mineral pores dominated by micropores and mesopores. The average gas content of field test is 0.96 m3/t. It is clear that semi-deep lacustrine facies, favorable lithofacies assemblage, fractures and preservation conditions are the main controlling factors of continental shale gas enrichment. Based on the analysis of main controlling factors, highlighting the quality and thermal evolution degree of continental shale, combined with preservation conditions and engineering technical conditions, an evaluation criterion of favorable areas for continental shale gas in the Daanzhai Member in the Sichuan Basin was established. Combined with GIS integrated spatial superposition technology, several favorable zones were proposed, including the southwest of Yuanba, the southeast of Langzhong, Yilong, the northwest of Fuling and the northwest of Jiannan areas.
-
Key words:
- continental shale gas /
- lithofacies /
- inorganic mineral pores /
- favorable area /
- Daanzhai Member /
- Jurassic /
- Sichuan Basin
-
图 1 四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段沉积相、页岩厚度分布
Figure 1. Sedimentary facies and distribution of shale thickness in Jurassic Daanzhai Member, Sichuan Basin
图 3 四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段有机碳含量平面分布(a)及直方图(b-c)
Figure 3. Planar distribution(a) and histogram(b-c) of organic carbon contents of Jurassic Daanzhai Member, Sichuan Basin
图 4 四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段页岩干酪根类型统计
Figure 4. Statistical histogram of shale kerogen types of Jurassic Daanzhai Member, Sichuan Basin
图 5 四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段页岩有机质Ro等值线
Figure 5. Ro contour map of shale organic matter in Jurassic Daanzhai Member, Sichuan Basin
图 6 四川盆地元坝地区侏罗系大安寨段孔隙度分布
Figure 6. Histogram of pore distribution in Jurassic Daanzhai Member, Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin
图 7 四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段微孔隙类型
Figure 7. Micropore types of Jurassic Daanzhai Member, Sichuan Basin
图 8 四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段夹层储集空间特征
a.介壳灰岩，残余粒屑结构，不连续溶蚀裂缝，宽为0.01~0.08 mm，FY1井，2 596.8 m；b.介壳灰岩，YL30井，3 982.69 m；c.介壳灰岩，介壳内发育丰富溶孔，YL4井，3 790.14 m；d.介壳灰岩，介壳局部放大，发育丰富的微裂隙和溶孔，其中充填泥质，YL4井，3 760.75 m
Figure 8. Characteristics of interbedded reservoir space in Jurassic Daanzhai Member, Sichuan Basin
图 9 四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段页岩中的裂缝类型
Figure 9. Fracture types of shales in Jurassic Daanzhai Member, Sichuan Basin
图 10 四川盆地元坝地区侏罗系大安寨段页岩高压压汞—吸附联合测试孔隙分布
Figure 10. Histogram of pore distribution by high-pressure mercury injection and adsorption combined test of shale in Jurassic Daanzhai Member, Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin
图 11 四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段页岩油气有利区评价
Figure 11. Favorable area evaluation of shale oil and gas in Jurassic Daanzhai Member, Sichuan Basin
表 1 四川盆地元坝地区侏罗系大安寨段陆相页岩孔隙度与渗透率
Table 1. Porosity and permeability of continental shale in Jurassic Daanzhai Member, Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin
井名 样品数/个 孔隙度/% 渗透率/10-3 μm2 最小值 最大值 平均值 最小值 最大值 平均值 YL4 13 1.33 8.42 4.23 0.001 8 3.410 0 3.880 0 YL17 79 0.95 5.21 2.88 0.001 8 2.920 0 0.780 0 YL10 38 0.98 3.72 1.71 0.010 3 0.470 0 0.070 0 YL16 15 1.04 6.19 2.48 0.002 6 2.070 0 0.130 0 YL122 26 0.97 7.31 2.29 0.004 9 3.110 0 0.140 0 YL104 7 1.21 3.01 2.10 0.005 3 0.520 0 0.110 0 YL21 7 2.79 5.19 3.95 0.009 7 1.940 0 0.390 0 YL102 2 3.54 4.99 4.27 0.080 5 0.100 0 0.090 0 合计 202 0.95 8.42 3.21 0.001 8 3.410 0 1.720 0 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 四川盆地元坝地区侏罗系大安寨段储层物性参数
Table 2. Reservoir physical parameters of Jurassic Daanzhai Member, Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin
地层 样品数/个 孔隙度/% 渗透率/10-3 μm2 最小值 最大值 平均值 最小值 最大值 平均值 大一亚段 51 0.95 6.19 1.73 0.001 8 2.070 0 1.780 0 大二亚段 88 0.97 8.42 2.86 0.002 6 3.410 0 2.430 0 大三亚段 41 0.98 5.19 2.10 0.001 8 1.940 0 1.370 0
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 四川盆地陆相页岩气有利区评价标准
Table 3. Evaluation criteria of favorable areas for continental shale gas, Sichuan Basin
参数类型 参数名称 评分等级 一类(1.0~0.75) 二类(0.75~0.5) 三类(0.5~0) 页岩品质 ω(TOC)≥0.5%页岩累计厚度/m > 60 60~30 < 30 ω(TOC)≥1.0%页岩连续厚度/m > 30 30~10 < 10 ω(TOC)≥2.0%页岩连续厚度/m > 15 15~5 < 5 岩相类型 页岩型、页岩夹薄(纹)层型 页岩夹中层型 页岩夹厚层型 纹层发育情况 发育 较发育 不发育 孔隙度/% 页岩 > 4 4~2 < 2 夹层 > 3 3~2 < 2 热演化程度 成熟度/% Ⅰ-Ⅱ 1.3~3.0(气为主) 0.9~1.3(油、气同产)3.0~3.5(气) < 0.9(油) > 3.5(气) Ⅲ型 1.1~2.5 0.5~1.1或2.5~3.0 < 0.5或 > 3.0 保存条件 压力系数 > 1.2 1.2~0.9 < 0.9 工程条件 埋深/m 1 500~3 500 3 500~4 500，1 000~1 500 > 4 500， < 1 000 脆性指数/% > 50 50~30 < 30 岩性组合类型 页岩与砂岩、碳酸盐岩互层 页岩夹砂岩、碳酸盐岩 页岩
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 邹才能, 潘松圻, 荆振华, 等. 页岩油气革命及影响[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(1): 1-12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8719.2020.01.001ZOU Caineng, PAN Songqi, JING Zhenhua, et al. Shale oil and gas revolution and its impact[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(1): 1-12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8719.2020.01.001 [2] 马永生, 黎茂稳, 蔡勋育, 等. 海相深层油气富集机理与关键工程技术基础研究进展[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(5): 737-748. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202105737MA Yongsheng, LI Maowen, CAI Xunyu, et al. Advances in basic research on the mechanism of deep marine hydrocarbon enrichment and key exploitation technologies[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(5): 737-748. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202105737 [3] 付小平, 杨滔. 川东北地区下侏罗统自流井组陆相页岩储层孔隙结构特征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(4): 589-598. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202104589FU Xiaoping, YANG Tao. Pore structure of continental shale reservoirs in Lower Jurassic Ziliujing Formation, northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(4): 589-598. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202104589 [4] 朱彤. 四川盆地陆相页岩油气富集主控因素及类型[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(3): 345-354. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202003345ZHU Tong. Main controlling factors and types of continental shale oil and gas enrichment in Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(3): 345-354. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202003345 [5] 王世谦, 胡素云, 董大忠. 川东侏罗系: 四川盆地亟待重视的一个致密油气新领域[J]. 天然气工业, 2012, 32(12): 22-29. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2012.12.005WANG Shiqian, HU Suyun, DONG Dazhong. Jurassic tight oil & gas resources in East Sichuan Basin: a new exploration target[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2012, 32(12): 22-29. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2012.12.005 [6] 邹才能, 杨智, 王红岩, 等. "进源找油": 论四川盆地非常规陆相大型页岩油气田[J]. 地质学报, 2019, 93(7): 1551-1562. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2019.07.001ZOU Caineng, YANG Zhi, WANG Hongyan, et al. "Exploring petroleum inside source kitchen": Jurassic unconventional continental giant shale oil & gas field in Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2019, 93(7): 1551-1562. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2019.07.001 [7] 孙莎莎, 董大忠, 李育聪, 等. 四川盆地侏罗系自流井组大安寨段陆相页岩油气地质特征及成藏控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 124-135. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202101012.htmSUN Shasha, DONG Dazhong, LI Yucong, et al. Geological characte-ristics and controlling factors of hydrocarbon accumulation in terrestrial shale in the Da'anzhai Member of the Jurassic Ziliujing Formation, Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(1): 124-135. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202101012.htm [8] 黄东, 杨跃明, 杨光, 等. 四川盆地侏罗系致密油勘探开发进展与对策[J]. 石油实验地质, 2017, 39(3): 304-310. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201703304HUANG Dong, YANG Yueming, YANG Guang, et al. Countermeasure and progress of exploration and development of Jurassic tight oil in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2017, 39(3): 304-310. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201703304 [9] 郭旭升, 胡东风, 李宇平, 等. 海相和湖相页岩气富集机理分析与思考: 以四川盆地龙马溪组和自流井组大安寨段为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(2): 18-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201602005.htmGUO Xusheng, HU Dongfeng, LI Yuping, et al. Analyses and thoughts on accumulation mechanisms of marine and lacustrine shale gas: a case study in shales of Longmaxi Formation and Da'anzhai Section of Ziliujing Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23(2): 18-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201602005.htm [10] 杨跃明, 黄东. 四川盆地侏罗系湖相页岩油气地质特征及勘探开发新认识[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(6): 22-33. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201906004.htmYANG Yueming, HUANG Dong. Geological characteristics and new understandings of exploration and development of Jurassic lacustrine shale oil and gas in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(6): 22-33. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201906004.htm [11] 杨跃明, 黄东, 杨光, 等. 四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段湖相页岩油气形成地质条件及勘探方向[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2019, 42(2): 1-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRKT201902002.htmYANG Yueming, HUANG Dong, YANG Guang, et al. Geological conditions to form lacustrine facies shale oil and gas of Jurassic Daanzhai Member in Sichuan Basin and exploration directions[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2019, 42(2): 1-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRKT201902002.htm [12] 朱毅秀, 金振奎, 金科, 等. 中国陆相湖盆细粒沉积岩岩石学特征及成岩演化表征: 以四川盆地元坝地区下侏罗统大安寨段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(2): 494-508. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202102019.htmZHU Yixiu, JIN Zhenkui, JIN Ke, et al. Petrologic features and diagenetic evolution of fine-grained sedimentary rocks in continental lacustrine basins: a case study on the Lower Jurassic Da'anzhai Member of Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(2): 494-508. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202102019.htm [13] 朱毅秀, 吕品, 金科, 等. 四川元坝地区大安寨段陆相细粒沉积岩储层物性特征及有利储集层研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(4): 39-47. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ202104006.htmZHU Yixiu, LYU Pin, JIN Ke, et al. Study on physical properties and favorable reservoirs of terrestrial pulveryte reservoirs in Daanzhai Member, Yuanba Area, Sichuan[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2021, 28(4): 39-47. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ202104006.htm [14] 孙天礼, 欧成华, 郭威, 等. 元坝大安寨灰岩—砂岩—页岩储集模式及开发对策[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(6): 36-44. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ202106005.htmSUN Tianli, OU Chenghua, GUO Wei, et al. Accumulation mode and development Countermeasures for limestone-sandstone-shale reservoirs in Daanzhai Member, Yuanba block[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2021, 28(6): 36-44. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ202106005.htm [15] 徐雄飞, 于祥春, 卿忠, 等. 三塘湖盆地芦草沟组岩相特征及其与页岩油藏的关系[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2020, 41(6): 677-684. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202006007.htmXU Xiongfei, YU Xiangchun, QING Zhong, et al. Lithofacies characteristics and its relationship with shale oil reservoirs of Lucaogou Formation in Santanghu Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2020, 41(6): 677-684. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202006007.htm [16] 霍建峰, 高健, 郭小文, 等. 川东地区龙马溪组页岩不同岩相孔隙结构特征及其主控因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(6): 1162-1175. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202006006.htmHUO Jianfeng, GAO Jian, GUO Xiaowen, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of pore structures of various lithofacies in shales of Longmaxi Formation, eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(6): 1162-1175. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202006006.htm [17] 董春梅, 马存飞, 林承焰, 等. 一种泥页岩层系岩相划分方法[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(3): 1-7. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX201503001.htmDONG Chunmei, MA Cunfei, LIN Chengyan, et al. A method of classification of shale set[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum, 2015, 39(3): 1-7. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX201503001.htm [18] 王玉满, 王淑芳, 董大忠, 等. 川南下志留统龙马溪组页岩岩相表征[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(1): 119-133. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201601013.htmWANG Yuman, WANG Shufang, DONG Dazhong, et al. Lithofacies characterization of Longmaxi Formation of the Lower Silurian, southern Sichuan[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23(1): 119-133. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201601013.htm [19] 刘忠宝, 刘光祥, 胡宗全, 等. 陆相页岩层系岩相类型、组合特征及其油气勘探意义: 以四川盆地中下侏罗统为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(12): 10-21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201912003.htmLIU Zhongbao, LIU Guangxiang, HU Zongquan, et al. Lithofacies types and assemblage features of continental shale strata and their significance for shale gas exploration: a case study of the Middle and Lower Jurassic strata in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(12): 10-21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201912003.htm [20] 胡宗全, 王濡岳, 刘忠宝, 等. 四川盆地下侏罗统陆相页岩气源储特征及耦合评价[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(1): 261-272.HU Zongquan, WANG Ruyue, LIU Zhongbao, et al. Source-reservoir characteristics and coupling evaluations for the Lower Jurassic lacustrine shale gas reservoir in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2021, 28(1): 261-272. [21] 田泽普, 宋新民, 王拥军, 等. 考虑基质孔缝特征的湖相致密灰岩类型划分: 以四川盆地中部侏罗系自流井组大安寨段为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(2): 213-224. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201702007.htmTIAN Zepu, SONG Xinmin, WANG Yongjun, et al. Classification of lacustrine tight limestone considering matrix pores or fractures: a case study of Da'anzhai Member of Jurassic Ziliujing Formation in central Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(2): 213-224. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201702007.htm [22] 李延钧, 冯媛媛, 刘欢, 等. 四川盆地湖相页岩气地质特征与资源潜力[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(4): 423-428. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201304004.htmLI Yanjun, FENG Yuanyuan, LIU Huan, et al. Geological characte-ristics and resource potential of lacustrine shale gas in the Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(4): 423-428. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201304004.htm [23] 张利萍, 潘仁芳. 页岩气的主要成藏要素与气储改造[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2009, 14(3): 20-23. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY200903006.htmZHANG Liping, PAN Renfang. Major accumulation factors and storage reconstruction of shale gas reservoir[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2009, 14(3): 20-23. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY200903006.htm [24] 张林晔, 李政, 朱日房. 页岩气的形成与开发[J]. 天然气工业, 2009, 29(1): 124-128. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG200901044.htmZHANG Linye, LI Zheng, ZHU Rifang. The formation and exploitation of shale gas[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2009, 29(1): 124-128. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG200901044.htm [25] 张金川, 金之钧, 袁明生. 页岩气成藏机理和分布[J]. 天然气工业, 2004, 24(7): 15-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG200407004.htmZHANG Jinchuan, JIN Zhijun, YUAN Mingsheng. Reservoiring mechanism of shale gas and its distribution[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2004, 24(7): 15-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG200407004.htm [26] 贾承造, 邹才能, 李建忠, 等. 中国致密油评价标准、主要类型、基本特征及资源前景[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(3): 343-350. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201203000.htmJIA Chengzao, ZOU Caineng, LI Jianzhong, et al. Assessment criteria, main types, basic features and resource prospects of the tight oil in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(3): 343-350. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201203000.htm [27] 卢双舫, 黄文彪, 陈方文, 等. 页岩油气资源分级评价标准探讨[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(2): 249-256. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201202018.htmLU Shuangfang, HUANG Wenbiao, CHEN Fangwen, et al. Classification and evaluation criteria of shale oil and gas resources: discussion and application[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(2): 249-256. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201202018.htm [28] 贾承造, 郑民, 张永峰. 中国非常规油气资源与勘探开发前景[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(2): 129-136. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201202002.htmJIA Chengzao, ZHENG Min, ZHANG Yongfeng. Unconventional hydrocarbon resources in China and the prospect of exploration and development[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(2): 129-136. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201202002.htm [29] 邹才能, 杨智, 陶士振, 等. 纳米油气与源储共生型油气聚集[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(1): 13-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201201003.htmZOU Caineng, YANG Zhi, TAO Shizhen, et al. Nano-hydrocarbon and the accumulation in coexisting source and reservoir[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(1): 13-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201201003.htm [30] 邱振, 邹才能, 李建忠, 等. 非常规油气资源评价进展与未来展望[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(2): 238-246. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201302007.htmQIU Zhen, ZOU Caineng, LI Jianzhong, et al. Unconventional petroleum resources assessment: progress and future prospects[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2013, 24(2): 238-246. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201302007.htm [31] 姜在兴, 张文昭, 梁超, 等. 页岩油储层基本特征及评价要素[J]. 石油学报, 2014, 35(1): 184-196. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201401027.htmJIANG Zaixing, ZHANG Wenzhao, LIANG Chao, et al. Characteristics and evaluation elements of shale oil reservoir[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2014, 35(1): 184-196. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201401027.htm [32] 夏威, 蔡潇, 丁安徐, 李辉. 南川地区栖霞—茅口组碳酸盐岩储集空间研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(2): 197-203. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202102008.htmXIA Wei, CAI Xiao, DING Anxu, LI Hui. Reservoir spaces of carbonate rocks in Qixia-Maokou Formation of Nanchuan area[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(2): 197-203. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202102008.htm [33] 刘忠宝, 胡宗全, 刘光祥, 等. 四川盆地东北部下侏罗统自流井组陆相页岩储层孔隙特征及形成控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 136-145. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202101013.htmLIU Zhongbao, HU Zongquan, LIU Guangxiang, et al. Pore characteristics and controlling factors of continental shale reservoirs in the Lower Jurassic Ziliujing Formation, northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(1): 136-145. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202101013.htm [34] 崔景伟, 邹才能, 朱如凯, 等. 页岩孔隙研究新进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2012, 27(12): 1319-1325. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXJZ201212004.htmCUI Jingwei, ZOU Caineng, ZHU Rukai, et al. New advances in shale porosity research[J]. Advances in Earth Sciences, 2012, 27(12): 1319-1325. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXJZ201212004.htm [35] 付小东, 秦建中, 滕格尔, 等. 烃源岩矿物组成特征及油气地质意义: 以中上扬子古生界海相优质烃源岩为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2011, 38(6): 671-684. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201106005.htmFU Xiaodong, QIN Jianzhong, TENGER, et al. Mineral components of source rocks and their petroleum significance: a case from Paleozoic marine source rocks in the Middle-Upper Yangtze region[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2011, 38(6): 671-684. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201106005.htm [36] 郭岭, 姜在兴, 郭峰. 渝东南龙马溪组黑色页岩矿物组成及其页岩气意义[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 46(11): 4146-4154. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201511024.htmGUO Ling, JIANG Zaixing, GUO Feng. Mineral components of shales from Longmaxi Formation in southeastern Chongqing and their implications for shale gas[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2015, 46(11): 4146-4154. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201511024.htm [37] 冯动军, 胡宗全, 李双建, 等. 川东盆缘带龙马溪组关键保存要素对页岩气富集的控制作用[J]. 地质论评, 2021, 67(1): 144-158. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP202101015.htmFENG Dongjun, HU Zongquan, LI Shuangjian, et al. Controlling effect of key preservation elements on shale gas enrichment in Longmaxi Formation, eastern marginal zone of Sichuan Basin[J]. Geological Review, 2021, 67(1): 144-158. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP202101015.htm [38] 冯动军, 胡宗全, 高波, 等. 川东南地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气成藏条件分析[J]. 地质论评, 2016, 62(6): 1523-1534. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP201606014.htmFENG Dongjun, HU Zongquan, GAO Bo, et al. Analysis of shale gas reservoir-forming condition of Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation in southeast Sichuan Basin[J]. Geological Review, 2016, 62(6): 1523-1534. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP201606014.htm -
点击查看大图
图(11) / 表(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 709
- HTML全文浏览量: 276
- PDF下载量: 100
- 被引次数: 0
苏公网安备32021102000780号