准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组不同岩相泥质烃源岩品质与含油性特征——以J10025井为例

何晋译; 冷筠滢; 何文军; 李志明; 刘得光; 杨森; 李楚雄

doi:10.11781/sysydz2025030606

准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组不同岩相泥质烃源岩品质与含油性特征——以J10025井为例

doi: 10.11781/sysydz2025030606

何晋译^{1, 2, 3,},
冷筠滢^{1, 2, 3, ,},
何文军⁴,
李志明^{1, 2, 3},
刘得光⁴,
杨森⁴,
李楚雄^{1, 2, 3}

1.
中国石化石油勘探开发研究院无锡石油地质研究所, 江苏无锡 214126
2.
页岩油气富集机理与高效开发全国重点实验室, 江苏无锡 214126
3.
中国石化油气成藏重点实验室, 江苏无锡 214126
4.
中国石油新疆油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 新疆克拉玛依 834000

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金 42090022

中国石化石油勘探开发研究院院重点课题 YK-2023-18

详细信息

作者简介:
何晋译(1990—)，男，博士，助理研究员，主要从事页岩油气赋存与富集机理研究。E-mail: hjy0423@163.com

通讯作者:
冷筠滢(1993-), 女, 硕士, 助理研究员, 主要从事石油地质研究。E-mail: Lengjy2986.syky@sinopec.com

中图分类号: TE122.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 23
- HTML全文浏览量: 9
- PDF下载量: 3
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2024-02-21
- 修回日期: 2025-04-06
- 刊出日期: 2025-05-28

Quality and oil-bearing properties of argillaceous hydrocarbon source rocks across different lithofacies of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin: a case study of well J10025

HE Jinyi^{1, 2, 3
,},
LENG Junying^{1, 2, 3
, ,},
HE Wenjun⁴,
LI Zhiming^{1, 2, 3},
LIU Deguang⁴,
YANG Sen⁴,
LI Chuxiong^{1, 2, 3}

1.
Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, SINOPEC, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China
2.
State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China
3.
SINOPEC Key Laboratory of Hydrocarbon Accumulation Mechanisms, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China
4.
Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Xinjiang Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, China

摘要

摘要: 不同岩相泥质烃源岩品质与含油性特征研究可为揭示页岩油富集规律及预测甜点提供重要依据。选取准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷J10025井二叠系芦草沟组57块泥岩样品，通过X射线衍射、薄片观察、岩石热解、有机岩石学、镜质体反射率、多温阶热解等综合分析，在岩相划分的基础上，系统研究了不同岩相泥质烃源岩品质与含油性特征。结果表明，吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组主要发育块状长英质泥岩、块状灰质泥岩、块状云质泥岩、纹层状长英质泥岩、纹层状含灰质泥岩、纹层状灰质泥岩和纹层状云质泥岩7类岩相。不同岩相泥质烃源岩品质差异明显，其中块状长英质泥岩和块状灰质泥岩品质较差，块状云质泥岩品质中等，纹层状长英质泥岩品质较好，而纹层状含灰质泥岩、纹层状灰质泥岩和纹层状云质泥岩为优质烃源岩。块状云质泥岩含油性和可动性相对较好，是相对有利的页岩油甜点岩相。J10025井大约在3 500~3 570 m和3 700~3 750 m深度区间存在含油性较好的泥岩，但整体可动性差，制约了泥岩类页岩油甜点的发育。影响泥岩含油性与可动性的主要因素包括生烃能力、排烃效率与TOC含量。游离烃含量明显受控于泥岩的生烃能力，而泥岩普遍发生的高效排烃直接导致游离油含量减少；同时，高TOC含量导致大量吸附油的存在，制约了页岩油的可动性。
- 页岩油 /
- 岩相 /
- 烃源岩品质 /
- 含油性 /
- 芦草沟组 /
- 吉木萨尔凹陷 /
- 准噶尔盆地
Abstract: The study on the quality and oil-bearing properties of argillaceous hydrocarbon source rocks across different lithofacies is crucial for understanding shale oil enrichment patterns and predicting sweet spots. 57 mudstone samples from the Permian Lucaogou Formation in the well J10025 of the Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin were selected in this study. Based on lithofacies classification, the quality and oil-bearing properties of those argillaceous hydrocarbon source rocks across different lithofacies were systematically investigated through X-ray diffraction (XRD), thin-section observation, rock pyrolysis, organic petrology, vitrinite reflectance (R_o) measurement, and multi-temperature pyrolysis. The results indicated that 7 lithofacies were predominantly developed in the Lucaogou Formation of the Jimsar Sag, including massive felsic mudstones, massive calcareous mudstones, massive dolomitic mudstones, laminated felsic mudstones, laminated calcareous-bearing mudstones, laminated calcareous mudstones, and laminated dolomitic mudstones. Distinct quality differences were observed in those source rocks. The massive felsic mudstones and massive calcareous mudstones exhibited poor quality, while massive dolomitic mudstones were moderate-quality source rocks. The laminated felsic mudstones demonstrated good quality, whereas laminated calcareous-bearing mudstones, laminated calcareous mudstones, and laminated dolomitic mudstones were high-quality hydrocarbon source rocks. The massive dolomitic mudstones exhibited relatively favorable oil-bearing capacity and mobility, making them potential sweet spot lithofacies. In the well J10025, mudstones with relatively good oil-bearing properties were deposited at depth intervals of approximately 3 500 to 3 570 m and 3 700 to 3 750 m. However, its overall poor mobility restricted the development of the mudstone-type shale oil sweet spots. The main factors influencing the oil-bearing capacity and mobility of mudstones included hydrocarbon-generating capacity, hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency, and total organic carbon (TOC) content. The content of free hydrocarbons was significantly controlled by the hydrocarbon-generating capacity of mudstones. Meanwhile, the widespread efficient hydrocarbon expulsion in mudstones directly led to a reduction of free oil content. Additionally, high TOC content resulted in a large amount of adsorbed oil, which constrained shale oil mobility.
- shale oil /
- lithofacies /
- hydrocarbon source rock quality /
- oil-bearing properties /
- Lucaogou Formation /
- Jimsar Sag /
- Junggar Basin
注释:

利益冲突声明/Conflict of Interests

作者何晋译、冷筠滢、李志明、李楚雄是本刊主办单位员工，均未参与本文的同行评审、编审流程或决策。

Authors HE Jinyi, LENG Junying, LI Zhiming, and LI Chuxiong are employees of the sponsor of this journal. None of them took part in peer review/editorial procedures or decision-making of this article.

作者贡献/Authors’Contributions

何晋译、李志明和何文军负责论文撰写和修改；冷筠滢参与数据的整理和分析；刘得光、杨森和李楚雄提供资料数据。所有作者均阅读并同意最终稿件的提交。

The manuscript was written and revised by HE Jinyi, LI Zhiming, and HE Wenjun. Data collection and analysis were conducted by LENG Junying. The source data and materials were provided by LIU Deguang, YANG Sen, and LI Chuxiong. All authors have read the final version of the paper and consented to its submission.

HTML全文

图 1 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组顶面构造(a)和J10025井地层综合柱状图(b)据参考文献[37]修改。

Figure 1. Top surface structure (a) and comprehensive stratigraphic column of well J10025 (b) in Permian Lucaogou Formation of Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组泥岩矿物组成

Figure 2. Mineral composition of mudstones in Permian Lucaogou Formation of Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组泥岩岩心(a-f)和显微镜下照片(g-n)

a.3 484.16 m，块状构造；b.3 565.56 m，块状构造；c.3 658.04 m，块状构造；d.3 515.94 m，纹层状构造；e.3 612.37 m，纹层状构造；f.3 670.28 m，纹层状构造；g.3 478.06 m，块状构造；h.3 484.16 m，块状构造；i.3 658.04 m，块状构造；j.3 515.94 m，纹层状构造，可见黏土纹层和长英质碎屑纹层；k.3 539.06 m，纹层状构造，可见黏土纹层和长英质碎屑纹层；l.3 641.01 m，纹层状构造，可见方解石纹层；m.3 641.01 m，纹层状构造，可见方解石纹层；n.3 670.28 m，纹层状构造，可见长英质碎屑纹层和白云石纹层。

Figure 3. Mudstone cores(a-f) and their thin-section micrographs (g-n)from Permian Lucaogou Formation of Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组泥岩有机质丰度与生烃能力对比

Figure 4. Comparison of organic matter abundance and hydrocarbon-generating capacity of mudstones in Permian Lucaogou Formation of Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组不同岩相泥岩有机质类型

Figure 5. Types of organic matter in mudstones across different lithofacies in Lucaogou Formation of Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组不同岩相泥岩有机显微组分对比

a和b为纹层状含灰质泥岩，J10025井，3 515.94 m，a中可见层状藻类体，具黄褐色荧光，b中可见灰色无荧光的镜质体；c和d为纹层状灰质泥岩，J10025井，3 721.13 m，c中可见层状藻类体，纹层中分布孢子体，具黄褐色荧光，d中可见灰色无荧光的镜质体；e和f为纹层状长英质泥岩，J10025井，3 539.06 m，e中可见层状藻类体，f中可见灰色无荧光的镜质体和亮白色的丝质体；g、h和i为纹层状云质泥岩，J10025井，3 682.70 m，g中可见形态完整的薄片状藻类体，具黄色荧光，h和i中可见灰色无荧光的镜质体和亮白色的丝质体；j和k为块状灰质泥岩，J10025井，3 812.66 m，j和k中可见灰色无荧光的镜质体和少量丝质体；l和m为块状长英质泥岩，J10025井，3 484.16 m，l和m中可见灰色无荧光的镜质体和亮白色的丝质体；n和o为块状云质泥岩，J10025井，3 658.04 m，n中可见结构藻类体、孢子体和角质体，具黄色荧光，o中可见灰色无荧光的镜质体和亮白色的丝质体。

Figure 6. Comparison of organic macerals in mudstones across different lithofacies in Permian Lucaogou Formation of Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组泥岩R_o(a)和T_max(b)随深度变化

Figure 7. Variations of vitrinite reflectance (R_o) (a) and maximum pyrolysis temperature (T_max) (b) of mudstones with depth in Permian Lucaogou Formation of Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组不同岩相泥岩热解游离烃(a)和油饱和度指数(b)对比

Figure 8. Comparison of free hydrocarbon content from pyrolysis (a) and oil saturation index (b) of mudstones in different lithofacies of Permian Lucaogou Formation, Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组不同岩相泥岩不同赋存状态页岩油含量对比

Figure 9. Comparison of shale oil content of mudstones under different occurrence states in different lithofacies of Permian Lucaogou Formation, Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组不同岩相泥岩含油性及可动性综合对比

Figure 10. Comprehensive comparison of oil-bearing capacity and mobility of mudstones in different lithofacies of Permian Lucaogou Formation, Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组不同岩相泥岩游离烃S₁、产率指数与TOC含量、S₁+S₂、I_H交会图

Figure 11. Free hydrocarbon (S₁), productivity index vs. TOC content, S₁+S₂, and hydrogen index (I_H) of mudstones in different lithofacies of Permian Lucaogou Formation, Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组不同岩相泥岩吸附油含量与TOC含量(a)及主要矿物含量(b-d)交会图

Figure 12. Adsorbed oil content vs. TOC content (a) and main mineral content (b-d) of mudstones in different lithofacies of Permian Lucaogou Formation, Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组不同岩相泥质烃源岩综合对比

Table 1. Comprehensive comparison of argillaceous hydrocarbon source rocks in different lithofacies of Permian Lucaogou Formation, Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin

岩相	ω(TOC)/%	S₁+S₂/(mg/g)	I_H/(mg/g)	类型	有机显微组分	品质
块状长英质泥岩	0.10~2.33/1.48	0.03~1.13/0.50	17~40/28	Ⅲ型	镜质体和丝质体	差
块状灰质泥岩	0.07~0.44/0.21	0.01~0.01/0.05	7~36/18	Ⅲ型	镜质体和丝质体	差
块状云质泥岩	0.88~4.69/1.92	1.88~25.93/9.24	135~513/317	Ⅰ—Ⅱ₂型	壳质组和腐泥组	中等
纹层状长英质泥岩	2.44~9.21/4.86	6.30~65.03/29.28	170~701/447	Ⅰ和Ⅱ₂型	腐泥组藻类体	好
纹层状含灰质泥岩	3.23~9.80/7.29	13.43~13.43/48.26	393~681/597	Ⅰ型	腐泥组藻类体	优质
纹层状灰质泥岩	1.34~9.71/6.41	2.76~80.43/47.55	197~819/649	Ⅰ型	腐泥组藻类体	优质
纹层状云质泥岩	1.93~10.55/5.78	8.10~88.84/39.68	350~826/598	Ⅰ—Ⅱ₁型	腐泥组藻类体	优质
注：表中数值意义为：最小值~最大值/平均值。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(48)

[1]	李政, 包友书, 朱日房, 等. 页岩油赋存特征、可动性实验技术及研究方法进展[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2024, 31(4): 84-95. LI Zheng, BAO Youshu, ZHU Rifang, et al. Progress in experimental techniques and research methods for shale oil occurrence characteristics and mobility[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2024, 31(4): 84-95.
[2]	鲜成钢, 金衍, 李斌会, 等. 页岩油气地质—工程一体化理论与技术研究进展[J]. 钻采工艺, 2024, 47(6): 8-15. XIAN Chenggang, JIN Yan, LI Binhui, et al. Research progress on theory and technology of shale oil and gas geoengineering integration[J]. Drilling and Production Technology, 2024, 47(6): 8-15.
[3]	张锦宏. 中国石化页岩油工程技术新进展[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(1): 1-8. ZHANG Jinhong. Progress in SINOPEC shale oil engineering technology[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(1): 1-8.
[4]	郭秋麟, 米石云, 张倩, 等. 中国页岩油资源评价方法与资源潜力探讨[J]. 石油实验地质, 2023, 45(3): 402-412. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202303402 GUO Qiulin, MI Shiyun, ZHANG Qian, et al. Assessment methods and potential of shale oil resources in China[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2023, 45(3): 402-412. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202303402
[5]	王乾宇, 吴飞鹏, 孙秋分, 等. 页岩气产能预测方法的优选与评价[J]. 断块油气田, 2023, 30(4): 559-565, 578. WANG Qianyu, WU Feipeng, SUN Qiufen, et al. Optimization and evaluation of prediction methods for shale gas productivity[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2023, 30(4): 559-565, 578.
[6]	宋永亭, 胡婧, 冯云, 等. 微生物技术在页岩油气开发中的研究与应用[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2023, 30(5): 92-99. SONG Yongting, HU Jing, FENG Yun, et al. Research and application of microbial technology in shale oil and gas reservoirs development[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2023, 30(5): 92-99.
[7]	邹才能, 潘松圻, 荆振华, 等. 页岩油气革命及影响[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(1): 1-12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8719.2020.01.001 ZOU Caineng, PAN Songqi, JING Zhenhua, et al. Shale oil and gas revolution and its impact[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(1): 1-12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8719.2020.01.001
[8]	金霄, 冯艳芳, 罗晓玲, 等. 准噶尔盆地南缘环博格达山中二叠统黑色泥页岩生烃动力学研究: 对周边探区油气勘探启示[J]. 现代地质, 2023, 37(5): 1321-1335. JIN Xiao, FENG Yanfang, LUO Xiaoling, et al. Kinetic and hydrocarbon generation of Middle Permian black shale around the Bogda Mountain, southern Junggar Basin: implications for petroleum exploration[J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(5): 1321-1335.
[9]	刘超威, 李辉, 王泽胜, 等. 准噶尔盆地阜康凹陷二叠系上乌尔禾组油气勘探突破与启示[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2024, 45(2): 139-150. LIU Chaowei, LI Hui, WANG Zesheng, et al. Breakthrough and implication of oil and gas exploration in Permian Upper Wuerhe Formation in Fukang Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2024, 45(2): 139-150.
[10]	李映艳, 陈轩, 高阳, 等. 井震结合分析页岩油"甜点"沉积特征及分布: 以吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组"下甜点"为例[J]. 断块油气田, 2023, 30(2): 186-195. LI Yingyan, CHEN Xuan, GAO Yang, et al. Sedimentary morphologys and distributions of shale oil "sweet spot" by the data of well to seismic analysis: a case study of the lower sweet pot in Lucaogou Formation of Jimsar Sag[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2023, 30(2): 186-195.
[11]	姜龙燕, 钱门辉, 何发岐, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区三叠系延长组长7页岩油特征及其主控因素[J]. 石油实验地质, 2024, 46(5): 941-953. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202405941 JIANG Longyan, QIAN Menhui, HE Faqi, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of Chang 7 shale oil in Triassic Yanchang Formation, Fuxian area, Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2024, 46(5): 941-953. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202405941
[12]	钟红利, 卓自敏, 张凤奇, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地甘泉地区长7页岩油储层非均质性及其控油规律[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 10-18. Zhong Hongli, Zhuo Zimin, Zhang Fengqi, et al. Heterogeneity of Chang 7 shale oil reservoir and its oil control law in Ganquan area, Ordos Basin[J]. Special Oil &Gas Reservoirs, 2023, 30(4): 10-18.
[13]	刘惠民, 李政, 包友书, 等. 渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷高产页岩油井BYP5页岩地质特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6): 1405-1417. LIU Huimin, LI Zheng, BAO Youshu, et al. Geology of shales in prolific shale-oil well BYP5 in the Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6): 1405-1417.
[14]	文家成, 胡钦红, 杨升宇, 等. 渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔二段页岩储层特征及页岩油可动性评价[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 63-70. Wen Jiacheng, Hu Qinhong, Yang Shengyu, et al. Shale reservoir characteristics and shale oil mobility in memher 2 of Kongdian Formation of Cangdong Sag, Bohai Bay Basin [J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2023, 30(4): 63-70.
[15]	刘惠民. 济阳坳陷页岩油勘探实践与前景展望[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2022, 27(1): 73-87. LIU Huimin. Exploration practice and prospect of shale oil in Jiyang Depression[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2022, 27(1): 73-87.
[16]	何文渊, 何海清, 王玉华, 等. 川东北地区平安1井侏罗系凉高山组页岩油重大突破及意义[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2022, 27(1): 40-49. HE Wenyuan, HE Haiqing, WANG Yuhua, et al. Major breakthrough and significance of shale oil of the Jurassic Lianggaoshan Formation in well Ping'an 1 in northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2022, 27(1): 40-49.
[17]	刘苗苗, 付小平, 谢佳彤. 四川盆地中侏罗统页岩储层特征及其影响因素[J]. 断块油气田, 2023, 30(6): 905-913. LIU Miaomiao, FU Xiaoping, XIE Jiatong. The reservoirs characteristics and its influencing factors of Middle Jurassic shale in Sichuan Basin[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2023, 30(6): 905-913.
[18]	赵晨旭, 李忠诚, 郭世超, 等. 松辽盆地南部长岭断陷青一段陆相页岩地球化学和沉积环境特征[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(6): 55-61. ZHAO Chenxu, LI Zhongcheng, GUO Shichao, et al. Characteristics of geochemistry and depositional environment of terrestrial shales in the first member of Qingshankou Formation of Changling Fault Depression in the southern Songliao Basin[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2023, 30(6): 55-61.
[19]	昝灵, 白鸾羲, 印燕铃, 等. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜宁组二段页岩油基本特征及成因分析[J]. 石油实验地质, 2023, 45(2): 356-365. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202102233 ZAN Ling, BAI Luanxi, YIN Yanling, et al. Basic characteristics and genesis analysis of shale oil in the second member of Paleogene Funing Formation in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2023, 45(2): 356-365. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202102233
[20]	高阳, 叶义平, 何吉祥, 等. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷陆相页岩油开发实践[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(2): 133-141. GAO Yang, YE Yiping, HE Jixiang, et al. Development practice of continental shale oil in Jimsar Sag in the Junggar Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(2): 133-141.
[21]	张宸嘉, 曹剑, 王俞策, 等. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组页岩油富集规律[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(9): 1253-1268. ZHANG Chenjia, CAO Jian, WANG Yuce, et al. Enrichment law of shale oil of Lucaogou Formation in Jimusar Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(9): 1253-1268.
[22]	付锁堂, 姚泾利, 李士祥, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地中生界延长组陆相页岩油富集特征与资源潜力[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(5): 698-710. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202005698 FU Suotang, YAO Jingli, LI Shixiang, et al. Enrichment characteristics and resource potential of continental shale oil in Mesozoic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(5): 698-710. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202005698
[23]	黎茂稳, 马晓潇, 蒋启贵, 等. 北美海相页岩油形成条件、富集特征与启示[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(1): 13-28. LI Maowen, MA Xiaoxiao, JIANG Qigui, et al. Enlightenment from formation conditions and enrichment characteristics of marine shale oil in North America[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(1): 13-28.
[24]	向宝力, 廖健德, 周妮, 等. 吉木萨尔凹陷吉174井二叠系芦草沟组烃源岩地球化学特征[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2013, 13(32): 9636-9640. XIANG Baoli, LIAO Jiande, ZHOU Ni, et al. Organic geochemical features of Permian source rock from Lucaogou Formation in Ji 174 well of Jimsar Depression[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2013, 13(32): 9636-9640.
[25]	王剑, 李二庭, 陈俊, 等. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组优质烃源岩特征及其生烃机制研究[J]. 地质论评, 2020, 66(3): 755-764. WANG Jian, LI Erting, CHEN Jun, et al. Characteristics and hydrocarbon generation mechanism of high-quality source rocks in Permian Lucaogou Formation, Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Geological Review, 2020, 66(3): 755-764.
[26]	吕倩, 李水福, 胡守志, 等. 泌阳凹陷深凹区页岩非均质性与含油性特征分析[J]. 断块油气田, 2016, 23(3): 284-289. LV Qian, LI Shuifu, HU Shouzhi, et al. Heterogeneity and oil-bearing property of shale in Biyang Depression and their influencing factors[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2016, 23(3): 284-289.
[27]	龙海岑, 李绍鹏. 泥页岩层系非均质性及其控制因素研究: 以苏北盆地阜二段为例[J]. 非常规油气, 2022, 9(4): 78-90. LONG Haicen, LI Shaopeng. The research on the heterogeneity of shale formations and its controlling factors: a case study of the second member of Funing Formation in Subei Basin[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2022, 9(4): 78-90.
[28]	石蕾, 宗文明, 孙求实, 等. 泥页岩有机非均质性评价及其在烃源岩分级评价中的应用: 以辽西拗陷中元古界蓟县系为例[J]. 地质与资源, 2022, 31(3): 367-374. SHI Lei, ZONG Wenming, SUN Qiushi, et al. Shale organic heterogeneity evaluation method and its application in source rocks grading evaluation: a case study of Mesoproterozoic Jixianianin in Liaoxi Depression[J]. Geology and Resources, 2022, 31(3): 367-374.
[29]	张迈, 唐友军, 徐兴友, 等. 松辽盆地长岭凹陷青山口组一段泥页岩非均质性评价: 以吉页油1井为例[J]. 地质与资源, 2021, 30(3): 265-272. ZHANG Mai, TANG Youjun, XU Xingyou, et al. Heterogeneity evaluation of shale in the first member of Qingshankou Formation in Changling Sag, Songliao Basin: a case study of JYY1 well[J]. Geology and Resources, 2021, 30(3): 265-272.
[30]	王川, 董田, 蒋恕, 等. 中扬子地区上奥陶统—下志留统五峰组—龙马溪组页岩纵向非均质性及主控因素[J]. 地质科技通报, 2022, 41(3): 108-121. WANG Chuan, DONG Tian, JIANG Shu, et al. Vertical heterogeneity and the main controlling factors of the Upper Ordovician-Lower Silurian Wufeng-Longmaxi shales in the Middle Yangtze region[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2022, 41(3): 108-121.
[31]	张鹏, 黄宇琪, 张金川, 等. 湘鄂西页岩非均质性研究: 以Ld1井龙马溪组为例[J]. 地质学报, 2020, 94(5): 1568-1577. ZHANG Peng, HUANG Yuqi, ZHANG Jinchuan, et al. Study on shale heterogeneity in western Hunan and Hubei: a case study of Longmaxi Formation in well Ld1[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2020, 94(5): 1568-1577.
[32]	曾翔, 蔡进功, 董哲, 等. 泥页岩沉积特征与生烃能力: 以东营凹陷沙河街组三段中亚段—沙河街组四段上亚段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(1): 31-43. ZENG Xiang, CAI Jingong, DONG Zhe, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and hydrocarbon generation potential of mudstone and shale: a case study of middle submember of member 3 and upper submember of member 4 in Shahejie Formation in Dongying Sag[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(1): 31-43.
[33]	王剑, 周路, 刘金, 等. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组页岩层系甜点体烃类可流动性影响因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2022, 33(1): 116-124. WANG Jian, ZHOU Lu, LIU Jin, et al. Influencing factors of hydrocarbon mobility in sweet spot of the Lucaogou Formation shale in Jimusar Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2022, 33(1): 116-124.
[34]	王然, 常秋生, 钱永新, 等. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组页岩油"甜点体"储集特征及成因机理[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(4): 604-611. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004604 WANG Ran, CHANG Qiusheng, QIAN Yongxin, et al. Reservoir characteristics and genesis of shale oil "sweet spots" in Lucaogou Formation, Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(4): 604-611. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004604
[35]	刘金, 王剑, 张宝真, 等. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组微—纳米孔隙页岩油原位赋存特征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(2): 270-278. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202202270 LIU Jin, WANG Jian, ZHANG Baozhen, et al. In situ occurrence of shale oil in micro-nano pores in Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2022, 44(2): 270-278. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202202270
[36]	唐勇, 何文军, 姜懿洋, 等. 准噶尔盆地二叠系咸化湖相页岩油气富集条件与勘探方向[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1): 125-143. TANG Yong, HE Wenjun, JIANG Yiyang, et al. Enrichment conditions and exploration direction of Permian saline lacustrine shale oil and gas in Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(1): 125-143.
[37]	刘金, 王剑, 张晓刚, 等. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组甜点页岩油微观赋存特征及成因机制[J]. 地质论评, 2022, 68(3): 907-920. LIU Jin, WANG Jian, ZHANG Xiaogang, et al. Microscopic occurrence characteristics and genetic mechanism of shale oil in sweet spot reservoir of the Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag[J]. Geological Review, 2022, 68(3): 907-920.
[38]	李书琴, 印森林, 高阳, 等. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组混合细粒岩沉积微相[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(2): 235-249. LI Shuqin, YIN Senlin, GAO Yang, et al. Study on sedimentary microfacies of mixed fine-grained rocks in Lucaogou Formation, Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2020, 31(2): 235-249.
[39]	柳波, 石佳欣, 付晓飞, 等. 陆相泥页岩层系岩相特征与页岩油富集条件: 以松辽盆地古龙凹陷白垩系青山口组一段富有机质泥页岩为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(5): 828-838. LIU Bo, SHI Jiaxin, FU Xiaofei, et al. Petrological characteristics and shale oil enrichment of lacustrine fine-grained sedimentary system: a case study of organic-rich shale in first member of Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in Gulong Sag, Songliao Basin, NE China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(5): 828-838.
[40]	杨万芹, 蒋有录, 王勇. 东营凹陷沙三下—沙四上亚段泥页岩岩相沉积环境分析[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(4): 19-26. YANG Wanqin, JIANG Youlu, WANG Yong. Study on shale facies sedimentary environment of lower Es₃-upper Es₄ in Dongying Sag[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum, 2015, 39(4): 19-26.
[41]	谢宗奎. 柴达木台南地区第四系细粒沉积岩相与沉积模式研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2009, 16(5): 245-250. XIE Zongkui. Research on the Quaternary fine-fraction lithofacies and sedimentation model in Tainan area, Qaidam Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2009, 16(5): 245-250.
[42]	ZHANG Jianguo, JIANG Zaixing, JIANG Xiaolong, et al. Oil generation induces sparry calcite formation in lacustrine mudrock, Eocene of East China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2016, 71: 344-359.
[43]	中国石油天然气总公司. 陆相烃源岩地球化学评价方法: SY/T 5735-1995[S]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1996. China National Petroleum Corporation. Geochemical evaluation method for terrestrial hydrocarbon source rocks: SY/T 5735-1995[S]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1996.
[44]	马永生, 蔡勋育, 赵培荣, 等. 中国陆相页岩油地质特征与勘探实践[J]. 地质学报, 2022, 96(1): 155-171. MA Yongsheng, CAI Xunyu, ZHAO Peirong, et al. Geological characteristics and exploration practices of continental shale oil in China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2022, 96(1): 155-171.
[45]	蒋启贵, 黎茂稳, 钱门辉, 等. 不同赋存状态页岩油定量表征技术与应用研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2016, 38(6): 842-849. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201606842 JIANG Qigui, LI Maowen, QIAN Menhui, et al. Quantitative characterization of shale oil in different occurrence states and its application[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2016, 38(6): 842-849. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201606842
[46]	吉鸿杰, 邱振, 陶辉飞, 等. 烃源岩特征与生烃动力学研究: 以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(4): 34-42. JI Hongjie, QIU Zhen, TAO Huifei, et al. Source rock characteristics and hydrocarbon generation kinetics: a case study of the Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimusar Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(4): 34-42.
[47]	HE Jinyi, CAI Jingong, LEI Tianzhu, et al. Characteristics comparison and occurrence mode of different types of soluble organic matter in lacustrine shale in the Dongying Sag, Eastern China[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2022, 254: 103971.
[48]	LI Zheng, ZOU Yanrong, XU Xingyou, et al. Adsorption of mudstone source rock for shale oil—Experiments, model and a case study[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2016, 92: 55-62.