四川盆地中二叠世岩相古地理及其油气地质意义

彭金宁; 杜崇娇; 李龙龙; 蒋小琼; 潘文蕾; 陆永德; 罗开平

doi:10.11781/sysydz202301049

四川盆地中二叠世岩相古地理及其油气地质意义

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202301049

中国石化石油勘探开发研究院无锡石油地质研究所, 江苏无锡 214126

基金项目:

中国石油化工股份有限公司项目“川西二叠系成藏条件及勘探潜力分析” P18069-2

详细信息

作者简介:
彭金宁(1979-), 男, 博士, 高级工程师, 从事油气地质综合评价研究。E-mail: pengjn.syky@sinopec.com

中图分类号: TE121.3
计量
- 文章访问数: 384
- HTML全文浏览量: 126
- PDF下载量: 85
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-02-15
- 修回日期: 2022-11-15
- 刊出日期: 2023-01-28

Lithofacies palaeogeography of Middle Permian in the Sichuan Basin and its petroleum geological significance

Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, SINOPEC, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China

摘要

摘要: 近期四川盆地中二叠统陆续取得勘探发现，展现出很大的勘探潜力。中二叠世该区构造—沉积分异明显，导致油气成藏规律复杂，层序岩相古地理的重建对认识构造—沉积演化、沉积建造和油气勘探具有重要意义。通过综合油气勘探成果、典型钻井及野外露头资料，并以三级层序为最小纵向编图单元，重建了四川盆地中二叠世栖霞—茅口期各层序的岩相古地理。四川盆地中二叠统可划分为5个三级层序，即SQq1(梁山组—栖一段B)、SQq2(栖一段A—栖二段)、SQm1(茅一段—茅二段C)、SQm2(茅二段B—A)和SQm3(茅三—茅四段)。SQq1和SQm1沉积期总体以海侵和填平补齐过程为主，盆内局部古高地存在点状、带状滩体；SQq2、SQm2和SQm3沉积期以持续海退、地貌分异为主，盆缘发育镶边的碳酸盐岩台地沉积体系，台内可形成较大规模多个滩体；SQq2沉积期是中二叠世主要成滩期，较漫长的海退过程和局部块体升降，促使川西台缘、川中南部台内形成较大规模多个滩体；SQm3沉积期在盆地北部沉积分异明显加剧，全面转换为台缘—斜坡—陆棚的隆凹相间沉积分异格局；SQq2和SQm3沉积期高位体系域(HST)的台缘、台内滩体为白云石化、溶蚀等后期建设性成岩改造提供了物质基础。坡折带地貌的刻画和台缘、台内滩体预测应成为下一步勘探研究的重点。
- 三级层序 /
- 岩相古地理 /
- 油气地质 /
- 中二叠统 /
- 四川盆地
Abstract: Exploration discoveries have been made in the Middle Permian of the Sichuan Basin, indicating great exploration potential. However, the Middle Permian has obvious tectonic-sedimentary variation, resulting in complexity of hydrocarbon accumulation mechanism. The reconstruction of sequence lithofacies paleogeography is of great significance to understand the tectonic-sedimentary evolution, sedimentary formation and hydrocarbon exploration. In this paper, the lithofacies palaeogeography during the Middle Permian Qixia-Maokou period in the Sichuan Basin was reconstructed with the third order sequence as the minimum longitudinal mapping unit based on oil and gas exploration results as well as typical drilling and outcropping data. Five third-order sequences for the Middle Permian in the Sichuan Basin were supposed in this study including: SQq1 (from the Liangshan Formation to the section B of the first member of the Qixia Formation), SQq2 (from the section A of the first member to the second member of the Qixia Formation), SQm1 (from the first member to the section C of the second member of the Maokou Formation), SQm2 (from the section B to the section A of the second member of the Maokou Formation), and SQm3 (from the third to the fourth member of Maokou Formation). During the deposition of SQq1 and SQm1, transgression and filling were dominant, and spot and banded beach bodies in some palaeo-highlands of the basin were discovered. During the deposition of SQq2, SQm2 and SQm3, continuous regression and geomorphic differentiation were dominant, the carbonate platforms depositional system with edge were developed in the margin parts of the basin, and large scale multi-stage and multi-zone beach bodies could be formed in the platform. SQq2 was the main shoal-forming stage in the Middle Permian. The relatively long regressive process [JP+1]and local block uplift promoted the formation of large scale multi-stage and multi-zone shoals in the platform margin of the western Sichuan Basin and the southern part of the central Sichuan Basin. During SQm3 period, the sedimentary differentiation in the northern Sichuan Basin was obviously intensified, and it was transformed into an alternate uplift and sag pattern with platform margin, slope and shelf. The platform margin and intra-platform shoal of the HST during the deposition of SQq2 and SQm3 provided material basis for dolomitization, dissolution and other later constructive diagenetic transformation. Therefore, the delineation of slope break zone geomorphology and the prediction of platform margin and intra-platform shoal should be regarded as the focus of further exploration.
- third-order sequence /
- lithofacies palaeogeography /
- petroleum geology /
- Middle Permian /
- Sichuan Basin

HTML全文

图 1 四川盆地中二叠统层序地层划分方案

Figure 1. Sequence stratigraphic division of Middle Permian, Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 四川盆地下二叠统梁山组岩电响应特征

Figure 2. Rock electrical response characteristics of Lower Permian Liangshan Formation, Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 四川盆地SQq1和SQq2层序野外露头和镜下特征

a.P₁l和P₂q界面，旺苍金龙村剖面；b.P₁l和P₂q界面，华蓥二崖剖面；c.P₂q^1B，薄层状微晶生物碎屑灰岩夹硅质结核(A)，华蓥二崖剖面；d.中—厚层状微晶生物碎屑灰岩，P₂q^1A，剑阁猫儿塘剖面；e.微晶生物碎屑灰岩，照片d镜下显微照片，单偏光；f.厚层状白云岩，P₂q²，剑阁何家梁剖面；g.细—粗晶白云岩，照片f镜下显微照片；h.豹斑灰岩(A为灰质白云岩，B为白云质灰岩)，P₂q²，旺苍鹿渡坝剖面；i.P₂q^1B和P₂q²界面，旺苍鹿渡坝剖面

Figure 3. Outcrop and microscopic characteristics of SQq1 and SQq2 sequences, Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 四川盆地中二叠统茅口组SQm1、SQm2和SQm3层序野外露头和镜下特征

a.P₂q和P₂m界面，綦江藻渡剖面^[26]；b.P₂q和P₂m界面，广元西北乡剖面；c.P₂m¹，“眼球眼皮”状灰岩(A为眼球，B为眼皮)，广元西北乡剖面；d.P₂m²(A为燧石条带)，剑阁马儿岩剖面；e.P₂m²，灰白色厚层状生物碎屑微晶灰岩，茂县燕子岩剖面；f.图片e镜下显微照片，单偏光；g.P₂m³，深灰色薄—中层状含生物碎屑微晶灰岩，城口渡口剖面；h.图片g镜下显微照片，单偏光；i.广元车家坝剖面(A为茅口组硅质岩，B为吴家坪组王坡页岩，C为吴家坪组灰岩)^[26]；j.YDD3井岩心(A为茅口组灰岩，B为风化壳，C为玄武岩)^[26]；k.绵阳千佛镇剖面(A为茅口组灰岩，B为玄武岩，C为吴家坪组灰岩)；l. P₂m⁴，中—厚层状微晶生物碎屑灰岩，茂县燕子岩剖面

Figure 4. Outcrop and microscopic characteristics of SQm1, SQm2 and SQm3 sequences, Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 四川盆地中二叠世层序—岩相古地理分布

Figure 5. Sequence-lithofacies palaeogeography of Middle Permian, Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 四川盆地及周缘中二叠统滩相白云岩储层特征

a.HS1井SQq2，白云岩中可见溶孔、溶洞发育；b.HS1井SQq2，中粗晶白云岩中可见晶间孔发育；c.广元长江沟SQq2，中粗晶白云岩中见溶洞发育；d.MX108井SQq2，中晶白云岩晶间孔发育

Figure 6. Characteristics of Middle Permian beach facies dolomite reservoirs in Sichuan Basin and its periphery

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 四川盆地中二叠统SQm3沉积分异模式

a.YB8井SQm3，生屑灰岩；b.YB7井SQm3，亮晶生屑灰岩；c.旺苍正源SQm3，泥页岩发育；d.旺苍正源SQm3，硅质岩

Figure 7. Sedimentary differentiation model of Middle Permian SQm3 sequence, Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(35)

[1]	胡东风, 王良军, 张汉荣, 等. 碳酸盐岩烃源岩气藏的发现及其油气地质意义: 以四川盆地涪陵地区中二叠统茅口组一段气藏为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40(7): 23-33. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202007005.htm HU Dongfeng, WANG Liangjun, ZHANG Hanrong, et al. Discovery of carbonate source rock gas reservoir and its petroleum geological implications: a case study of the gas reservoir in the first member of Middle Permian Maokou Formation in the Fuling area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(7): 23-33. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202007005.htm
[2]	姜智利, 朱祥. 四川盆地元坝地区二叠系茅口组油气成藏特征及主控因素[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(4): 639-646. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202204639 JIANG Zhili, ZHU Xiang. Hydrocarbon accumulation characte-ristics and main controlling factors for Permian Maokou Formation in Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2022, 44(4): 639-646. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202204639
[3]	杨跃明, 杨雨, 文龙, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统天然气勘探新进展与前景展望[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40(7): 10-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202007004.htm YANG Yueming, YANG Yu, WEN Long, et al. New exploration progress and prospect of Middle Permian natural gas in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(7): 10-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202007004.htm
[4]	张宇, 曹清古, 罗开平, 等. 四川盆地二叠系茅口组油气藏勘探发现与启示[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(3): 610-620. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202203010.htm ZHANG Yu, CAO Qinggu, LUO Kaiping, et al. Reservoir exploration of the Permian Maokou Formation in the Sichuan Basin and enlightenment obtained[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(3): 610-620. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202203010.htm
[5]	李双建, 杨天博, 韩月卿, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统热液白云岩化作用及其储层改造意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(6): 1265-1280. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202106003.htm LI Shuangjian, YANG Tianbo, HAN Yueqing, et al. Hydrothermal dolomitization and its role in improving Middle Permian reservoirs for hydrocarbon accumulation, Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geo-logy, 2021, 42(6): 1265-1280. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202106003.htm
[6]	冯增昭, 杨玉卿, 金振奎, 等. 中国南方二叠纪岩相古地理[J]. 沉积学报, 1996, 14(2): 1-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB602.000.htm FENG Zengzhao, YANG Yuqing, JIN Zhenkui, et al. Lithofacies palaeogeography of the Permian of South China[J]. Acta Sedi-mentologica Sinica, 1996, 14(2): 1-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB602.000.htm
[7]	黄先平, 杨天泉, 张红梅. 四川盆地下二叠统沉积相及其勘探潜力区研究[J]. 天然气工业, 2004, 24(1): 10-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG200401003.htm HUANG Xianping, YANG Tianquan, ZHANG Hongmei. Research on the sedimentary facies and exploration potential areas of Lower Permian in Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2004, 24(1): 10-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG200401003.htm
[8]	陈宗清. 论四川盆地中二叠统栖霞组天然气勘探[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2009, 20(3): 325-334. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX200903006.htm CHEN Zongqing. Discussion on gas exploration of Middle Permian Qixia Formation, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2009, 20(3): 325-334. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX200903006.htm
[9]	胡明毅, 魏国齐, 胡忠贵, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统栖霞组层序—岩相古地理[J]. 古地理学报, 2010, 12(5): 515-526. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDLX201005004.htm HU Mingyi, WEI Guoqi, HU Zhonggui, et al. Sequence-lithofacies palaeogeography of the Middle Permian Qixia Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2010, 12(5): 515-526. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDLX201005004.htm
[10]	田景春, 郭维, 黄平辉, 等. 四川盆地西南部茅口期岩相古地理[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 34(2): 1-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY201202002.htm TIAN Jingchun, GUO Wei, HUANG Pinghui, et al. Lithofacies palaeogeography of Maokou period in southwestern Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2012, 34(2): 1-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY201202002.htm
[11]	周进高, 姚根顺, 杨光, 等. 四川盆地栖霞组—茅口组岩相古地理与天然气有利勘探区带[J]. 天然气工业, 2016, 36(4): 8-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201604004.htm ZHOU Jin'gao, YAO Genshun, YANG Guang, et al. Lithofacies palaeogeography and favorable gas exploration zones of Qixia and Maokou Fms in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2016, 36(4): 8-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201604004.htm
[12]	白晓亮, 杨跃明, 文龙, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统栖霞组沉积相展布及勘探意义[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(5): 13-24. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY202005002.htm BAI Xiaoliang, YANG Yueming, WEN Long, et al. Sedimentary facies distribution and exploration significance of the Middle Permian Qixia Formation in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2020, 42(5): 13-24. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY202005002.htm
[13]	李霞, 胡明毅, 李士祥. 龙门山—米苍山前缘二叠系碳酸盐缓坡沉积[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2005, 27(1): 36-37. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHSX200501011.htm LI Xia, HU Mingyi, LI Shixiang. Carbonate ramp deposition of Permian in Longmen-Micang mountain front[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2005, 27(1): 36-37. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHSX200501011.htm
[14]	冯仁蔚, 王兴志, 张帆, 等. 川西南周公山及邻区下二叠统碳酸盐岩成岩作用对储集性的影响[J]. 地质找矿论丛, 2008, 23(3): 223-229. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZZK200803010.htm FENG Renwei, WANG Xingzhi, ZHANG Fan, et al. Influence of diagenesis of Lower Permian carbonate on reservoir performance in Zhougongshan and the near districts in the southwest Sichuan[J]. Contributions to Geology and Mineral Resources Research, 2008, 23(3): 223-229. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZZK200803010.htm
[15]	赵宗举, 周慧, 陈轩, 等. 四川盆地及邻区二叠纪层序岩相古地理及有利勘探区带[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(S2): 35-51. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB2012S2003.htm ZHAO Zongju, ZHOU Hui, CHEN Xuan, et al. Sequence lithofacies paleogeography and favorable exploration zones of the Permian in Sichuan Basin and adjacent areas, China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(S2): 35-51. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB2012S2003.htm
[16]	张运波. 四川盆地中二叠统层序地层及沉积模式[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2011. ZHANG Yunbo. Sequence stratigraphy and depositional models of the Middle Permian in Sichuan Basin[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 2011.
[17]	许国明, 谢刚平, 隆轲, 等. 四川盆地西南部中二叠统沉积特征与勘探目标[J]. 天然气工业, 2015, 35(7): 27-33. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201507008.htm XU Guoming, XIE Gangping, LONG Ke, et al. Sedimentary features and exploration targets of Middle Permian reservoirs in the southwestern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2015, 35(7): 27-33. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201507008.htm
[18]	石新, 王兴志, 张帆, 等. 川西北地区栖霞组白云岩储集层研究[J]. 西南石油学院学报, 2005, 27(2): 13-16. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY200502003.htm SHI Xin, WANG Xingzhi, ZHANG Fan, et al. The study of dolomite reservoirs in Qixia Formation in the northwest of Sichuan region[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum Institute, 2005, 27(2): 13-16. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY200502003.htm
[19]	张廷山, 陈晓慧, 刘治成, 等. 峨眉地幔柱构造对四川盆地栖霞期沉积格局的影响[J]. 地质学报, 2011, 85(8): 1251-1264. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201108002.htm ZHANG Tingshan, CHEN Xiaohui, LIU Zhicheng, et al. Effect of Emeishan mantle plume over the sedimentary pattern of mid-Permian Xixia period in Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2011, 85(8): 1251-1264. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201108002.htm
[20]	陈轩, 赵宗举, 高阳, 等. 四川盆地北部中二叠统茅口组碳酸盐岩斜坡沉积及其油气勘探意义[J]. 海相油气地质, 2013, 18(4): 9-14. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXYQ201304003.htm CHEN Xuan, ZHAO Zongju, GAO Yang, et al. Middle Permian Maokou carbonate slope deposition and its significances for petroleum exploration in northern part of Sichuan Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2013, 18(4): 9-14. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXYQ201304003.htm
[21]	姚倩颖, 刘一锋, 江青春, 等. 川北—川东地区中二叠世晚期地层划分新认识及地质意义[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(2): 276-287. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202102276 YAO Qianying, LIU Yifeng, JIANG Qingchun, et al. Geological significance of late Mid-Permian stratigraphy in northern and eastern Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(2): 276-287. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202102276
[22]	王成善, 李祥辉, 陈洪德, 等. 中国南方二叠纪海平面变化及升降事件[J]. 沉积学报, 1999, 17(4): 536-541. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB199904004.htm WANG Chengshan, LI Xianghui, CHEN Hongde, et al. Permian sea-level changes and rising-falling events in South China[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1999, 17(4): 536-541. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB199904004.htm
[23]	王成善, 陈洪德, 寿建峰, 等. 中国南方二叠纪层序地层划分与对比[J]. 沉积学报, 1999, 17(4): 499-509. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB199904000.htm WANG Chengshan, CHEN Hongde, SHOU Jianfeng, et al. Characteristics and correlation of Permian depositional sequences in South China[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1999, 17(4): 499-509. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB199904000.htm
[24]	黄涵宇, 何登发, 李英强, 等. 四川盆地及邻区二叠纪梁山—栖霞组沉积盆地原型及其演化[J]. 岩石学报, 2017, 33(4): 1317-1337. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201704023.htm HUANG Hanyu, HE Dengfa, LI Yingqiang, et al. The prototype and its evolution of the Sichuan sedimentary basin and adjacent areas during Liangshan and Qixia stages in Permian[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2017, 33(4): 1317-1337. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201704023.htm
[25]	胡笙, 谭秀成, 罗冰, 等. 四川盆地西北部二叠系栖霞阶层序地层特征及地质意义[J]. 古地理学报, 2020, 22(6): 1109-1126. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDLX202006007.htm HU Sheng, TAN Xiucheng, LUO Bing, et al. Sequence stratigraphic characteristics and geological significance of the Permian Qixia stage in northwestern Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeo-graphy, 2020, 22(6): 1109-1126. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDLX202006007.htm
[26]	王海真, 池英柳, 赵宗举, 等. 四川盆地栖霞组岩溶储层及勘探选区[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(5): 833-842. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201305004.htm WANG Haizhen, CHI Yingliu, ZHAO Zongju, et al. Karst reservoirs developed in the Middle Permian Qixia Formation of Sichuan Basin and selection of exploration regions[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(5): 833-842. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201305004.htm
[27]	HAQ B U, SCHUTTER S R. A chronology of Paleozoic sea-level changes[J]. Science, 2008, 322(5898): 64-68. http://archives.datapages.com/data/HGS/vol51/no05/images/vol51no5p18.pdf
[28]	杨帅, 陈安清, 张玺华, 等. 四川盆地二叠纪栖霞—茅口期古地理格局转换及勘探启示[J]. 沉积学报, 2021, 39(6): 1466-1477. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB202106011.htm YANG Shuai, CHEN Anqing, ZHANG Xihua, et al. Paleogeographic transition of the Permian Chihsia-Maokou period in the Sichuan Basin and indications for oil-gas exploration[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2021, 39(6): 1466-1477. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB202106011.htm
[29]	周进高. 障壁碳酸盐岩台地类型与演化[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2013. ZHOU Jin'gao. Types of barrier carbonate platform and their evolution[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2013.
[30]	张玺华, 陈聪, 黄婕, 等. 四川盆地中二叠世广元—巴中拉张槽的发现及其油气地质意义[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(4): 466-475. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201904007.htm ZHANG Xihua, CHEN Cong, HUANG Jie, et al. The discovery of Middle Permian Guangyuan-Bazhong extensional trough in the Sichuan Basin and its petroleum geological significance[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(4): 466-475. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201904007.htm
[31]	PAYNE J L, LEHRMANN D J, FOLLETT D, et al. Erosional truncation of uppermost Permian shallow-marine carbonates and implications for Permian-Triassic boundary events[J]. GSA Bulletin, 2007, 119(7/8): 771-784.
[32]	SUN Yadong, LAI Xulong, WIGNALL P B, et al. Dating the onset and nature of the Middle Permian Emeishan large igneous pro-vince eruptions in SW China using conodont biostratigraphy and its bearing on mantle plume uplift models[J]. Lithos, 2010, 119(1/2): 20-33. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024493710001465
[33]	ZHENG Haofu, MA Yongsheng, CHI Guoxiang, et al. Stratigraphic and structural control on hydrothermal dolomitization in the Middle Permian carbonates, southwestern Sichuan Basin (China)[J]. Minerals, 2019, 9(1): 32. http://www.onacademic.com/detail/journal_1000042323407099_6e8d.html
[34]	邓莉, 闫全人, 宋博, 等. 中—晚二叠世上扬子地块(四川盆地区)裂解的沉积响应[J]. 岩石学报, 2021, 37(8): 2465-2482. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB202108013.htm DENG Li, YAN Quanren, SONG Bo, et al. Sedimentary responses to rifting of the Upper Yangtze block (Sichuan Basin area) in the Middle-Late Permian[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2021, 37(8): 2465-2482. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB202108013.htm
[35]	王兴志, 李博, 杨西燕, 等. 四川盆地北部中二叠世晚期"广元—旺苍"海槽特征及其油气地质意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(3): 562-574. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202103012.htm WANG Xingzhi, LI Bo, YANG Xiyan, et al. Characteristics of "Guangyuan-Wangcang" trough during Late Middle Permian and its petroleum geological significance in northern Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(3): 562-574. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202103012.htm