Liu Yurui. COMPARISON ANALYSIS OF MESO-CENOZOIC HYDROCARBON GENERATION BETWEEN THE NORTH JIANGSU BASIN AND THE SOUTH YELLOW SEA BASIN[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2010, 32(6): 541-546. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201006541
Citation: Liu Yurui. COMPARISON ANALYSIS OF MESO-CENOZOIC HYDROCARBON GENERATION BETWEEN THE NORTH JIANGSU BASIN AND THE SOUTH YELLOW SEA BASIN[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2010, 32(6): 541-546. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201006541

COMPARISON ANALYSIS OF MESO-CENOZOIC HYDROCARBON GENERATION BETWEEN THE NORTH JIANGSU BASIN AND THE SOUTH YELLOW SEA BASIN

doi: 10.11781/sysydz201006541
  • Received Date: 2010-05-04
  • Rev Recd Date: 2010-10-08
  • Publish Date: 2010-12-28
  • The North Jiangsu Basin and the South Yellow Sea Basin are a unified Mesozoic-Cenozoic basin.The North Jiangsu Basin has seen fruitful exploration. Four out of seven sets of dark mudstone only contribute to hydrocarbon accumulation by geochemical analysis, in which three are wide lacustrine lime mudstones in depression which is characterized with wide distribution, high quality and significant in lithology-electricity, the other one is pure mudstone in rift lake. It can conclude that there are 5 sets of source rocks in the Southern Depression which are more in numbers and slightly larger in thickness than in the North Jiangsu Basin, and only one in the Northern Depression of the South Yellow Sea Basin. The source rocks of the South Yellow Sea Basin are similar in original environment and lithology-electricity with the North Jiangsu Basin, but less in quality and continuity. Source rocks develop at the low mature-mature stage in two basins, of which the South Yellow Sea Basin is lower in maturity than the North Jiangsu Basin resulting to narrow distribution of expulsive petroleum source rock. Quality, maturity and degree of expulsion of source rocks dominate abundance of hydrocarbon resources in sags of the North Jiangsu Basin, higher maturity and hydrocarbon expulsion of source rock, higher abundance of resources, otherwise it is low. Deeper sediments are buried in rift sag, more mature in source rocks. The end of the Sanduo stage is time for complete maturity of source rocks. In general, the South Yellow Sea Basin is not larger than the North Jiangsu Basin in resource potential where the Southern Depression is better than the Northern Depression.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    毛凤鸣,戴靖.复杂小断块石油勘探开发技术[M].北京:中国石化出版社,2005:10-24.
    [2]
    钱基.苏北盆地油气田形成与分布[J].石油学报,2001,22(3):12-16.
    [3]
    鄢琦,周总英.中国东部断陷盆地石油资源丰度统计模型的建立[J].石油实验地质,2009,31(3):292-295.
    [4]
    刘玉瑞.苏北后生断陷层序地层格架与沉积体系[J].复杂油气藏,2010,3(1):10-14.
    [5]
    陈安定.苏北盆地油源判别指标研究[J].石油实验地质,2009,29(4):397-401.
    [6]
    李鹤永,邱旭明,刘启东.高邮凹陷戴南组一段暗色泥岩生烃条件再认识[J].复杂油气藏,2009,2(4):17-22.
    [7]
    刘平兰.苏北海安凹陷泰州组烃源岩评价[J].石油实验地质,2009,31(4):389-393.
    [8]
    肖国林.南黄海盆地油气地质特征及其资源潜力再认识[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,2002,22(2):81-87.
    [9]
    翟光明.中国石油地质志卷十六:沿海大陆架及毗邻海域油气区(上册)[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1992:366-382.
    [10]
    戴春山,杨艳秋,闫桂京.南黄海中-古生代海相残留盆地埋藏生烃史模拟及其意义[J].石油与天然气地质,2005,26(1):49-56.
    [11]
    刘玉瑞.苏北盆地断层封堵类型及定量评价[J].石油实验地质,2009,31(5):531-536.
    [12]
    刘玉瑞,刘启东,杨小兰.苏北盆地走滑断层特征与油气聚集关系[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,(3):279-283,293.
    [13]
    邱旭明.苏北盆地高邮凹陷油气输导特征及油气分布[J].石油与天然气地质,2008.29(4):437-443.
    [14]
    吴向阳,夏连军,陈晶.苏北盆地高邮凹陷构造再认识及对油气勘探的意义[J].石油实验地质,2009,36(6):570-575.
    [15]
    郭飞飞,曹强,唐文旭.南黄海北部盆地东北凹陷地层剥蚀厚度恢复[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,2009,29(5):99-103.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (3086) PDF downloads(915) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return