苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜宁组二段页岩油基本特征及成因分析

昝灵; 白鸾羲; 印燕铃; 张琬璐

doi:10.11781/sysydz202302356

苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜宁组二段页岩油基本特征及成因分析

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202302356

中国石化华东油气分公司, 南京 210019

基金项目:

中国石化科技部项目 P20049-3

中国石化科技部项目 P21112

详细信息

作者简介:
昝灵(1984-), 男, 博士, 研究员, 从事页岩油地质研究。E-mail: zanl.hdsj@sinopec.com

中图分类号: TE122.116
计量
- 文章访问数: 394
- HTML全文浏览量: 118
- PDF下载量: 177
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-03-11
- 修回日期: 2023-03-01
- 刊出日期: 2023-03-28

Basic characteristics and genesis analysis of shale oil in the second member of Paleogene Funing Formation in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

East China Oil and Gas Company, SINOPEC, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210019, China

摘要

摘要: 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜宁组二段陆相页岩油具有高产、稳产特征，在剖析页岩油形成条件的基础上，通过原油物性和地化特征分析，揭示了阜二段页岩油的成因。溱潼凹陷阜二段泥页岩分布广、厚度大，有机质丰度和热演化程度适中，具备形成页岩油的良好物质基础。阜二段页岩油具有低气油比、高异常压力特征，为低含硫轻质—中质油，饱和烃和轻烃含量较高，原油伴生气以甲烷为主。页岩油β-胡萝卜烷、伽马蜡烷含量高，ααα-C₂₉甾烷（20R）含量高于ααα-C₂₇甾烷（20R），形成于咸水的还原环境。热演化程度是控制陆相页岩油品质的关键因素，深凹带阜二段处于生烃高峰，页岩油流动性较好。阜二段Ⅰ、Ⅱ亚段泥页岩普遍含有木栓质体（6.6%）和底栖藻无定型体（11.5%），在成熟阶段既生油又生气，有利于形成轻质组分。阜二段泥页岩具有相对适中的有机质丰度和矿物组成，吸附油能力较弱，滞留油以游离油（69%~96%）为主。
- 热演化程度 /
- 有机质类型 /
- 有机质丰度 /
- 页岩油 /
- 阜宁组二段 /
- 古近系 /
- 溱潼凹陷 /
- 苏北盆地
Abstract: The continental shale oil in the second member of Paleogene Funing Formation in the Qintong Sag, Subei Basin has the characteristics of high and stable production. Based on the analysis of the formation conditions of shale oil, the genesis of shale oil is revealed according to crude oil geochemical characteristics and physical properties. Results show that the mud shale in the second member of Funing Formation in the Qintong Sag is widely distributed and thick, with medium organic matter abundance and moderate thermal evolution, which provides a good material basis for the formation of shale oil. The shale oil in the second member of Funing Formation has the characteristics of low gas/oil ratio and high pressure, which belongs to low sulfur and light to medium oil, with high content of saturated hydrocarbon and light hydrocarbon, and the associated gas of crude oil is mainly methane. The shale oil has high content of β-daucane and gammacerane, and its sterane content of ααα-C₂₉ (20R) is higher than that of ααα-C₂₇ (20R), indicating that it is formed in the reduction environment of salt water. Thermal evolution is the key factor controlling the quality of continental shale oil. The second member of Funing Formation in the deep sag zone is at the peak of hydrocarbon generation, and the shale oil has good fluidity. The mud shale in the Ⅰ and Ⅱ submembers of the second member of Funing Formation generally contains suberinite (6.6%) and amorphous body of benthic algal (11.5%), and can generate oil and gas at the mature stage, which is conducive to the formation of light components. The mud shale in the second member of Funing Formation has the characteristics of moderate organic matter abundance and mineral composition, and its oil adsorption capacity is poor, making the remaining oil mainly free oil (69%-96%).
- thermal evolution /
- organic matter type /
- organic matter abundance /
- shale oil /
- the second member of Funing Formation /
- Qintong Sag /
- Subei Basin /

HTML全文

图 1 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷阜宁组二段暗色泥岩(有机碳含量大于0.5%)厚度分布

Figure 1. Thickness of dark mudstone (TOC>0.5%) in the second member of Funing Formation in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷阜宁组二段泥页岩综合柱状图

Figure 2. Composite columnar section of mud shale in the second member of Funing Formation in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷阜宁组二段泥页岩有机质类型划分

Figure 3. Classification of organic matter types of mud shale in the second member of Funing Formation in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷阜宁组二段泥页岩R_o随埋深变化趋势

Figure 4. Variation trend of mud shale R_o with buried depth in the second member of Funing Formation in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷阜宁组二段页岩油和泥页岩生物标志化合物对比

Figure 5. Comparison of biomarkers between shale oil and mud shale in the second member of Funing Formation in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷阜宁组二段页岩油和泥页岩生标指纹对比

T1.13β(H), 14α(H)-C₁₉三环萜烷；T2.13β(H), 14α(H)-C₂₀三环萜烷；T3.13β(H), 14α(H)-C₂₁三环萜烷；T4.13β(H), 14α(H)-C₂₂三环萜烷；T5.13β(H), 14α(H)-C₂₃三环萜烷；T6.13β(H), 14α(H)-C₂₄三环萜烷；T7.C₂₄-四环萜烷；T8.13β(H), 14α(H)-C₂₆三环萜烷(R)；T9.13β(H), 14α(H)-C₂₆-三环萜烷(S)；T10.13β(H), 14α(H)-C₂₈三环萜烷(R)；T11.13β(H), 14α(H)-C₂₈三环萜烷(S)；T12.13β(H), 14α(H)-C₂₉三环萜烷(R)；T13.13β(H), 14α(H)-C₂₉三环萜烷(S)；S1.C₂₁-5α(H)-孕甾烷；S2.C₂₂-5α(H)-升孕甾烷；S3.5α(H), 14α(H), 17α(H)-胆甾烷(20S)；S4.5α(H), 14β(H), 17β(H)-胆甾烷(20R)；S5.5α(H), 14β(H), 17β(H)-胆甾烷(20S)；S6.5α(H), 14α(H), 17α(H)-胆甾烷(20R)；S7.24-甲基-5α(H), 14α(H), 17α(H)-胆甾烷(20S)；S8.24-甲基-5α(H), 14β(H), 17β(H)-胆甾烷(20R)；S9.24-甲基-5α(H), 14β(H), 17β(H)-胆甾烷(20S)；S10.24-甲基-5α(H), 14α(H), 17α(H)-胆甾烷(20R)；S11.24-乙基-5α(H), 14α(H), 17α(H)-胆甾烷(20S)；S12.24-乙基-5α(H), 14β(H), 17β(H)-胆甾烷(20R)；S13.24-乙基-5α(H), 14β(H), 17β(H)-胆甾烷(20S)

Figure 6. Comparison of biological standard fingerprints between shale oil and mud shale in the second member of Funing Formation in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷阜宁组二段含油饱和度指数(OSI)、氯仿沥青“A”随深度变化关系

Figure 7. Variation of oil saturation index (OSI) and chloroform bitumen "A" with depth in the second member of Funing Formation in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷阜宁组二段泥页岩有机显微组分

Figure 8. Organic macerals of mud shale in the second member of Funing Formation in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷深凹带阜宁组二段泥页岩生烃转化率对比

Figure 9. Comparison of hydrocarbon generation conversion rate of mud shale in the second member of Funing Formation in deep sag zone of Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷阜宁组二段泥页岩有机质丰度、矿物组成与含油性关系

Figure 10. Relationship between organic matter abundance, mineral components and oil content of mud shale in the second member of Funing Formation in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷阜宁组二段游离油和束缚油随深度变化趋势

S_1-1为游离轻质油；S_1-2为游离中质油；S_2-1为吸附油

Figure 11. Variation trend of free oil and bound oil with depth in the second member of Funing Formation in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷阜宁组二段页岩油物性特征

Table 1. Physical properties of shale oil in the second member of Funing Formation in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

井号	埋深/m	密度/(g·cm^-3)	动力黏度(50 ℃)/(mPa·s)	含硫/%
SY3-7HF	3 636~3 815	$\frac{0.868\;1 \sim 0.888\;3}{0.878\;1}$	$\frac{31.54 \sim 292.14}{108.15}$	$\frac{0.17 \sim 0.35}{0.25}$
SD1	3 826~3 952	$\frac{0.879\;1 \sim 0.898\;7}{0.888\;1}$	$\frac{40.04 \sim 118.37}{67.18}$	$\frac{0.16 \sim 0.51}{0.34}$
QY1	4 015~4 165	$\frac{0.838\;1 \sim 0.870\;0}{0.850\;0}$	$\frac{11.45 \sim 26.64}{16.98}$	$\frac{0.08 \sim 0.26}{0.14}$
注：表中分式意义为$\frac{ { 最小值 \sim 最大值 }}{ { 平均值 }}$。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷阜宁组二段有机显微组分分布

Table 2. Distribution of organic macerals in the second member of Funing Formation in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

层位	腐泥组/%	壳质组/%	镜质组/%	惰质组/%	类型指数	干酪根类型
Ⅴ亚段	12.2	74.2	11.9	1.7	38.7	Ⅱ₂型
Ⅳ亚段	38.6	53.5	6.9	1.0	59.2	Ⅱ₁型
Ⅲ亚段	23.4	63.4	10.8	2.4	44.6	Ⅱ₁型
Ⅱ亚段	14.4	64.0	17.1	4.5	29.1	Ⅱ₂型
Ⅰ亚段	7.6	66.6	22.1	3.7	20.6	Ⅱ₂型

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(26)

[1]	聂海宽, 张培先, 边瑞康, 等. 中国陆相页岩油富集特征[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(2): 55-62. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201602009.htm NIE Haikuan, ZHANG Peixian, BIAN Ruikang, et al. Oil accumulation characteristics of China continental shale[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23(2): 55-62. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201602009.htm
[2]	支东明, 唐勇, 杨智峰, 等. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷陆相页岩油地质特征与聚集机理[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3): 524-534. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201903009.htm ZHI Dongming, TANG Yong, YANG Zhifeng, et al. Geological characteristics and accumulation mechanism of continental shale oil in Jimusaer Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(3): 524-534. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201903009.htm
[3]	付金华, 李士祥, 牛小兵, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系长7段页岩油地质特征与勘探实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(5): 870-883. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202005005.htm FU Jinhua, LI Shixiang, NIU Xiaobing, et al. Geological characteristics and exploration of shale oil in Chang 7 Member of Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(5): 870-883. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202005005.htm
[4]	孙龙德, 刘合, 何文渊, 等. 大庆古龙页岩油重大科学问题与研究路径探析[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(3): 453-463. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202103002.htm SUN Longde, LIU He, HE Wenyuan, et al. An analysis of major scientific problems and research paths of Gulong shale oil in Daqing Oilfield, NE China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(3): 453-463. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202103002.htm
[5]	昝灵, 骆卫峰, 印燕铃, 等. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜宁组二段页岩油形成条件及有利区评价[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(2): 233-241. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202102233 ZAN Lin, LUO Weifeng, YIN Yanling, et al. Formation conditions of shale oil and favorable targets in the second member of Paleogene Funing Formation in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(2): 233-241. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202102233
[6]	李东海, 昝灵, 黄文欢, 等. 溱潼凹陷西斜坡阜三段隐蔽油藏勘探开发一体化实践[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(3): 281-290. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202103002.htm LI Donghai, ZAN Ling, HUANG Wenhuan, et al. Exploration and development integration practice of subtle reservoir of 3rd member of Funing Formation in western slope of Qintong depression[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(3): 281-290. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202103002.htm
[7]	张世明. 东营凹陷页岩油赋存特征分子动力学模拟[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2021, 28(5): 74-80. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS202105008.htm ZHANG Shiming. Molecular dynamics simulation of shale oil occurrence in Dongying Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2021, 28(5): 74-80. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS202105008.htm
[8]	刘丽, 闵令元, 孙志刚, 等. 济阳坳陷页岩油储层孔隙结构与渗流特征[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2021, 28(1): 106-114. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS202101014.htm LIU Li, MIN Lingyuan, SUN Zhigang, et al. Pore structure and percolation characteristics in shale oil reservoir of Jiyang Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2021, 28(1): 106-114. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS202101014.htm
[9]	周立宏, 何海清, 郭绪杰, 等. 渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷古近系沙一下亚段中等成熟页岩油富集主控因素与勘探突破[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(5): 1073-1086. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202205006.htm Zhou Lihong, He Haiqing, Guo Xujie, et al. Main factors controlling the medium-mature shale oil enrichment and exploration breakthrough in the Paleogene lower E₃s1L in Qikou Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(5): 1073-1086. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202205006.htm
[10]	彭寿昌, 查小军, 雷祥辉, 等. 吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组上"甜点"段页岩油储层演化特征及差异性评价[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(4): 30-38. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ202104005.htm PENG Shouchang, ZHA Xiaojun, LEI Xianghui, et al. Evolution characteristics and difference evaluation of shale oil reservoirs in the upper sweet spot interval of Lucaogou Formation in Jimusaer Sag[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2021, 28(4): 30-38. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ202104005.htm
[11]	姚振华, 覃建华, 高阳, 等. 吉木萨尔凹陷页岩油物性变化规律[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(1): 72-78. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202201011.htm YAO Zhenhua, QIN Jianhua, GAO Yang, et al. Variations of physical properties of shale oil in Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2022, 43(1): 72-78. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202201011.htm
[12]	章敬. 非常规油藏地质工程一体化效益开发实践: 以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组页岩油为例[J]. 断块油气田, 2021, 28(2): 151-155. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202102003.htm ZHANG Jing. Effective development practices of geology-engineering integration on unconventional oil reservoirs: taking Lucaogou Formation shale oil in Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin for example[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2021, 28(2): 151-155. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202102003.htm
[13]	王然, 何文军, 赵辛楣, 等. 准噶尔盆地吉174井芦草沟组页岩油地质剖面分析[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(1): 192-203 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202201017.htm WANG Ran, HE Wenjun, ZHAO Xinmei, et al. Geological section analysis of shale oil in Lucaogou Formation of Well-Ji-174, Junggar Basin[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(1): 192-203 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202201017.htm
[14]	张治恒, 田继军, 韩长城, 等. 吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 116-126. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANX202102012.htm ZHANG Zhiheng, TIAN Jijun, HAN Changcheng, et al. Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag, Jungger Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(2): 116-126. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANX202102012.htm
[15]	柳波, 石佳欣, 付晓飞, 等. 陆相泥页岩层系岩相特征与页岩油富集条件: 以松辽盆地古龙凹陷白垩系青山口组一段富有机质泥页岩为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(5): 828-838. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201805009.htm LIU Bo, SHI Jiaxin, FU Xiaofei, et al. Petrological characteristics and shale oil enrichment of lacustrine fine-grained sedimentary system: a case study of organic-rich shale in first member of Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in Gulong Sag, Songliao Basin, NE China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(5): 828-838. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201805009.htm
[16]	宋明水, 刘惠民, 王勇, 等. 济阳坳陷古近系页岩油富集规律认识与勘探实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(2): 225-235. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202002003.htm SONG Mingshui, LIU Huimin, WANG Yong, et al. Enrichment rules and exploration practices of Paleogene shale oil in Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(2): 225-235. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202002003.htm
[17]	覃建华, 高儇博, 彭寿昌, 等. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷页岩油地球化学特征及油-源对比[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2021, 45(1): 1-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQSY202101001.htm QIN Jianhua, GAO Xuanbo, PENG Shouchang, et al. Geochemical characteristics and oil-source correlation of shale oil in Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin, China[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum Univer-sity, 2021, 45(1): 1-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQSY202101001.htm
[18]	张君峰, 徐兴友, 白静, 等. 松辽盆地南部白垩系青一段深湖相页岩油富集模式及勘探实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(4): 637-652. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202004002.htm ZHANG Junfeng, XU Xingyou, BAI Jing, et al. Enrichment and exploration of deep lacustrine shale oil in the first member of Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation, southern Songliao Basin, NE China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(4): 637-652. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202004002.htm
[19]	徐兴友, 刘卫彬, 白静, 等. 松辽盆地南部青山口组一段页岩油富集地质特征及资源潜力[J]. 地质与资源, 2021, 30(3): 296-305. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GJSD202103011.htm XU Xingyou, LIU Weibin, BAI Jing, et al. Enrichment characte-ristics and resource potential of shale oil in the first member of Qingshankou Formation in southern Songliao Basin[J]. Geology and Resources, 2021, 30(3): 296-305. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GJSD202103011.htm
[20]	王民, 马睿, 李进步, 等. 济阳坳陷古近系沙河街组湖相页岩油赋存机理[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(4): 789-802. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201904020.htm WANG Min, MA Rui, LI Jinbu, et al. Occurrence mechanism of lacustrine shale oil in the Paleogene Shahejie Formation of Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(4): 789-802. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201904020.htm
[21]	姚红生, 昝灵, 高玉巧, 等. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜宁组二段页岩油富集高产主控因素与勘探重大突破[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(5): 776-783. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202105776 YAO Hongsheng, ZAN Ling, GAO Yuqiao, et al. Main controlling factors for the enrichment of shale oil and significant discovery in second member of Paleogene Funing Formation, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(5): 776-783. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202105776
[22]	昝灵, 骆卫峰, 马晓东. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷阜二段烃源岩生烃潜力及形成环境[J]. 非常规油气, 2016, 3(3): 1-8. ZAN Ling, LUO Weifeng, MA Xiaodong. Hydrocarbon generation potential and genetic environments of second member of Funing Formation in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2016, 3(3): 1-8.
[23]	李浩, 陆建林, 王保华, 等. 陆相页岩油富集高产关键因素分析[J]. 现代地质, 2020, 34(4): 837-848. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ202004020.htm LI Hao, LU Jianlin, WANG Baohua, et al. Critical controlling factors of enrichment and high-yield of land shale oil[J]. Geoscience, 2020, 34(4): 837-848. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ202004020.htm
[24]	陈春峰, 万延周, 张伯成, 等. 南黄海盆地阜宁组烃源岩地层热压生烃特征[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2021, 37(4): 18-24. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HYDT202104002.htm CHEN Chunfeng, WAN Yanzhou, ZHANG Bocheng, et al. Thermo-compression characteristics of hydrocarbon generation for the source rocks in the Funing Formation of South Yellow Sea Basin[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2021, 37(4): 18-24. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HYDT202104002.htm
[25]	黎茂稳, 马晓潇, 蒋启贵, 等. 北美海相页岩油形成条件、富集特征与启示[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(1): 13-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201901002.htm LI Maowen, MA Xiaoxiao, JIANG Qigui, et al. Enlightenment from formation conditions and enrichment characteristics of marine shale oil in North America[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(1): 13-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201901002.htm
[26]	张科, 姚素平, 胡文瑄, 等. 木栓质的菌解-热模拟实验特征及木栓质体的成烃演化机制[J]. 地质学报, 2011, 85(6): 1045-1057. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201106013.htm ZHANG Ke, YAO Suping, HU Wenxuan, et al. Bacterial degradation and thermal simulation of suberin in quercus suberus: implications for hydrocarbon generation of suberinite[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2011, 85(6): 1045-1057. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201106013.htm