塔里木盆地顺北地区奥陶系超深层原油裂解动力学及地质意义

李慧莉; 马安来; 蔡勋育; 林会喜; 李建交; 刘金钟; 朱秀香; 吴鲜

doi:10.11781/sysydz202105818

塔里木盆地顺北地区奥陶系超深层原油裂解动力学及地质意义

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202105818

1.
中国石化石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 102206
2.
中国石油化工集团有限公司油田事业部, 北京 100728
3.
中国科学院广州地球化学研究所, 广州 510640
4.
中国石化西北油田分公司, 乌鲁木齐 830011

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金 U19B6003

国家自然科学基金 41772153

中国石化科技部项目 P19024-4

中国石化科技部项目 P21085-8

详细信息

作者简介:
李慧莉(1972-), 女, 博士, 高级工程师, 从事油气成藏及石油地质综合研究。E-mail: lihl.syky@sinopec.com

通讯作者:
马安来(1969-), 男, 博士, 副教授, 从事油气地球化学及成藏机理研究。E-mail: maal.syky@sinopec.com

中图分类号: TE122.3
计量
- 文章访问数: 376
- HTML全文浏览量: 91
- PDF下载量: 52
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-06-09
- 修回日期: 2021-08-13
- 刊出日期: 2021-09-28

Kinetics of oil-cracking of ultra-deep Ordovician oil in the North Shuntuoguole area of Tarim Basin and its geological implications

1.
SINOPEC Petroleum Exploration & Production Research Institute, Beijing 102206, China
2.
Department of Oilfield Exploration & Development, SINOPEC, Beijing 100728, China
3.
Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Science, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510640, China
4.
SINOPEC Northwest Oilfield Company, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830011, China

摘要

摘要: 随着塔里木盆地海相油气勘探向深层的拓展，超深层油藏赋存温度上限是有机地球化学和石油地质学关注的科学问题。使用封闭体系黄金管热模拟实验方法，对塔里木盆地顺北7井奥陶系超深层原油开展了50 MPa、90 MPa两种压力和2℃/h、20℃/h两种升温速率的热模拟实验；根据模拟实验结果，应用Kinetics软件进行化学动力学计算，对比不同温压条件下原油热裂解进程，讨论其地质意义。结果表明，在不同温压条件下，同一原油具有基本相似的裂解过程和基本一致的终点温度裂解总生气量。在原油裂解中，早期有重烃气的生成，晚期重烃气进一步转化为甲烷。升温速率对原油裂解进程影响显著，较高的升温速率下，原油裂解进程向高温推移，并且具有较高的油相保存温度上限。压力对原油裂解的影响较小。同一升温速率条件下，裂解早期压力对原油热裂解稍有"抑制"作用，而裂解晚期，压力则稍有"促进"作用。原油在不同温压条件下裂解过程的差异，可以用裂解活化能分布的差异进行解释。顺北7井原油在两种压力条件下均具有相对集中的活化能分布，表明原油发生裂解转化过程的"温度窗"相对较窄。顺北一区油相保持的温度上限高于180℃，在埋深9 000 m的深部仍可保持油相。
- 原油热裂解 /
- 动力学模拟 /
- 油气藏相态 /
- 奥陶系 /
- 超深层 /
- 顺北地区 /
- 塔里木盆地
Abstract: With the expansion to the deep strata for the exploration of marine oil and gas in the Tarim Basin, the upper limit of temperature for the occurrence of ultra-deep reservoirs has become a scientific concerning of organic geochemistry and petroleum geology. Thermal simulations of the ultra-deep Ordovician oil from well SB 7 in the North Shuntuoguole area of Tarim Basin were carried out using a gold-tube confined system under two different pressures of 50 and 90 MPa and two different heating rates of 2 and 20℃/h, respectively. According to the results of simulation experiments, Kinetics software was used to calculate the chemical kinetics, and the mass yield of gas generation during oil-cracking under different temperature and pressure conditions was compared, and its geological significance was discussed. Under different temperature and pressure stages, the same oil sample experienced a similar process of oil-cracking as well as of total volume and mass yield of gas generation. Heavier gas compounts were generated in the early stage of oil-cracking and further transformed to form methane in the later stage. Heating rates impacted greatly on oil-cracking processes. Under a higher heating rate, the oil-cracking process moved to higher temperature and the separate oil phase can be kept with a higher temperature limit. High pressures only played minor roles on oil-cracking. With the same heating rate, higher pressure negligibly suppressed oil-cracking in the early stage of oil-cracking, whereas in the later stage, higher pressure promoted oil-cracking a bit. The difference of oil-cracking process under different temperatures and pressures can be explained by the distribution of activation energy. The distribution of activation energy of C₁-C₅ gas mass yield of oil-cracking of well SB 7 is relatively more concentrated, suggesting that the "temperature window" of oil-cracking is relatively narrower. According to the thermal simulation and kinetics calculation results, the maximum temperature of oil phase in the block 1 in the North Shuntuoguole area is greater than 180℃, and oil phase can be maintained at a depth greater than 9 000 m.
- oil cracking /
- kinetics simulation /
- reservoir fluid phase /
- Ordovician /
- ultra-deep /
- North Shuntuoguole area /
- Tarim Basin

HTML全文

图 1 塔里木盆地顺北地区顺北7井原油全油色谱、饱和烃色谱—质谱质量色谱图

Figure 1. Whole oil gas chromatogram, mass chromatograms of saturated fraction of oil from well SB 7 in North Shuntuoguole area, Tarim Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 塔里木盆地顺北地区顺北7井原油热裂解模拟实验气体体积产率(a, c, e)、气体质量产率(b, d, f)与热裂解温度的关系

Figure 2. Gas volume (a, c, e) and mass yields (b, d, f) with pyrolysis temperatures of oil samples from well SB 7 in North Shuntuoguole area, Tarim Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 塔里木盆地顺北地区顺北7井原油在两种压力条件下裂解C₁—C₅质量转化率及活化能分布

Figure 3. Activation energy distribution and gas mass yields of C₁-C₅ of oil from well SB7 in North Shuntuoguole area, Tarim Basin at 50 and 90 MPa

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 塔里木盆地顺北地区顺北7井原油在两种压力条件、不同升温速率下原油裂解生气转化率与温度的关系

Figure 4. Mass conversion rates of oil from well SB 7 in North Shuntuoguole area, Tarim Basin with geological temperature at different pressures and heating rates

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 50 MPa压力条件下塔里木盆地不同类型海相原油升温速率与独立油相保存地质温度上限的关系

Figure 5. Temperature at which liquid oil as a separate phase for a possible geological heating rates under 50 MPa for different types of marine oil of Tarim Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 塔里木盆地海相原油两种压力、不同升温速率独立油相保存的地质温度

Table 1. Geological temperatures of marine oil of Tarim Basin as a separate oil phase under two pressures and different heating rates ℃

升温速率/(℃·Ma^-1)	50 MPa		90 MPa
升温速率/(℃·Ma^-1)	C=51%	C=62.5%	C=51%	C=62.5%
0.2	179	181	180	182
0.5	185	188	186	189
1	190	193	191	193
2	195	197	196	198
3	197	200	198	200
5	202	204	202	204
8	204	207	205	207
10	206	209	207	210

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(35)

[1]	马永生, 黎茂稳, 蔡勋育, 等. 中国海相深层油气富集机理与勘探开发: 研究现状、关键技术瓶颈与基础科学问题[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(4): 655-672. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202004002.htm MA Yongsheng, LI Maowen, CAI Xunyu, et al. Mechanisms and exploitation of deep marine petroleum accumulations in China: advances, technological bottlenecks and basic scientific problems[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(4): 655-672. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202004002.htm
[2]	何治亮, 张军涛, 丁茜, 等. 深层—超深层优质碳酸盐岩储层形成控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(4): 633-644. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201704001.htm HE Zhiliang, ZHANG Juntao, DING Qian, et al. Factors controlling the formation of high-quality deep to ultra-deep carbonate reservoirs[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38(4): 633-644. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201704001.htm
[3]	何治亮, 李双建, 刘全有, 等. 盆地深部地质作用与深层资源: 科学问题与攻关方向[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(5): 767-779. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202005767 HE Zhiliang, LI Shuangjian, LIU Quanyou, et al. Deep geolo-gical processes and deep resources in basins: scientific issues and research directions[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(5): 767-779. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202005767
[4]	杨海军, 李勇, 唐雁刚, 等. 塔里木盆地克拉苏盐下深层大气田的发现[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2019, 40(1): 12-20. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD201901003.htm YANG Haijun, LI Yong, TANG Yan'gang, et al. Discovery of Kelasu subsalt deep large gas field, Tarim Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019, 40(1): 12-20. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD201901003.htm
[5]	漆立新, 云露, 曹自成, 等. 顺北油气田地质储量评估与油气勘探方向[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2021, 42(2): 127-135. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202102001.htm QI Lixin, YUN Lu, CAO Zicheng, et al. Geological reserves assessment and petroleum exploration targets in Shunbei oil & gas field[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2021, 42(2): 127-135. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202102001.htm
[6]	云露. 顺北地区奥陶系超深断溶体油气成藏条件[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2021, 42(2): 136-142. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202102002.htm YUN Lu. Hydrocarbon accumulation of ultra-deep Ordovician fault-karst reservoirs in Shunbei area[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2021, 42(2): 136-142. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202102002.htm
[7]	漆立新. 塔里木盆地顺北超深断溶体油藏特征与启示[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(1): 102-111. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202001010.htm QI Lixin. Characteristics and inspiration of ultra-deep fault-karst reservoir in the Shunbei area of the Tarim Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(1): 102-111. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202001010.htm
[8]	文山师, 李海英, 洪才均, 等. 顺北油田断溶体储层地震响应特征及描述技术[J]. 断块油气田, 2020, 27(1): 45-49. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202001010.htm WEN Shanshi, LI Haiying, HONG Caijun, et al. Technology of seismic response characteristics and description of fault-karst reservoir in Shunbei Oilfield[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2020, 27(1): 45-49. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202001010.htm
[9]	焦方正. 塔里木盆地顺北特深碳酸盐岩断溶体油气藏发现意义与前景[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(2): 207-216. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201802002.htm JIAO Fangzheng. Significance and prospect of ultra-deep carbonate fault-karst reservoirs in Shunbei area, Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(2): 207-216. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201802002.htm
[10]	漆立新. 塔里木盆地顺托果勒隆起奥陶系碳酸盐岩超深层油气突破及其意义[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2016, 21(3): 38-51. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201603004.htm QI Lixin. Oil and gas breakthrough in ultra-deep Ordovician carbonate formations in Shuntuoguole Uplift, Tarim Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2016, 21(3): 38-51. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201603004.htm
[11]	邹榕, 徐中祥, 张晓明, 等. 顺北和托甫台区块奥陶系断裂结构单元测井响应特征初探[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(2): 18-23. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202002004.htm ZOU Rong, XU Zhongxiang, ZHANG Xiaoming, et al. Log response characteristics of Ordovician fracture unit in Shunbei and Tuofutai block[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(2): 18-23. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202002004.htm
[12]	谷茸, 云露, 朱秀香, 等. 塔里木盆地顺北油田油气来源研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(2): 248-254. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD202002012.htm GU Rong, YUN Lu, ZHU Xiuxiang, et al. Oil and gas sources in Shunbei Oilfield, Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(2): 248-254. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD202002012.htm
[13]	刘宝增. 塔里木盆地顺北地区油气差异聚集主控因素分析: 以顺北1号、顺北5号走滑断裂带为例[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(3): 83-95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202003008.htm LIU Baozeng. Analysis of main controlling factors of oil and gas differential accumulation in Shunbei area, Tarim Basin: taking Shunbei No. 1 and No. 5 strike slip fault zones as examples[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(3): 83-95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202003008.htm
[14]	马安来, 金之钧, 李慧莉, 等. 塔里木盆地顺北地区奥陶系超深层油藏蚀变作用及保存[J]. 地球科学, 2020, 45(5): 1737-1753. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX202005017.htm MA Anlai, JIN Zhijun, LI Huili, et al. Secondary alteration and preservation of ultra-deep Ordovician oil reservoirs of North Shuntuoguole area of Tarim Basin, NW China[J]. Earth Science, 2020, 45(5): 1737-1753. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX202005017.htm
[15]	顾忆, 万旸璐, 黄继文, 等. "大埋深、高压力"条件下塔里木盆地超深层油气勘探前景[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41(2): 157-164. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD201902002.htm GU Yi, WAN Yanglu, HUANG Jiwen, et al. Prospects for ultra-deep oil and gas in the "deep burial and high pressure" Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41(2): 157-164. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD201902002.htm
[16]	马安来, 林会喜, 云露, 等. 塔里木盆地顺北地区奥陶系超深层原油金刚烷化合物分布及意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(3): 334-346. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX202103002.htm MA Anlai, LIN Huixi, YUN Lu, et al. Characteristics of diamondoids in oils from the ultra-deep Ordovician in the North Shun-tuoguole area in Tarim Basin, NW China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2021, 32(3): 334-346. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX202103002.htm
[17]	马安来, 何治亮, 云露, 等. 塔里木盆地顺北地区奥陶系超深层天然气地球化学特征及成因[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(7): 1047-1060. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX202107011.htm MA Anlai, HE Zhiliang, YUN Lu, et al. The geochemical characteristics and origin of Ordovician ultra-deep natural gas in the North Shuntuoguole are, Tarim Basin, NW China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2021, 32(7): 1047-1060. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX202107011.htm
[18]	马安来. 塔河油田不同类型海相原油裂解动力学分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(6): 1120-1128. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201506014.htm MA Anlai. Kinetics of oil-cracking of different types of marine oils from Tahe oilfield, Tarim Basin, NW China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26(6): 1120-1128. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201506014.htm
[19]	马安来, 金之钧, 刘金钟. 塔里木盆地寒武系深层油气赋存相态研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2015, 37(6): 681-688. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD201506004.htm MA Anlai, JIN Zhijun, LIU Jinzhong. Hydrocarbon phase in the deep Cambrian of the Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2015, 37(6): 681-688. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD201506004.htm
[20]	李贤庆, 仰云峰, 冯松宝, 等. 塔里木盆地原油裂解生烃特征与生气过程研究[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2012, 41(3): 397-405. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD201203012.htm LI Xianqing, YANG Yunfeng, FENG Songbao, et al. Characteristics of hydrocarbon and gas generation process from pyrolyzed crude oils in Tarim Basin[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2012, 41(3): 397-405. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD201203012.htm
[21]	朱光有, 杨海军, 苏劲, 等. 塔里木盆地海相石油的真实勘探潜力[J]. 岩石学报, 2012, 28(4): 1333-1347. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201204029.htm ZHU Guangyou, YANG Haijun, SU Jin, et al. True exploration potential of marine oils in the Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2012, 28(4): 1333-1347. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201204029.htm
[22]	何坤, 张水昌, 米敬奎. 原油裂解的动力学及控制因素研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2011, 22(2): 211-218. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201102003.htm HE Kun, ZHANG Shuichang, MI Jingkui. Research on the kinetics and controlling factors for oil cracking[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2011, 22(2): 211-218. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201102003.htm
[23]	田辉, 王招明, 肖中尧, 等. 原油裂解成气动力学模拟及其意义[J]. 科学通报, 2006, 51(15): 1821-1827. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXTB200615013.htm TIAN Hui, WANG Zhaoming, XIAO Zhongyao, et al. Oil cracking to gases: kinetic modeling and geological significance[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2006, 51(22): 2763-2770. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXTB200615013.htm
[24]	田春志, 卢双舫, 李启明, 等. 塔里木盆地原油高压条件下裂解成气的化学动力学模型及其意义[J]. 沉积学报, 2002, 20(3): 488-492. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB200203021.htm TIAN Chunzhi, LU Shuangfang, LI Qiming, et al. The chemical kinetic model of oil cracking to gas under high pressure in Tarim Basin and its significance[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2002, 20(3): 488-492. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB200203021.htm
[25]	曹自成, 路清华, 顾忆, 等. 塔里木盆地顺北油气田1号和5号断裂带奥陶系油气藏特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(5): 975-984. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202005009.htm CAO Zicheng, LU Qinghua, GU Yi, et al. Characteristics of Ordovician reservoirs in Shunbei 1 and 5 fault zones, Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(5): 975-984. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202005009.htm
[26]	罗明霞, 夏永涛, 邵小明, 等. 塔里木盆地顺北油气田不同层系原油地球化学特征对比及成因分析[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41(6): 849-854. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD201906009.htm LUO Mingxia, XIA Yongtao, SHAO Xiaoming, et al. Geochemical characteristics and origin of oil from different strata in Shunbei oil and gas field, Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41(6): 849-854. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD201906009.htm
[27]	董鹏, 李贤庆, 仰云峰, 等. 原油裂解成气动力学研究进展[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2009, 28(2): 201-208. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KYDH200902016.htm DONG Peng, LI Xianqing, YANG Yunfeng, et al. The advancement of kinetic study on crude oil-cracking gas[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2009, 28(2): 201-208. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KYDH200902016.htm
[28]	SCHENK H J, DI PRIMIO R, HORSFIELD B. The conversion of oil into gas in petroleum reservoirs. Part 1: comparative kinetic investigation of gas generation from crude oils of lacustrine, marine and fluviodeltaic origin by programmed-temperature closed-system pyrolysis[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 1997, 26(7/8): 467-481.
[29]	WAPLES D W. The kinetics of in-reservoir oil destruction and gas formation: constraints from experimental and empirical data, and from thermodynamics[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2000, 31(6): 553-575. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146638000000231
[30]	CLAYPOOL G E, MANCINI E A. Geochemical relationships of petroleum in Mesozoic reservoirs to carbonate source rocks of Jurassic Smackover Formation, southwestern Alabama[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1989, 73(7): 904-924.
[31]	MCCAIN W D Jr, BRIDGES B. Volatile oils and retrograde gases: what's the difference[J]. Petroleum Engineer International, 1994, 66(1): 35-36.
[32]	HUNT J M. Petroleum geochemistry and geology[M]. 2nd ed. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company, 1995: 743.
[33]	王斌, 赵永强, 何生, 等. 塔里木盆地顺北5号断裂带北段奥陶系油气成藏期次及其控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(5): 965-974. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202005008.htm WANG Bin, ZHAO Yongqiang, HE Sheng, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation stages and their controlling factors in the northern Ordovician Shunbei 5 fault zone, Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(5): 965-974. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202005008.htm
[34]	王玉伟, 陈红汉, 郭会芳, 等. 塔里木盆地顺1走滑断裂带超深储层油气充注历史[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(5): 972-989 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201905003.htm WANG Yuwei, CHEN Honghan, GUO Huifang, et al. Hydrocarbon charging history of the ultra-deep reservoir in Shun 1 strike-slip fault zone, Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(5): 972-989. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201905003.htm
[35]	王昱翔, 王斌, 顾忆, 等. 塔里木盆地顺北地区中下奥陶统缝洞充填方解石地球化学特征及地质意义[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41(4): 583-592. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD201904016.htm WANG Yuxiang, WANG Bin, GU Yi, et al. Geochemical characteristics and geological significance of calcite filled fractures and caves in Middle-Lower Ordovician, northern Shuntuoguole area, Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41(4): 583-592. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD201904016.htm