黔西地区石炭系页岩气成藏地质特征及含气性影响因素

姜秉仁; 邓恩德; 杨通保; 韩明辉; 马子杰

doi:10.11781/sysydz202204629

黔西地区石炭系页岩气成藏地质特征及含气性影响因素

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202204629

1.
贵州省煤层气页岩气工程技术研究中心, 贵阳 550016
2.
贵州盘江煤电集团技术研究院有限公司, 贵阳 550081
3.
贵州省煤田地质局, 贵阳 550081

基金项目:

贵州省地质勘查基金项目 2018-01号

国家科技重大专项 2016ZX05034004-007

贵州省应用基础研究计划重大项目黔科合JZ字[2014]2005

详细信息

作者简介:
姜秉仁(1983—), 男, 高级工程师, 从事非常规天然气勘探开发工作。E-mail: 398696980@qq.com

通讯作者:
邓恩德(1990—), 男, 硕士, 高级工程师, 从事非常规油气地质研究工作。E-mail: pjmdjtded@foxmail.com

中图分类号: TE122.3
计量
- 文章访问数: 362
- HTML全文浏览量: 83
- PDF下载量: 46
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-12-22
- 修回日期: 2022-05-16
- 刊出日期: 2022-07-28

Geological conditions and controls of gas content of Carboniferous shale gas reservoirs in western Guizhou

1.
Guizhou Provincial CBM and Shale Gas Engineering Research Center, Guiyang, Guizhou 550081, China
2.
Guizhou Panjiang Coal Power Group Technology Research Institute Co., Ltd., Guiyang, Guizhou 550081, China
3.
Coal Mine Exploration of Guizhou Province, Guiyang, Guizhou 550081, China

摘要

摘要: 石炭系旧司组是贵州省发育的一套重要富有机质页岩层系，尚未取得页岩气勘探开发突破。为深入研究旧司组页岩气成藏地质特征，分析其含气性影响因素，选取黔西地区旧司组钻井岩心及野外露头样品为研究对象，综合运用有机地球化学、X-射线衍射、覆压孔渗、场发射扫描电镜、液氮吸附、现场解吸、高压等温吸附等实验手段开展系统研究。旧司组泥页岩有机质类型以Ⅱ型为主，有机碳含量较高，处于过成熟早期阶段；矿物组成以石英和黏土矿物为主，脆性矿物含量高，有利于后期压裂改造；储层为特低孔、特低渗，微观孔隙类型包括粒间孔、粒内孔、有机质孔及微裂缝4类，微观孔隙孔径较小，纳米级孔隙非常发育，比表面积和总孔体积较大，具备较好的页岩气富集与保存条件；现场解吸总含气量较高，平均为1.95 m³/t，吸附能力较强，吸附气量平均为3.10 m³/t，显示出良好的含气性；泥页岩吸附气量与TOC、R_o、黏土矿物含量、孔隙度、比表面积及总孔体积呈较好的正相关性，与平均孔径呈负相关。
- 页岩气 /
- 成藏特征 /
- 含气性 /
- 旧司组 /
- 石炭系 /
- 黔西地区
Abstract: The Carboniferous Jiusi Formation is an important organic-rich shale stratum developed in Guizhou province, yet no breakthrough has been achieved for shale gas exploration and development. To study the geological conditions and controlling factors of shale gas accumulation in the Jiusi Formation, core and outcrop samples from the western Guizhou were analyzed using a series of methods, including organic geochemistry, XRD, FE-SEM, under overburden pressure, in-situ desorption and high pressure isothermal. The organic matters in the Jiusi shale are primarily type Ⅱ kerogen with a high organic carbon content, and are at the early stage of over maturity. Quartz and clays are the dominant minerals. The brittle mineral content is high, which is conducive to hydraulic fracturing. The reservoir is characterized by ultra-low porosity and permeability. There are mainly inter- and intragranular pores, organic pores, and micro-cracks. Small pore diameter, well-developed nano-scale pores, big specific surface area and total pore volume provide favorable conditions for shale gas enrichment and preservation. High in-situ desorption gas content (with an average value of 1.95 m³/t) and strong adsorption capacity (with a mean value of 3.10 m³/t) suggest good potential for shale gas. The adsorbed gas quantity is positively correlated with TOC, R_o, clay mineral content, porosity, specific surface area and total pore volume, and negatively correlated with average pore size.
- shale gas /
- accumulation characteristics /
- gas-bearing property /
- Jiusi Formation /
- Carboniferous /
- western Guizhou

HTML全文

图 1 黔西地区研究区石炭系旧司组页岩厚度等值线及采样位置

Figure 1. Shale thickness contours of Carboniferous Jiusi Formation and sampling location of study area in western Guizhou

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 黔西地区LY1井TOC含量随深度变化特征

Figure 2. TOC variation with depth of well LY 1 in western Guizhou

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 黔西地区研究区石炭系旧司组矿物成分特征

Figure 3. Mineral composition of Carboniferous Jiusi Formation of study area in western Guizhou

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 黔西地区旧司组泥页岩样品场发射扫描电镜下微观孔隙类型及特征

Figure 4. FE-SEM observations of pore types and characteristics of shale from Jiusi Formation, western Guizhou

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 泥页岩含气量现场解吸测试流程

Figure 5. Flow chart of in-situ desorption test for shale gas content

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 黔西地区旧司组泥页岩样品等温吸附曲线

Figure 6. Isotherm adsorption curves of shale from Jiusi Formation, western Guizhou

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 黔西地区旧司组泥页岩TOC含量与饱和吸附气量、总含气量关系

Figure 7. Relationship between TOC content and adsorbed gas volume, total gas content of shale from Jiusi Formation, western Guizhou

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 黔西地区旧司组泥页岩TOC含量、R_o与吸附气量关系

Figure 8. Relationship between TOC content, R_o and adsorbed gas volume of shale from Jiusi Formation, western Guizhou

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 黔西地区石炭系旧司组泥页岩黏土矿物、石英质量分数与吸附气量关系

Figure 9. Relationship between mass fraction of clay mineral and quartz and adsorbed gas volume of shale from Jiusi Formation, western Guizhou

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 黔西地区石炭系旧司组泥页岩孔隙度与吸附气量关系

Figure 10. Relationship between porosity and adsorbed gas of shale from Jiusi Formation, western Guizhou

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 黔西地区石炭系旧司组泥页岩孔径结构参数与吸附气量关系

Figure 11. Relationship between pore structure parameters and adsorbed gas volume of shale from Jiusi Formation, western Guizhou

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 黔西地区旧司组泥页岩微观孔隙结构参数

Table 1. Pore structure parameters of shale from Jiusi Formation, western Guizhou

样品编号	比表面积/(m²·g^-1)	孔体积/(m³·g^-1)	平均孔径/nm
JS-01	20.080	0.023 6	4.25
JS-03	15.245	0.016 6	5.59
JS-05	22.321	0.026 1	3.89
JS-07	30.287	0.031 3	3.15
JS-09	19.366	0.022 8	4.42
JS-12	10.853	0.007 8	7.68
JS-15	16.841	0.015 5	5.20
JS-16	19.016	0.019 1	4.86

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 黔西地区石炭系旧司组泥页岩现场解吸总含气量

Table 2. Total gas content of in-situ desorption experiment of shale from Jiusi Formation, western Guizhou

样品编号	井名	深度/m	含气量/(m³·t^-1)	样品编号	井名	深度/m	含气量/(m³·t^-1)	样品编号	井名	深度/m	含气量/(m³·t^-1)
JS-01	SY1井	705.17	2.35	JS-12	LY1井	252.35	1.95	JS-19	QY2井	671.00	1.37
JS-03	SY1井	716.26	1.98	JS-13	LY1井	292.92	1.70	JS-20	QY2井	702.80	1.41
JS-05	SY1井	750.28	2.49	JS-14	LY1井	300.90	1.61	JS-21	QY2井	725.56	1.58
JS-07	SY1井	780.15	2.94	JS-15	LY1井	307.80	2.05	JS-23	QY2井	736.21	1.90
JS-09	SY1井	816.22	2.17	JS-16	LY1井	312.21	1.82	JS-24	QY2井	746.16	2.08
JS-10	LY1井	239.38	1.82	JS-18	LY1井	316.83	2.00	JS-26	QY2井	762.05	1.88

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(34)

[1]	张金川, 金之钧, 袁明生. 页岩气成藏机理和分布[J]. 天然气工业, 2004, 24(7): 15-18. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0976.2004.07.005 ZHANG Jinchuan, JIN Zhijun, YUAN Mingsheng. Reservoiring mechanism of shale gas and its distribution[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2004, 24(7): 15-18. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0976.2004.07.005
[2]	杜伟, 胡宗全, 刘光祥, 等. 四川盆地及周缘上奥陶统五峰组岩相特征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(3): 398-404. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202003398 DU Wei, HU Zongquan, LIU Guangxiang, et al. Lithofacies of Upper Ordovician Wufeng Formation in Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(3): 398-404. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202003398
[3]	ZHANG Qian, LITTKE R, ZIEGER L, et al. Ediacaran, Cambrian, Ordovician, Silurian and Permian shales of the Upper Yangtze Platform, South China: deposition, thermal maturity and shale gas potential[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2019, 216: 103281. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2019.103281
[4]	邓恩德, 易同生, 颜智华, 等. 海陆过渡相页岩气聚集条件及勘探潜力研究: 以黔北地区金沙参1井龙潭组为例[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2020, 49(6): 1166-1181. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD202006014.htm DENG Ende, YI Tongsheng, YAN Zhihua, et al. Accumulation condition and shale gas potential of the marine-terrestrial transitional facies: a case study of Jinshacan 1 well of Longtan Formation in northern Guizhou[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2020, 49(6): 1166-1181. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD202006014.htm
[5]	郭旭升, 胡东风, 段金宝. 中国南方海相油气勘探展望[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(5): 675-686. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202005675 GUO Xusheng, HU Dongfeng, DUAN Jinbao. Marine petroleum exploration in South China[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(5): 675-686. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202005675
[6]	聂海宽, 何治亮, 刘光祥, 等. 中国页岩气勘探开发现状与优选方向[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2020, 49(1): 13-35. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD202001002.htm NIE Haikuan, HE Zhiliang, LIU Guangxiang, et al. Status and direction of shale gas exploration and development in China[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2020, 49(1): 13-35. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD202001002.htm
[7]	葛明娜, 庞飞, 包书景. 贵州遵义五峰组—龙马溪组页岩微观孔隙特征及其对含气性控制: 以安页1井为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41(1): 23-30. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201901023 GE Mingna, PANG Fei, BAO Shujing. Micro pore characteristics of Wufeng-Longmaxi shale and their control on gas content: a case study of well Anye 1 in Zunyi area, Guizhou province[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41(1): 23-30. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201901023
[8]	邓恩德, 颜智华, 姜秉仁, 等. 黔西地区上二叠统龙潭组海陆交互相页岩气储层特征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(3): 467-476. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202003467 DENG Ende, YAN Zhihua, JIANG Bingren, et al. Reservoir characteristics of marine-continental shale gas in Upper Permian Longtan Formation, western Guizhou province[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(3): 467-476. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202003467
[9]	杨瑞东, 程伟, 周汝贤. 贵州页岩气源岩特征及页岩气勘探远景分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2012, 23(2): 340-347. YANG Ruidong, CHENG Wei, ZHOU Ruxian. Characteristics of organic-rich shale and exploration area of shale gas in Guizhou province[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2012, 23(2): 340-347.
[10]	陈相霖, 苑坤, 林拓, 等. 四川垭紫罗裂陷槽西北缘(黔水地1井)发现上古生界海相页岩气[J]. 中国地质, 2021, 48(2): 661-662. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI202102023.htm CHEN Xianglin, YUAN Kun, LIN Tuo, et al. Discovery of shale gas within Upper Paleozoic marine facies by Qian Shuidi-1 well in the northwest of Yaziluo rift trough, Sichuan province[J]. Geology in China, 2021, 48(2): 661-662. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI202102023.htm
[11]	秦琴, 龙成雄, 唐显贵. 黔西南地区石炭系旧司组页岩沉积环境分析[J]. 中国煤炭地质, 2016, 28(4): 35-40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1803.2016.04.07 QIN Qin, LONG Chengxiong, TANG Xiangui. Analysis of carboniferous Jiusi Formation shale sedimentary environment in southwestern Guizhou[J]. Coal Geology of China, 2016, 28(4): 35-40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1803.2016.04.07
[12]	陈榕, 苑坤, 张子亚, 等. 黔西地区打屋坝组富有机质页岩地球化学特征及其意义[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41(1): 10-15. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201901010 CHEN Rong, YUAN Kun, ZHANG Ziya, et al. Geochemical characteristics of organic-rich shale in the Dawuba Formation, western Guizhou province[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41(1): 10-15. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201901010
[13]	贵州省地质矿产局. 贵州省区域地质志[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1987. Guizhou Provincial Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources. Regional geology of Guizhou province[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1987.
[14]	秦文, 唐显贵, 秦琴, 等. 黔西南区旧司组黑色页岩地球化学及储层特征分析[J]. 断块油气田, 2014, 21(2): 181-186. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT201402011.htm QIN Wen, TANG Xiangui, QIN Qin, et al. Analysis on reservoir characteristics and geochemistry of Jiusi Formation potential shale in southwestern Guizhou[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2014, 21(2): 181-186. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT201402011.htm
[15]	苑坤, 陈榕, 林拓, 等. 贵州南部晚石炭世沉积环境与古地理特征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41(1): 38-44. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201901038 YUAN Kun, CHEN Rong, LIN Tuo, et al. Petrological characteristics and sedimentary environment in the southern Guizhou during the Late Carboniferous[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41(1): 38-44. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201901038
[16]	郭少斌, 王子龙, 马啸. 中国重点地区二叠系海陆过渡相页岩气勘探前景[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(3): 377-385. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202103377 GUO Shaobin, WANG Zilong, MA Xiao. Exploration prospect of shale gas with Permian transitional facies of some key areas in China[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(3): 377-385. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202103377
[17]	聂海宽, 唐玄, 边瑞康. 页岩气成藏控制因素及中国南方页岩气发育有利区预测[J]. 石油学报, 2009, 30(4): 484-491. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB200904003.htm NIE Haikuan, TANG Xuan, BIAN Ruikang. Controlling factors for shale gas accumulation and prediction of potential development area in shale gas reservoir of South China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2009, 30(4): 484-491. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB200904003.htm
[18]	林腊梅, 张金川, 刘锦霞, 等. 页岩气勘探目标层段优选[J]. 地学前缘, 2012, 19(3): 259-263. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201203028.htm LIN Lamei, ZHANG Jinchuan, LIU Jinxia, et al. Favorable depth zone selection for shale gas prospecting[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2012, 19(3): 259-263. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201203028.htm
[19]	李佳昱, 梁婷, 朱小二, 等. 重庆涪陵二龙口剖面P—T界线附近黏土矿物特征及其古环境意义[J]. 地质学报, 2021, 95(3): 868-882. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE202103018.htm LI Jiayu, LIANG Ting, ZHU Xiaoer, et al. Palaeoenvironmental implications of clay mineral characteristics in the Permian-Triassic transitional succession in the Erlongkou section, Fuling, Chongqing[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2021, 95(3): 868-882. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE202103018.htm
[20]	王濡岳, 胡宗全, 包汉勇, 等. 四川盆地上奥陶统五峰组—下志留统龙马溪组页岩关键矿物成岩演化及其控储作用[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(6): 996-1005. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2022061037 WANG Ruyue, HU Zongquan, BAO Hanyong, et al. Diagenetic evolution of key minerals and its controls on reservoir quality of Upper Ordovician Wufeng-Lower Silurian Longmaxi shale of Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(6): 996-1005. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2022061037
[21]	郭旭升. 涪陵页岩气田焦石坝区块富集机理与勘探技术[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014: 73-106. GUO Xusheng. Accumulation mechanism and exploration technology of Jiaoshiba block in Fuling shale gas field[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2014: 73-106.
[22]	邓恩德, 金军, 王冉, 等. 黔北地区龙潭组海陆过渡相页岩微观孔隙特征及其储气性[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2017, 17(24): 190-195. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXJS201724032.htm DENG Ende, JIN Jun, WANG Ran, et al. Characteristics of microscopic pore and gas storage on shale in Permian Longtan Formation, northern Guizhou[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2017, 17(24): 190-195. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXJS201724032.htm
[23]	SLATT R M, O'BRIEN N R. Pore types in the Barnett and Woodford gas shales: contribution to understanding gas storage and migration pathways in fine-grained rocks[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2011, 95(12): 2017-2030.
[24]	LOUCKS R G, REED R M, RUPPEL S C, et al. Spectrum of pore types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classification for matrix-related mudrock pores[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2012, 96(6): 1071-1098.
[25]	蔡苏阳, 肖七林, 朱卫平, 等. 川南地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩储层纳米孔隙发育特征及其控制因素: 以四川盆地南部长宁双河剖面为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(6): 920-927. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202006920 CAI Suyang, XIAO Qilin, ZHU Weiping, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of nano pores in shale reservoirs of Wufeng-Longmaxi formations in southern Sichuan Basin: insights from Shuanghe outcrop in Changning area[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(6): 920-927. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202006920
[26]	聂海宽, 张金川. 页岩气聚集条件及含气量计算: 以四川盆地及其周缘下古生界为例[J]. 地质学报, 2012, 86(2): 349-361. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201202014.htm NIE Haikuan, ZHANG Jinchuan. Shale gas accumulation conditions and gas content calculation: a case study of Sichuan Basin and its periphery in the Lower Paleozoic[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2012, 86(2): 349-361. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201202014.htm
[27]	许露露, 温雅茹, 张焱林, 等. 鄂西地区上奥陶统五峰组—下志留统龙马溪组页岩含气性特征及保存条件[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(3): 395-405. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202103395 XU Lulu, WEN Yaru, ZHANG Yanlin, et al. Gas-bearing characte-ristics and preservation conditions of Upper Ordovician Wufeng-Lower Silurian Longmaxi shale in western Hubei[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(3): 395-405. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202103395
[28]	唐颖, 张金川, 刘珠江, 等. 解吸法测量页岩含气量及其方法的改进[J]. 天然气工业, 2011, 31(10): 108-112. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201110032.htm TANG Ying, ZHANG Jinchuan, LIU Zhujiang, et al. Use and improvement of the desorption method in shale gas content tests[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2011, 31(10): 108-112. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201110032.htm
[29]	中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 页岩气地质评价方法: GB/T 31483-2015[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2015: 3-6. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China. Geological evaluation methods for shale gas: GB/T 31483-2015[S]. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2015: 3-6.
[30]	高永利, 李腾, 关新, 等. 基于重量法的页岩气高压等温吸附研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40(4): 566-572. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201804566 GAO Yongli, LI Teng, GUAN Xin, et al. Mass method adsorption characteristics of shale gas under high pressure[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2018, 40(4): 566-572. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201804566
[31]	唐玄, 张金川, 丁文龙, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部上古生界海陆过渡相页岩储集性与含气性[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(2): 147-157. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201602017.htm TANG Xuan, ZHANG Jinchuan, DING Wenlong, et al. The reservoir property of the Upper Paleozoic marine-continental transitional shale and its gas-bearing capacity in the southeastern Ordos Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23(2): 147-157. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201602017.htm
[32]	党伟, 张金川, 黄潇, 等. 陆相页岩含气性主控地质因素: 以辽河西部凹陷沙河街组三段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(12): 1516-1530. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201512007.htm DANG Wei, ZHANG Jinchuan, HUANG Xiao, et al. Main-controlling geological factors of gas-bearing property of continental shale gas: a case study of member 3rd of Shahejie Formation in western Liaohe Sag[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(12): 1516-1530. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201512007.htm
[33]	STRAPOC' D, MASTALERZ M, SCHIMMELMANN A, et al. Geoche-mical constraints on the origin and volume of gas in the New Albany shale (Devonian-Mississippian), eastern Illinois Basin[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2010, 94(11): 1713-1740.
[34]	NIE Haikuan, HE Zhiliang, LIU Guangxiang, et al. Genetic mechanism of high-quality shale gas reservoirs in the Wufeng-LongmaxiFms in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry B, 2021, 8(1): 24-34.