Controlling factors of continental shale oil mobility and resource potential in Dongpu Sag, Bohai Bay Basin
-
摘要: 可动性好是陆相页岩油富集高产的关键。通过显微镜薄片观察、扫描电镜、X射线能谱分析、岩石多温阶热解、高压压汞等实验，对渤海湾盆地东濮凹陷古近系沙三段页岩油赋存特征与可动性影响因素进行了分析，并运用盆模法预测了可动油资源的分布。页岩油主要以游离态赋存于粒间孔、晶间孔、溶蚀孔和连通裂缝中，并在裂缝周围富集，成熟度和裂缝发育程度是页岩油可动性主控因素，有机质丰度和孔隙度对其影响相对较复杂。东濮凹陷沙三中、下亚段页岩油资源潜力较大，以中—高熟油为主，可动油纵向上主要分布在3 500~4 500 m，平面上主要分布在洼陷带和内斜坡带，其中前梨园洼陷以及文东内斜坡带、濮卫次洼、柳屯洼陷、海通集洼陷可动油丰度较高，是下一步陆相页岩油重要勘探方向。Abstract: Good mobility is a key to the enrichment and high production of continental shale oil. Various data including thin section observation, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy spectrum (EDS), rock pyrolysis, high pressure mercury injection (HPMI) experiment were integrated to investigate the occurrence characteristics and major factors controlling shale oil mobility in the third member (Es3) of Shahejie Formation in the Dongpu Sag, Bohai Bay Basin. The distribution of movable oil resources was also predicted by using basin modelling. Shale oil mainly exists in intergranular pores, intercrystalline pores, dissolution pores and connected fractures in a free state, and is enriched around fractures. Maturity and fracture development are the main controlling factors of shale oil mobility. The influence of TOC content and porosity on shale oil mobility is relatively complicated. The shale in the middle and lower Es3 in the Dongpu Sag shows a great oil potential, mainly producing medium- and high-maturity oils. Movable oil is mainly distributed at a burial depth of 3 500-4 500 m, and is located in secondary depressions and inner slopes. The Qianliyuan Subsag, Wendong Inner Slope Zone, Puwei Subsag, Liutun Subsag, and Haitongji Subsag have higher movable oil abundances, which are the main exploration targets for continental shale oils.
-
图 1 渤海湾盆地东濮凹陷构造区划(a)、地层柱状图(b)及地层剖面(c)
Figure 1. Tectonic units (a), stratigraphic column (b) and geological section (c) of Dongpu Sag, Bohai Bay Basin
图 2 渤海湾盆地东濮凹陷沙三段页岩油镜下赋存空间
Figure 2. Occurrence of shale oil in Es3, Dongpu Sag, Bohai Bay Basin
图 3 渤海湾盆地东濮凹陷卫69井沙三段页岩方解石晶间溶蚀孔及连通裂缝中赋存液态烃及能谱特征
Figure 3. Occurrence and energy spectrum of liquid hydrocarbons in intergranular dissolution pores and connecting fractures in calcites in shale from Es3, Dongpu Sag, Bohai Bay Basin
图 4 渤海湾盆地东濮凹陷沙三段页岩油可动系数分布
Figure 4. Frequency of shale oil mobility coefficients in Es3, Dongpu Sag, Bohai Bay Basin
图 5 渤海湾盆地东濮凹陷沙三段页岩含油性与可动性相关参数与埋深关系
Figure 5. Relationship between oil-bearing and mobility parameters and burial depth of shale in Es3, Dongpu Sag, Bohai Bay Basin
图 6 渤海湾盆地东濮凹陷沙三段可动系数与成熟度和埋深的关系
Figure 6. Mobility coefficient vs. maturity and burial depth of shale in Es3, Dongpu Sag, Bohai Bay Basin
图 7 渤海湾盆地东濮凹陷沙三段可动系数与孔隙度关系
Figure 7. Relationship between mobility coefficient and porosity of shale in Es3, Dongpu Sag, Bohai Bay Basin
图 8 渤海湾盆地东濮凹陷沙三段不同岩相泥页岩孔隙度分布
Figure 8. Frequency of shale porosity in different lithofacies of Es3, Dongpu Sag, Bohai Bay Basin
图 9 渤海湾盆地东濮凹陷沙三段泥页岩可动油与TOC关系
Figure 9. Relationship between TOC and movable oil in shale in Es3, Dongpu Sag, Bohai Bay Basin
-
[1] 邹才能, 杨智, 崔景伟, 等. 页岩油形成机制、地质特征及发展对策[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(1): 14-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201301003.htmZOU Caineng, YANG Zhi, CUI Jingwei, et al. Formation mechanism, geological characteristics and development strategy of nonmarine shale oil in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(1): 14-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201301003.htm [2] 黎茂稳, 马晓潇, 蒋启贵, 等. 北美海相页岩油形成条件、富集特征与启示[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(1): 13-28. doi: 10.13673/j.cnki.cn37-1359/te.2019.01.002LI Maowen, MA Xiaoxiao, JIANG Qigui, et al. Enlightenment from formation conditions and enrichment characteristics of marine shale oil in North America[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(1): 13-28. doi: 10.13673/j.cnki.cn37-1359/te.2019.01.002 [3] 王保华, 李浩, 陆建林, 等. 陆相页岩层系非泥页岩夹层发育程度定量表征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41(6): 879-884. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201906879WANG Baohua, LI Hao, LU Jianlin, et al. Quantitative characterization of development of permeable interlayers in continental shale strata[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41(6): 879-884. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201906879 [4] BOWKER K A. Barnett shale gas production, Fort Worth Basin: issues and discussion[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(4): 523-533. doi: 10.1306/06190606018 [5] 赵贤正, 周立宏, 蒲秀刚, 等. 断陷湖盆湖相页岩油形成有利条件及富集特征: 以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔店组二段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(9): 1013-1029. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201909001.htmZHAO Xianzheng, ZHOU Lihong, PU Xiugang, et al. Favorable formation conditions and enrichment characteristics of lacustrine facies shale oil in faulted lake basin: a case study of Member 2 of Kongdian Formation in Cangdong Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(9): 1013-1029. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201909001.htm [6] 宋明水. 济阳坳陷页岩油勘探实践与现状[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(1): 1-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201901001.htmSONG Mingshui. Practice and current status of shale oil exploration in Jiyang Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(1): 1-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201901001.htm [7] BREYER J A. Shale reservoirs: giant resources for the 21st century[M]//AAPG Memoir 97. Tulsa: AAPG, 2012. [8] BREYER J A. The Eagle Ford shale: a renaissance in U.S. oil production[M]//AAPG Memoir 110. Tulsa: AAPG, 2016. [9] WOOD L J. Shale tectonics[M]//AAPG Memoir 93. Tulsa: AAPG, 2010. [10] APLIN A C, MACQUAKER J H S. GS20: getting started in shales[M]. Tulsa: AAPG, 2010. [11] CAMP W, DIAZ E, WAWAK B. Electron microscopy of shale hydrocarbon reservoirs[M]//AAPG Memoir 102. Tulsa: AAPG, 2013. [12] 任纪舜, 王作勋, 陈炳蔚, 等. 从全球看中国大地构造: 中国及邻区大地构造图简要说明[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1999.REN Jishun, WANG Zuoxun, CHEN Bingwei, et al. A view of Chinese tectonics: brief introduction of the tectonic maps of China and region[M]. Beijing: Geological Press, 1999. [13] 孙焕泉, 蔡勋育, 周德华, 等. 中国石化页岩油勘探实践与展望[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5): 569-575. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2019.05.004SUN Huanquan, CAI Xunyu, ZHOU Dehua, et al. Practice and prospect of SINOPEC shale oil exploration[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5): 569-575. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2019.05.004 [14] 傅成玉. 非常规油气资源勘探开发[M]. 北京: 中国石化出版社, 2015.FU Chengyu. Exploration and development of unconventional petroleum resources[M]. Beijing: China Petrochemical Press, 2015. [15] 宋明水, 刘惠民, 王勇, 等. 济阳坳陷古近系页岩油富集规律认识与勘探实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(2): 225-235. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202002003.htmSONG Mingshui, LIU Huimin, WANG Yong, et al. Enrichment rules and exploration practices of Paleogene shale oil in Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(2): 225-235. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202002003.htm [16] LI Tingwei, JIANG Zhenxue, LI Zhuo, et al. Continental shale pore structure characteristics and their controlling factors: a case study from the lower third member of the Shahejie Formation, Zhanhua Sag, Eastern China[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2017, 45: 670-692. [17] LI Zhiqing, OYEDIRAN I A, HUANG Runqiu, et al. Study on pore structure characteristics of marine and continental shale in China[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2016, 33: 143-152. [18] LI Jijun, WANG Weiming, CAO Qun, et al. Impact of hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency of continental shale upon shale oil accumulations in Eastern China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2015, 59: 467-479. [19] 周新科, 许化政. 东濮凹陷地质特征研究[J]. 石油学报, 2007, 28(5): 20-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB200705005.htmZHOU Xinke, XU Huazheng. Discussion on geological features of Dongpu Depression[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2007, 28(5): 20-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB200705005.htm [20] 张晶, 鹿坤, 蒋飞虎, 等. 东濮凹陷页岩油气富集条件[J]. 断块油气田, 2015, 22(2): 184-188. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT201502010.htmZHANG Jing, LU Kun, JIANG Feihu, et al. Enrichment condition of shale oil and gas in Dongpu Depression[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2015, 22(2): 184-188. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT201502010.htm [21] 余海波, 程秀申, 漆家福, 等. 东濮凹陷古近纪断裂活动对沉积的控制作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5): 12-23. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANX201905002.htmYU Haibo, CHENG Xiushen, QI Jiafu, et al. Control of fault activity on sedimentation of Paleogene in Dongpu Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(5): 12-23. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANX201905002.htm [22] 徐翰. 渤海湾盆地东濮凹陷形成与演化的数值模拟与构造分析[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2018.XU Han. Numerical simulation and structural analysis on the formation and evolution of the Dongpu Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 2018. [23] 徐田武, 张洪安, 李继东, 等. 渤海湾盆地东濮凹陷盐湖相成烃成藏特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(2): 248-261. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201902005.htmXU Tianwu, ZHANG Hong'an, LI Jidong, et al. Characters of hydrocarbon generation and accumulation of salt-lake facies in Dongpu Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(2): 248-261. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201902005.htm [24] 李被, 刘池洋, 黄雷, 等. 东濮凹陷北部沙河街组三段中亚段沉积环境分析[J]. 现代地质, 2018, 32(2): 227-239. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201802002.htmLI Bei, LIU Chiyang, HUANG Lei, et al. Analysis of the sedimentary environment in the north of Dongpu Depression during the deposition of the middle section of the third member of the Shahejie Formation[J]. Geoscience, 2018, 32(2): 227-239. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201802002.htm [25] 蒋启贵, 黎茂稳, 钱门辉, 等. 不同赋存状态页岩油定量表征技术与应用研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2016, 38(6): 842-849. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201606842JIANG Qigui, LI Maowen, QIAN Menhui, et al. Quantitative characterization of shale oil in different occurrence states and its application[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2016, 38(6): 842-849. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201606842 -
下载:
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 632
- HTML全文浏览量: 109
- PDF下载量: 128
- 被引次数: 0
苏公网安备32021102000780号