川北地区上二叠统吴家坪组火山碎屑岩油气藏储层特征及主控因素

夏文谦; 朱祥; 金民东; 张雷; 刘雁婷; 章思遥

doi:10.11781/sysydz202302307

川北地区上二叠统吴家坪组火山碎屑岩油气藏储层特征及主控因素

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202302307

中国石化勘探分公司, 成都 610041

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金企业创新发展联合基金项目 U19B6003

中国石化科技部项目 P20059-1

详细信息

作者简介:
夏文谦(1984-), 男, 博士, 副研究员, 从事油气勘探综合研究。E-mail: xiawq.ktnf@sinopec.com

中图分类号: TE122.22
计量
- 文章访问数: 299
- HTML全文浏览量: 117
- PDF下载量: 54
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-07-04
- 修回日期: 2023-02-13
- 刊出日期: 2023-03-28

Characteristics and controlling factors of volcanic clastic rock reservoirs in Wujiaping Formation of Upper Permian in northern Sichuan Basin

SINOPEC Exploration Company, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China

摘要

摘要: 受峨眉地裂运动影响，川北地区二叠纪吴家坪期发育一套火山碎屑岩。该类岩性非均质性强，储层孔隙结构复杂。为进一步明确该地区吴家坪组火山碎屑岩油气藏储层发育特征和形成机理，从而落实其勘探潜力，以露头和实钻资料为基础，结合岩心薄片观察、地化分析、氩离子抛光扫描电镜、盖层微孔联合测定等多种手段，分析川北地区吴家坪组火山碎屑岩储层发育特征及成因机理。研究认为，该火山碎屑岩主要岩性为凝灰质泥岩、泥质凝灰岩及沉凝灰岩。储层储集空间主要为纳米级黏土矿物收缩孔和有机质孔，微米级有机酸溶蚀孔和微裂缝。储层物性具有中—高孔特低渗的特征，其中凝灰质泥岩物性最好。储层主控因素分析认为，近火山口斜坡—陆棚环境有利于火山碎屑岩储层发育，火山灰脱玻化作用及次生有机酸溶蚀是储层形成孔隙的主要原因。
- 火山碎屑岩 /
- 储层特征 /
- 主控因素 /
- 吴家坪组 /
- 上二叠统 /
- 川北地区
Abstract: Under the influence of the Emei Taphrogenesis, a set of volcanic clastic rocks were developed in the Wujiapingian age of Permian in the northern Sichuan Basin. The lithology is highly heterogeneous, and the pore structure of reservoir is complex. In order to further clarify the characteristics and formation mechanism of volcanic clastic rock reservoirs in the Wujiaping Formation and confirm the exploration potential, this paper analyzes the reservoir characteristics and formation mechanism of volcanic clastic rock reservoirs in the Wujiaping Formation in the northern Sichuan Basin based on outcrop and actual drilling data and combining with core section observation, geochemistry analysis, argon ion buffing scanning electron microscope, combined determination of cap micro pores and other methods. It is concluded that the volcanic clastic rocks can be divided into three rock types: tuffaceous mudstone, argillaceous tuff and sedimentary tuff. The reservoir space is dominated by nano-scale clay mineral shrinkage pore and organic matter pore and micron-scale organic acid dissolution pore and micro fracture. The reservoir physical property is characterized by medium to high porosity and ultra-low permeability, and the tuffaceous mudstone has the best physical property among the three rock types. The analysis of the controlling factors of the reservoir shows that the near-crater slope and shelf environment is favorable for the development of volcanic clastic rock reservoirs, and the devitrification of volcanic ash and secondary organic acid dissolution are the main causes for the formation of pores in the reservoir.
- volcanic clastic rock /
- reservoir characteristics /
- main controlling factor /
- Wujiaping Formation /
- Upper Permian /
- northern Sichuan Basin

HTML全文

图 1 四川盆地二叠系火山岩分布

修改自参考文献[20]。

Figure 1. Distribution of Permian volcanic rocks in Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 川北地区YB701井二叠系吴家坪组火山碎屑岩综合柱状图

Figure 2. Synthesis column of volcanic clastic rocks in Wujiaping Formation of well YB701, northern Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 川北地区上二叠统吴家坪组火山碎屑岩储集岩类型

a.YB701井，6 695.20 m，凝灰质泥岩岩心，页理发育，内夹少量凝灰岩薄层，偶见黄铁矿团块；b.YB8井，7 228.29 m，凝灰质泥岩镜下特征，颜色较深，黏土矿物含量高；c.YB8井，7 228.29 m，凝灰质泥岩氩离子抛光扫描电镜特征，以黏土矿物为主，长英质含量较少；d.YB701井，6 687.30 m，泥质凝灰岩岩心，以沉凝灰岩和凝灰质泥岩互层形态为主，见水平层理、包卷层理；e.YB8井，7 213.00 m，泥质凝灰岩镜下特征，沉凝灰岩和凝灰质泥岩呈层状分布；f.YB8井，7 213.00 m，泥质凝灰岩氩离子抛光扫描电镜特征，凝灰质含量及碳酸盐矿物含量有所增加；g.YB701井，6 683.30 m，沉凝灰岩岩心，见生物碎屑及泥质碎屑颗粒杂乱排列；h.YB8井，7 211.6 m，沉凝灰岩镜下特征，颗粒相对粗大，以粉—细晶为主；i.YB8井，7 212.00 m，沉凝灰岩氩离子抛光扫描电镜特征，多种矿物杂乱排列

Figure 3. Rock types of volcanic clastic rock reservoirs in Wujiaping Formation of Upper Permian, northern Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 川北地区YB701井上二叠统吴家坪组火山碎屑岩储层物性特征

Figure 4. Physical characteristics of volcanic clastic rock reservoirs in Wujiaping Formation of well YB701, northern Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 川北地区上二叠统吴家坪组火山碎屑岩储层孔径分布

Figure 5. Pore size distribution of volcanic clastic rock reservoirs in Wujiaping Formation of Upper Permian, northern Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 川北地区上二叠统吴家坪组火山碎屑岩储层孔隙微观特征

a.YB7井，6 935.70 m，黏土矿物收缩孔；b.YB7井，6 934.77 m，黏土矿物收缩孔；c.YB7井，6 935.70 m，有机质孔；d.YB7井，6 935.22 m，溶蚀孔洞；e.YB7井，6 935.22 m，白云石溶孔；f.YB7井，6 935.22 m，铁白云石形成的溶孔；g.YB7井，6 935.56 m，微裂缝；h.YB701井，6 686.50 m，白云石溶孔被黏土矿物充填；i.YB7井，6 935.22 m，石膏充填早期溶孔

Figure 6. Pore microscopic characteristics of volcanic clastic rock reservoirs in Wujiaping Formation of Upper Permian, northern Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 川北地区YB701井上二叠统吴家坪组火山碎屑岩储层孔隙度与矿物含量交会特征

Figure 7. Intersection characteristics of porosity and mineral content of volcanic clastic rock reservoirs in Wujiaping Formation of well YB701, northern Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 川北地区上二叠统吴家坪组火山碎屑岩发育模式

Figure 8. Development model of volcanic clastic rocks in Wujiaping Formation of Upper Permian, northern Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(36)

[1]	贾承造, 郑民, 张永峰. 中国非常规油气资源与勘探开发前景[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(2): 129-136. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201202002.htm JIA Chengzao, ZHENG Min, ZHANG Yongfeng. Unconventional hydrocarbon resources in China and the prospect of exploration and development[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(2): 129-136. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201202002.htm
[2]	贾承造. 论非常规油气对经典石油天然气地质学理论的突破及意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(1): 1-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201701002.htm JIA Chengzao. Breakthrough and significance of unconventionaloil and gas to classical petroleum geological theory[J]. PetroleumExploration and Development, 2017, 44(1): 1-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201701002.htm
[3]	杨双, 李忠博, 闫相宾, 等. 火山岩圈闭识别描述方法及其应用[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(3): 540-548. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202103540 YANG Shuang, LI Zhongbo, YAN Xiangbin, et al. Method of identi-fying and characterizing of volcanic traps and its application[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(3): 540-548. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202103540
[4]	邹才能, 陶士振, 侯连华, 等. 非常规油气地质[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2011. ZOU Caineng, TAO Shizhen, HOU Lianhua, et al. Unconventionalpetroleum geology[M]. Beijing: Geology Press, 2011.
[5]	徐夕生, 邱检生. 火成岩岩石学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010. XU Xisheng, QIU Jiansheng. Igneous petrology[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2010.
[6]	邹才能. 火山岩油气地质[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2012. ZOU Caineng. Petroleum geology of volcanic rocks[M]. Beijing: Geology Press, 2012.
[7]	孙林, 邹信波, 李旭光, 等. 珠江口盆地惠州凹陷火山岩酸化可行性[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2022, 29(2): 145-154. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS202202018.htm SUN Lin, ZOU Xinbo, LI Xuguang, et al. Feasibility study on acidification of volcanic rocks in Huizhou Sag, Pearl River MouthBasin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2022, 29(2): 145-154. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS202202018.htm
[8]	伊培荣, 彭峰, 韩芸. 国外火山岩油气藏特征及其勘探方法[J]. 特种油气藏, 1998, 5(2): 65-70. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ802.012.htm YI Peirong, PENG Feng, HAN Yun. Reservoir characteristics of volcanic oil and gas exploration[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 1998, 5(2): 65-70. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ802.012.htm
[9]	SCHUTTER S R. Hydrocarbon occurrence and exploration in and around igneous rocks[C]//Hydrocarbons in Crystalline Rocks. London: The Geological Society of London, 2003: 735.
[10]	罗静兰, 邵红梅, 张成立. 火山岩油气藏研究方法与勘探技术综述[J]. 石油学报, 2003, 24(1): 31-38. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB200301006.htm LUO Jinglan, SHAO Hongmei, ZHANG Chengli. Summary of research methods and exploration technologies for volcanic reservoirs[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2003, 24(1): 31-38. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB200301006.htm
[11]	高瑞琴, 杨继波, 丛培栋, 等. 二连油田沉凝灰岩储层特征分析[J]. 测井技术, 2006, 30(4): 330-333. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1338.2006.04.012 GAO Ruiqin, YANG Jibo, CONG Peidong, et al. Analysis of thecharacteristics of tuffite reservoir in Erlian oilfield[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2006, 30(4): 330-333. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1338.2006.04.012
[12]	马剑, 黄志龙, 刘再振, 等. 三塘湖盆地条湖组含沉积有机质凝灰岩致密储层特征[J]. 地学前缘, 2015, 22(6): 185-196. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201506016.htm MA Jian, HUANG Zhilong, LIU Zaizhen, et al. Tight reservoir characteristics of sedimentary organic matter-bearing tuff in Tiaohu Formation of Santanghu Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2015, 22(6): 185-196. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201506016.htm
[13]	李军, 王炜, 王书勋. 青西油田沉凝灰岩储集特征[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2004, 25(3): 288-290. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3873.2004.03.017 LI Jun, WANG Wei, WANG Shuxun. Bedded tuff reservoir in Qingxi oilfield[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2004, 25(3): 288-290. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3873.2004.03.017
[14]	宫清顺, 倪国辉, 芦淑萍, 等. 准噶尔盆地乌尔禾油田凝灰质岩成因及储层特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2010, 31(4): 481-485. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201004017.htm GONG Qingshun, NI Guohui, LU Shuping, et al. Genesis and reservoir features of tuffaceous rocks in Wuerhe oilfield of the Junggar Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2010, 31(4): 481-485. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201004017.htm
[15]	何斌, 徐义刚, 肖龙, 等. 峨眉山大火成岩省的形成机制及空间展布: 来自沉积地层学的新证据[J]. 地质学报, 2003, 77(2): 194-202. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE200302012.htm HE Bin, XU Yigang, XIAO Long, et al. Generation and spatial distribution of the Emeishan large igneous Province: new evidence from stratigraphic records[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2003, 77(2): 194-202. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE200302012.htm
[16]	江昱良, 秦启荣, 高瑞琪, 等. 蜀南地区二叠系火成岩特征及储集性研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(2): 11-19. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ202102002.htm JIANG Yuliang, QIN Qirong, GAO Ruiqi, et al. Study on the characteristics and reservoir quality of Permian igneous rocks in southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2021, 28(2): 11-19. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ202102002.htm
[17]	李素华, 贾霍甫, 胡昊, 等. 四川盆地井研地区火山岩岩相类型及储层分布[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(6): 39-46. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ202206005.htm LI Suhua, JIA Huofu, HU Hao, et al. Lithofacies types and reservoir distribution of volcanic rocks in Jingyan area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reserviors, 2022, 29(6): 39-46. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ202206005.htm
[18]	何江, 郑荣才, 胡欣, 等. 四川盆地西部晚二叠世吴家坪组沉积体系[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(1): 87-95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201501012.htm HE Jiang, ZHENG Rongcai, HU Xin, et al. Sedimentary system of the Late Permian Wujiaping Formation in the western Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36(1): 87-95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201501012.htm
[19]	张晗, 黄虎, 侯明才. 四川广元地区朝天剖面上二叠统吴家坪组凝灰岩成因及其地质意义[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2020, 42(1): 36-48. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGX202001004.htm ZHANG Han, HUANG Hu, HOU Mingcai. Origin of tuffs from Upper Permian Wujiaping Formation in Chaotian Section of Guangyuan area, Sichuan, China and its geological significance[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 2020, 42(1): 36-48. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGX202001004.htm
[20]	马新华, 徐春春, 李国辉, 等. 四川盆地二叠系火成岩分布及含气性[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(2): 216-225. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201902004.htm MA Xinhua, XU Chunchun, LI Guohui, et al. Distribution and gas-bearing properties of Permian igneous rocks in Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(2): 216-225. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201902004.htm
[21]	马新华, 杨雨, 张健, 等. 四川盆地二叠系火山碎屑岩气藏勘探重大发现及其启示[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(2): 1-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201902002.htm MA Xinhua, YANG Yu, ZHANG Jian, et al. A major discovery in Permian volcanic rock gas reservoir exploration in the Sichuan Basin and its implications[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(2): 1-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201902002.htm
[22]	徐敏, 梁虹, 邓绍强, 等. 四川盆地二叠系火山岩地震响应特征及分布规律[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2019, 19(29): 27-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXJS201929005.htm XU Min, LIANG Hong, DENG Shaoqiang, et al. Seismic response characteristics and distribution of Permian volcanic rocks in Sichuan Basin[J]. ScienceTechnology and Engineering, 2019, 19(29): 27-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXJS201929005.htm
[23]	文龙, 李亚, 易海永, 等. 四川盆地二叠系火山岩岩相与储层特征[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(2): 17-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201902005.htm WEN Long, LI Ya, YI Haiyong, et al. Lithofacies and reservoir characteristics of Permian volcanic rocks in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(2): 17-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201902005.htm
[24]	张本健, 王宇峰, 裴森奇, 等. 川西北地区上二叠统吴家坪组沉积演化[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(12): 1709-1720. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201912005.htm ZHANG Benjian, WANG Yufeng, PEI Senqi, et al. Sedimentary evolution of the Upper Permian Wujiaping Formation in the northwestern Sichuan[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2019, 30(12): 1709-1720. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201912005.htm
[25]	马剑, 黄志龙, 钟大康, 等. 三塘湖盆地马朗凹陷二叠系条湖组凝灰岩致密储集层形成与分布[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(5): 714-722. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201605007.htm MA Jian, HUANG Zhilong, ZHONG Dakang, et al. Formation and distribution of tuffaceous tight reservoirs in the Permian Tiaohu Formation in the Malang Sag, Santanghu Basin, NWChina[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(5): 714-722. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201605007.htm
[26]	赵海玲, 黄微, 王成, 等. 火山岩中脱玻化孔及其对储层的贡献[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2009, 30(1): 47-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT200901012.htm ZHAO Hailing, HUANG Wei, WANG Cheng, et al. Micropores from devitrification in volcanic rocks and their contribution to reservoirs[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2009, 30(1): 47-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT200901012.htm
[27]	郭旭升, 胡东风, 李宇平, 等. 海相和湖相页岩气富集机理分析与思考: 以四川盆地龙马溪组和自流井组大安寨段为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(2): 18-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201602005.htm GUO Xusheng, HU Dongfeng, LI Yuping, et al. Analyses and thoughts on accumulation mechanisms of marine and lacustrine shale gas: a case study in shales of Longmaxi Formation and Da'anzhai Section of Ziliujing Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23(2): 18-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201602005.htm
[28]	魏祥峰, 刘若冰, 张廷山, 等. 页岩气储层微观孔隙结构特征及发育控制因素: 以川南—黔北XX地区龙马溪组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(5): 1048-1059. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201305025.htm WEI Xiangfeng, LIU Ruobing, ZHANG Tingshan, et al. Micro-pores structure characteristics and development control factors of shale gas reservoir: a case of Longmaxi Formation in XX area of southern Sichuan and northern Guizhou[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2013, 24(5): 1048-1059. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201305025.htm
[29]	翟常博, 邓模, 曹清古, 等. 川东地区上二叠统龙潭组泥页岩基本特征及页岩气勘探潜力[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(6): 921-932. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202106921 ZHAI Changbo, DENG Mo, CAO Qinggu, et al. Basic characte-ristics and exploration potential of shale gas in Longtan Formation of Upper Permian in eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(6): 921-932. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202106921
[30]	朱彤, 张哲, 冯动军, 等. 梁平福禄镇剖面大安寨段泥页岩地质特征[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(1): 139-149. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202201012.htm ZHU Tong, ZHANG Zhe, FENG Dongjun, et al. Geological characteristics of mud shale in Da'anzhai section of Fulu Town, Liangping[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(1): 139-149. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202201012.htm
[31]	魏志红, 魏祥峰. 页岩不同类型孔隙的含气性差异: 以四川盆地焦石坝地区五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2014, 34(6): 37-41. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201406007.htm WEI Zhihong, WEI Xiangfeng. Comparison of gas-bearing property between different pore types of shale: a case from the Upper Ordovician Wufeng and Longmaxi Fms in the Jiaoshiba area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34(6): 37-41. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201406007.htm
[32]	兰叶芳, 吴海枝, 任传建, 等. 黔西北燕子口地区五峰组—龙马溪组泥页岩储层特征[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2021, 28(1): 115-124. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS202101015.htm LAN Yefang, WU Haizhi, REN Chuanjian, et al. Shale reservoircharacteristics of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in Yanzikou area, northwestern Guizhou[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2021, 28(1): 115-124. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS202101015.htm
[33]	唐相路, 姜振学, 邵泽宇, 等. 第四系弱成岩泥页岩孔隙结构及物性特征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(2): 210-218. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202202210 TANG Xianglu, JIANG Zhenxue, SHAO Zeyu, et al. Pore structure and physical properties of Quaternary weak diagenetic shales[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2022, 44(2): 210-218. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202202210
[34]	侯明才, 王文楷, 张本健, 等. 四川周公山—汉王场地区峨眉山玄武岩中流体类型及活动期次[J]. 岩石学报, 2013, 29(8): 2709-2718. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201308008.htm HOU Mingcai, WANG Wenkai, ZHANG Benjian, et al. Fluid types and activities of Emeishan basalt in Zhougong Mountain- Hanwang Field of Sichuan Province[J]. Acta PetrologicaSinica, 2013, 29(8): 2709-2718. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201308008.htm
[35]	宋谢炎, 侯增谦, 曹志敏, 等. 峨眉大火成岩省的岩石地球化学特征及时限[J]. 地质学报, 2001, 75(4): 498-506. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE200104013.htm SONG Xieyan, HOU Zengqian, CAO Zhimin, et al. Geochemical characteristics and period of the Emei Igneous Province[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2001, 75(4): 498-506. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE200104013.htm
[36]	张招崇, MAHONEY JJ, 王福生, 等. 峨眉山大火成岩省西部苦橄岩及其共生玄武岩的地球化学: 地幔柱头部熔融的证据[J]. 岩石学报, 2006, 22(6): 1538-1552. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200606012.htm ZHANG Zhaochong, MAHONEY JJ, WANG Fusheng, et al. Geochemistry of picritic and associated basalt flows of the western Emeishan Flood Basalt Province, China: evidence for a plume-head origin[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2006, 22(6): 1538-1552. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200606012.htm