Development practice and challenges of deep shale gas in southern Sichuan Basin
-
摘要: 深层页岩气资源量丰富，开发潜力巨大，但工程地质条件相对略差，效益开发难度较大。为支撑深层页岩气的效益开发，以四川盆地南部地区威荣和永川气田的开发实践为例，针对深层页岩气构造复杂、断缝发育、优质储层薄、产量递减快、最终可采储量低等难点，以“布好井、打好井、管好井”为目标，在气藏精细描述、渗流实验等研究基础上，采用地球物理—地质建模—压裂模拟—数值模拟一体化方法，形成了以地质甜点评价与预测技术、复杂构造区井网优化设计技术、“四位一体”钻井跟踪保障技术和全生命周期生产精细管控技术为核心的开发关键技术体系。同时，根据开发中暴露出的问题，梳理总结了在“构造—断裂—应力场”耦合机理、小—微尺度裂缝精细刻画、开发技术政策优化等方面的难点，提出了持续攻关的方向。研究认为：①深层页岩孔隙度、含气量等地质参数与中深层基本相当，但工程参数更复杂，具有地应力高、水平应力差高和破裂压力高的特征，改造难度大；②深层页岩气已在甜点评价与预测、建模—数模一体化技术和精细生产管理等方面形成了关键配套技术，取得了较好的开发效果；③目前深层页岩气主要面临套变、压窜、最终可采储量不达标等方面的难题，需要持续深化地质精细评价、流体运移规律和建模—数模一体化等技术攻关。Abstract: There is great potential for developing deep shale gas resources, but the engineering geological conditions are relatively poorer, making it difficult for benefit development. In order to support the benefit development of deep shale gas, taking the development practices of Weirong and Yongchuan gas fields in the southern region of Sichuan Basin as an example, focusing on the difficulties of complex deep shale gas structures, developed fractures, thin high-quality reservoirs, rapid production decline, and low EUR, with the goal of "good well placement, good well drilling, and good well management", a key development technology system is formed by use of the integrated method of geophysics, geological modeling, fracturing simulation, and numerical simulation based on the research on precise gas reservoir description and seepage experiments, which is characterized by geological sweet spot evaluation and prediction technology, well network optimization design technology in complex tectonic areas, "four in one" drilling tracking guarantee technology, and full life cycle production control technology. At the same time, based on the problems exposed during development process, the difficulties and challenges in the coupling mechanism of "structure-fault-stress field", characterization of small-scale and microscale fractures, optimization of development technology strategies were summarized, and the problems that need to be continuously studied were proposed. The conclusion is that: ① The geological parameters such as porosity and gas content of deep shale are basically equivalent to those of medium-deep strata, but the engineering parameters are more complex, characterized by high in-situ stress, high horizontal stress difference, and high fracture pressure, making it difficult to transform; ② Key supporting technologies in dessert evaluation and prediction, modeling-numerical simulation integration technology, and fine production management has been formed in deep shale gas, with good development results; ③ At present, deep shale gas is mainly faced with challenges such as casing deformation, pressure channeling, and EUR non-compliance. It is necessary to further advance technical research in geological fine evaluation, fluid migration patterns, and modeling-numerical simulation integration.
-
图 1 川南下志留统龙马溪组压力系数与埋深叠合图
Figure 1. Superimposed map of pressure coefficient and burial depth of Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in southern Sichuan
图 2 川南页岩甜点评价与预测技术流程
Figure 2. Flow-process chart of shale sweet spot evaluation and prediction technology in southern Sichuan
图 3 川南永川气田井轨迹方位与无阻流量关系
Figure 3. Relationship between well trajectory orientation and absolute open flow rate in Yongchuan gas field in southern Sichuan
图 4 川南永川气田水平井段长与投资、产值和净现值关系
Figure 4. Relationship between horizontal well length and investment, output value, and NPV in Yongchuan gas field in southern Sichuan
图 5 川南永川气田气井距B级断层距离与无阻流量关系
Figure 5. Relationship between the distance from gas wells in Yongchuan gas field to B-level faults and open flow rate, southern Sichuan
图 6 川南永川气田井距与采出程度、单井EUR关系
Figure 6. Relationship between well spacing and recovery degree, single well EUR in Yongchuan gas field in southern Sichuan
图 7 川南深层页岩气地质工程“四性合一”精细地质分段
Figure 7. Fine geological segmentation of "four in one" deep shale gas geological engineering in southern Sichuan
图 8 川南威荣气田威页25-XHF井闷井排液阶段曲线
Figure 8. Shut-in well drainage stage curves of well Weiye 25-XHF in Weirong gas field, southern Sichuan
图 9 川南威荣、永川深层页岩气定产降压阶段生产管控模式
Figure 9. Production control mode of Weirong and Yongchuan deep shale gas during rate-control stages in southern Sichuan
表 1 川南威荣、永川深层页岩气与涪陵中深层页岩气地质工程参数对比
Table 1. Comparison of geological engineering parameters between Weirong, Yongchuan deep shale gas reservoirs and Fuling medium-deep shale gas reservoir, southern Sichuan
地质工程参数 中深层 深层 对比情况 涪陵气田 威荣气田 永川气田 埋深/m 2 400~3 500 3 550~3 880 3 800~4 200 深500~1 500 TOC大于3%页岩厚度/m 30.5 17.5 20.5 薄10~13 孔隙度/% 5~7 4.6~6.5 5~6 相当 含气量/(m3/t) 6~10 5~8 5~9 相当 沉积微相 硅质深水陆棚 内灰质深水陆棚 外灰质深水陆棚 相带略差 硅质含量/% 55 38 42 低13~17 钙质含量/% 10 22 13 高3~12 黏土含量/% 35 40 45 高5~10 地压系数 1.35~1.55 1.9~2.0 1.6~2.1 高0.3~0.6 杨氏模量/GPa 38.4 21.6 26.8 低10~15 泊松比 0.19 0.23 0.25 高0.04~0.06 力学脆性指数 0.62 0.43 0.46 低0.16~0.20 最小水平应力/MPa 48.3~58.4 86~98 90~100 高30~40 水平应力差/MPa 7.5~8.2 10~16 10~20 高3~12 破裂压力/MPa 55~70 95~113 91.4~114 高30~40 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 川南威荣、永川深层页岩气与涪陵中深层页岩气主要生产动态指标对比
Table 2. Comparison of main production performance indicators of Weirong and Yongchuan deep shale gas reservoirs and Fuling medium-deep shale gas reservoir, southern Sichuan
不同阶段生产动态指标 威荣气田 永川气田 涪陵气田 排液阶段 初期井口压力/MPa 47.3 52.8 26.5 最高日排液量/m3 650 420 35 阶段返排率/% 39 17 4.3 定产降压 初期产量/(104 m3/d) 7.5 5.5 8 稳产期/d 120 260 680 单位压降产气量/(104 m3/MPa) 58.6 51.8 272.4 稳产期累产气量/(104 m3) 1 983 1 942 6 785 定压降产 首年递减率/% 64 58 45.2 返排率/% 85~90 55~60 10~15
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 川南威荣、永川深层页岩气排液阶段“五段式”闷排制度
Table 3. "Five stage" shut-in drainage system for Weirong and Yongchuan deep shale gas during drainage stage, southern Sichuan
序号 阶段 时间/d 目的 制度/mm 1 闷井 5~9 达到渗吸平衡 2 纯排液 9~15 降低应力敏感性、防支撑剂回流 2~5 3 见气初期 10~20 降低应力敏感、防裂缝快闭合 5~7 4 气相突破 12~18 降低地层能量损失 7~9 5 稳定测试 5~7 获取稳定测试产量及压力 6~8
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 川南威荣、永川深层页岩气定产降压阶段生产管控标准
Table 4. Rate control standards for Weirong and Yongchuan deep shale gas fields in southern Sichuan
压力区间/MPa 生产制度/(104 m3/d) 压降速度/(MPa/d) 稳产期/d 单位压降产气量/(104 m3/MPa) 35~45 6~8 ≤0.12 80 ≥45 25~35 5~7 ≤0.1 100 ≥50 20~25 4~6 ≤0.08 60 ≥60 10~20 4~6 ≤0.05 200 ≥80 3.5~10 3~5 ≤0.03 220 ≥100 注：当井口压力下降至20 MPa时，开展下油管作业，以提升气井的携液生产能力。
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 邹才能, 赵群, 丛连铸, 等. 中国页岩气开发进展、潜力及前景[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(1): 1-14. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202101002.htmZOU Caineng, ZHAO Qun, CONG Lianzhu, et al. Development progress, potential and prospect of shale gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 41(1): 1-14. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202101002.htm [2] 赵群, 杨慎, 王红岩, 等. 中国页岩气开发现状及前景预判[J]. 环境影响评价, 2019, 41(1): 6-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXHS201901002.htmZHAO Qun, YANG Shen, WANG Hongyan, et al. China's shale gas development and its prospects[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment, 2019, 41(1): 6-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXHS201901002.htm [3] 何骁, 李武广, 党录瑞, 等. 深层页岩气开发关键技术难点与攻关方向[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(1): 118-124. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202101017.htmHE Xiao, LI Wuguang, DANG Lurui, et al. Key technological challenges and research directions of deep shale gas development[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(1): 118-124. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202101017.htm [4] 郭彤楼. 深层页岩气勘探开发进展与攻关方向[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(1): 1-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202101001.htmGUO Tonglou. Progress and research direction of deep shale gas exploration and development[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(1): 1-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202101001.htm [5] 马新华. 天然气与能源革命: 以川渝地区为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2017, 37(1): 1-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201701002.htmMA Xinhua. Natural gas and energy revolution: a case study of Sichuan-Chongqing gas province[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2017, 37(1): 1-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201701002.htm [6] 董大忠, 邹才能, 戴金星, 等. 中国页岩气发展战略对策建议[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(3): 397-406. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201603002.htmDONG Dazhong, ZOU Caineng, DAI Jinxing, et al. Suggestions on the development strategy of shale gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(3): 397-406. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201603002.htm [7] 徐凤生, 王富平, 张锦涛, 等. 我国深层页岩气规模效益开发策略[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(1): 205-213. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202101029.htmXU Fengsheng, WANG Fuping, ZHANG Jintao, et al. Strategies for scale benefit development of deep shale gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(1): 205-213. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202101029.htm [8] 张金川, 陶佳, 李振, 等. 中国深层页岩气资源前景和勘探潜力[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(1): 15-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202101003.htmZHANG Jinchuan, TAO Jia, LI Zhen, et al. Prospect of deep shale gas resources in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(1): 15-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202101003.htm [9] 谭聪. 涪陵焦石坝区块页岩气井弹性产率变化规律研究[J]. 新疆石油天然气, 2017, 13(3): 65-70. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSY201703016.htmTAN Cong. A study on changing laws of unit pressure drop for gas production of shale gas wells in the Fuling Jiaoshiba block[J]. Xinjiang Oil & Gas, 2017, 13(3): 65-70. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSY201703016.htm [10] 沈金才, 刘尧文. 涪陵焦石坝区块页岩气井产量递减典型曲线应用研究[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2016, 44(4): 88-95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYZT201604018.htmSHEN Jincai, LIU Yaowen. Application study on typical production decline curves of shale gas wells in the Fuling Jiaoshiba block[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2016, 44(4): 88-95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYZT201604018.htm [11] 孙龙德, 赵文智, 刘合, 等. 页岩油"甜点"概念及其应用讨论[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1): 1-13. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202301001.htmSUN Longde, ZHAO Wenzhi, LIU He, et al. Concept and application of "sweet spot" in shale oil[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(1): 1-13. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202301001.htm [12] 姚东华, 周立宏, 王文革, 等. 页岩油综合甜点测井评价: 以沧东凹陷孔店组二段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(7): 912-924. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202207003.htmYAO Donghua, ZHOU Lihong, WANG Wenge, et al. Logging evaluation of composite sweet spots for shale oil: a case study of member 2 of Kongdian Formation in Cangdong Sag[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(7): 912-924. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202207003.htm [13] 刘钰洋, 刘诗琦, 潘懋, 等. 基于三维角点网格模型的现今地应力有限元模拟[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 55(4): 643-653. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJDZ201904007.htmLIU Yuyang, LIU Shiqi, PAN Mao, et al. Research of crustal stress simulation using finite element analysis based on corner point grid[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2019, 55(4): 643-653. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJDZ201904007.htm [14] 李志鹏, 刘显太, 杨勇, 等. 渤南油田低渗透储集层岩性对地应力场的影响[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(4): 693-702. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201904008.htmLI Zhipeng, LIU Xiantai, YANG Yong, et al. Influences of lithology on in-situ stress field in low permeability reservoirs in Bonan Oilfield, Bohai Bay Basin, China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(4): 693-702. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201904008.htm [15] 王妍妍, 王卫红, 胡小虎, 等. 基于压裂效果评价的页岩气井井距优化研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 40(5): 131-139. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY201805013.htmWANG Yanyan, WANG Weihong, HU Xiaohu, et al. Study on the optimization of shale gas well spacing based on assessment of the fracturing performance[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2018, 40(5): 131-139. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY201805013.htm [16] 位云生, 王军磊, 齐亚东, 等. 页岩气井网井距优化[J]. 天然气工业, 2018, 38(4): 129-137. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201804022.htmWEI Yunsheng, WANG Junlei, QI Yadong, et al. Optimization of shale gas well pattern and spacing[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(4): 129-137. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201804022.htm [17] 刘清友, 朱海燕, 陈鹏举. 地质工程一体化钻井技术研究进展及攻关方向: 以四川盆地深层页岩气储层为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(1): 178-188. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202101026.htmLIU Qingyou, ZHU Haiyan, CHEN Pengju. Research progress and direction of geology-engineering integrated drilling technology: a case study on the deep shale gas reservoirs in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(1): 178-188. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202101026.htm [18] 曹学军, 王明贵, 康杰, 等. 四川盆地威荣区块深层页岩气水平井压裂改造工艺[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(7): 81-87. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201907015.htmCAO Xuejun, WANG Minggui, KANG Jie, et al. Fracturing technologies of deep shale gas horizontal wells in the Weirong block, southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(7): 81-87. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201907015.htm [19] 伍贤柱. 四川盆地威远页岩气藏高效开发关键技术[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2019, 47(4): 1-9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYZT201904001.htmWU Xianzhu. Key technologies in the efficient development of the Weiyuan shale gas reservoir, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2019, 47(4): 1-9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYZT201904001.htm [20] 郭艳东, 王卫红, 刘华, 等. 页岩气多段压裂水平井产能影响因素研究[J]. 科技通报, 2018, 34(4): 72-78. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJTB201804015.htmGUO Yandong, WANG Weihong, LIU Hua, et al. Research on the production influencing factors of shale gas multi-stage fractured horizontal well[J]. Bulletin of Science and Technology, 2018, 34(4): 72-78. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJTB201804015.htm [21] 朱维耀, 马东旭. 页岩储层有效应力特征及其对产能的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 845-852. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201806011.htmZHU Weiyao, MA Dongxu. Effective stress characteristics in shale and its effect on productivity[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2018, 29(6): 845-852. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201806011.htm [22] 王辉, 周朝, 周忠亚, 等. 页岩气井排水采气工艺综合优选方法[J]. 钻采工艺, 2022, 45(2): 154-159. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZCGY202202028.htmWANG Hui, ZHOU Chao, ZHOU Zhongya, et al. Comprehensive optimal selection method of drainage gas recovery technology for shale gas horizontal wells[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2022, 45(2): 154-159. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZCGY202202028.htm [23] 蒋泽银, 李伟, 罗鑫, 等. 页岩气平台井泡沫排水采气技术[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40(4): 85-90. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202004016.htmJIANG Zeyin, LI Wei, LUO Xin, et al. Foam drainage gas recovery technology for shale-gas platform wells[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(4): 85-90. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202004016.htm [24] 蒋一欣, 刘成, 高浩宏, 等. 昭通国家级页岩气示范区泡沫排水采气工艺技术及其应用[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(S1): 164-170. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG2021S1025.htmJIANG Yixin, LIU Cheng, GAO Haohong, et al. Foam drainage gas recovery technology and its application in the shale gas wells of Zhaotong National Shale Gas Demonstration Area[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(S1): 164-170. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG2021S1025.htm [25] 方志刚, 王振松, 马斌, 等. 页岩气全生命周期气举排水采气技术研究与应用[J]. 石油科技论坛, 2022, 41(2): 45-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYKT202202006.htmFANG Zhigang, WANG Zhensong, MA Bin, et al. Research and application of life-cycle gas-lift drainage and production techno-logy for shale gas[J]. Petroleum Science and Technology Forum, 2022, 41(2): 45-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYKT202202006.htm [26] 梁兴, 王高成, 张介辉, 等. 昭通国家级示范区页岩气一体化高效开发模式及实践启示[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2017, 22(1): 29-37. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201701005.htmLIANG Xing, WANG Gaocheng, ZHANG Jiehui, et al. High-efficiency integrated shale gas development model of Zhaotong National Demonstration Zone and its practical enlightenment[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2017, 22(1): 29-37. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201701005.htm [27] 吴奇, 梁兴, 鲜成钢, 等. 地质一工程一体化高效开发中国南方海相页岩气[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2015, 20(4): 1-23. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201504001.htmWU Qi, LIANG Xing, XIAN Chenggang, et al. Geoscience-to-production integration ensures effective and efficient South China marine shale gas development[J]. China petroleum exploration, 2015, 20(4): 1-23. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201504001.htm [28] 刘乃震, 王国勇, 熊小林. 地质工程一体化技术在威远页岩气高效开发中的实践与展望[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2018, 23(2): 59-68. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201802008.htmLIU Naizhen, WANG Guoyong, XIONG Xiaolin. Practice and prospect of geology-engineering integration technology in the efficient development of shale gas in Weiyuan block[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2018, 23(2): 59-68. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201802008.htm [29] 谢军, 张浩淼, 佘朝毅, 等. 地质工程一体化在长宁国家级页岩气示范区中的实践[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2017, 22(1): 21-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201701004.htmXIE Jun, ZHANG Haomiao, SHE Chaoyi, et al. Practice of geology-engineering integration in Changning State Shale Gas Demonstration Area[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2017, 22(1): 21-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201701004.htm [30] 章敬. 非常规油藏地质工程一体化效益开发实践: 以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组页岩油为例[J]. 断块油气田, 2021, 28(2): 151-155. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202102003.htmZHANG Jing. Effective development practices of geology-enginee-ring integration on unconventional oil reservoirs: taking Lucaogou Formation shale oil in Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin for example[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2021, 28(2): 151-155. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202102003.htm -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 221
- HTML全文浏览量: 104
- PDF下载量: 60
- 被引次数: 0
苏公网安备32021102000780号