Advanced Search
Volume 39 Issue 2
. 
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT  > 2017  >  39(2): 287-294
Zhao Xi, Liu Bo, Guo Rongtao, Zhang Shanming, Li Yang, Tian Zepu. Reservoir characterization and its application to development[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2017, 39(2): 287-294. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201702287
Citation: Zhao Xi, Liu Bo, Guo Rongtao, Zhang Shanming, Li Yang, Tian Zepu. Reservoir characterization and its application to development[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2017, 39(2): 287-294. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201702287
shu

Reservoir characterization and its application to development

doi: 10.11781/sysydz201702287
  • 1.

    School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

  • 2. Institute of Oil and Gas, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

  • 3. School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China

  • Received Date: 2016-06-20
  • Rev Recd Date: 2017-02-22
  • Publish Date: 2017-03-28
    Abstract
  • Recently, the exploration and development of unconventional oil and gas resources have obtained a great breakthrough, which expanded research and promoted the technique innovation of reservoir study. Consequently, from conventional-scale to nano-scale pores, low to extra-low porosity and permeability, the understanding of reservoir pore structure, porosity and permeability continues to deepen. Various reservoir characterizations were introduced and compared. On the basis of pore structure and porosity-permeability characteristics, reservoirs were classified into four kinds: macro to medium-pore and high permeability reservoirs, micro-pore and low permeability reservoirs, nano-pore and ultra-low permeability reservoirs, and compound pore reservoirs. The advantages, disadvantages and applications of each characterization method were discussed, and some combined methods applicable to different types of reservoirs were also presented. A divisional-layered characterization technique was put forward to deal with compound pore reservoirs. In addition, the application in pore genesis, filling material, and surface structure of internal walls of pore were discussed. Thus, the research on reservoir extended from the structure level to the genesis level, providing references for more comprehensive understanding.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(41)
  • [1]
    陈杰,周改英,赵喜亮,等.储层岩石孔隙结构特征研究方法综述[J].特种油气藏,2005,12(4):11-14. Chen Jie,Zhou Gaiying,Zhao Xiliang,et al.Overview of study methods of reservoir rock pore structure[J].Special Oil and Gas Reservoir,2005,12(4):11-14.
    [2]
    邹才能,陶士振,杨智,等.中国非常规油气勘探与研究新进展[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报,2012,31(4):312-322. Zou Caineng,Tao Shizhen,Yang Zhi,et al.New advance in unconventional petroleum exploration and research in China[J].Bulletin of Mineralogy,Petrology and Geochemistry,2012,31(4):312-322.
    [3]
    于炳松.页岩气储层孔隙分类与表征[J].地学前缘,2013,20(4):211-220. Yu Bingsong.Classification and characterization of gas shale pore system[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2013,20(4):211-220.
    [4]
    蒋裕强,陈林,蒋婵,等.致密储层孔隙结构表征技术及发展趋势[J].地质科技情报,2014,33(3):63-70. Jiang Yuqiang,Chen Lin,Jiang Chan,et al.Characterization techniques and trends of the pore structure of tight reservoirs[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2014,33(3):63-70.
    [5]
    白斌,朱如凯,吴松涛,等.非常规油气致密储层微观孔喉结构表征新技术及意义[J].中国石油勘探,2014,19(3):78-86. Bai Bin,Zhu Rukai,Wu Songtao,et al.New micro-throat structural characterization techniques for unconventional tight hydrocarbon reservoir[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2014,19(3):78-86.
    [6]
    崔景伟,邹才能,朱如凯,等.页岩孔隙研究新进展[J].地球科学进展,2012,27(12):1319-1325. Cui Jingwei,Zou Caineng,Zhu Rukai,et al.New advances in shale porosity research[J].Advances in Earth Science,2012,27(12):1319-1325.
    [7]
    张腾,张烈辉,唐洪明,等.页岩孔隙整合化表征方法:以四川盆地下志留统龙马溪组为例[J].天然气工业,2015,35(12):19-26. Zhang Teng,Zhang Liehui,Tang Hongming,et al.An integrated shale pore characterization method:A case study of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2015,35(12):19-26.
    [8]
    方小洪.储层参数平面上的预测和空间展布[D].成都:成都理工大学,2006. Fang Xiaohong.Reservoir parameter forecast in the plane and mop in the space[D].Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology,2006.
    [9]
    魏广振.岩石孔喉平均半径SEM测定法[J].分析仪器,2011(2):51-53. Wei Guangzhen.A method for measuring mean radius of pore throat of rocks by scanning electron microscops[J].Analytical Instrumentation,2011(2):51-53.
    [10]
    赵永刚,赵明华,赵永鹏,等.一种分析碳酸盐岩孔隙系统数字图像的新方法[J].天然气工业,2006,26(12):75-78. Zhao Yonggang,Zhao Minghua,Zhao Yongpeng,et al.A new approach of analyzing digital image of pore system of carbonate rocks[J].Natural Gas Industry,2006,26(12):75-78.
    [11]
    Németh P,Tribaudino M,Bruno E,et al.TEM investigation of Ca-rich plagioclase:Structural β uctuations related to the I1-P1 phase transition[J].American Mineralogist,2007,92(7):1080-1086.
    [12]
    Fisher Q J,Cliff R A,Dodson M H.U-Pb systematics of an Upper Carboniferous black shale from south Yorkshire,UK[J].Chemical Geology,2003,194(4):331-347.
    [13]
    Mayer J,Giannuzzi L A,Kamino T,et al.TEM sample preparation and FIB-induced damage[J].MRS Bulletin,2007,32(5):400-407.
    [14]
    Javadpour F,Farshi M M,Amrein M.Atomic-force microscopy:A new tool for gas-shale characterization[J].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,2012,51(4):236-243.
    [15]
    白永强,李娜,杨旭,等.基于原子力显微镜表征的含油储层微观孔隙结构分析及应用[J].东北石油大学学报,2013,37(1):45-50. Bai Yongqiang,Li Na,Yang Xu,et al.Analysis and applications of microscopic pore structure characterization of oil reservoir by atomic force microscopy[J].Journal of Northeast Petroleum University,2013,37(1):45-50.
    [16]
    应凤祥,杨式升,张敏,等.激光扫描共聚焦显微镜研究储层孔隙结构[J].沉积学报,2002,20(1):75-79. Ying Fengxiang,Yang Shisheng,Zhang Min,et al.Application of laser scanning confocal microscope to the measurement of pore texture in reservoirs[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2002,20(1):75-79.
    [17]
    孙先达,李宜强,戴琦雯.激光扫描共聚焦显微镜在微孔隙研究中的应用[J].电子显微学报,2014(2):123-128. Sun Xianda,Li Yiqiang,Dai Qiwen.Laser scanning confocal microscope in micropores study[J].Journal of Chinese Electron Microscopy Society,2014(2):123-128.
    [18]
    Ketcham R A,Carlson W D.Acquisition,optimization and interpretation of X-ray computed tomographic imagery:Applications to the geosciences[J].Computers & Geosciences,2001,27(4):381-400.
    [19]
    薛清太.高压饱和法在低孔低渗储层孔隙度测试中的应用[J].内蒙古石油化工,2011,37(8):289-290. Xue Qingtai.Application of high pressure saturation method in porosity test of low porosity and low permeability reservoir[J].Inner Mongulia Petrochemical Industry,2011,37(8):289-290.
    [20]
    李桂梅.液体饱和法岩心孔隙度测量不确定度评定[J].计量与测试技术,2012,39(4):83-84. Li Guimei.The assessment of measuring the porosity of core using fluid saturation method[J].Metrology & Measurement Technique,2012,39(4):83-84.
    [21]
    李新,刘鹏,罗燕颖,等.页岩气储层岩心孔隙度测量影响因素分析[J].地球物理学进展,2015,30(5):2181-2187. Li Xin,Liu Peng,Luo Yanying,et al.Analysis of influencing factors on porosity measurement of shale gas reservoir core[J].Progress in Geophysics,2015,30(5):2181-2187.
    [22]
    Zhu Xiaojun,Cai Jingong,Xu Xingyou,et al.Discussion on the method for determining BET specific surface area in argillaceous source rocks[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2013,48:124-129.
    [23]
    曹庚振,王林,张艳惠,等.氮气物理吸附法和压汞法表征FCC催化剂孔径分布研究[J].炼油与化工,2015(1):9-12. Cao Gengzhen,Wang Lin,Zhang Yanhui,et al.Research on nitrogen physical adsorption method and mercury intrusion method used for characterization of FCC catalyst pore size distribution[J].Refining and Chemical Industry,2015(1):9-12.
    [24]
    Clarkson C R,Bustin R M.Variation in micropore capacity and size distribution with composition in bituminous coal of the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin:Implications for coalbed methane potential[J].Fuel,1996,75(13):1483-1498.
    [25]
    运华云,赵文杰,刘兵开,等.利用T2分布进行岩石孔隙结构研究[J].测井技术,2002,26(1):18-21. Yun Huayun,Zhao Wenjie,Liu Bingkai,et al.Researching rock pore structure with T2 distribution[J].Well Logging Techno-logy,2002,26(1):18-21.
    [26]
    周科平,李杰林,许玉娟,等.基于核磁共振技术的岩石孔隙结构特征测定[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2012,43(12):4796-4800. Zhou Keping,Li Jielin,Xu Yujuan,et al.Measurement of rock pore structure based on NMR technology[J].Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology),2012,43(12):4796-4800.
    [27]
    Radlinski A P,Mastalerz M,Hinde A L,et al.Application of SAXS and SANS in evaluation of porosity,pore size distribution and surface area of coal[J].International Journal of Coal Geo-logy,2004,59(3/4):245-271.
    [28]
    田华,张水昌,柳少波,等.X射线小角散射法研究页岩成熟演化过程中孔隙特征[J].石油实验地质,2016,38(1):135-140. Tian Hua,Zhang Shuichang,Liu Shaobo,et al.Evolution of pores in shale during thermal maturation using small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS)[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2016,38(1):135-140.
    [29]
    Radlinski A P.Small-angle neutron scattering and the microstructure of rocks[J].Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry,2006,63(1):363-397.
    [30]
    Melnichenko Y B,Radlinski A P,Mastalerz M,et al.Characterization of the CO2 fluid adsorption in coal as a function of pressure using neutron scattering techniques (SANS and USANS)[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,2009,77(1/2):69-79.
    [31]
    Mares T E,Radliński A P,Moore T A,et al.Assessing the potential for CO2 adsorption in a subbituminous coal,Huntly Coalfield,New Zealand,using small angle scattering techniques[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,2009,77(1/2):54-68.
    [32]
    Bahadur J,Melnichenko Y B,Mastalerz M,et al.Hierarchical pore morphology of Cretaceous shale:A small-angle neutron scattering and ultrasmall-angle neutron scattering study[J].Energy & Fuels,2014,28(10):6336-6344.
    [33]
    Loucks R G,Reed R M,Ruppel S C,et al.Spectrum of pore types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classification for matrix-related mudrock pores[J].AAPG Bulletin,2012,96(6):1071-1098.
    [34]
    Ross D J K,Bustin R M.The importance of shale composition and pore structure upon gas storage potential of shale gas reservoirs[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2009,26(6):916-927.
    [35]
    Slatt R M,O'Brien N R.Pore types in the Barnett and Woodford gas shales:Contribution to understanding gas storage and migration pathways in fine-grained rocks[J].AAPG Bulletin,2011,95(12):2017-2030.
    [36]
    焦淑静,韩辉,翁庆萍,等.页岩孔隙结构扫描电镜分析方法研究[J].电子显微学报,2012,31(5):432-436. Jiao Shujing,Han Hui,Weng Qingping,et al.Scanning electron microscope analysis of porosity in shale[J].Journal of Chinese Electron Microscopy Society,2012,31(5):432-436.
    [37]
    田华,张水昌,柳少波,等.压汞法和气体吸附法研究富有机质页岩孔隙特征[J].石油学报,2012,33(3):419-427. Tian Hua,Zhang Shuichang,Liu Shaobo,et al.Determination of organic-rich shale pore features by mercury injection and gas adsorption methods[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(3):419-427.
    [38]
    Clarkson C R,Solano N,Bustin R M,et al.Pore structure characterization of north American shale gas reservoirs using USANS/SANS,gas adsorption,and mercury intrusion[J].Fuel,2013,103:606-616.
    [39]
    Choquette P W,Pray L C.Geologic nomenclature and classification of porosity in sedimentary carbonates[J].AAPG Bulletin,1970,54(2):207-250.
    [40]
    Schmidt V,Mcdonald D A.Texture and recognition of secondary porosity in sandstones[J].Special Publications,1979,26:209-225.
    [41]
    孙先达,索丽敏,张民志,等.激光共聚焦扫描显微检测技术在大庆探区储层分析研究中的新进展[J].岩石学报,2005,21(5):1479-1488. Sun Xianda,Suo Limin,Zhang Minzhi,et al.New progress of reservoir research by the technology of Laser confocal scanning microscope analysis in the Daqing exploration area[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,2005,21(5):1479-1488.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]HE Chencheng, ZHAO Yongqiang, YU Lingjie, LU Longfei, LIU Weixin, PAN Anyang, LI Chuxiong. Pore structure and fractal characteristics of deep shale gas reservoirs in the Permian Dalong Formation, northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2024, 46(2): 263-277. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202402263
    [2]MA Yunfeng, ZHAO Jianguo, SUN Long, BAO Yuning, CAO Qingyun, GONG Xiaoke, CHEN Zhaobing, WANG Hengli. Microscopic occurrence characteristics and seepage law of water bodies in gas reservoir under stress: a case study of tight reservoirs in the eighth member of Permian Shihezi Formation, Shenmu Gas Field, Ordos Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2023, 45(3): 466-473. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202303466
    [3]AN Cheng, LIU Guangdi, SUN Mingliang, YOU Fuliang, WANG Zixin, CAO Yushun. Analysis of shale pore structure characteristics based on nitrogen adsorption experiment and fractal FHH model: a case study of 7th member of Triassic Yanchang Formation in Huachi area, Ordos Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2023, 45(3): 576-586. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202303576
    [4]TANG Xianglu, JIANG Zhenxue, SHAO Zeyu, HOU Zesheng, HE Shijie, LIU Xiaoxue, WANG Yuchao. Pore structure and physical properties of Quaternary weak diagenetic shales[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2022, 44(2): 210-218. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202202210
    [5]WANG Jian, ZHOU Lu, JIN Jun, LIU Jin, CHEN Jun, JIANG Huan, ZHANG Baozhen. Pore structure, hydrocarbon occurrence and their relationship with shale oil production in Lucaogou Formation of Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(6): 941-948. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202106941
    [6]FU Xiaoping, YANG Tao. Pore structure of continental shale reservoirs in Lower Jurassic Ziliujing Formation, northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(4): 589-598. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202104589
    [7]FAN Jiawei, CHEN Kongquan, SHEN Junjun, ZHU Wei, TANG Xiehua, LI Junjun, WANG Pengwan, ZHANG Fang. Shale reservoir characteristics of Ordovician Wufeng-Silurian Longmaxi formations in Dangyang synclinorium, Middle Yangtze region[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2020, 42(1): 69-78. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202001069
    [8]ZHANG Yinghan, LI Zhuo, LIU Dongdong, GAO Fenglin, JIANG Zhenxue, LIANG Zhikai, YANG Dongxu, YU Hailong. Lithofacies characteristics and impact on pore structure of the Shahezi Formation shale, Changling Fault Depression, Songliao Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2019, 41(1): 142-148. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201901142
    [9]HE Qing, HE Sheng, DONG Tian, ZHAI Gangyi, WANG Yi, WAN Kuo. Pore structure characteristics and controls of Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation, western Hubei Province[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2019, 41(4): 530-539. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201904530
    [10]WANG Ruyue, HU Zongquan, YANG Tao, GONG Dajian, YIN Shuai, LIU Zhongbao, GAO Bo. Pore structure characteristics of the Lower Cambrian black shale in the Cengong block, southeastern Guizhou area[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2019, 41(2): 207-214. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201902207
    [11]WANG Ruyue, HU Zongquan, NIE Haikuan, LIU Zhongbao, CHEN Qian, GAO Bo, LIU Guangxiang, GONG Dajian. Comparative analysis and discussion of shale reservoir characteristics in the Wufeng-Longmaxi and Niutitang formations: a case study of the well JY1 in SE Sichuan Basin and well TX1 in SE Guizhou area[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2018, 40(5): 639-649. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201805639
    [12]LIU Jinlin, LI Huaibin, ZHANG Xuebing, ZHANG Yunfeng, SHEN Jianian, WANG Jian. Pore characteristics and controlling factors of coal reservoirs from Jixi Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2018, 40(5): 691-698. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201805691
    [13]SUN Jian, BAO Hanyong. Comprehensive characterization of shale gas reservoirs: A case study from Fuling shale gas field[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2018, 40(1): 1-12. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201801001
    [14]OUYANG Siqi, SUN Wei, HUANG Hexing. Multi-method synergistic characterization of total pore structure of extra-low permeability sandstone reservoirs: case study of the Heshui area of Ordos Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2018, 40(4): 595-604. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201804595
    [15]CHEN Yulin, ZENG Yan, DUAN Yongming, WANG Qiongxian. Pore structure characteristics and reservoir classification of dolomite reservoirs in fourth member of Leikoupo Formation, Longmen Mountain front, western Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2018, 40(5): 621-631. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201805621
    [16]Chen Hongyu, Lu Longfei, Liu Weixin, Shen Baojian, Yu Linjie, Yang Yunfeng. Pore network changes in opaline siliceous shale during diagenesis[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2017, 39(3): 341-347. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201703341
    [17]Song Lei, Ning Zhengfu, Sun Yidan, Ding Guanyang, Du Huaming. Pore structure characterization of tight oil reservoirs by a combined mercury method[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2017, 39(5): 700-705. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201705700
    [18]Liu Weixin, Bao Fang, Yu Lingjie, Zhang Wentao, Zhang Qingzheng, Lu Longfei, Fan Ming. Micro-pore structure and connectivity of the Silurian Longmaxi shales, southeastern Sichuan area[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2016, 38(4): 453-459. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201604453
    [19]Liu Weixin, Cheng Qiuquan, Wang Yanbin, Guo Li Qin, Jianzhong. MICRO-ANALYSIS AND ITS APPLICATION OF OIL AND GAS RESERVOIR CHARACTERISTICS[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2006, 28(5): 489-492. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200605489
    [20]WANG Jinyou, ZHANG Shiqi, ZHAO Junqing, XIAO Huanqing. CHARACTERISTICS OF VOLCANIC ROCK RESERVOIRS IN THE LINSHANG AREA OF THE HUIMIN SAG[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2003, 25(3): 264-268. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200303264
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(27)

    1. 张学敏，魏莉，万欢，郝明慧，朱建英. 低渗储层表征技术研究进展与应用. 石油化工应用. 2025(01): 10-15 .
    2. 孙雄，薛晓辉，胡琳，李遇. 扫描电镜下龙马溪组页岩储集空间特征研究——以滇东北XY1井为例. 矿产与地质. 2025(01): 152-159 .
    3. 钟高润，吴彦君，王帅，李亚婷，雷开宇，李亚军，杨莎莎. 核磁共振技术在二氧化碳地质封存与利用中的应用研究前景综述. 地球物理学进展. 2024(01): 225-240 .
    4. 葛明娜，包书景，石砥石，马勇，张金川，张琴，张立勤，林燕华，王婷. 黔东南地区牛蹄塘组页岩孔隙结构多尺度表征及其对页岩气富集的影响. 中国地质. 2024(01): 57-72 .
    5. 曹琰，金之钧，朱如凯，刘扣其，梁新平. 富有机质泥页岩孔隙结构研究进展及展望. 沉积与特提斯地质. 2024(02): 231-252 .
    6. 王伟刚，杨磊磊，桑鹏程，沈雨欣. 油藏描述特征及新技术研究进展. 石油化工应用. 2024(06): 11-14+18 .
    7. 张晓辉，辛红刚，曹润荣，李成，马继业. 鄂尔多斯盆地南梁-华池地区长8储层微观孔喉结构差异及成藏意义. 地质与勘探. 2023(02): 418-432 .
    8. 屈海洲，郭新宇，徐伟，李文皓，唐松，邓雅霓，何仕鹏，张云峰，张兴宇. 碳酸盐岩微孔隙的分类、成因及对岩石物理性质的影响. 石油与天然气地质. 2023(05): 1102-1117 .
    9. 张晓辉，张娟，袁京素，崔小丽，毛振华. 鄂尔多斯盆地南梁—华池地区长8_1致密储层微观孔喉结构及其对渗流的影响. 岩性油气藏. 2021(02): 36-48 .
    10. 王哲麟，师永民，潘懋，汪贺，马子麟. 微观剩余油赋存状态的矿物学机制探讨——以鄂尔多斯盆地中部中-低渗砂岩储层为例. 北京大学学报(自然科学版). 2021(01): 111-120 .
    11. 孙彤，张志强，师永民，汪贺. 基于氮吸附的致密砂岩储层纳米级孔隙分布表征. 特种油气藏. 2020(02): 145-151 .
    12. 付茜，刘启东，刘世丽，段宏亮. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷古近系阜宁组二段页岩油成藏条件分析. 石油实验地质. 2020(04): 625-631 . 本站查看
    13. 张永超，刘昌岭，吴能友，刘乐乐，郝锡荦，孟庆国，李承峰，孙建业，王代刚. 含水合物沉积物孔隙结构特征与微观渗流模拟研究. 海洋地质前沿. 2020(09): 23-33 .
    14. 陈林，李珊珊，游君君，李连义，徐涛，江汝锋，张霞，胡高伟. 文昌B凹陷古近系低渗储层物性影响因素定量评价与应用. 地质科技情报. 2019(03): 165-173 .
    15. 赵庆飞，凡哲元，郑祥克，徐卿莲，张中华. 中国石化新区不同类型油藏开发指标快速评价模型的构建. 油气地质与采收率. 2019(04): 77-81 .
    16. 王鹏飞，霍春亮，叶小明，刘卫林，徐静. 伊拉克BU油田碳酸盐岩储层沉积过程数值模拟. 油气地质与采收率. 2019(04): 56-61 .
    17. 汪贺，师永民，徐大卫，陈旋，李拉毛才旦. 非常规储层孔隙结构表征技术及进展. 油气地质与采收率. 2019(05): 21-30 .
    18. 王塞塞，张黎明，王建，吴义志，张凯. 基于多目标算法的断块油藏生产优化研究. 特种油气藏. 2019(05): 124-129 .
    19. 康博韬，杨宝泉，张迎春，顾文欢，景至一. 深水浊积砂岩油田动态相渗规律分析及应用. 特种油气藏. 2019(05): 106-111 .
    20. 张建芝，李谋杰，张云银，魏红梅，商伟. 灰质背景下浊积岩储层地震响应特征及识别方法——以东营凹陷坨71井区为例. 油气地质与采收率. 2019(06): 70-79 .
    21. 刘家军，金忠康，蔡新明. 流线影响因素分析及其在断块油藏开发调整中的应用. 油气藏评价与开发. 2019(06): 24-29 .
    22. 周连敏，王晶晶，林火养，贾晨，庄红妹，程立. 复杂断块不整合地层地质建模方法. 断块油气田. 2018(02): 181-184 .
    23. 田淼，董春梅，于永朋，宋雪梅. 基于集合卡尔曼滤波算法刻画低渗透砂岩储层的相对高渗透条带. 油气地质与采收率. 2018(04): 16-21 .
    24. 林志鹏，单敬福，陈乐，孙千军，方世祥，严雪. 苏里格气田苏6区块盒8段古河道砂体演化规律. 油气地质与采收率. 2018(05): 1-9+23 .
    25. 赵胜绪，岳湘安，张立娟，韦杰迈，凌卿，刘凯. 部分水解聚丙烯酰胺溶液在孔喉模型中机械降解的主控因素. 油气地质与采收率. 2018(06): 84-88 .
    26. 李雪娇，付美龙，陈航，侯宝峰. 砂岩油藏智能水驱提高采收率作用机理实验. 油气地质与采收率. 2018(06): 101-106 .
    27. 刘标，姚素平，胡文瑄，曹剑，解德录. 核磁共振冻融法表征非常规油气储层孔隙的适用性. 石油学报. 2017(12): 1401-1410 .

    Other cited types(17)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-05020406080
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 15.6 %FULLTEXT: 15.6 %META: 76.5 %META: 76.5 %PDF: 7.9 %PDF: 7.9 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 11.9 %其他: 11.9 %其他: 0.4 %其他: 0.4 %China: 0.2 %China: 0.2 %India: 0.1 %India: 0.1 %Seattle: 0.2 %Seattle: 0.2 %The Bronx: 0.1 %The Bronx: 0.1 %[]: 0.1 %[]: 0.1 %三门峡: 0.1 %三门峡: 0.1 %上海: 0.5 %上海: 0.5 %东京: 0.1 %东京: 0.1 %东莞: 0.3 %东莞: 0.3 %临汾: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %乌鲁木齐: 0.1 %乌鲁木齐: 0.1 %伊利诺伊州: 0.2 %伊利诺伊州: 0.2 %佛森: 0.1 %佛森: 0.1 %克拉玛依: 0.2 %克拉玛依: 0.2 %兰州: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %凉山: 0.2 %凉山: 0.2 %北京: 8.8 %北京: 8.8 %十堰: 0.2 %十堰: 0.2 %南京: 0.3 %南京: 0.3 %南宁: 0.2 %南宁: 0.2 %南昌: 0.2 %南昌: 0.2 %南通: 0.2 %南通: 0.2 %台州: 0.1 %台州: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %和田: 0.1 %和田: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %商丘: 0.2 %商丘: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %大庆: 0.4 %大庆: 0.4 %大连: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %天津: 1.9 %天津: 1.9 %太原: 0.1 %太原: 0.1 %孝感: 0.1 %孝感: 0.1 %安卡拉: 0.2 %安卡拉: 0.2 %安康: 0.1 %安康: 0.1 %宣城: 0.2 %宣城: 0.2 %密蘇里城: 0.1 %密蘇里城: 0.1 %巴特那: 0.2 %巴特那: 0.2 %常州: 0.2 %常州: 0.2 %广州: 0.1 %广州: 0.1 %张家口: 1.8 %张家口: 1.8 %德罕: 0.3 %德罕: 0.3 %德黑兰: 0.9 %德黑兰: 0.9 %成都: 0.9 %成都: 0.9 %扬州: 0.3 %扬州: 0.3 %昆明: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %晋城: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.2 %杭州: 0.7 %杭州: 0.7 %格兰特县: 0.2 %格兰特县: 0.2 %武汉: 2.3 %武汉: 2.3 %汉中: 0.1 %汉中: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.3 %沈阳: 0.3 %沧州: 0.5 %沧州: 0.5 %洛阳: 0.4 %洛阳: 0.4 %济南: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %济宁: 0.1 %济宁: 0.1 %淄博: 0.1 %淄博: 0.1 %温州: 0.1 %温州: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %湛江: 0.5 %湛江: 0.5 %漯河: 0.8 %漯河: 0.8 %濮阳: 0.1 %濮阳: 0.1 %盘锦: 0.2 %盘锦: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.7 %石家庄: 0.7 %纽约: 0.1 %纽约: 0.1 %绥化: 0.2 %绥化: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 23.6 %芒廷维尤: 23.6 %芝加哥: 0.8 %芝加哥: 0.8 %莫斯科: 0.1 %莫斯科: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.2 %衡阳: 0.2 %衢州: 0.1 %衢州: 0.1 %西宁: 21.3 %西宁: 21.3 %西安: 1.7 %西安: 1.7 %达州: 0.5 %达州: 0.5 %运城: 0.2 %运城: 0.2 %遵义: 0.3 %遵义: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %郑州: 0.2 %郑州: 0.2 %重庆: 0.6 %重庆: 0.6 %长春: 0.3 %长春: 0.3 %长沙: 4.6 %长沙: 4.6 %长治: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %阳泉: 0.1 %阳泉: 0.1 %阿什本: 0.7 %阿什本: 0.7 %雪兰莪: 0.3 %雪兰莪: 0.3 %青岛: 2.6 %青岛: 2.6 %首尔: 0.2 %首尔: 0.2 %其他其他ChinaIndiaSeattleThe Bronx[]三门峡上海东京东莞临汾乌鲁木齐伊利诺伊州佛森克拉玛依兰州凉山北京十堰南京南宁南昌南通台州合肥和田哈尔滨哥伦布商丘嘉兴大庆大连天津太原孝感安卡拉安康宣城密蘇里城巴特那常州广州张家口德罕德黑兰成都扬州昆明晋城朝阳杭州格兰特县武汉汉中沈阳沧州洛阳济南济宁淄博温州湘潭湛江漯河濮阳盘锦石家庄纽约绥化芒廷维尤芝加哥莫斯科衡阳衢州西宁西安达州运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆长春长沙长治阳泉阿什本雪兰莪青岛首尔

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Citation
    XML
    PDF-CN

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1543) PDF downloads(620) Cited by(44)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Website Copyright © Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, SINOPEC 苏ICP备15009037号 苏公网安备32021102000780号

    Address：No. 2060, Lihu Avenue, Wuxi, Jiangsu   (214126) Tel：0510-68787204，68787203 Fax：0510-68787113 Email：sysydz.syky@sinopec.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return