Sheng Xiujie, Jin Zhijun, Xu Zhongmei, Jiang Han. Uncertainty evaluation of petroleum risk assessment[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2014, 36(5): 633-641. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201405633
Citation: Sheng Xiujie, Jin Zhijun, Xu Zhongmei, Jiang Han. Uncertainty evaluation of petroleum risk assessment[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2014, 36(5): 633-641. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201405633

Uncertainty evaluation of petroleum risk assessment

doi: 10.11781/sysydz201405633
  • Received Date: 2014-05-01
  • Rev Recd Date: 2014-08-18
  • Publish Date: 2014-09-28
  • The margin and condition probability analysis is broadly applied to the geological risk evaluation for an immature play with joining the "success" probabilities subjectively specified for those independently involved geological factors. Considering that it is difficult to specify a reasonable scoring distribution curve for each geological factor, this method contributes a "point" estimation about whether there exists petroleum resource. Obviously, subjected to lack efficient ways to encode the information about geological multi-scene of subsurface and possibi-lities for each geological factor, the above crisp estimation conclusion would be generally either higher or lower. In order to enhance the capability of uncertainty expression of geological risk evaluation, this paper presents three heuristic mathematic models to deeply quantify the understanding of a geological expert and objectively delineate the possibilities of subsurface occasion, etc. Meanwhile, the uncertainty assessment methods discussed also de-monstrate a reasonable uncertainty evaluation process from subjective guess to objective prediction in order to shrink the uncertainty of evaluation as more as possible. Firstly, the double linear conversion between subjective inference for each factor and quantized confidence shares an efficient alternative to describe subjective uncertainty. Next, the specification of multi-value model and setup of corresponding fuzzy rules for each geological factor may accurately and honestly reflect the worldly uncertainty of subsurface multi-scene while matching the domain expert’s understanding as more as possible. At last, Montecarlo method randomly joins the objective uncertainty distribution curve of each factor and shares experts with quantiles evaluation which would benefit incoming reasonable exploration solution. As a conclusion, this paper not only investigates how to make full scale uncertainty evaluation for geological evaluation, but also expands a new horizon about geological risk uncertainty research.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    武守城.石油资源地质评价导论[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1994:292-294. Wu Shoucheng.Introduction of petroleum resources assessment[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1994:292-294.
    [2]
    国土资源部油气资源战略研究中心.新一轮全国油气资源评价[M].北京:中国大地出版社,2009:66-71. Strategic Research Center of Oil & Gas Resources,Ministry of Land & Resources.The latest national resources assessment[M].Beijing:China University of Geosciences Press,2009:66-71.
    [3]
    郭秋麟,米石云.油气勘探目标评价与决策分析[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2004:21-22. Guo Qiulin,Mi Shiyun.Assesment of petroleum exploration target and exploration decisions[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2004:21-22.
    [4]
    盛秀杰,金之钧,鄢琦,等.成藏体系油气资源评价中的统计方法体系[J].石油与天然气地质,2013,34(6):827-833. Sheng Xiujie,Jin Zhijun,Yan Qi,et al.Statistical method series for the resource assessment of petroleum accumulation system[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2013,34(6):827-833.
    [5]
    Rose P R.油气勘探项目的风险分析与管理[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2002:6-50. Rose P R.Risk analysis and management of petroleum exploration ventures[M].Beijing:Petroleum Press,2002:6-50.
    [6]
    Otis R M,Schneidermann N.A process for evaluating exploration prospects[J].AAPG Bulletin,1997,81(7):1087-1109.
    [7]
    White D A.Geologic risking guide for prospects and plays[J].AAPG Bulletin,1993,77(12):2048-2061.
    [8]
    Houghton J C,Dolton G L,Mast R F,et a1.U.S.Geological Survey estimation procedure for accumulation size distributions by play[J].AAPG Bulletin,1993,77(3):454-466.
    [9]
    盛秀杰,金之钧,郭勤涛,等.油气资源评价一体化技术及软件实现的探讨[J].地质论评,2014,60(1):159-168. Sheng Xiujie,Jin Zhijun,Guo Qintao,et al.Discussion on integrated resource evaluation and software development[J].Geolo-gical Review,2014,60(1):159-168.
    [10]
    金之钧 张金川.油气资源评价技术[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999:66-71. Jin Zhijun,Zhang Jinchuan.Petroleum resource assessment techniques[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1999:66-71.
    [11]
    陈善勇,金之钧,刘小平.黄骅坳陷第三系油气成藏体系定量评价[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(5):544-547,602. Chen Shanyong,Jin Zhijun,Liu Xiaoping.Quantitative evaluation of Tertiary petroleum accumulation systems in Huanghua depression[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2004,25(5):544-547,602.
    [12]
    金之钧,张一伟,王捷,等.油气成藏机理与分布规律[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2003. Jin Zhijun,Zhang Yiwei,Wang Jie,et al.Hydrocarbon accumulation mechanisms and oil/gas distribution[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2003.
    [13]
    Zadeh L A.Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1978,1(1):3-28.
    [14]
    Carranza E,Hale M.Geologically constrained fuzzy mapping of gold mineralization potential,Baguio District,Philippines[J].Natural Resources Research,2001,10(2):125-136.
    [15]
    Chen H C,Fang J H.A new method for prospect appraisal[J].AAPG Bulletin,1993,77(1):9-18.
    [16]
    Passino K M,Yurkovich S.Fuzzy control[M].California:Addison Wesley,1998.
    [17]
    Ross T J.Fuzzy logic with engineering applications[M].New York:McGraw-Hill,1995.
    [18]
    Robert C P,Casella G.Monte carlo statistical methods[M].2nd ed.New York:Springer,2004.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (989) PDF downloads(844) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return