留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

浅水三角洲前缘砂体沉积及渗流特征精细表征——以松辽盆地大庆长垣杏树岗油田为例

吕端川 宋金鹏

吕端川, 宋金鹏. 浅水三角洲前缘砂体沉积及渗流特征精细表征——以松辽盆地大庆长垣杏树岗油田为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(1): 88-94. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202001088
引用本文: 吕端川, 宋金鹏. 浅水三角洲前缘砂体沉积及渗流特征精细表征——以松辽盆地大庆长垣杏树岗油田为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(1): 88-94. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202001088
LÜ Duanchuan, SONG Jinpeng. Characterization of sedimentary and flow characteristics of shallow water delta front sand bodies: Xingshugang Oil Field, Daqing placanticline, Songliao Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2020, 42(1): 88-94. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202001088
Citation: LÜ Duanchuan, SONG Jinpeng. Characterization of sedimentary and flow characteristics of shallow water delta front sand bodies: Xingshugang Oil Field, Daqing placanticline, Songliao Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2020, 42(1): 88-94. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202001088

浅水三角洲前缘砂体沉积及渗流特征精细表征——以松辽盆地大庆长垣杏树岗油田为例

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202001088
基金项目: 

国家科技重大专项"大庆长垣特高含水油田提高采收率示范工程" 2016ZX05054

详细信息
    作者简介:

    吕端川(1987-), 男, 在读博士, 从事地质资源与地质工程研究。E-mail: duan227@126.com

  • 中图分类号: TE311

Characterization of sedimentary and flow characteristics of shallow water delta front sand bodies: Xingshugang Oil Field, Daqing placanticline, Songliao Basin

  • 摘要: 针对目前相渗研究与砂体沉积特征结合程度较低的问题,综合利用连续取心井的岩心、测井资料、油藏条件下的相渗测试数据、粒度分析、扫描电镜以及压汞数据,对松辽盆地大庆长垣浅水三角洲前缘亚相中分流河道微相及席状砂微相的沉积及渗流特征进行研究,分析了油水两相流的相对渗透率在分流河道垂向上的变化,以及在席状砂外缘、中部和内缘位置的差异。控制分流河道砂体和席状砂开发程度的因素分别为垂向上的水油流度差异和平面渗流能力的非均质性。浅水三角洲分流河道主体垂向上的相渗形态变化不大,但水油流度差异使底部更易水淹,是造成井间剩余油形成的主要因素;席状砂沉积特征的平面差异使注入水更易沿外缘推进,是造成内缘及中部的储量动用程度低的主要因素。

     

  • 图  1  松辽盆地大庆长垣构造区域划分及取心井位置

    Figure  1.  Structural regional division and coring well location in Daqing placanticline, Songliao Basin

    图  2  松辽盆地大庆长垣X取心井浅水三角洲水下分流河道砂岩心扫描图

    Figure  2.  Core photographs of underwater distributary channel in shallow water delta of X coring well, Daqing placanticline, Songliao Basin

    图  3  松辽盆地大庆长垣X取心井浅水三角洲水下分流河道样品粒径分布及扫描电镜照片

    Figure  3.  Particle size distribution and scanning electron microscope photographs of samples from underwater distributary channel in shallow water delta of X coring well, Daqing placanticline, Songliao Basin

    图  4  松辽盆地大庆长垣X取心井浅水三角洲水下分流河道样品相对渗透率及相渗比值随饱和度的关系

    Figure  4.  Relative permeability curves and relationship between water-oil fluidity ratio and water saturation of samples from underwater distributary channel in shallow water delta of X coring well, Daqing placanticline, Songliao Basin

    图  5  松辽盆地大庆长垣X取心井浅水三角洲席状砂岩心扫描图

    Figure  5.  Core photographs of sheet sand in shallow water delta of X coring well, Daqing placanticline, Songliao Basin

    图  6  松辽盆地大庆长垣X取心井浅水三角洲席状砂样品粒径分布及扫描电镜照片

    Figure  6.  Particle size distribution of samples from sheet sand in shallow water delta of X coring well, Daqing placanticline, Songliao Basin

    图  7  松辽盆地大庆长垣X取心井浅水三角洲席状砂样品相对渗透率及相渗比值随饱和度的关系

    Figure  7.  Relative permeability curves and relationship between water-oil fluidity ratio and water saturation of samples from sheet sand in shallow water delta of X coring well, Daqing placanticline, Songliao Basin

  • [1] 魏斌, 毕研斌, 郑浚茂. 高含水油田剩余油分布研究方法及应用[J]. 地球学报, 2003, 24(S1): 270-273. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200004012.htm

    WEI Bin, BI Yanbin, ZHENG Junmao. The method for studying remaining oil distribution in highly water-bearing oilfield and its application[J]. Acta Geoscientia Sinica, 2003, 24(S1): 270-273. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200004012.htm
    [2] 李红英, 陈善斌, 杨志成, 等. 巨厚油层隔夹层特征及其对剩余油分布的影响: 以渤海湾盆地L油田为例[J]. 断块油气田, 2018, 25(6): 709-714. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT201806006.htm

    LI Hongying, CHEN Shanbin, YANG Zhicheng, et al. Characte-ristics of interbeds in thick oil layer and its effect on remaining oil distribution: a case study of L Oilfield, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2018, 25(6): 709-714. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT201806006.htm
    [3] 林承焰, 孙廷彬, 董春梅, 等. 基于单砂体的特高含水期剩余油精细表征[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(6): 1131-1136. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201306012.htm

    LIN Chengyan, SUN Tingbin, DONG Chunmei, et al. Fine characte-rization of remaining oil based on a single sand body in the high water cut period[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(6): 1131-1136. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201306012.htm
    [4] 邱楠生, 万晓龙, 金之钧, 等. 渗透率级差对透镜状砂体成藏的控制模式[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2003, 30(3): 48-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK200303014.htm

    QIU Nansheng, WAN Xiaolong, JIN Zhijun, et al. Controlling model of permeability difference on the hydrocarbon accumulation of sand lens reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2003, 30(3): 48-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK200303014.htm
    [5] 熊光勤, 刘丽. 基于储层构型的流动单元划分及对开发的影响[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 36(3): 107-114. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY201403015.htm

    XIONG Guangqin, LIU Li. Flow units classification based on reservoir architecture and its influence on reservoir development[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Techno-logy Edition), 2014, 36(3): 107-114. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY201403015.htm
    [6] WANG Xixin, HOU Jiagen, LIU Yuming, et al. Studying reservoir heterogeneity by analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy logic, case study of Es1x formation of the Wang Guan Tun Oilfield, China[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2017, 156: 858-867.
    [7] SUN Mengsi, LIU Chiyang, FENG Congjun, et al. Main controlling factors and predictive models for the study of the characteristics of remaining oil distribution during the high water-cut stage in Fuyu Oilfield, Songliao Basin, China[J]. Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 2018, 36(1): 97-113.
    [8] YUE Ming, ZHU Weiyao, HAN Hongyan, et al. Experimental research on remaining oil distribution and recovery performances after nano-micron polymer particles injection by direct visua-lization[J]. Fuel, 2018, 212: 506-514.
    [9] ZHANG Yingjie, XU Qunjie, SUN Mojie. Research on microscopic characteristics of remaining oil distribution after strong Alkali ASP flooding by laser scanning confocal technology[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2013, 616-618: 757-761.
    [10] 杜庆龙. 多层非均质砂岩油田小层动用状况快速定量评价方法[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2016, 35(4): 43-48. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQSK201604008.htm

    DU Qinglong. Quick-quantitative evaluating method of the sublayer developed conditions in the multilayered heterogeneous sandstone oilfield[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2016, 35(4): 43-48. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQSK201604008.htm
    [11] 李俊飞, 叶小明, 尚宝兵, 等. 三角洲前缘河口坝单砂体划分及剩余油分布[J]. 特种油气藏, 2019, 26(2): 59-64. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ201902010.htm

    LI Junfei, YE Xiaoming, SHANG Baobing, et al. Division of single sand body in mouth bar of delta front and remaining oil distribution[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2019, 26(2): 59-64. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ201902010.htm
    [12] 李俊飞, 王鹏飞, 尚宝兵, 等. 基于储层构型的三角洲前缘剩余油分布规律: 以渤海湾盆地S油田东营组二段下亚段Ⅰ油组为例[J]. 断块油气田, 2019, 26(5): 580-586. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT201905009.htm

    LI Junfei, WANG Pengfei, SHANG Baobing, et al. Remaining oil distribution of delta front based on reservoir architecture: a case study of Ⅰ oil formation of E3d2 in S oilfield, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2019, 26(5): 580-586. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT201905009.htm
    [13] LIU Jiyu, SHAO Shuai, ZHAO Jiahong, et al. The flow unit division in the no. 1 fault block of Pubei Oilfield[J]. Advances in Petroleum Exploration & Development, 2013, 6(2): 51-55.
    [14] 邓庆杰, 胡明毅, 胡忠贵, 等. 浅水三角洲分流河道砂体沉积特征: 以松辽盆地三肇凹陷扶Ⅱ-Ⅰ组为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(1): 118-127. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201501016.htm

    DENG Qingjie, HU Mingyi, HU Zhonggui, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of shallow-water delta distributary channel sand bodies: a case from Ⅱ-Ⅰ formation of Fuyu oil layer in the Sanzhao Depression, Songliao Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36(1): 118-127. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201501016.htm
    [15] 张继成, 宋考平. 相对渗透率特征曲线及其应用[J]. 石油学报, 2007, 28(4): 104-107. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB200704020.htm

    ZHANG Jicheng, SONG Kaoping. Eigen curve of relative permeability and its application[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2007, 28(4): 104-107. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB200704020.htm
    [16] 徐永强, 何永宏, 卜广平, 等. 基于微观孔喉结构及渗流特征建立致密储层分类评价标准: 以鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长7储层为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41(3): 451-460. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201903451

    XU Yongqiang, HE Yonghong, BU Guangping, et al. Establishment of classification and evaluation criteria for tight reservoirs based on characteristics of microscopic pore throat structure and percolation: a case study of Chang 7 reservoir in Longdong area, Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41(3): 451-460. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201903451
    [17] 欧阳思琪, 孙卫, 黄何鑫. 多方法协同表征特低渗砂岩储层全孔径孔隙结构: 以鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区砂岩储层为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40(4): 595-604. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201804595

    OUYANG Siqi, SUN Wei, HUANG Hexin. Multi-method synergistic characterization of total pore structure of extra-low permeability sandstone reservoirs: case study of the Heshui area of Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2018, 40(4): 595-604. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201804595
    [18] 于倩男, 刘义坤, 姚迪, 等. 精控压裂薄差储层渗流特征实验研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2019, 9(1): 15-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ201901004.htm

    YU Qiannan, LIU Yikun, YAO Di, et al. Experimental study on seepage flow patterns of fine controlled fractured thin and poor reservoirs[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(1): 15-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ201901004.htm
    [19] 余启泰, 罗洪, 冯明生. 我国油田河流相与三角洲相储层参数统计研究[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 1999, 18(1): 28-31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQSK901.009.htm

    YU Qitai, LUO Hong, FENG Mingsheng. Statistical study on reservoir parameter of fluvial and delta facies of oil field in China[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 1999, 18(1): 28-31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQSK901.009.htm
    [20] 杜庆龙. 长期注水开发砂岩油田储层渗透率变化规律及微观机理[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(9): 1159-1164. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201609010.htm

    DU Qinglong. Variation law and microscopic mechanism of permeability in sandstone reservoir during long-term water flooding deve-lopment[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(9): 1159-1164. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201609010.htm
    [21] 王曙光, 赵国忠, 余碧君. 大庆油田油水相对渗透率统计规律及其应用[J]. 石油学报, 2005, 26(3): 78-81. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB200503017.htm

    WANG Shuguang, ZHAO Guozhong, YU Bijun. Statistical regularity of oil-water relative permeability in Daqing Oil Field[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2005, 26(3): 78-81. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB200503017.htm
    [22] 吕成远. 油藏条件下油水相对渗透率实验研究[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2003, 30(4): 102-104. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK200304032.htm

    LÜ Chengyuan. Experimental study on oil-water relative permeabi-lity under natural reservoir conditions[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2003, 30(4): 102-104. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK200304032.htm
    [23] 阮壮, 朱筱敏, 何宇航, 等. 大庆长垣北部葡萄花上部油层高分辨率层序地层划分[J]. 沉积学报, 2012, 30(2): 301-309. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201202011.htm

    RUAN Zhuang, ZHU Xiaomin, HE Yuhang, et al. High-resolution sequence stratigraphy division of Upper Putaohua reservoir, northern Daqing placanticline[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2012, 30(2): 301-309. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201202011.htm
    [24] 邹存友, 于立君. 中国水驱砂岩油田含水与采出程度的量化关系[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(2): 288-292. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201202017.htm

    ZOU Cunyou, YU Lijun. A quantization relationship between water cut and degree of reserve recovery for waterflooding sandstone reservoirs in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(2): 288-292. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201202017.htm
  • 加载中
图(7)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  795
  • HTML全文浏览量:  44
  • PDF下载量:  197
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-08-31
  • 修回日期:  2019-12-18
  • 刊出日期:  2020-01-28

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回