Advanced Search
Volume 38 Issue 4
. 
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT  > 2016  >  38(4): 460-465
Lu Longfei, Qin Jianzhong, Shen Baojian, Tenger, Liu Weixin, Zhang Qingzhen. Biogenic origin and hydrocarbon significance of siliceous shale from the Wufeng-Longmaxi formations in Fuling area, southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2016, 38(4): 460-465. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201604460
Citation: Lu Longfei, Qin Jianzhong, Shen Baojian, Tenger, Liu Weixin, Zhang Qingzhen. Biogenic origin and hydrocarbon significance of siliceous shale from the Wufeng-Longmaxi formations in Fuling area, southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2016, 38(4): 460-465. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201604460
shu

Biogenic origin and hydrocarbon significance of siliceous shale from the Wufeng-Longmaxi formations in Fuling area, southeastern Sichuan Basin

doi: 10.11781/sysydz201604460
  • 1.

    SINOPEC Key Laboratory of Hydrocarbon Accumulation, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China

  • 2. Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China

  • Received Date: 2016-03-10
  • Rev Recd Date: 2016-06-10
  • Publish Date: 2016-07-28
    Abstract
  • Drill core samples were collected from the Fuling area in the southeastern Sichuan Basin to study the origin of siliceous shale rich in organic matter in the Wufeng-Longmaxi formations. X-ray diffraction, optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive spectroscopy were applied to study the mineral components, micro-morphology and structure of the samples. Quartz is dominant in the lower part of Wufeng-Longmaxi formations, and decreases gradually upwards, while clay content increases. Abundant biological residue and debris with circled growth structure and needle structure were clearly observed, especially in the Wufeng Formation and the lower part of Longmaxi Formation. The circled structure has a skirt-like boundary, and was filled with microcrystalline quartz. Smaller quartz grains among biological residues are like irregular balls or ellipsoids. They are not idiomorphic, and are authigenic quartz via silica precipitation from siliceous organism dissolution. Debris scattered in mineral matrix, either in complete or clastic form. The enrichment of siliceous organisms and siliceous recrystallization provide direct biogenic evidence for siliceous shale in the Wufeng-Longmaxi formations, which has an important significance for potential hydrocarbon recovery, water sedimentary environment trace, micro-pore and fracture structure, and rock mechanics analysis.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(32)
  • [1]
    邹才能,董大忠,王社教,等.中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力[J].石油勘探与开发,2010,37(6):641-653. Zou Caineng,Dong Dazhong,Wang Shejiao,et al.Geological characteristics,formation mechanism and resource potential of shale gas in China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2010,37(6):641-653.
    [2]
    郭彤楼,张汉荣.四川盆地焦石坝页岩气田形成与富集高产模式[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(1):28-36. Guo Tonglou,Zhang Hanrong.Formation and enrichment mode of Jiaoshiba shale gas field,Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(1):31-40.
    [3]
    董大忠,邹才能,杨桦,等.中国页岩气勘探开发进展与发展前景[J].石油学报,2012,33(S1):107-114. Dong Dazhong,Zou Caineng,Yang Hua,et al.Progress and prospects of shale gas exploration and development in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(S1):107-114.
    [4]
    Scott L M,Daniel M J,Kent A B,et al.Mississippian Barnett shale,Fort Worth Basin,north-central Texas:Gas-shale play with multi-trillion cubic foot potential[J].AAPG Bulletin,2005,89(2):155-175.
    [5]
    郭少斌,付娟娟,高丹,等.中国海陆交互相页岩气研究现状与展望[J].石油实验地质,2015,37(5):535-540. Guo Shaobin,Fu Juanjuan,Gao Dan,et al.Research status and prospects for marine-continental shale gases in China[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2015,37(5):535-540.
    [6]
    郭旭升,李宇平,刘若冰,等.四川盆地焦石坝地区龙马溪组页岩微观孔隙结构特征及其控制因素[J].天然气工业,2014,34(6):9-16. Guo Xusheng,Li Yuping,Liu Ruobing,et al.Characteristics and controlling factors of micro-pore structures of Longmaxi Shale Play in the Jiaoshiba area,Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2014,34(6):9-16.
    [7]
    刘树根,王世玉,孙玮,等.四川盆地及其周缘五峰组—龙马溪组黑色页岩特征[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2013,40(6):621-639. Liu Shugen,Wang Shiyu,Sun Wei,et al.Characteristics of black shale in Wufeng Formation and Longmaxi Formation in Sichuan Basin and its peripheral areas[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition),2013,40(6):621-639.
    [8]
    魏志红,魏祥峰.页岩不同类型孔隙的含气性差异:以四川盆地焦石坝地区五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J].天然气工业,2014,34(6):37-41. Wei Zhihong,Wei Xiangfeng.Comparison of gas-bearing property between different pore types of shale:A case from the Upper Ordovician Wufeng and Longmaxi Fms in the Jiaoshiba area,Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2014,34(6):37-41.
    [9]
    徐二社,李志明,杨振恒.彭水地区五峰-龙马溪组页岩热演化史及生烃史研究:以PY1井为例[J].石油实验地质,2015,37(4):494-499. Xu Ershe,Li Zhiming,Yang Zhenheng.Thermal and hydrocarbon generation history of Wufeng and Longmaxi shales in Pengshui area, eastern Sichuan Basin: A well PY1 case study[J].Petro-leum Geology & Experiment,2015,37(4):494-499.
    [10]
    蔡进功.泥质沉积物和泥岩中有机黏土复合体[M].北京:科学出版社,2004:152-175. Cai Jingong.Organo-clay complexes in muddy sediments and mudstones[M].Beijing:Science Press,2004:152-175.
    [11]
    卢龙飞,蔡进功,刘文汇,等.泥岩与沉积物中粘土矿物吸附有机质的三种赋存状态及其热稳定性[J].石油与天然气地质,2013,34(1):16-26. Lu Longfei,Cai Jingong,Liu Wenhui,et al.Occurrence and thermostability of absorbed organic matter on clay minerals in mudstones and muddy sediments[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2013,34(1):16-26.
    [12]
    冯增昭.沉积岩石学(上册)[M].2版.北京:石油工业出版社,1997:8-10. Feng Zengzhao.Sedimentary petrology (Volume One)[M].2nd ed.Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1997:8-10.
    [13]
    Ormiston A R.The association of radiolarians with hydrocarbon source rocks//Blueford J R,Murchey B.Radiolaria of giant and subgiant fields in Asia.New York:Micropaleontology Press,1993:9-16.
    [14]
    Comer J B.Reservoir characteristics and gas production potential of Woodford shale in the southern Midcontinent.. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/dspace/handle/2022/1826.
    [15]
    Curtis M E,Ambrose R J,Sondergeld C H,et al.Investigation of the relationship between organic porosity and thermal maturity in the Marcellus shale//North American Unconventional Gas Conference and Exhibition.The Woodlands,Texas:Society of Petroleum Engineers,2011:4.
    [16]
    Ross D J K,Bustin R M.Shale gas potential of the Lower Jurassic Gordondale Member,northeastern British Columbia,Canada[J].Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology,2007,55(1):51-75.
    [17]
    Bowker K A.Recent developments of the Barnett shale play,Fort Worth Basin[J].West Texas Geological Society Bulletin,2003,42(6):4-11.
    [18]
    王玉净,张元动.江苏仑山地区上奥陶统五峰组放射虫动物群及其地质意义[J].微体古生物学报,2011,28(3):251-260. Wang Yujing,Zhang Yuandong.Radiolarian fauna of the Wufeng Formation (Upper Ordovician) in Lunshan area,Jiangsu and its geological significance[J].Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica,2011,28(3):251-260.
    [19]
    刘伟,许效松,冯心涛,等.中上扬子上奥陶统五峰组含放射虫硅质岩与古环境[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2010,30(3):65-70. Liu Wei,Xu Xiaosong,Feng Xintao,et al.Radiolarian siliceous rocks and palaeoenvironmental reconstruction for the Upper Ordovician Wufeng Formation in the middle-upper Yangtze area[J].Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology,2010,30(3):65-70.
    [20]
    王淑芳,邹才能,董大忠,等.四川盆地富有机质页岩硅质生物成因及对页岩气开发的意义[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2014,50(3):476-486. Wang Shufang,Zou Caineng,Dong Dazhong,et al.Biogenic silica of organic-rich shale in Sichuan Basin and its significance for shale gas[J].Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis,2014,50(3):476-486.
    [21]
    刘英俊,曹励明.元素地球化学导论[M].北京:地质出版社,1985:60-61. Liu Yingjun,Cao Liming.Introduction to element geochemistry[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House,1985:60-61.
    [22]
    黄志诚,黄钟瑾,陈智娜.下扬子区五峰组火山碎屑岩与放射虫硅质岩[J].沉积学报,1991,9(2):1-15. Huang Zhicheng,Huang Zhongjin,Cheng Zhina.Volcanic rock and radiolarian silicilith of Wufeng Formation in Lower Yangtze region[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,1991,9(2):1-15.
    [23]
    何卫红,汪啸风,卜建军.扬子海盆中部晚奥陶世五峰期海平面变化[J].地球学报,2003,24(1):55-60. He Weihong,Wang Xiaofeng,Bu Jianjun.Sea-level change of the central Yangtze Sea Basin in the Late Ordovician Wufengian Period[J].Acta Geoscientia Sinica,2003,24(1):55-60.
    [24]
    叶曦雯,刘素美,张经.生物硅的测定及其生物地球化学意义[J].地球科学进展,2003,18(3):420-426. Ye Xiwen,Liu Sumei,Zhang Jing.The determination of biogenic silica and its biogeochemistry significance[J].Advance in Earth Sciences,2003,18(3):420-426.
    [25]
    Ragueneau O,Tréguer P,Leynaert A,et al.A review of the Si cycle in the modern ocean:Recent progress and missing gaps in the application of biogenic opal as a paleoproductivity proxy[J].Global and Planetary Change,2000,26(4):317-365.
    [26]
    郭旭升,胡东风,文治东,等.四川盆地及周缘下古生界海相页岩气富集高产主控因素:以焦石坝地区五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J].中国地质,2014,41(3):893-901. Guo Xusheng,Hu Dongfeng,Wen Zhidong,et al.Major factors controlling the accumulation and high productivity in marine shale gas in the Lower Paleozoic of Sichuan Basin and its periphery:A case study of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation of Jiaoshiba area[J].Geology in China,2014,41(3):893-901.
    [27]
    罗超,刘树根,孙玮,等.上扬子区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩气基本特征研究:以贵州丹寨南皋剖面为例[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(3):453-470. Luo Chao,Liu Shugen,Sun Wei,et al.Basic characteristics of shale gas in the Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation in the Upper Yangtze region:Taking Nangao section in Danzhai as an example[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(3):453-470.
    [28]
    王玉净.中国西南地区古生代放射虫硅岩地层:一个潜在的油气勘探目标[J].微体古生物学报,2007,24(3):243-246. Wang Yujing.Paleozoic Radiolarian cherty strata of southwestern China:A potential target in oil and gas exploration[J].Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica,2007,24(3):243-246.
    [29]
    Fadhel M B, Zouaghi T, Amri A,et al.Radiolarian and planktic foraminifera biostratigraphy of the Early Albian organic rich beds of Fahdene Formation,Northern Tunisia[J].Journal of Earth Science,2014,25(1):45-63.
    [30]
    Kröger N,Sumper M.The biochemistry of silica formation in diatoms[M]//Baeuerlein E.Biomineralization.Weinheim,Germany:Wiley,2000:151-170.
    [31]
    Slatt R M, O'Brien N R.Pore types in the Barnett and Woodford gas shales:Contribution to understanding gas storage and migration pathways in fine-grained rocks[J].AAPG Bulletin,2011,95(12):2017-2030.
    [32]
    刘友祥,俞凌杰,张庆珍,等.川东南龙马溪组页岩的矿物组成与微观储集特征研究[J].石油实验地质,2015,37(3):328-333. Liu Youxiang,Yu Lingjie,Zhang Qingzhen,et al.Mineral composition and microscopic reservoir features of Longmaxi shales in southeastern Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2015,37(3):328-333.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]QIAN Yingqiang, YANG Xue, LIU Xiaoqiang, LI Meijun, CHEN Zeqin, XUE Ying. Molecular simulation of the displacement of shale gas in quartz slit by flue gas[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2023, 45(3): 560-565. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202303560
    [2]TANG Jianming, HE Jianhua, WEI Limin, LI Yong, DENG Hucheng, LI Ruixue, ZHAO Shuang. Pressure evolution of shale gas reservoirs in Wufeng-Longmaxi formations, Lintanchang area, southeast Sichuan Basin and its geological significance[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2023, 45(4): 739-750. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202304739
    [3]WANG Qiang, MU Yapeng, CHEN Xian, SONG Zhenxiang, MA Zhongliang, QIU Qi. Characteristics of methane isothermal adsorption of deep shale from Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in southeastern Sichuan Basin and its geological significance[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2022, 44(1): 180-187. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202201180
    [4]SONG Zhenxiang, WANG Baohua, WEI Xiangfeng, MA Zhongliang. Application of "retention coefficiency" method in shale gas resource evaluation: a case study of Upper Ordovician Wufeng Formation to Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation, southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2022, 44(3): 535-544. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202203535
    [5]FANG Dongliang, MENG Zhiyong. Main controlling factors of shale gas enrichment and high yield: a case study of Wufeng-Longmaxi formations in Fuling area, Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2020, 42(1): 37-41. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202001037
    [6]LIU Weixin, LU Longfei, WEI Zhihong, YU Lingjie, ZHANG Wentao, XU Chenjie, YE Deliao, SHEN Baojian, FAN Ming. Microstructure characteristics of Wufeng-Longmaxi shale gas reservoirs with different depth, southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2020, 42(3): 378-386. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202003378
    [7]LU Longfei, LIU Weixin, YU Lingjie, ZHANG Wentao, SHEN Baojian, BORJIGIN Tenger. Early diagenesis characteristics of biogenic opal and its influence on porosity and pore network evolution of siliceous shale[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2020, 42(3): 363-370. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202003363
    [8]WANG Qiang, WEI Xiangfeng, WEI Fubin, YAN Jihong, WAN Li. Overpressure in shale gas reservoirs of Wufeng-Longmaxi formations, Fuling area, southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2019, 41(3): 333-340. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201903333
    [9]LIU Yaowen, WANG Jin, ZHANG Mengyin, CAI Jin, LU Wentao, SHEN Tong. Pore features of shale gas layer in Wufeng-Longmaxi formations in Fuling area of Sichuan Basin and the application to development[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2018, 40(1): 44-50. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201801044
    [10]WANG Ruyue, HU Zongquan, NIE Haikuan, LIU Zhongbao, CHEN Qian, GAO Bo, LIU Guangxiang, GONG Dajian. Comparative analysis and discussion of shale reservoir characteristics in the Wufeng-Longmaxi and Niutitang formations: a case study of the well JY1 in SE Sichuan Basin and well TX1 in SE Guizhou area[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2018, 40(5): 639-649. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201805639
    [11]YANG Wenxin, LI Jiqing, ZHAO Jiangyan, HUANG Zhihong. Qualitative and quantitative study of micro-pore structures of Longmaxi Formation shale in Fuling area, Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2018, 40(1): 97-102. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201801097
    [12]KANG Jianwei, YAN Jianfei, YU Qian, TIAN Jingchun, MEN Yupeng, SUN Yuanyuan. Characteristics of organic-rich shale in Wufeng-Longmaxi formations in Suiyang area of northern Guizhou and its implication to shale gas[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2018, 40(2): 185-192. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201802185
    [13]ZHANG Boqiao, MENG Zhiyong, LIU Li, LI Kai, LIU Chao, SHU Zhiheng. Significance of shale gas genesis to the development of Guanyinqiao Member, Wufeng Formation, Fuling area, Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2018, 40(1): 30-37. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201801030
    [14]Chen Hongyu, Lu Longfei, Liu Weixin, Shen Baojian, Yu Linjie, Yang Yunfeng. Pore network changes in opaline siliceous shale during diagenesis[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2017, 39(3): 341-347. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201703341
    [15]Yang Yunfeng. Application of bitumen and graptolite reflectance in the Silurian Longmaxi shale, southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2016, 38(4): 466-472. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201604466
    [16]Shen Baojian, Yang Yunfeng, Tenger, Qin Jianzhong, Pan Anyang. Characteristics and hydrocarbon significance of organic matter in shale from the Jiaoshiba structure, Sichuan Basin: A case study of the Wufeng-Longmaxi formations in well Jiaoye1[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2016, 38(4): 480-488. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201604480
    [17]Liu Weixin, Bao Fang, Yu Lingjie, Zhang Wentao, Zhang Qingzheng, Lu Longfei, Fan Ming. Micro-pore structure and connectivity of the Silurian Longmaxi shales, southeastern Sichuan area[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2016, 38(4): 453-459. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201604453
    [18]Zhang Hanrong, Wang Qiang, Ni Kai, Li Chunyan. Six characteristics and main controlling factors of shale reservoirs in the Wufeng-Longmaxi formations, southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2016, 38(3): 320-325. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201603320
    [19]Liu Youxiang, Yu Lingjie, Zhang Qingzhen, Bao Fang, Lu Longfei. Mineral composition andmicroscopic reservoir features of Longmaxi shales in southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2015, 37(3): 328-333. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201503328
    [20]Xu Ershe, Li Zhiming, Yang Zhenheng. Thermal and hydrocarbon generation history of Wufeng and Longmaxi shales in Pengshui area, eastern Sichuan Basin: A well PY1 case study[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2015, 37(4): 494-499. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201504494
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(31)

    1. 何陈诚，赵永强，俞凌杰，卢龙飞，刘伟新，潘安阳，李楚雄. 川东北地区二叠系大隆组深层页岩气储层孔隙结构及其分形特征. 石油实验地质. 2024(02): 263-277 . 本站查看
    2. 王拔秀，张鹏辉，梁杰，陈建文，孟祥豪，付奕霖，鲍衍君. 生物成因微晶石英特征及其对海相页岩储层孔隙发育的影响. 沉积学报. 2024(05): 1738-1752 .
    3. 卢龙飞，陶国亮，万俊雨，申宝剑，潘安阳，秦建中. 海相优质烃源岩中硅钙质来源：生物骨壁壳及其碎屑. 石油实验地质. 2024(06): 1157-1165 . 本站查看
    4. 张成龙，钱战宏，张建东，邹海燕，许姗姗，蒋文博，付雷，金晓琳. 湖南桑植地区下志留统龙马溪组页岩孔缝特征及主控因素. 大庆石油地质与开发. 2023(02): 13-21 .
    5. 张廷山，陈雷，梁兴，张介辉，任官宝，计玉冰，秦何星，张涵冰. 昭通国家级页岩气示范区五峰组——龙马溪组页岩气富集地质主控因素. 天然气工业. 2023(04): 93-102 .
    6. 周家全，王越，宋子怡，柳季廷，成赛男. 准噶尔盆地博格达地区中二叠统芦草沟组热液硅质结核特征及页岩油意义. 石油与天然气地质. 2023(03): 789-800 .
    7. 卢龙飞，刘伟新，魏志红，潘安阳，张庆珍，腾格尔. 四川盆地志留系页岩成岩特征及其对孔隙发育与保存的控制. 沉积学报. 2022(01): 73-87 .
    8. 郭旭升，赵永强，申宝剑，魏祥峰，卢龙飞，潘安阳，李宇平. 中国南方海相页岩气勘探理论：回顾与展望. 地质学报. 2022(01): 172-182 .
    9. 孙建孟，宿鹤松，郭宁，王德强，曾鑫，袁卫国，冯明刚，严伟，周贤斌. 生物成因硅确定方法及其在页岩气储层可压裂性评价中的应用. 石油学报. 2022(04): 548-557 .
    10. 刘思逸，高平，肖贤明，刘若冰，秦婧，袁桃，王旭. 四川盆地五峰—龙马溪组黑色页岩有机岩石学特征研究. 现代地质. 2022(05): 1281-1291 .
    11. 郭雯，董大忠，李明，孙莎莎，管全中，张素荣. 富有机质页岩中石英的成因及对储层品质的指示意义——以四川盆地东南部及周缘龙马溪组龙一_1亚段为例. 天然气工业. 2021(02): 65-74 .
    12. 谢小敏，刘伟新，张瀛，赵迪斐，唐友军，申宝剑，李志明. 四川盆地下古生界硅质页岩层系中硅质来源及其对有机质保存的影响初探. 地质论评. 2021(02): 429-440 .
    13. 张弘，高鹏鑫，高卿楠. 热红外反射光谱技术在石英含量评价中的应用. 岩矿测试. 2021(05): 710-719 .
    14. 胡朝伟，胡广，张玺华，陈聪，彭翰霖，高兆龙，廖志伟，庞谦，游杰. 川西北地区茅口组上部黑色岩系的层位、沉积环境及生烃潜力评价. 石油实验地质. 2020(02): 202-214 . 本站查看
    15. 易婷，周文，杨璠，陈文玲，张昊天，徐浩，刘瑞崟，赵欣，蒋柯. 四川盆地龙马溪组页岩气储层石英类型与特征. 矿物学报. 2020(02): 127-136 .
    16. 卢龙飞，刘伟新，俞凌杰，张文涛，申宝剑，腾格尔. 生物蛋白石早期成岩相变特征及对硅质页岩孔隙发育与孔径分布的影响. 石油实验地质. 2020(03): 363-370 . 本站查看
    17. 刘伟新，卢龙飞，魏志红，俞凌杰，张文涛，徐陈杰，叶德燎，申宝剑，范明. 川东南地区不同埋深五峰组—龙马溪组页岩储层微观结构特征与对比. 石油实验地质. 2020(03): 378-386 . 本站查看
    18. 郭旭升，胡东风，黄仁春，魏志红，段金宝，魏祥峰，范小军，缪志伟. 四川盆地深层—超深层天然气勘探进展与展望. 天然气工业. 2020(05): 1-14 .
    19. 田鹤，曾联波，徐翔，舒志国，彭勇民，毛哲，罗兵. 四川盆地涪陵地区海相页岩天然裂缝特征及对页岩气的影响. 石油与天然气地质. 2020(03): 474-483 .
    20. 邵德勇，张六六，张亚军，张瑜，罗欢，乔博，闫建萍，张同伟. 中上扬子地区下寒武统富有机质页岩吸水特征及对页岩气勘探的指示意义. 天然气地球科学. 2020(07): 1004-1015 .
    21. 杨振恒，胡宗全，熊亮，丁江辉，申宝剑，史洪亮，卢龙飞，魏力民，李志明. 深层页岩气源储耦合机理研究——以川南地区X井为例. 油气藏评价与开发. 2020(05): 20-27 .
    22. 魏力民，王岩，张天操，周桦，温真桃，董翱. 页岩气富集与高产主控因素——以川南地区五峰组—龙马溪组为例. 断块油气田. 2020(06): 700-704 .
    23. 王强，魏祥峰，魏富彬，燕继红，万梨. 川东南涪陵地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气藏中的超压作用. 石油实验地质. 2019(03): 333-340 . 本站查看
    24. 杨振恒，翟常博，邓模，鲍云杰，张培先，张庆珍，谢小敏. 彭水及邻区五峰——龙马溪组成烃生物特征及意义. 油气藏评价与开发. 2019(05): 40-44+62 .
    25. 张梦吟，李争，王进，韩驰宇，刘霜，钱华. 四川盆地涪陵页岩气田五峰—龙马溪组岩矿纵向差异性研究——以JYA井为例. 石油实验地质. 2018(01): 64-70 . 本站查看
    26. 刘天琳，姜振学，刘伟伟，张昆，谢雪恋，阴丽诗，黄一舟. 江西修武盆地早寒武世热液活动对有机质富集的影响. 油气地质与采收率. 2018(03): 68-76 .
    27. 何顺，秦启荣，周吉羚，钟城，范存辉. 川东南DS地区龙马溪组页岩气形成及富集控制因素. 特种油气藏. 2018(06): 70-76 .
    28. 王佳，谭先锋，曾春林，陈青，冉天，薛伟伟，李霞，陈岑. 泥质岩成岩系统过程及其对SiO_2赋存状态的制约——以渝东南地区龙马溪组为例. 地球科学进展. 2017(03): 292-306 .
    29. 邹筱春. 涪陵页岩含气量主控因素及算法研究. 科技视界. 2017(33): 32+4 .
    30. 陈红宇，卢龙飞，刘伟新，申宝剑，俞凌杰，仰云峰. 蛋白石硅质页岩成岩过程中的孔隙结构变化特征. 石油实验地质. 2017(03): 341-347 . 本站查看
    31. 耿一凯，金振奎，赵建华，温馨，汪洋. 页岩储层孔隙类型控制因素研究——以川东焦石坝地区龙马溪组为例. 石油实验地质. 2017(01): 71-78 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(25)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-050102030
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 16.8 %FULLTEXT: 16.8 %META: 77.3 %META: 77.3 %PDF: 5.9 %PDF: 5.9 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 5.8 %其他: 5.8 %其他: 1.2 %其他: 1.2 %China: 1.6 %China: 1.6 %India: 0.1 %India: 0.1 %Koesan: 0.1 %Koesan: 0.1 %Ponzano Veneto: 0.3 %Ponzano Veneto: 0.3 %Switzerland: 0.1 %Switzerland: 0.1 %[]: 1.9 %[]: 1.9 %三门峡: 0.1 %三门峡: 0.1 %上海: 1.0 %上海: 1.0 %伦敦: 0.2 %伦敦: 0.2 %儋州: 0.2 %儋州: 0.2 %北京: 4.6 %北京: 4.6 %十堰: 0.1 %十堰: 0.1 %南京: 0.7 %南京: 0.7 %南通: 0.1 %南通: 0.1 %合肥: 1.0 %合肥: 1.0 %周口: 0.1 %周口: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %四平: 0.1 %四平: 0.1 %城南: 0.2 %城南: 0.2 %天津: 0.4 %天津: 0.4 %太原: 0.1 %太原: 0.1 %安顺: 0.1 %安顺: 0.1 %宣城: 1.2 %宣城: 1.2 %布里斯班: 0.3 %布里斯班: 0.3 %常州: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %弗吉尼亚州: 0.3 %弗吉尼亚州: 0.3 %张家口: 4.4 %张家口: 4.4 %成都: 1.2 %成都: 1.2 %扬州: 0.1 %扬州: 0.1 %新乡: 0.3 %新乡: 0.3 %无锡: 0.7 %无锡: 0.7 %杭州: 0.2 %杭州: 0.2 %武汉: 0.9 %武汉: 0.9 %济南: 0.5 %济南: 0.5 %济宁: 0.2 %济宁: 0.2 %淮南: 0.1 %淮南: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %滨州: 0.1 %滨州: 0.1 %漯河: 0.5 %漯河: 0.5 %盘锦: 0.1 %盘锦: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 27.4 %芒廷维尤: 27.4 %芝加哥: 0.1 %芝加哥: 0.1 %莫斯科: 1.3 %莫斯科: 1.3 %西宁: 33.8 %西宁: 33.8 %西安: 0.1 %西安: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %赣州: 0.1 %赣州: 0.1 %达州: 0.7 %达州: 0.7 %达拉斯: 0.2 %达拉斯: 0.2 %运城: 0.1 %运城: 0.1 %遂宁: 0.6 %遂宁: 0.6 %遵义: 0.1 %遵义: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %郑州: 1.6 %郑州: 1.6 %重庆: 0.7 %重庆: 0.7 %银川: 0.1 %银川: 0.1 %锦州: 0.3 %锦州: 0.3 %长治: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %首尔: 0.2 %首尔: 0.2 %马鞍山: 0.5 %马鞍山: 0.5 %驻马店: 0.1 %驻马店: 0.1 %其他其他ChinaIndiaKoesanPonzano VenetoSwitzerland[]三门峡上海伦敦儋州北京十堰南京南通合肥周口哥伦布嘉兴四平城南天津太原安顺宣城布里斯班常州平顶山弗吉尼亚州张家口成都扬州新乡无锡杭州武汉济南济宁淮南湘潭滨州漯河盘锦石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥莫斯科西宁西安贵阳赣州达州达拉斯运城遂宁遵义邯郸郑州重庆银川锦州长治首尔马鞍山驻马店

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Citation
    XML
    PDF-CN

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1626) PDF downloads(1399) Cited by(56)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Website Copyright © Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, SINOPEC 苏ICP备15009037号 苏公网安备32021102000780号

    Address：No. 2060, Lihu Avenue, Wuxi, Jiangsu   (214126) Tel：0510-68787204，68787203 Fax：0510-68787113 Email：sysydz.syky@sinopec.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return