北极斯维尔德鲁普盆地含油气系统分析与资源潜力评价

李刚; 胡靖靖; 白国平; 张凯逊; 邱海华; 王瑞丰

doi:10.11781/sysydz202303474

北极斯维尔德鲁普盆地含油气系统分析与资源潜力评价

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202303474

李刚^1,,
胡靖靖^{1, 2, ,},
白国平¹,
张凯逊³,
邱海华^{1, 4},
王瑞丰⁵

1.
中国石油大学(北京) 地球科学学院, 北京 102249
2.
中国石化勘探分公司勘探研究院, 成都 610041
3.
中国地质科学院地质力学研究所, 北京 100081
4.
中国石油塔里木油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 新疆库尔勒 841000
5.
中国石油大学(北京) 地球物理学院, 北京 102249

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金 91755104

中国地质调查局地质调查项目 DD20221810

详细信息

作者简介:
李刚(1994—)，男，博士生，从事非常规油气评价与勘探研究。E-mail: cup932014@163.com

通讯作者:
胡靖靖(1996-), 女, 硕士, 助理工程师, 从事含油气盆地分析与资源评价研究。E-mail: hujj.ktnf@sinopec.com

中图分类号: TE122.3
计量
- 文章访问数: 389
- HTML全文浏览量: 186
- PDF下载量: 57
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-10-26
- 修回日期: 2023-03-12
- 刊出日期: 2023-05-28

Petroleum systems and resource potential in Sverdrup Basin, Arctic

LI Gang^1
,,
HU Jingjing^{1, 2
, ,},
BAI Guoping¹,
ZHANG Kaixun³,
QIU Haihua^{1, 4},
WANG Ruifeng⁵

1.
College of Geoscience, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
2.
Research Institute of Exploration, SINOPEC Exploration Company, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
3.
Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
4.
Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina Tarim Oilfield Company, Korla, Xinjiang 841000, China
5.
College of Geophysics, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China

摘要

摘要: 斯维尔德鲁普盆地(Sverdrup Basin)是北极地区重要的含油气盆地之一，具有丰富的油气资源，但勘探程度相对较低。基于IHS数据库和公开文献资料，分析了斯维尔德鲁普盆地油气地质特征及分布规律，划分了盆地内含油气系统和成藏组合；采用蒙特卡洛模拟法对盆地油气资源潜力进行了评估，并预测了有利勘探区带。盆地内绝大多数已发现油气藏分布于盆地西部，即萨宾(Sabine)次盆和爱丁堡(Edinburgh)次盆；油气主要富集于侏罗系和三叠系碎屑岩储层中。盆地内可划分出2个含油气系统，分别为古生界含油气系统和中生界含油气系统，后者的油气资源潜力远高于前者。后者待发现可采资源量均值为石油474.81 MMbbl (1 MMbbl=1×10⁶ bbl，1 bbl=0.137 t)、天然气13 620.82 Bcf (1 Bcf=1×10⁹ ft³，1 ft³=0.028 3 m³)、凝析油63.66 MMbbl，合计油当量2 808.61 MMboe (1 MMboe=1×10⁶ bbl)，其中天然气可采资源量占盆地内待发现油气总可采资源量的80.82%。横跨盆地西部的下侏罗统构造型成藏组合、爱丁堡次盆的上三叠统—下侏罗统构造型成藏组合和萨宾次盆的上侏罗统构造型成藏组合是最有潜力的勘探区带。
- 油气分布 /
- 含油气系统 /
- 资源评价 /
- 斯维尔德鲁普盆地 /
- 北极
Abstract: The Sverdrup Basin is one of the important petroliferous basins in the Arctic. It has abundant oil and gas resources, but the exploration degree is relatively low. Based on the IHS database and literatures in the public domain, this paper documented the geological characteristics and distribution of oil and gas in the Sverdrup Basin, and classified the petroleum systems and hydrocarbon plays in the basin. The undiscovered hydrocarbons were eventually assessed by Monte Carlo simulation and the favorable exploration areas were predicted. The investigation results show that the discovered oil and gas accumulations are mainly distributed in the western area of the basin, which consists of Sabin and Edinburgh sub-basins. Oil and gas are mainly reserved in the Jurassic and Triassic clastic reservoirs. Two petroleum systems, which are the Paleozoic and Mesozoic systems, were identified in the basin. The Mesozoic petroleum system has a far greater exploration potential. Undiscovered recoverable reserves (mean value) in the Mesozoic petroleum system are 474.81 MMbbl (1 MMbbl=1×10⁶ bbl, 1 bbl=0.137 t) of oil, 13 620.82 Bcf (1 Bcf=1×10⁹ ft³, 1 ft³=0.028 3 m³) of natural gas and 63.66 MMbbl of condensate, amounting to 2 808.61 MMboe (3.85×10⁸ t), of which the natural gas accounts for 80.82%. The Lower Jurassic structural hydrocarbon play in the western area of the basin, the Upper Triassic-Lower Jurassic structural hydrocarbon play in the Edinburgh sub-basin and the Upper Jurassic structural hydrocarbon play in the Sabine sub-basin are the most promising exploration areas.
- hydrocarbon distribution /
- petroleum system /
- resource evaluation /
- Sverdrup Basin /
- Arctic

HTML全文

图 1 北极斯维尔德鲁普盆地的地理和构造位置

据参考文献[25]修改。

Figure 1. Geographical and tectonic location of the Sverdrup Basin, Arctic

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 北极斯维尔德鲁普盆地地层综合柱状图

据参考文献[26]修改。

Figure 2. Stratigraphic chart of the Sverdrup Basin, Arctic

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 北极斯维尔德鲁普盆地区域构造剖面示意

据参考文献[31]修改，剖面位置见图 1的A-A’。

Figure 3. Schematic geological cross-section of the Sverdrup Basin, Arctic

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 北极斯维尔德鲁普盆地油气控制和探明(2P)可采储量在不同层系中的分布

据参考文献[26]整理。

Figure 4. Probable and proved (2P) reserves of different reservoirs in the Sverdrup Basin, Arctic

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 北极斯维尔德鲁普盆地古生界和中生界含油气系统分布

Figure 5. Distribution of Paleozoic and Mesozoic petroleum systems in the Sverdrup Basin, Arctic

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 北极斯维尔德鲁普盆地中生界含油气系统内成藏组合分布区域示意

Figure 6. Distribution of hydrocarbon plays in Mesozoic petroleum system in the Sverdrup Basin, Arctic

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 北极斯维尔德鲁普盆地油气待发现可采资源量资源各评价结果对比

Figure 7. Comparison of evaluation results of recoverable resources to be discovered in the Sverdrup Basin, Arctic

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 北极斯维尔德鲁普盆地有利勘探区带平面分布

Figure 8. Distribution of favorable exploration areas in the Sverdrup Basin, Arctic

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 北极斯维尔德鲁普盆地各次级单元油气控制和探明(2P)可采储量分布

Table 1. Probable and proved (2P) reserves of different sub-basins in the Sverdrup Basin, Arctic

构造单元	石油/MMbbl	天然气/Bcf	凝析油/MMbbl	油当量/MMboe	占比/%
尤列卡次盆	0.33	40.00	4.67	11.67	0.36
挪威次盆	0	0	0	0	0
爱丁堡次盆	254.00	4 679.50	7.49	1 041.41	32.66
萨宾次盆	312.83	10 917.60	3.36	2 135.79	66.98
合计	567.16	15 637.10	15.52	3 188.86	100.00
注：数据据参考文献[26]整理。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 北极斯维尔德鲁普盆地含油气系统控制和探明可采储量分布

Table 2. Probable and proved reserves of different petroleum systems in the Sverdrup Basin, Arctic

含油气系统	石油/MMbbl	天然气/Bcf	凝析油/MMbbl	油当量/MMboe	天然气占比/%
中生界	564.33	15 626.50	15.46	3 184.20	81.79
古生界	2.83	10.60	0.06	4.66	0.06
总计	567.16	15 637.10	15.52	3 188.86	81.76
数据据参考文献[26]整理。

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 北极斯维尔德鲁普盆地成藏组合控制和探明可采储量分布

Table 3. Probable and proved reserves of hydrocarbon plays in the Sverdrup Basin, Arctic

含油气系统	成藏组合	油气藏/个	石油/MMbbl	天然气/Bcf	凝析油/MMbbl	油当量/MMboe
中生界含油气系统	下白垩统构造型	2	80.00	600.00	0.54	180.54
	上侏罗统构造型	6	305.00	1 394.00	1.26	538.49
	下侏罗统构造型	7	88.50	6 215.00	1.63	1 126.00
	下侏罗统地层—构造复合型	1	0	2 600.00	0	433.33
	上三叠统—下侏罗统构造型	9	77.00	3 657.50	6.06	692.94
	下中三叠统构造型	7	13.83	1 160.00	5.97	213.03
古生界含油气系统	下二叠统构造型	1	0	10.00	0.06	1.76
古生界含油气系统	下泥盆统地层—构造复合型	1	2.83	0.60	0	2.93
注：数据据参考文献[26]整理。

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 北极斯维尔德鲁普盆地待发现油气可采资源量蒙特卡洛模拟评价结果

Table 4. Evaluation results of Monte Carlo simulation of recoverable resources to be discovered in the Sverdrup Basin, Arctic

资评结果		中生界含油气系统
		成藏组合
		油藏部分	气藏部分	总计
石油/MMbbl	F5	159.06	13.44	172.50
	F50	425.65	42.75	468.40
	F95	708.87	86.70	795.57
	均值	429.44	45.37	474.81
天然气/Bcf	F5	4.61	4 753.84	4 758.45
	F50	12.58	13 946.35	13 958.93
	F95	22.16	21 564.43	21 586.59
	均值	12.90	13 607.92	13 620.82
凝析油/MMbbl	F5	0.05	19.84	19.89
	F50	0.14	60.45	60.59
	F95	0.29	117.66	117.95
	均值	0.15	63.51	63.66
油当量/MMboe	F5	159.88	825.59	985.47
	F50	427.89	2 427.59	2 855.48
	F95	712.85	3 798.43	4 511.28
	均值	431.74	2 376.87	2 808.61

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(43)

[1]	刘震, 常迈, 赵阳, 等. 低勘探程度盆地烃源岩早期预测方法研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2007, 14(4): 159-167. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2007.04.017 LIU Zhen, CHANG Mai, ZHAO Yang, et al. Method of early prediction on source rocks in basins with low exploration activity[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2007, 14(4): 159-167. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2007.04.017
[2]	赵政璋, 何海清. 中国石油近几年新区油气勘探成果及下步工作面临的挑战和措施[J]. 沉积学报, 2004, 22(S1): 1-7. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB2004S1001.htm ZHAO Zhengzhang, HE Haiqing. Recent oil & gas exploration harvests in the new area of PetroChina and future challenges and measures[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2004, 22(S1): 1-7. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB2004S1001.htm
[3]	蔡勋育, 赵培荣, 高波, 等. 中国石化页岩气"十三五"发展成果与展望[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 16-27. CAI Xunyu, ZHAO Peirong, GAO Bo, et al. Sinopec's shale gas development achievements during the "Thirteenth Five-Year Plan" period and outlook for the future[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(1): 16-27.
[4]	王锐, 伦增珉, 吕成远, 等. 中外提高采收率新技术研究现状及发展趋势[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2021, 28(5): 81-86. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS202105010.htm WANG Rui, LUN Zengmin, LÜ Chengyuan, et al. Research status and development trends of worldwide new technologies for enhanced oil recovery[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2021, 28(5): 81-86. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS202105010.htm
[5]	陈建文. 深水盆地油气勘探新领域[J]. 海洋地质动态, 2003, 19(8): 38-41. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-2722.2003.08.010 CHEN Jianwen. New exploration domain for oil and gas in deep water basins[J]. Marine Geology Letters, 2003, 19(8): 38-41. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-2722.2003.08.010
[6]	金春爽, 乔德武, 姜春艳. 国内外深水区油气勘探新进展[J]. 海洋地质动态, 2003, 19(10): 20-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-2722.2003.10.008 JIN Chunshuang, QIAO Dewu, JIANG Chunyan. Advances of oil and gas explorations in worldwide deepwater[J]. Marine Geology Letters, 2003, 19(10): 20-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-2722.2003.10.008
[7]	牛嘉玉, 王玉满, 谯汉生. 中国东部老油区深层油气勘探潜力分析[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2004, 9(1): 34-41. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2004.01.005 NIU Jiayu, WANG Yuman, QIAO Hansheng. Analysis of potential for oil & gas exploration of deep formations in old oil areas in East China[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2004, 9(1): 34-41. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2004.01.005
[8]	曹强, 叶加仁, 石万忠, 等. 低勘探程度盆地烃源岩早期评价: 以南黄海北部盆地东北凹为例[J]. 石油学报, 2009, 30(4): 522-529. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB200904009.htm CAO Qiang, YE Jiaren, SHI Wanzhong, et al. Preliminary prediction and evaluation of source rocks in low-exploration basins: a case study on the northeast sag of the Northern South Yellow Sea Basin in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2009, 30(4): 522-529. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB200904009.htm
[9]	李刚, 白国平, 高平, 等. 全球前寒武系—下寒武统原生油气藏地质及分布特征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(6): 958-966. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202106958 LI Gang, BAI Guoping, GAO Ping, et al. Geological characteristics and distribution of global primary hydrocarbon accumulations of Precambrian-Lower Cambrian[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(6): 958-966. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202106958
[10]	杨莎莎, 黄旭日, 贾继生, 等. 黄陵地区延长组长6段深水砂岩储层特征分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 44(1): 53-65. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY202201004.htm YANG Shasha, HUANG Xuri, JIA Jisheng, et al. An analysis on the characteristics of deepwater sandstone reservior of Chang 6 member, Yanchang Formation in Huangling Area[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2022, 44(1): 53-65. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY202201004.htm
[11]	王耀华, 甘军, 梁刚, 等. 断裂—砂体—潜山复式天然气输导体系及成藏模式: 以琼东南盆地深水区为例[J]. 断块油气田, 2022, 29(3): 319-324. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202203006.htm WANG Yaohua, GAN Jun, LIANG Gang, et al. Composite fault-sand body-buried hill migration systems and accumulation models of natural gas: a case study of the deep-water area in Qiongdongnan Basin[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2022, 29(3): 319-324. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202203006.htm
[12]	郭彤楼. 深层页岩气勘探开发进展与攻关方向[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(1): 1-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202101001.htm GUO Tonglou. Progress and research direction of deep shale gas exploration and development[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Deve-lopment, 2021, 11(1): 1-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202101001.htm
[13]	何治亮, 马永生, 朱东亚, 等. 深层—超深层碳酸盐岩储层理论技术进展与攻关方向[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(3): 533-546. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202103002.htm HE Zhiliang, MA Yongsheng, ZHU Dongya, et al. Theoretical and technological progress and research direction of deep and ultra-deep carbonate reservoirs[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(3): 533-546. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202103002.htm
[14]	LI Gang, GAO Ping, XIAO Xianming, et al. Lower Cambrian organic-rich shales in Southern China: a review of gas-bearing property, pore structure, and their controlling factors[J]. Geofluids, 2022, 23: 9745313.
[15]	LI Gang, XIAO Xianming, GAI Haifeng, et al. Nanopore structure evolution of lower Cambrian shale in the western Hubei area, southern China, and its geological implications based on thermal simulation experimental results[J]. Natural Resources Research, 2022, 32(2): 731-754. doi: 10.1007/s11053-022-10149-1
[16]	GAUTIER D L, BIRD K J, CHARPENTIER R R, et al. Assessment of undiscovered oil and gas in the Arctic[J]. Science, 2009, 324(5931): 1175-1179.
[17]	EMBRY A. Petroleum prospectivity of the Triassic-Jurassic succession of Sverdrup Basin, Canadian Arctic Archipelago[J]. Geological Society, London, Memoirs, 2011, 35: 545-558. http://www.cspg.org/cspg/documents/Conventions/Archives/Annual/2010/0155_GC2010_Petroleum_Prospectivity_of_Triassic-Jurassic.pdf
[18]	SCHENK C J. An estimate of undiscovered conventional oil and gas resources of the world, 2012[R/OL]. http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2012/3042/.
[19]	杨静懿, 李江海, 毛翔. 北极地区盆地群油气地质特征及其资源潜力[J]. 极地研究, 2013, 25(3): 304-314. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDYZ201303012.htm YANG Jingyi, LI Jianghai, MAO Xiang. Petroleum geology characteristics and prospect of basin groups in Arctic region[J]. Chinese Journal of Polar Research, 2013, 25(3): 304-314. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDYZ201303012.htm
[20]	陈雨石, 陈振林, 李学杰. 斯维尔德鲁普盆地天然气水合物成藏条件及分布预测[J]. 地质科技情报, 2016, 35(4): 115-120. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201604018.htm CHEN Yushi, CHEN Zhenlin, LI Xuejie. Accumulation condition analysis and distribution prediction of gas hydrate in Sverdrup Basin[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2016, 35(4): 115-120. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201604018.htm
[21]	朱伟林, 王志欣, 吴培康, 等. 国外含油气盆地丛书: 环北极地区含油气盆地[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013: 213-237. ZHU Weilin, WANG Zhixin, WU Peikang, et al. The global petroli-ferous basins seriesl: circumarctic hydrocarbon basins[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2013: 213-237.
[22]	曹婧, 于璐源, 李赫然, 等. 中国参与北极天然气开发的挑战和路径[J]. 科技经济导刊, 2020, 28(26): 86-87. CAO Jing, YU Luyuan, LI Heran, et al. Challenges and paths of China's participation in Arctic natural gas development[J]. Guide to Science and Technology Economy, 2020, 28(26): 86-87.
[23]	张凯逊, 韩淑琴, 孟秋含, 等. 北极地区盆地分类与油气资源分布规律[J]. 地质力学学报, 2020, 26(6): 901-910. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLX202006010.htm ZHANG Kaixun, HAN Shuqin, MENG Qiuhan, et al. Classification of sedimentary basins and distribution patterns of oil and gas resources in the Arctic[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2020, 26(6): 901-910. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLX202006010.htm
[24]	赵喆, 梁英波, 胡菁菁, 等. 北极地区含油气潜力及勘探开发趋势分析[J]. 地学前缘, 2014, 21(3): 47-55. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201403008.htm ZHAO Zhe, LIANG Yingbo, HU Jingjing, et al. Arctic oil and natural gas potential and exploration and development trend[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2014, 21(3): 47-55. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201403008.htm
[25]	USGS (United States Geological Survey), 2012[EB/OL]. [2019-01-01]. http:www.usgs.gov.
[26]	IHS Energy, 2020. Sverdrup Basin[DB/OL]. Basin Monitor, 2020. Database available from IHS Energy Group, 15 Inverness Way East, Englewood, Colorado, 80112, USA.
[27]	高莉, 杨晓光, 刘剑平, 等. 斯沃德鲁普盆地构造演化与油气远景评价[J]. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 47(2): 242-249. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SCHO201602016.htm GAO Li, YANG Xiaoguang, LIU Jianping, et al. Tectonic evolution and hydrocarbon prospects of Sverdrup Basin[J]. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 47(2): 242-249. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SCHO201602016.htm
[28]	HARRISON J C. Tectonics and kinematics of a foreland folded belt influenced by salt, Arctic Canada[M]//JACKSON M P A, ROBERTS D G, SNELSON S, et al. Salt tectonics: a global pers-pective. [s. l. ]: American Association of Petroleum, 1995, 65: 379-412.
[29]	SCOTT R A, TURTON M A K. Mesozoic tectonic events in the North Atlantic and Arctic: stratigraphic response in an adjacent rift-flank basin(Sverdrup Basin, Arctic Canada)[J]. Polarforschung, 2001, 69(1): 73-83. http://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11771427.pdf
[30]	MORRELL G R, FORTIER M, PRICE P R, et al. Petroleum exploration in northern Canada: a guide to oil and gas exploration and potential[M]. Vancouver, Canda: Jr Public Cop, 1995: 1-110.
[31]	ZIEGLER P A. Evolution of the Arctic-North Atlantic and the western Tethys[M]. Tulsa, United States: American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 1988, 43: 1-198.
[32]	BROOKS P W, EMBRY A F, GOODARZI F, et al. Organic geoche-mistry and biological marker geochemistry of Schei Point Group (Triassic) and recovered oils from the Sverdrup Basin (Arctic Islands, Canada)[J]. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 1992, 40(3): 173-187.
[33]	KONDLA D, SANEI H, EMBRY A, et al. Depositional environment and hydrocarbon potential of the Middle Triassic strata of the Sverdrup Basin, Canada[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2015, 147-148: 71-84. http://www.onacademic.com/detail/journal_1000037991061210_478b.html
[34]	MUKHOPADHYAY P K, GOODARZI F, KRUGE M A, et al. Comparison of source rock geochemistry of selected rocks from the Schei Point group and Ringnes Formation, Sverdrup Basin, Arctic Canada[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 1997, 34(3/4): 225-260. http://www.xueshufan.com/publication/1994628121
[35]	童晓光. 论成藏组合在勘探评价中的意义[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 31(6): 1-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY200906000.htm TONG Xiaoguang. A discussion on the role of accumulation association in the explorating evaluation[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2009, 31(6): 1-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY200906000.htm
[36]	田作基, 吴义平, 王兆明, 等. 全球常规油气资源评价及潜力分析[J]. 地学前缘, 2014, 21(3): 10-17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201403003.htm TIAN Zuoji, WU Yiping, WANG Zhaoming, et al. Global conventional oil and gas resource assessment and its potential[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2014, 21(3): 10-17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201403003.htm
[37]	侯平, 田作基, 郑俊章, 等. 中亚沉积盆地常规油气资源评价[J]. 地学前缘, 2014, 21(3): 56-62. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201403010.htm HOU Ping, TIAN Zuoji, ZHENG Junzhang, et al. Evaluation of conventional hydrocarbon resources in sedimentary basins of central Asia region[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2014, 21(3): 56-62. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201403010.htm
[38]	王大鹏, 白国平, 陆红梅, 等. 扎格罗斯盆地含油气系统分析与资源潜力评价[J]. 现代地质, 2016, 30(2): 361-372. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201602011.htm WANG Dapeng, BAI Guoping, LU Hongmei, et al. Analysis of petroleum systems and resources evaluation in the Zagros Foreland Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2016, 30(2): 361-372. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201602011.htm
[39]	王炯辉, 刘葵, 徐兵, 等. USGS"2000世界油气评价"待发现油气资源预测法[J]. 中国地质矿产经济, 2002, 15(12): 27-31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDKJ200212009.htm WANG Jionghui, LIU Kui, XU Bing, et al. "USGS—the world oil-gas evaluation in the year of 2000"—forecasting methods for the discovery of oil-gas resources[J]. China Geology & Mining Economics, 2002, 15(12): 27-31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDKJ200212009.htm
[40]	余一欣, 殷进垠, 郑俊章, 等. 阿姆河盆地成藏组合划分与资源潜力评价[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(6): 750-756. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201506008.htm YU Yixin, YIN Jinyin, ZHENG Junzhang, et al. Division and resources evaluation of hydrocarbon plays in the Amu Darya Basin, central Asia[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(6): 750-756. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201506008.htm
[41]	王大鹏, 殷进垠, 田纳新, 等. 塞内加尔盆地成藏组合划分与资源潜力评价[J]. 现代地质, 2017, 31(6): 1201-1213. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201706009.htm WANG Dapeng, YIN Jinyin, TIAN Naxin, et al. Division and resource evaluation of hydrocarbon plays in the Senegal Basin, West Africa[J]. Geoscience, 2017, 31(6): 1201-1213. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201706009.htm
[42]	孙丰楠, 张凯逊, 韩淑琴, 等. 北乌斯丘尔特盆地成藏组合分析与油气资源潜力评价[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2020, 44(6): 43-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQSY202006005.htm SUN Fengnan, ZHANG Kaixun, HAN Shuqin, et al. Analysis of petroleum play and resources evaluation in the North Ustyurt Basin[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2020, 44(6): 43-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQSY202006005.htm
[43]	何斌, 白国平, 贺永红, 等. 加蓬海岸盆地油气成藏组合特征及有利目标优选[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2018, 23(3): 99-108. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201803013.htm HE Bin, BAI Guoping, HE Yonghong, et al. Characteristics and favorable target optimization of hydrocarbon plays in the Gabon Coastal Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2018, 23(3): 99-108. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201803013.htm