苏北盆地溱潼凹陷沙垛1井侵入岩岩石学特征及其储集性与含油性研究

夏祥; 马晓东; 胡文瑄; 臧素华

doi:10.11781/sysydz202401087

苏北盆地溱潼凹陷沙垛1井侵入岩岩石学特征及其储集性与含油性研究

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202401087

1.
南京大学地球科学与工程学院, 南京 210008
2.
中国石化华东油气分公司, 南京 210019

基金项目:

中国石化华东油气分公司横向项目“溱潼凹陷辉绿岩形成期次与储集性研究” 34600000-21-ZC0699-0003

详细信息

作者简介:
夏祥(1997-), 男, 硕士生, 从事石油地质研究。E-mail: xiaxiang@smail.nju.edu.cn

中图分类号: TE122.2
计量
- 文章访问数: 124
- HTML全文浏览量: 42
- PDF下载量: 40
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-04-07
- 修回日期: 2023-12-06
- 刊出日期: 2024-01-28

Petrological characteristics, reservoir property and oil-bearing potential of intrusive rocks in well Shaduo 1, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

1.
School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210008, China
2.
SINOPEC East China Oil & Gas Company, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210019, China

摘要

摘要: 火成岩油气藏逐渐成为重要的油气藏类型，但火成岩储层非均质性很强，储集性能变化很大，储层成因机制研究非常薄弱，成为制约火成岩储层评价的主要瓶颈。以苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜宁组二段侵入岩为研究对象，通过系统的岩心观察、薄片鉴定、电子探针分析测试和测井解释等，剖析了溱潼凹陷沙垛1井阜二段侵入岩岩性、岩相特征、储层特征和储层发育主控因素。结果表明：该区侵入岩的岩性纵向变化显著，由多期侵入岩叠加组成，顶部为辉绿岩，中部为辉石二长岩，下部为橄榄辉长岩；孔隙发育程度不均一，辉绿岩和辉石二长岩孔隙发育程度低，而橄榄辉长岩孔隙发育程度较高；由于多期侵入作用的叠加以及热液蚀变的改造，发育了较好的储集空间。孔隙类型主要为溶蚀孔和构造裂缝，还发育收缩裂缝。影响储层物性的主要因素是岩性和热液流体活动，其中橄榄辉长岩中辉石等暗色矿物最易蚀变，溶蚀孔发育程度高；此外，区域性的断裂构造在许多致密的火成岩中产生了大量的构造裂缝，有效沟通了侵入岩储层的孔缝系统，且为后期的溶蚀作用提供了岩浆热液流动的通道。沙垛1井钻遇的侵入岩总体上含油性差，下部侵入岩层中可见零星荧光显示，上部侵入岩层中基本不含油。
- 侵入岩储层特征 /
- 含油性 /
- 阜宁组二段 /
- 溱潼凹陷 /
- 苏北盆地
Abstract: Igneous rock oil and gas reservoir has gradually become an important type of oil and gas reservoir, but the igneous rock reservoir is highly heterogeneous, the reservoir property varies greatly, and the study of reservoir genetic mechanism is unsubstantial, which has become the main bottleneck of igneous rock reservoir evaluation. Taking the intrusive rocks in the second member of Paleogene Funing Formation in the Qintong Sag, Subei Basin as the research object, through systematic core observation, thin section identification, electron probe analysis and testing and logging interpretation, the lithologic and lithofacies characteristics, reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of reservoir development of the intrusive rocks in the second member of Funing Formation in well Shaduo 1 in the Qintong Sag were analyzed. The results show that the lithology of the intrusive rocks varies remarkably longitudinally, and the intrusive rock body is composed of multiphase intrusive rock, with diabase on the top, pyroxene monzonite in the middle and olivine gabbro at the bottom. The development of porosity varies, with diabase and pyroxene monzonite exhibiting low porosity, while olivine gabbro showing relatively higher porosity. Due to the superimposition of multiple intrusions and hydrothermal alteration, good reservoir spaces are formed, with predominant pore types being dissolution pores and structural fractures, accompanied by the development of shrinkage fractures. The main factors affecting the reservoir physical properties are lithology and hydrothermal fluid activity. Among them, dark minerals such as pyroxene in olivine gabbro are most easily altered, so dissolution pores are highly developed. Additionally, regional fault structures generate numerous structural fractures in many dense igneous rocks, effectively connecting the pore-fracture system of intrusive rock reservoir and providing channels through which magmatic hydrothermal fluids flow in the subsequent dissolution processes. Generally, the overall oil-bearing potential of the intrusive rocks encountered in well Shaduo 1 is poor. Sporadic fluorescence is observed in the lower intrusive rock layers, while the upper intrusive rock layers are essentially devoid of oil.
- intrusive rock reservoir /
- oil-bearing potential /
- second member of Funing Formation /
- Qintong Sag /
- Subei Basin
注释:

1) 利益冲突声明/Conflict of Interests

1) 所有作者声明不存在利益冲突。

2) 夏祥和胡文瑄完成论文的构思；夏祥、马晓东、胡文瑄、臧素华参与论文写作修改。所有作者阅读并同意最终稿件的提交。

2) 作者贡献/Authors’Contributions

HTML全文

图 1 苏北盆地和研究区地质构造

a.苏北盆地构造单元；b.溱潼凹陷阜宁组二段构造单元。据参考文献[35]修改。

Figure 1. Geological sketch map of Subei Basin and the research area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷沙垛1井侵入岩发育情况及采样位置

Figure 2. Development and sampling location of intrusive rocks in well Shaduo 1, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷沙垛1井侵入岩不同岩石类型的岩相学特征

a.辉石二长岩岩心，新鲜呈块状构造，稍蚀变；b.橄榄辉长岩岩心，岩石晶体颗粒变大，非常破碎，蚀变程度较大；c.辉绿岩，辉绿结构，斜长石杂乱排列，斜长石格架中充填辉石，3 548.5 m，正交偏光；d.辉石二长岩，长石含量占主导，长柱状斜长石和短柱状正长石均有分布，并含有辉石，3 551.3 m，正交偏光；e.橄榄辉长岩，辉石与斜长石为主，含有较多橄榄石，裂理发育，3 589.5 m，正交偏光；f.橄榄辉长岩，收缩裂缝边缘多发生绿泥石化，3 587.8 m，单偏光。

Figure 3. Petrographic characteristics of different types of intrusive rocks in well Shaduo 1, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷沙垛1井侵入岩中长石An-Ab-Or图解和辉石Wo-En-Fs图解

Figure 4. Diagrams of An-Ab-Or of feldspar and Wo-En-Fs of pyroxene in intrusive rocks in well Shaduo 1, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷沙垛1井侵入岩主量元素变化

Figure 5. Variation of major elements of intrusive rocks in well Shaduo 1, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷沙垛1井侵入岩储集空间

a.收缩微缝，呈“树根状”不规则分布，蓝色铸体薄片，单偏光，3 590.3 m；b.收缩微缝，裂缝边缘发生溶蚀，有次生绿泥石形成，蓝色铸体薄片，单偏光，3 592 m；c.溶蚀孔隙，辉石发生溶蚀形成次生孔隙，蓝色铸体薄片，单偏光，3 598 m；d.溶蚀孔洞，辉石矿物绿泥石化(片状矿物)，扫描电镜。

Figure 6. Reservoir space of intrusive rocks in well Shaduo 1, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷沙垛1井孔隙度分布

Figure 7. Porosity distribution of intrusive rocks in well Shaduo 1, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷沙垛1井侵入岩部分测井曲线

Figure 8. Logging curves of intrusive rocks in well Shaduo 1, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷沙垛1井侵入岩不同部位荧光显微照片

a.3 943 m，不含油；b.3 592 m，荧光沿孔喉呈条状分布；c.3 595.8 m，微弱荧光沿孔喉呈条状分布；d.3 598 m，荧光呈团簇状分布。

Figure 9. Fluorescence micrographs of intrusive rocks from well Shaduo 1, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷沙垛1井长石矿物电子探针值

Table 1. Electron probe values of feldspar minerals in well Shaduo 1, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin %

样品	TiO₂	Na₂O	FeO	K₂O	MgO	MnO	CaO	Al₂O₃	SiO₂	合计
SD-6	0.10	4.00	0.90	0.30	1.90	0.10	10.60	27.10	49.43	94.30
	0.09	4.54	0.71	0.20	0.11	0.01	12.73	29.58	52.44	100.40
	0.08	3.74	0.56	0.12	0.14	0.01	14.21	30.98	50.82	100.66
SD-8	0.10	5.55	0.73	0.31	0.13	0.01	10.39	28.33	55.07	100.61
SD-8	0.06	4.80	1.09	0.25	0.15	0.01	11.89	30.07	53.89	102.20
SD-10	0.00	8.42	0.60	0.60	0.07	0.02	5.20	24.80	62.54	102.24
	0.04	8.05	0.28	0.55	0.01		6.28	25.53	61.50	102.24
	0.03	7.84	0.33	0.64	0.03		6.56	25.17	58.94	99.52
SD-12	0.05	4.06	1.05	0.16	0.03	0.01	13.50	31.41	52.00	102.27
SD-12	0.08	5.95	0.70	0.28	0.11		9.72	27.90	55.90	100.63

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷沙垛1井辉石矿物电子探针值

Table 2. Electron probe values of pyroxene minerals in well Shaduo 1, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin %

样品	TiO₂	Na₂O	FeO	K₂O	MgO	MnO	CaO	Al₂O₃	SiO₂	合计
SD-6	1.13	0.35	11.20	0.01	8.77	3.25	22.13	2.57	48.86	98.25
	2.30	0.41	13.09	0.01	11.38	0.27	20.81	4.72	46.67	99.65
	1.30	0.36	12.41	0.01	12.13	0.27	21.52	3.01	49.81	100.81
	0.20	0.03	37.81	0.01	10.68	0.85	3.00	0.21	49.57	102.37
	2.06	0.46	12.70	0.01	11.77	0.26	20.36	4.02	46.71	98.34
	2.00	0.44	12.87	0.01	11.87	0.27	20.61	4.13	48.44	100.63
	0.08	0.03	39.30	0.03	10.05	0.74	1.92	0.09	49.60	101.84
	0.11	0.03	37.39	0.00	10.14	0.94	2.57	0.10	49.61	100.89
	0.61	0.33	15.19	0.01	11.68	0.35	20.86	1.80	52.13	102.96
SD-8	1.29	0.36	13.00	0.00	12.87	0.31	19.18	2.54	47.80	97.36
	36.87	0.23	38.41	0.31	3.86	3.29	0.27	2.95	10.41	96.60
	0.07	0.05	38.02	0.02	10.23	0.85	2.79	0.28	48.71	101.02
SD-10	0.46	0.35	16.93		10.90	0.54	20.59	0.80	51.09	101.64
SD-10	0.02	0.44	25.99	0.39	9.21	0.31	3.54	7.14	41.36	88.42
SD-12	0.92	0.36	7.07	0.00	15.73	0.15	21.21	2.98	50.82	99.24
	0.06	5.24	6.37	0.15	4.20	0.16	6.75	27.08	49.93	99.94
	0.66	0.32	6.92	0.02	15.88	0.15	20.75	3.28	50.52	98.49
	0.03	0.07	24.88		36.95	0.33	0.13	0.02	37.69	100.09
		0.05	24.93	0.03	35.03	0.35	0.27	0.04	39.63	100.32
SD-19	0.03	0.03	27.06	0.03	37.26	0.40	0.24	0.02	38.39	103.45
SD-19		8.86	3.59	0.15	3.41	0.08	0.87	20.86	66.90	104.70

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(38)

[1]	SCHUTTER S R. Occurrences of hydrocarbons in and around igneous rocks[J]. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2003, 214(1): 35-68. doi: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2003.214.01.03
[2]	黄赟, 陈清华. 苏北盆地火成岩分布及其与走滑构造的关系[C]//2016中国地球科学联合学术年会论文集(十五)——专题32: 电磁地球物理学研究应用及其新进展、专题33: 盆地动力学与能源. 北京: 中国和平音像电子出版社, 2016: 68-71. HUANG Yun, CHEN Qinghua. The distribution of igneous rocks in the Northern Jiangsu Basin and their relationship with strike slip structures[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 China Geoscience Joint Academic Annual Meeting (Tenth Five Year) -Topic 32: Research and application of electromagnetic geophysics and its new progress, Topic 33: Basin dynamics and energy. Beijing: China Heping Audio Video Electronic Publishing House, 2016: 68-71.
[3]	张啸, 陈国军, 李俊飞, 等. 准噶尔盆地石西凸起风化型火山岩储层相态发育模式[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(3): 47-55. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2023.03.006 ZHANG Xiao, CHEN Guojun, LI Junfei, et al. Phase development pattern of weathered volcanic reservoirs in Shixi high, Junggar Basin[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2023, 30(3): 47-55. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2023.03.006
[4]	马奎前, 李超, 原建伟, 等. 火山岩对砂岩储层物性影响的定量表征及应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 91-97. MA Kuiqian, LI Chao, YUAN Jianwei, et al. Quantitative characte-rization of the influence of volcanic rocks on the physical properties of sandstone reservoirs and its application[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2023, 30(5): 91-97.
[5]	张莹, 曲丽丽, 朱露, 等. SVM算法在渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷火山岩储层流体预测中的应用[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(2): 181-189. ZHANG Ying, QU Lili, ZHU Lu, et al. Application of SVM algorithm in fluid prediction of volcanic reservoirs in Nanpu Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Deve-lopment, 2023, 13(2): 181-189.
[6]	郭克园, 蔡国刚, 罗海炳, 等. 辽河盆地欧利坨子地区火山岩储层特征及成藏条件[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2002, 13(3/4): 60-66. GUO Keyuan, CAI Guogang, LUO Haibing, et al. Characteristics and reservoir forming conditions of volcanic reservoir in Oulituozi area of Liaohe Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2002, 13(3/4): 60-66.
[7]	王金友, 张世奇, 赵俊青, 等. 渤海湾盆地惠民凹陷临商地区火山岩储层特征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2003, 25(3): 264-268. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2003.03.008 WANG Jinyou, ZHANG Shiqi, ZHAO Junqing, et al. Characteristics of volcanic rock reservoirs in the Linshang area of the Huimin Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2003, 25(3): 264-268. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2003.03.008
[8]	叶涛, 韦阿娟, 彭靖淞, 等. 渤海海域白垩系义县组火山岩岩相特征及成储差异[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2018, 47(5): 1081-1091. YE Tao, WEI Ajuan, PENG Jingsong, et al. Characteristics and reservoir-forming differences of volcanic lithofacies in Yixian Formation of Cretaceous in Bohai Bay area[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2018, 47(5): 1081-1091.
[9]	杨庆宁. 辽河东部凹陷南部沙三段火山岩储层特征[J]. 中国石油和化工标准与质量, 2018, 38(24): 121. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4076.2018.24.057 YANG Qingning. Characteristics of volcanic rock reservoirs in the southern Shasan Formation of the Liaohe Eastern Depression[J]. China Petroleum and Chemical Standard and Quality, 2018, 38(24): 121. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4076.2018.24.057
[10]	李军, 邵龙义, 时林春, 等. 辽河坳陷东部凹陷辉绿岩油气藏储集特征[J]. 地质科技情报, 2013, 32(1): 119-124. LI Jun, SHAO Longyi, SHI Linchun, et al. Features of diabase reservoirs in the eastern sag of Liaohe Depression[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2013, 32(1): 119-124.
[11]	朱毅秀, 金之钧, 林畅松, 等. 塔里木盆地塔中地区早二叠世岩浆岩及油气成藏关系[J]. 石油实验地质, 2005, 27(1): 50-54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2005.01.009 ZHU Yixiu, JIN Zhijun, LIN Changsong, etal. Relations between the Early Permian magmatic rocks and hydrocarbon accumulation in the central Tarim[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2005, 27(1): 50-54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2005.01.009
[12]	魏翔宇, 高有峰, 魏琴, 等. 蚀变对中基性火山岩储层的控制作用: 以松辽盆地徐家围子断陷下白垩统营城组为例[J]. 世界地质, 2017, 36(2): 541-551. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5589.2017.02.020 WEI Xiangyu, GAO Youfeng, WEI Qin, et al. Controlling of alteration on intermediate and basic volcanic reservoirs: a case study of Lower Cretaceous Yingcheng Formation of Xujiaweizi Fault Depression, Songliao Basin[J]. Global Geology, 2017, 36(2): 541-551. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5589.2017.02.020
[13]	熊伟, 王越, 熊峥嵘, 等. 准噶尔盆地石北凹陷岛弧环境下火山—沉积建造特征及源储发育模: 以石炭系姜巴斯套组为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2023, 45(4): 656-666. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202304656 XIONG Wei, WANG Yue, XIONG Zhengrong, et al. Characteristics of volcanic-sedimentary formations and developmental patterns of source and reservoir rocks in an island arc environment of Shibei Sag, Junggar Basin: taking the Carboniferous Jiangbasitao Formation as an example[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2023, 45(4): 656-666. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202304656
[14]	李宗浩, 侯磊, 李卉, 等. 准噶尔盆地石西凸起晚石炭世火山岩储层发育影响因素[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2023, 30(4): 33-45. LI Zonghao, HOU Lei, LI Hui, et al. Influencing factors of Late Carboniferous volcanic reservoir development in Shixi Uplift, Junggar Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2023, 30(4): 33-45.
[15]	杨虎, 薛晓军, 陈向辉, 等. 克拉美丽气田火成岩天然裂缝漏失压力模型[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2023, 44(1): 93-99. YANG Hu, XUE Xiaojun, CHEN Xianghui, et al. Leakage pressure model of natural fractures in igneous rocks in Kelameili gas field[J]. Xinjiang Petroloeum Geology, 2023, 44(1): 93-99.
[16]	陈俊, 王剑, 雷海艳, 等. 火成岩风化壳储集层特征与油气产能关系研究: 以准噶尔盆地红山嘴石炭系油藏为例[J]. 现代地质, 2022, 36(4): 1009-1021. CHEN Jun, WANG Jian, LEI Haiyan, et al. Characteristics of igneous weathering crust reservoir and its relation with oil and gas productivity: a case study of the Carboniferous Hongshanzui reservoir, Junggar Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(4): 1009-1021.
[17]	孔垂显, 邱子刚, 秦军, 等. 准噶尔盆地西北缘石炭系火山岩储层特征研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2017, 24(6): 28-32. KONG Chuixian, QIU Zigang, QIN Jun, et al. Study on the characteristics of Carboniferous volcanic reservoir along the northwestern margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2017, 24(6): 28-32.
[18]	王小军, 赵飞, 张琴, 等. 准噶尔盆地金龙油田佳木河组火山岩储层孔隙类型及特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(1): 144-151. WANG Xiaojun, ZHAO Fei, ZHANG Qin, et al. Pore types and characteristics of volcanic reservoirs of the Jiamuhe Formation in Jinlong Oilfield, Junggar Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38(1): 144-151.
[19]	付茜. 中国火成岩油气勘探开发现状及展望[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2017, 39(1): 25-32. FU Qian. Status and prospect of igneous oil and gas exploration and development in China[J]. Oil Drilling Production Technology, 2017, 39(1): 25-32.
[20]	邹才能, 赵文智, 贾承造, 等. 中国沉积盆地火山岩油气藏形成与分布[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2008, 35(3): 257-271. ZOU Caineng, ZHAO Wenzhi, JIA Chengzao, et al. Formation and distribution of volcanic hydrocarbon reservoirs in sedimentary basins of China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2008, 35(3): 257-271.
[21]	刘嘉麒, 孟凡超. 火山作用与油气成藏[J]. 天然气工业, 2009, 29(8): 1-4. LIU Jiaqi, MENG Fanchao. Hydrocarbon generation, migration and accumulation related to igneous activity[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2009, 29(8): 1-4.
[22]	刘凯, 邹正银, 王志章, 等. 基于机器学习的火山岩岩性智能识别及预测[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(1): 38-45. LIU Kai, ZOU Zhengyin, WANG Zhizhang, et al. Intelligent identification and prediction of lithology of volcanic reservoirs based on machine learning[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2022, 29(1): 38-45.
[23]	WU Changzhi, GU Lianxing, ZHANG Zunzhong. Formation mechanisms of hydrocarbon reservoirs associated with volcanic and subvolcanic intrusive rocks: examples in Mesozoic-Cenozoic basins of Eastern China[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2006, 90(1): 137-147.
[24]	刘君兰, 张金川, 王胜, 等. 辉绿岩床侵入对围岩有机质热演化影响的模拟研究: 以赵家山下马岭组剖面为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(1): 255-264. LIU Junlan, ZHANG Jinchuan, WANG Sheng, et al. Numerical simulation of influence of diabase bed intrusion on thermal evolution of organic rich host rock: a case study of Zhaojiashan Xiamaling Formation[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(1): 255-264.
[25]	陈庆春, 朱东亚, 胡文瑄, 等. 试论火山岩储层的类型及其成因特征[J]. 地质论评, 2003, 49(3): 286-291. CHEN Qingchun, ZHU Dongya, HU Wenxuan, et al. Classification and characteristics of oil and gas reservoir beds of volcanic rocks[J]. Geological Review, 2003, 49(3): 286-291.
[26]	李鸿儒, 牛佳文, 韩明刚, 等. 高邮凹陷北斜坡辉绿岩及其接触带储层发育特征与有利油气藏条件[J]. 地质科技情报, 2019, 38(2): 117-129. LI Hongru, NIU Jiawen, HAN Minggang, et al. Reservoir characteristics and hydrocarbon entrapment of diabase and its contact metamorphic rocks in northern slope of Gaoyou Sag[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2019, 38(2): 117-129.
[27]	LIU Chao, XIE Qingbin, WANG Guiwen, et al. Reservoir properties and controlling factors of contact metamorphic zones of the diabase in the northern slope of the Gaoyou Sag, Subei Basin, Eastern China[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2016, 35: 392-411.
[28]	李坚. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷帅垛地区火山机构分析[D]. 荆州: 长江大学, 2019. LI Jian. Analysis of volcanic mechanism in Shuaiduo area of Qintong Depression, Subei Basin[D]. Jingzhou: Yangtze University, 2019.
[29]	邱海峻, 许志琴, 乔德武. 苏北盆地构造演化研究进展[J]. 地质通报, 2006, 25(9/10): 1117-1120. QIU Haijun, XU Zhiqin, QIAO Dewu. Progress in the study of the tectonic evolution of the Subei Basin, Jiangsu, China[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2006, 25(9/10): 1117-1120.
[30]	王玺, 陈清华, 朱文斌, 等. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷边界断裂带构造特征及成因[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2013, 37(1): 20-28. WANG Xi, CHEN Qinghua, ZHU Wenbin, et al. Structural characteristics and origin of boundary fault belts of the Gaoyou Sag in the Subei Basin[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2013, 37(1): 20-28.
[31]	邱旭明, 陈伟, 李鹤永, 等. 苏北盆地走滑构造与复杂断块油气成藏[J]. 石油实验地质, 2023, 45(3): 393-401. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202303393 QIU Xuming, CHEN Wei, LI Heyong, et al. Strike-slip structures and hydrocarbon accumulation in complex fault blocks in Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2023, 45(3): 393-401. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202303393
[32]	杨力. 苏北盆地中新生代构造演化及其与油气的关系[D]. 荆州: 长江大学, 2015. YANG Li. The structural evolution in the Cenozoic of Subei Basin and its relationship with oil and gas[D]. Jingzhou: Yangtze University, 2015.
[33]	刘寅, 陈清华, 胡凯, 等. 渤海湾盆地与苏北—南黄海盆地构造特征和成因对比[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2014, 38(1): 38-51. LIU Yin, CHEN Qinghua, HU Kai, et al. Comparison of the Bohai Bay Basin and Subei-South Yellow Sea Basin in the structural characte-ristics and forming mechanism[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2014, 38(1): 38-51.
[34]	陈艳, 张景发, 姜文亮, 等. 苏北盆地重力场及地壳结构特征[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2017, 32(6): 2295-2303. CHEN Yan, ZHANG Jingfa, JIANG Wenliang, et al. Gravity field and characteristics of crustal structure in Subei Basin[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2017, 32(6): 2295-2303.
[35]	昝灵, 骆卫峰, 印燕铃, 等. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜宁组二段页岩油形成条件及有利区评价[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(2): 233-241. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202102233 ZAN Lin, LUO Weifeng, YIN Yanling, et al. Formation conditions of shale oil and favorable targets in the second member of Paleogene Funing Formation in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(2): 233-241. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202102233
[36]	昝灵, 白鸾羲, 印燕铃, 等. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜宁组二段页岩油基本特征及成因分析[J]. 石油实验地质, 2023, 45(2): 356-365. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202302356 ZAN Ling, BAI Luanxi, YIN Yanling, et al. Basic characteristics and genesis analysis of shale oil in the second member of Paleo-gene Funing Formation in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2023, 45(2): 356-365. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202302356
[37]	郭瑞超, 王浩, 蒲娅琳, 等. 显微荧光确定砂岩含气性与物性下限探讨: 以蜀南地区须家河组为例[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2020, 34(5): 34-38. GUO Ruichao, WANG Hao, PU Yalin, et al. Determination of gas bearing property and lower limit of physical property of sandstone by microscopy fluorescence: by taking Xujiahe Formation in Shunan area as an example[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2020, 34(5): 34-38.
[38]	郭舜玲, 孙玉善, 尚李平, 等. 荧光显微镜技术[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1994. GUO Shunling, SUN Yushan, SHANG Liping, et al. Fluorescence microscopy technology[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1994.