Mi Jingkui, Zhang Shuichang, Wang Xiaomei. COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT HYDROCARBON GENERATION SIMULATION APPROACHES AND KEY TECHNIQUE[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2009, 31(4): 409-414. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200904409
Citation: Mi Jingkui, Zhang Shuichang, Wang Xiaomei. COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT HYDROCARBON GENERATION SIMULATION APPROACHES AND KEY TECHNIQUE[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2009, 31(4): 409-414. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200904409

COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT HYDROCARBON GENERATION SIMULATION APPROACHES AND KEY TECHNIQUE

doi: 10.11781/sysydz200904409
  • Received Date: 2008-12-22
  • Rev Recd Date: 2009-05-31
  • Publish Date: 2009-08-28
  • Hydrocarbon generation simulation experiment is an important approach in resource assessment and confirmation.The experiment system can be divided into 3 types:open,semi-open and closed.Different system has different advantage and disadvantage,and can be chosen to resolve different problems.The accuracy of reaction temperature,mostly determined by the frame of simulation system,has great influence on the application of experiment results.Experiments of different samples under different pressure in the same simulation system are important for researches of influence of pressure on hydrocarbon generation.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    Waples D W.Time and temperature in petroleum exploration[J].AAPG Bulletin,1980,64:916-926
    [2]
    Lopatian N V.Temperature and geologic time as factors in coalification[J].IZV Akad Nauk SSSR Ser Geol Izvestiya,1971,3:95-106
    [3]
    Eisma E,Jurg J W.Fundamental aspects of diagenesis of organic matter and the formation of hydrocarbon[A].In:Proceedings of 7th world petroleum congress[C].London:Applied Science Pub,1967
    [4]
    Henderson W,Eglinton G,Simmods P,et al.Thermal alteration as contributory process to genesis of petroleum[J].Nature,1968,209:1012-1016
    [5]
    Brooks J D,Smith J W.The diagenesis of plant liquids during the formation of coal,petroleum and natural gas-Ⅱ.Coalification and the formation of oil and gas in Gippsland Basin[J].Geochim et Cosmochim Acta,1969,33:1183-1194
    [6]
    Tissot B P,Welte D H.Petroleum formation and occurrence:a new approach to oil and gas exploration[M].Berlin:Springer-Verlag,1978
    [7]
    Hunt J M.Petroleum geochemistry and geology[M].San Francisco:Freeman,1979
    [8]
    Durand B M,Monin J C.Kerogen[M].Paris:Editions Technip,1980
    [9]
    汪本善,刘德汉,张丽洁等.渤海湾盆地黄骅拗陷石油演化特征及人工模拟实验研究[J].石油学报,1980,1(1):43-51
    [10]
    刘德汉,周中毅,贾蓉芬等.碳酸盐生油岩中沥青变质程度和沥青热变质实验[J].地球化学,1982,(3):237-243
    [11]
    傅家谟,徐世平,盛国英等.抚顺煤树脂体成烃的初步研究(Ⅱ)[A].见:中国科学院地球化学研究所有机地球化学开放研究实验室编.中国科学院地球化学研究所有机地球化学开放研究实验室研究年报[R].北京:科学出版社,1987.13-22
    [12]
    刘德汉,傅家谟,戴童谟等.煤成气和煤成油产出阶段和特征的初步研究[A].见:中国科学院地球化学研究所编.中国科学院地球化学研究所年报[R].贵阳:贵州人民出版社,1986.185-196
    [13]
    张惠之,刘德汉,傅家谟等.不同煤岩组分的热解成气实验研究[A].见:中国科学院地球化学研究所编.中国科学院地球化学研究所年报[R].贵阳:贵州人民出版社,1986.150-152
    [14]
    Cramer B,Faber E,Gerling D,et al.Reaction kinetics of stable carbon isotope in natural gas-insights from dry,open system pyrolysis experiments[J].Energy and Fuels,2001,15:517-532
    [15]
    Berner U,Faber E,Stahl W.Mathematical simulation of the carbon isotopic fraction between huminitic coals and related methane[J].Chemical Geology,1992,94:315-39
    [16]
    Berner U,Fabe E,Scheeder G,et al.Primary cracking of algal and landplant kerogens:kinetic models of isotope variations in methane,ethane and propane[J].Chemical Geology,1995,126:233-245
    [17]
    刘光祥.塔里木盆地S74井稠油热模拟实验研究(一)—模拟产物地球化学特征[J].石油实验地质,2008,30(2):179-185
    [18]
    刘光祥.塔里木盆地S74井稠油热模拟实验研究(二)—沥青生烃潜力探讨[J].石油实验地质,2008,30 (4):382-385
    [19]
    胡国艺,李振铎,李志生等.降温热模拟实验中烃源岩成熟度和产气率的变化特征[J].石油与天然气地质,2006,27(2):253-257
    [20]
    张欣国,缪九军,徐良发等.煤岩二次生烃模拟中生烃潜量损耗量研究[J].石油实验地质,2008,30(4):792-796
    [21]
    刘全有,刘文汇,王晓锋等.不同烃源岩实验评价方法的对比[J].石油实验地质,2007,29(1):88-93
    [22]
    田静,王云鹏,刘德汉等.利用全岩热模拟方法研究海相烃源岩生排烃过程及影响因素[J].油气地质与采收率,2008,15(3):29-31
    [23]
    曹建军,孔凡顺,彭木高.煤成气生气量热模拟实验条件对比综述[J].油气地质与采收率,2004,11(5):14-16
    [24]
    张守春,张林.压力抑制条件下生烃定量模拟实验研究—以渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷为例[J].石油实验地质,2008,30(5):522-526
    [25]
    孟庆强,马亮帮.不同藻类热模拟实验的生烃特征对比[J].石油实验地质,2008,30(3):281-285
    [26]
    刘金钟,唐永春.用干酪根生烃动力学方法预测甲烷生烃量之一例[J].科学通报,1998,43(11):1187-1191
    [27]
    付少英,彭平安,张文正等.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界煤的生烃动力学研究[J].中国科学(D辑),2002,32(10):812-818
    [28]
    Braun R L,Brurnham A K,Reynolds J G,et al.Mathematical model of oil generation,degradation and expulsion[J].Energy &Fuels,1990,4(1):132-146
    [29]
    刘德汉,付金华,郑聪斌等.鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系海相碳酸盐岩生烃性能与中部长庆气田气源成因研究[J].地质学报,2004,78(4):542-550
    [30]
    Monthioux M,Landais P,Durand B.Comparison between extracts from natural and artificial maturation series of Mahakam deltacoals[J].Org Geochem,1986,10(3):299-311
    [31]
    McTavish R A.Pressure retardation of vitrinite diagenesis,offshore northwest Europe[J].Nature,1978,271:648-650
    [32]
    Connan J,Montel F,Blanc P H,et al.Experimental study of expulsion of HCs from shaley source rocks[J].Org Geochem,1992,19(2):153-171
    [33]
    郝芳,姜建群,邹华耀等.超压对有机质热演化的差异抑制作用及层次[J].中国科学(D辑),2004,34(5):443-451
    [34]
    Price L C,Wenger L M.The influence of pressure on petroleum generation and maturation as suggested by aqueous pyrolysis[J].Org Geochem,1992,19(1):141-159
    [35]
    Dalla T M,Mahlmann R F,Ernst W G.Experimental study on the pressure dependence of vitrinite maturation[J].Geochem Cosmo Acta,1997,61(14):2921-2928
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1309) PDF downloads(943) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return