Advanced Search
Volume 39 Issue 5
. 
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT  > 2017  >  39(5): 716-723
Zheng Jianfeng, Shen Anjiang, Huang Lili, Chen Yongquan, She Min. Pore effect of dolomite reservoirs based on burial dissolution simulation: A case study of the Lower Cambrian Xiaoerbulake Formation in the Tarim Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2017, 39(5): 716-723. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201705716
Citation: Zheng Jianfeng, Shen Anjiang, Huang Lili, Chen Yongquan, She Min. Pore effect of dolomite reservoirs based on burial dissolution simulation: A case study of the Lower Cambrian Xiaoerbulake Formation in the Tarim Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2017, 39(5): 716-723. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201705716
shu

Pore effect of dolomite reservoirs based on burial dissolution simulation: A case study of the Lower Cambrian Xiaoerbulake Formation in the Tarim Basin

doi: 10.11781/sysydz201705716
  • 1.

    CNPC Key Laboratory of Carbonate Reservoir, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310023, China

  • 2. PetroChina Hangzhou Research Institute of Geology, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310023, China

  • 3. PetroChina Tarim Oil Field Company, Korla, Xinjiang 841000, China

  • Received Date: 2017-05-13
  • Rev Recd Date: 2017-07-27
  • Publish Date: 2017-09-28
    Abstract
  • Burial dissolution is one of the important factors which control the development of dolomite reservoirs, but its effect on porosity is still not clear, which restricts the evaluation and exploration of burial dissolution dolomite reservoirs. This study took arene dolomites, stromatolite dolomites and thrombolite dolomites of the Lower Cambrian Xiaoerbulake Formation in the Tarim Basin as an example, used 0.2% acetic acid solution instead of organic acids of burial environment, carried out dissolution simulation experiments of dolomite reservoirs in the condition of high temperature and high pressure. The results showed three different samples' porosity was improved in different temperatures and pressures, but their permeability increased exponentially. The reservoir space of arene dolomites changed from pores to pores and vugs, while the reservoir space of stromatolite dolomites and thrombolite dolomites changed from pores to pores and solution fractures. It implied that organic acid had a strong solubility to dolomites, and the initial pore structure controlled the final reservoir space type. With the dissolution from homogeneous to heterogeneous, the vugs and solution fractures developed heterogeneously, and reservoir connectivity was partly improved. So, burial dissolution is of great importance in reforming the permeability of dolomite reservoirs.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(32)
  • [1]
    Moore C H.Carbonate reservoirs:Porosity evolution and diagenesis in a sequence stratigraphic framework[M].Amsterdam:Elsevier,2001:145-183.
    [2]
    张新华,黄文辉,王安甲,等.塔里木盆地下古生界白云岩储层发育控制因素分析[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版),2009,39(2):288-292. Zhang Xinhua,Huang Wenhui,Wang Anjia,et al.Analysis of the reservoir development controlling factors of the Cambro-Lower Ordovician dolomite in Tarim Basin[J].Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition),2009,39(2):288-292.
    [3]
    郑剑锋,沈安江,乔占峰,等.塔里木盆地下奥陶统蓬莱坝组白云岩成因及储层主控因素分析：以巴楚大班塔格剖面为例[J].岩石学报,2013,29(9):3223-3232. Zheng Jianfeng,Shen Anjiang,Qiao Zhanfeng,et al.Genesis of dolomite and main controlling factors of reservoir in Penglaiba Formation of Lower Ordovician,Tarim Basin:A case study of Dabantage outcrop in Bachu area[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,2013,29(9):3223-3232.
    [4]
    赵文智,沈安江,郑剑锋,等.塔里木、四川及鄂尔多斯盆地白云岩储层孔隙成因探讨及对储层预测的指导意义[J].中国科学(地球科学),2014,44(9):1925-1939. Zhao Wenzhi,Shen Anjiang,Zheng Jianfeng,et al.The porosity origin of dolostone reservoirs in the Tarim,Sichuan and Ordos basins and its implication to reservoir prediction[J].Science China(Earth Sciences),2014,57(10):2498-2511.
    [5]
    沈安江,赵文智,胡安平,等.海相碳酸盐岩储集层发育主控因素[J].石油勘探与开发,2015,42(5):545-554. Shen Anjiang,Zhao Wenzhi,Hu Anping,et al.Major factors controlling the development of marine carbonate reservoirs[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(5):545-554.
    [6]
    费剑炜,杨红彩,周芳芳,等.塔里木盆地雅克拉断凸及周缘前中生界白云岩储层成因与勘探潜力[J].石油实验地质,2015,37(3):286-292. Fei Jianwei,Yang Hongcai,Zhou Fangfang,et al.Genetic types and exploration potential of pre-Mesozoic dolomite reservoirs in Yakela fault arch and its surrounding areas,Tarim Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2015,37(3):286-292.
    [7]
    江文剑,侯明才,邢凤存,等.川东南寒武系娄山关群白云岩成岩作用特征[J].石油实验地质,2016,38(3):311-319. Jiang Wenjian,Hou Mingcai,Xing Fengcun,et al.Diagenetic characteristics of dolomites in the Cambrian Loushanguan Group in southeastern Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2016,38(3):311-319.
    [8]
    李小宁,黄思静,黄树光,等.四川盆地南江栖霞组白云岩岩石学、地球化学特征及成因[J].石油实验地质,2016,38(2):251-258,265. Li Xiaoning,Huang Sijing,Huang Shuguang,et al.Petrologic and geochemical characteristics and the origin of dolomites in the Qixia Formation in Nanjiang county of the Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2016,38(2):251-258,265.
    [9]
    毕彩芹,朱强,杨园园.也门1区块白云岩成因及其对油气成藏的影响[J].油气地质与采收率,2017,24(3):44-49,65. Bi Caiqin,Zhu Qiang,Yang Yuanyuan.Genetic analysis on the dolomite formation and its influence on hydrocarbon accumulation in Block1,Yemen[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2017,24(3):44-49,65.
    [10]
    张静,胡见义,罗平,等.深埋优质白云岩储集层发育的主控因素与勘探意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2010,37(2):203-210. Zhang Jing,Hu Jianyi,Luo Ping,et al.Master control factors of deep high-quality dolomite reservoirs and the exploration significance[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2010,37(2):203-210.
    [11]
    邢凤存,张文淮,李思田.热流体对深埋白云岩储集性影响及其油气勘探意义：塔里木盆地柯坪露头区研究[J].岩石学报,2011,27(1):266-276. Xing Fengcun,Zhang Wenhuai,Li Sitian.Influence of hot fluids on reservoir property of deep buried dolomite strata and its signi-ficance for petroleum exploration:A case study of Keping outcrop in Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,2011,27(1):266-276.
    [12]
    金振奎,余宽宏.白云岩储集层埋藏溶蚀作用特征及意义：以塔里木盆地东部下古生界为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2011,38(4):428-434. Jin Zhenkui,Yu Kuanhong.Characteristics and significance of the burial dissolution of dolomite reservoirs:Taking the Lower Palaeozoic in eastern Tarim Basin as an example[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2011,38(4):428-434.
    [13]
    Sun S Q.Dolomite reservoirs:Porosity evolution and reservoir characteristics[J].AAPG Bulletin,1995,79(2):186-204.
    [14]
    Davies G R,Smith Jr L B.Structurally controlled hydrothermal dolomite reservoir facies:An overview[J].AAPG Bulletin,2006,90(11):1641-1690.
    [15]
    朱光有,张水昌,梁英波,等.TSR对深部碳酸盐岩储层的溶蚀改造：四川盆地深部碳酸盐岩优质储层形成的重要方式[J].岩石学报,2006,22(8):2182-2194. Zhu Guangyou,Zhang Shuichang,Liang Yingbo,et al.Dissolution and alteration of the deep carbonate reservoirs by TSR:An important type of deep-buried high-quality carbonate reservoirs in Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,2006,22(8):2182-2194.
    [16]
    Pokrovsky O S,Golubev S V,Schott J.Dissolution kinetics of calcite,dolomite and magnesite at 25 ℃ and 0 to 50 atm pCO2[J].Chemical Geology,2005,217(3/4):239-255.
    [17]
    Liu Zaihua,Yuan Daoxian,Dreybrodt W.Comparative study of dissolution rate-determining mechanisms of limestone and dolomite[J].Environmental Geology,2005,49(2):274-279.
    [18]
    黄思静,成欣怡,赵杰,等.近地表温压条件下白云岩溶解过程的实验研究[J].中国岩溶,2012,31(4):349-359. Huang Sijing,Cheng Xinyi,Zhao Jie,et al.Test on the dolomite dissolution under subaerial temperature and pressure[J].Carsologica Sinica,2012,31(4):349-359.
    [19]
    佘敏,寿建峰,贺训云,等.碳酸盐岩溶蚀机制的实验探讨:表面溶蚀与内部溶蚀对比[J].海相油气地质,2013,18(3):55-61. She Min,Shou Jianfeng,He Xunyun,et al.Experiment of dissolution mechanism of carbonate rocks:Surface dissolution and internal dissolution[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2013,18(3):55-61.
    [20]
    佘敏,寿建峰,沈安江,等.从表生到深埋藏环境下有机酸对碳酸盐岩溶蚀的实验模拟[J].地球化学,2014,43(3):276-286. She Min,Shou Jianfeng,Shen Anjiang,et al.Experimental simulation of dissolution for carbonate rocks in organic acid under the conditions from epigenesis to deep burial environments[J].Geochimica,2009,43(3):276-286.
    [21]
    佘敏,寿建峰,沈安江,等.埋藏有机酸性流体对白云岩储层溶蚀作用的模拟实验[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2014,38(3):10-17. She Min,Shou Jianfeng,Shen Anjiang,et al.Experimental simulation of dissolution and alteration of buried organic acid fluid on dolomite reservoir[J].Journal of China University of Petro-leum,2014,38(3):10-17.
    [22]
    郑和荣,吴茂炳,邬兴威,等.塔里木盆地下古生界白云岩储层油气勘探前景[J].石油学报,2007,28(2):1-8. Zheng Herong,Wu Maobing,Wu Xingwei,et al.Oil-gas exploration prospect of dolomite reservoir in the Lower Paleozoic of Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2007,28(2):1-8.
    [23]
    赵文智,沈安江,胡素云,等.塔里木盆地寒武—奥陶系白云岩储层类型与分布特征[J].岩石学报,2012,28(3):758-768. Zhao Wenzhi,Shen Anjiang,Hu Suyun,et al.Types and distributional features of Cambrian-Ordovician dolostone reservoirs in Tarim Basin,northwestern China[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,2012,28(3):758-768.
    [24]
    王招明,谢会文,陈永权,等.塔里木盆地中深1井寒武系盐下白云岩原生油气藏的发现与勘探意义[J].中国石油勘探,2014,19(2):1-13. Wang Zhaoming,Xie Huiwen,Chen Yongquan,et al.Discovery and exploration of Cambrian subsalt dolomite original hydrocarbon reservoir at Zhongshen-1 well in Tarim Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2014,19(2):1-13.
    [25]
    杜金虎,潘文庆.塔里木盆地寒武系盐下白云岩油气成藏条件与勘探方向[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(3):327-339. Du Jinhu,Pan Wenqing.Accumulation conditions and play targets of oil and gas in the Cambrian subsalt dolomite,Tarim Basin,NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(3):327-339.
    [26]
    宋金民,罗平,杨式升,等.塔里木盆地下寒武统微生物碳酸盐岩储集层特征[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(4):404-413. Song Jinmin,Luo Ping,Yang Shisheng,et al.Reservoirs of Lower Cambrian microbial carbonates,Tarim Basin,NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(4):404-413.
    [27]
    沈安江,郑剑锋,陈永权,等.塔里木盆地中下寒武统白云岩储集层特征、成因及分布[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(3):340-349. Shen Anjiang,Zheng Jianfeng,Chen Yongquan,et al.Characteristics,origin and distribution of dolomite reservoirs in Lower-Middle Cambrian,Tarim Basin,NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(3):340-349.
    [28]
    范明,胡凯,蒋小琼,等.酸性流体对碳酸盐岩储层的改造作用[J].地球化学,2009,38(1):20-26. Fan Ming,Hu Kai,Jiang Xiaoqiong,et al.Effect of acid fluid on carbonate reservoir reconstruction[J].Geochimica,2009,38(1):20-26.
    [29]
    黄康俊,王炜,鲍征宇,等.埋藏有机酸性流体对四川盆地东北部飞仙关组储层的溶蚀改造作用:溶解动力学实验研究[J].地球化学,2011,40(3):289-300. Huang Kangjun,Wang Wei,Bao Zhengyu,et al.Dissolution and alteration of Feixianguan Formation in the Sichuan Basin by organic acid fluids under burial condition:Kinetic dissolution experi-ments[J].Geochimica,2011,40(3):289-300.
    [30]
    蔡春芳,邱利瑞.塔里木盆地油田水有机配合物的模拟计算[J].新疆石油地质,1998,19(1):32-34. Cai Chunfang,Qiu Lirui.Simulation and calculation of organic complex compound in oilfield water,Tarim Basin[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,1998,19(1):32-34.
    [31]
    Smith Jr L B.Origin and reservoir characteristics of Upper Ordovician Trenton-Black River hydrothermal dolomite reservoirs in New York[J].AAPG Bulletin,2006,90(11):1691-1718.
    [32]
    郑剑锋,沈安江,潘文庆,等.塔里木盆地下古生界热液白云岩储层的主控因素及识别特征[J].海相油气地质,2011,16(4):47-56. Zheng Jianfeng,Shen Anjiang,Pan Wenqing,et al.Key contro-lling factors and identification characteristics of Lower Paleozoic hydrothermal dolostone reservoirs in Tarim Basin[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2011,16(4):47-56.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]ZHANG Liang, ZHU Yixiu, ZHOU Lu, QIN Kaixuan, JIANG Jun, XIONG Rongkun, LI Zezhou. Preservation mechanism of pores in middle and deep sandstone reservoirs of Cretaceous Bashijiqike Formation in Yingmaili area, Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2024, 46(5): 1075-1087. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2024051075
    [2]ZHOU Zhuoming. Co-evolution characteristics of organic matter and reservoir in continental shale: a case study of Shahezi Formation in Changling Faulted Depression, Songliao Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2023, 45(2): 243-251. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202302243
    [3]ZHANG Zhuang, SU Chengpeng, SONG Xiaobo, SHI Guoshan, WANG Renfu, LI Suhua, DONG Xia, HU Yongliang. Petroleum geological conditions and exploration potential of the Permian Qixia Formation in the middle segment of Western Depression, Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2022, 44(6): 959-970. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202206959
    [4]ZOU Yu, WANG Guojian, LU Li, ZHU Huaiping, LIU Guangxiang, YUAN Yusong, YANG Haiyuan, JIN Zhijun. Simulation experiment and mathematical model analysis for shale gas diffusion in nano-scale pores[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(5): 844-854. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202105844
    [5]LI Yong, DENG Meizhou, LI Guorong, GAO Hengyi, WANG Qiongxian, HE Sai. Palaeokarst characteristics and effects on reservoirs in the fourth member of Leikoupo Formation, Longmen Mountain front, western Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(1): 56-63. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202101056
    [6]HUANG Zhenkai, LI Maowen, ZHENG Lunju, TAO Guoliang, LI Zhiming, JIANG Qigui, QIAN Menhui, CAO Tingting, LI Shuangjian, WO Yujin, SUN Dongsheng. Pore development in lacustrine source rock evolution: interpretation based on geological samples and simulation experiments: interpretation based on geological samples and simulation experiments[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2020, 42(4): 639-645. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004639
    [7]WANG Qiongxian, SONG Xiaobo, CHEN Hongde, LIU Haonian. Cement characteristics and effects on dolomite reservoir pores in the fourth member of Leikoupo Formation, Longmen Mountain front, western Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2018, 40(6): 757-763. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201806757
    [8]YU Haoyuan, CAI Chunfang, ZHENG Jianfeng, HUANG Lili, YUAN Wenfang. Influence of microbial textures on pore characteristics of microbial dolomites: A case study of Lower Cambrian Xiaoerbulake Formation in Keping area, Tarim Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2018, 40(2): 233-243. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201802233
    [9]Li Bin, Peng Jun, Yang Suju, Xia Qingsong, Xu Qingqi, Hao Yueqi. Genetic model and characteristics of the Cambrian Shorebulake reservoir in Bachu area, Tarim Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2017, 39(6): 797-804. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201706797
    [10]Qian Yixiong, Du Yongming, Chen Daizhao, You Donghua, Zhang Juntao, Chen Yue, Liu Zhongbao. Stratigraphic sequences and sedimentary facies of Qigebulak Formation at Xianerbulak, Tarim Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2014, 36(1): 1-8. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201401001
    [11]Huang Chenggang, Yuan Jianying, Cao Zhenglin, Zhang Shiming, Wang Ying, She Min, Mi Haijie. Simulation experiment for ankerite dissolution in clastic reservoir of saline lacustrine basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2014, 36(5): 650-655. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201405650
    [12]Jiang Xiaoqiong, Guan Honglin, Zheng Herong, Wang Shuyi, Fan Ming, Bao Yunjie, Li Fengli, Han Yu. Discussion on origin of dolomite reservoirs in Feixianguan Formation, Puguang Gas Field, Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2014, 36(3): 332-336. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201403332
    [13]Zheng Xingping, Liu Yongfu, Zhang Jie, Zheng Jianfeng. Characteristics and origin of dolomite reservoirs in Lower Ordovician Yingshan Formation, northern slope of Tazhong uplift, Tarim Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2013, 35(2): 157-161. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201302157
    [14]Zhang Jing, Luo Ping. GENESIS OF ORDOVICIAN MATRIX-POROSITY DOLOMITE RESERVOIR IN THE TARIM BASIN[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2010, 32(5): 470-474. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201005470
    [15]Ma Hongqiang, Wang Shuyi, Yong Hong, Chen Qianglu, Jiang Haijian, Wang Bin, Li Huili, Sha Xuguang. BURIAL KARST CHARACTERISTICS OF ORDOVICIAN CARBONATE RESERVOIRS IN CENTRAL TARIM BASIN[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2010, 32(5): 434-441. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201005434
    [16]Cheng Qiuquan, Fan Ming, Huang Jiwen, Chen Zhengfu. THE TWO-STAGE FRACTIONATION MODEL OF METHANE CARBON ISOTOPE FROM THE THERMAL SIMULATION EXPERIMENTS OF SOURCE ROCKS IN THE KUQA DEPRESSION OF THE TARIM BASIN[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2009, 31(1): 101-104. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200901101
    [17]Jiang Xiaoqiong, Wang Shuyi, Fan Ming, Zhang Jianyong, Guan Honglin, Bao Yunjie. STUDY OF SIMULATION EXPERIMENT FOR CARBONATE ROCKS DISSOLUTION IN BURIAL DIAGENETIC ENVIRONMENT[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2008, 30(6): 643-646. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200806643
    [18]Chen Zhonghong, Zha Ming. SIMULATION EXPERIMENT OF THE GEOCHROMATOGRAPHIC EFFECT OF AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS DURING HYDROCARBON EXPULSION[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2007, 29(6): 612-616. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200706612
    [19]Zhao Zongju, Wang Zhaoming, Wu Xingning, Chen Xueshi. GENETIC TYPES AND DISTRIBUTION FORECAST OF AVAILABLE CARBONATE RESERVOIRS IN ORDOVICIAN IN THE CENTRAL AREA OF TARIM BASIN[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2007, 29(1): 40-46. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200701040
    [20]Wang Zhenping, Zhao Xigu, Fu Xiaotai Lu Shuangfang, Qu Jiayan, . SIMULATION EXPERIMENTS OF HYDROCARBON-EXPELLING OF SOURCE ROCKS AND APPARENT OIL-EXPELLONG EFFICIENCY OF THE TARIM BASIN[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 1995, 17(4): 372-376. doi: 10.11781/sysydz199504372
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(13)

    1. 陈森然，刘诗琦，刘新社，魏柳斌，刘波，王恩泽，于进鑫，熊鹰. 碳酸盐岩成岩重结晶作用及其储层意义. 北京大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(05): 839-850 .
    2. 梁金同，文华国，李笑天，乔占峰，佘敏，钟怡江，张浩. 碳酸盐岩储层埋藏溶蚀改造与水岩模拟实验研究进展. 地球科学. 2023(02): 814-834 .
    3. 沈安江，胡安平，张杰，王小芳，王慧. 微生物碳酸盐岩“三因素”控储地质认识和分布规律. 石油与天然气地质. 2022(03): 582-596 .
    4. 赵文智，沈安江，乔占峰，张建勇，倪新锋. 中国碳酸盐岩沉积储层理论进展与海相大油气田发现. 中国石油勘探. 2022(04): 1-15 .
    5. 白莹，李建忠，刘伟，徐兆辉，徐旺林，李欣，Abitkazy Taskyn. 塔里木盆地西北部下寒武统白云岩特征及多重白云石化模式. 石油学报. 2021(09): 1174-1191 .
    6. 曹婷婷，曲希玉，蒋龑，王清斌，刘成龙. 混积条件下有机酸-矿物溶蚀模拟实验. 矿物岩石地球化学通报. 2021(05): 1181-1188 .
    7. 乔占峰，吕玉珍，陈薇，佘敏，邵冠铭，曹鹏，孙晓伟. 白云岩埋藏溶蚀孔洞的形成机理与演化——来自高温高压溶蚀模拟的证据. 海相油气地质. 2021(04): 326-334 .
    8. 丁茜，何治亮，王静彬，朱东亚. 生烃伴生酸性流体对碳酸盐岩储层改造效应的模拟实验. 石油与天然气地质. 2020(01): 223-234 .
    9. 熊鹰，谭秀成，伍坤宇，王小芳. 碳酸盐岩储集层成岩作用中“孔隙尺寸控制沉淀”研究进展、地质意义及鄂尔多斯盆地实例. 古地理学报. 2020(04): 744-760 .
    10. 姜伟民，刘波，石开波，高孝巧，刘帆，于进鑫. 塔里木盆地柯坪地区肖尔布拉克组碳酸盐岩微相类型和储集层特征. 新疆石油地质. 2019(04): 437-448 .
    11. 厚东琳. 白云石化对储层发育的控制作用——以普光、元坝气田飞仙关组为例. 断块油气田. 2019(04): 449-452 .
    12. 余浩元，蔡春芳，郑剑锋，黄理力，袁文芳. 微生物结构对微生物白云岩孔隙特征的影响——以塔里木盆地柯坪地区肖尔布拉克组为例. 石油实验地质. 2018(02): 233-243 . 本站查看
    13. 韩志艳，周卓明，杨昊，宋振响. 松辽盆地梨树断陷东南斜坡带营城——沙河子组储层特征及主控因素. 石油实验地质. 2018(03): 345-352 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(6)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-05020406080
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 23.2 %FULLTEXT: 23.2 %META: 75.1 %META: 75.1 %PDF: 1.7 %PDF: 1.7 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 5.4 %其他: 5.4 %China: 1.2 %China: 1.2 %India: 0.1 %India: 0.1 %Prineville: 0.1 %Prineville: 0.1 %[]: 0.4 %[]: 0.4 %三门峡: 0.2 %三门峡: 0.2 %上海: 6.3 %上海: 6.3 %东莞: 0.4 %东莞: 0.4 %临汾: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %丽水: 0.1 %丽水: 0.1 %加利福尼亚州: 0.1 %加利福尼亚州: 0.1 %北京: 3.1 %北京: 3.1 %台州: 0.2 %台州: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %天津: 0.2 %天津: 0.2 %宣城: 0.2 %宣城: 0.2 %广州: 0.4 %广州: 0.4 %廊坊: 0.2 %廊坊: 0.2 %弗吉尼亚州: 0.6 %弗吉尼亚州: 0.6 %张家口: 3.9 %张家口: 3.9 %成都: 0.8 %成都: 0.8 %扬州: 0.1 %扬州: 0.1 %昆明: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %晋城: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %杭州: 0.5 %杭州: 0.5 %武汉: 0.4 %武汉: 0.4 %济南: 0.1 %济南: 0.1 %湖州: 0.2 %湖州: 0.2 %湘潭: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %漯河: 0.2 %漯河: 0.2 %盘锦: 0.2 %盘锦: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.9 %石家庄: 0.9 %芒廷维尤: 29.9 %芒廷维尤: 29.9 %芝加哥: 0.5 %芝加哥: 0.5 %莫斯科: 0.7 %莫斯科: 0.7 %衢州: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %西宁: 7.7 %西宁: 7.7 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %达州: 0.1 %达州: 0.1 %运城: 0.1 %运城: 0.1 %遵义: 0.2 %遵义: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %郑州: 31.2 %郑州: 31.2 %金华: 0.2 %金华: 0.2 %长沙: 0.5 %长沙: 0.5 %长治: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %青岛: 0.4 %青岛: 0.4 %首尔: 0.1 %首尔: 0.1 %其他ChinaIndiaPrineville[]三门峡上海东莞临汾丽水加利福尼亚州北京台州哥伦布天津宣城广州廊坊弗吉尼亚州张家口成都扬州昆明晋城杭州武汉济南湖州湘潭漯河盘锦石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥莫斯科衢州西宁贵阳达州运城遵义邯郸郑州金华长沙长治青岛首尔

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Citation
    XML
    PDF-CN

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1222) PDF downloads(213) Cited by(19)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Website Copyright © Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, SINOPEC 苏ICP备15009037号 苏公网安备32021102000780号

    Address：No. 2060, Lihu Avenue, Wuxi, Jiangsu   (214126) Tel：0510-68787204，68787203 Fax：0510-68787113 Email：sysydz.syky@sinopec.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return