Accumulation conditions and controlling factors for the enrichment of shale oil and gas in the Jurassic Qianfoya Formation, Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin

GUO Xusheng; ZHAO Yongqiang; ZHANG Wentao; LI Yuping; WEI Xiangfeng; SHEN Baojian

doi:10.11781/sysydz202105749

Volume 43 Issue 5

Sep. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT > 2021 > 43(5): 749-757

GUO Xusheng, ZHAO Yongqiang, ZHANG Wentao, LI Yuping, WEI Xiangfeng, SHEN Baojian. Accumulation conditions and controlling factors for the enrichment of shale oil and gas in the Jurassic Qianfoya Formation, Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(5): 749-757. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202105749

Citation:

GUO Xusheng, ZHAO Yongqiang, ZHANG Wentao, LI Yuping, WEI Xiangfeng, SHEN Baojian. Accumulation conditions and controlling factors for the enrichment of shale oil and gas in the Jurassic Qianfoya Formation, Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(5): 749-757. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202105749

Citation:

GUO Xusheng, ZHAO Yongqiang, ZHANG Wentao, LI Yuping, WEI Xiangfeng, SHEN Baojian. Accumulation conditions and controlling factors for the enrichment of shale oil and gas in the Jurassic Qianfoya Formation, Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(5): 749-757. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202105749

PDF( 2157 KB)

Accumulation conditions and controlling factors for the enrichment of shale oil and gas in the Jurassic Qianfoya Formation, Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202105749

GUO Xusheng^{1, 2
,},
ZHAO Yongqiang^{1, 3},
ZHANG Wentao^{1, 3},
LI Yuping⁴,
WEI Xiangfeng⁴,
SHEN Baojian^{1, 3}

1.
SINOPEC Key Laboratory of Petroleum Accumulation Mechanisms, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China
2.
SINOPEC, Beijing 100020, China
3.
Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, SINOPEC, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China
4.
SINOPEC Exploration Company, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China

Received Date: 2021-07-24
Rev Recd Date: 2021-09-03
Publish Date: 2021-09-28

Abstract

Abstract

Taking key wells such as Yuanye 3 in the Yuanba area of the Sichuan Basin as examples, the accumulation conditions of continental shale oil and gas in the Middle Jurassic Qianfoya Formation in this area have been evaluated based on core observation and experimental analysis. The organic-rich mudstone of the Qianfoya Formation has high porosity and good oil and gas content. It is the main reservoir lithofacies type, while the physical properties of limestone and sandstone interlayers are relatively poorer. The pores are mainly inorganic ones, accounting for approximately 60% to 80% of the total porosity. Compared with marine shale, the proportion of micropores is lower and the content of macropores is higher, which is conducive to the production of shale oil and gas. The fourth section of the lower part of the second member of the Qianfoya Formation is dominated by organic-rich mudstone, with a high shale-to-stratum ratio, an average porosity of 5.43%, and an average total organic carbon (TOC) content of 1.72%. The free hydrocarbon content (S₁) of frozen sample pyrolysis is 2.63 mg/g, and the average total gas content is 1.51 m³/t, showing a good oil-bearing property and favorable geological conditions for the formation of continental shale oil and gas. Comparative analysis with other wells has indicated that half-deep lacustrine facies is the most favorable sedimentary facies belt, providing basic material for oil and gas enrichment, and high maturity and fracture development is the important condition for oil and gas enrichment.
- controlling factors,
- continental shale oil and gas,
- Qianfoya Formation,
- Middle Jurassic,
- Yuanba area,
- Sichuan Basin

FullText(HTML)

References(24)

References

[1]	郭彤楼, 李宇平, 魏志红. 四川盆地元坝地区自流井组页岩气成藏条件[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2011, 22(1): 1-7. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201101003.htm GUO Tonglou, LI Yuping, WEI Zhihong. Reservoir-forming conditions of shale gas in Ziliujing formation of Yuanba area in Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2011, 22(1): 1-7. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201101003.htm
[2]	胡东风, 魏志红, 刘若冰, 等. 四川盆地拔山寺向斜泰页1井页岩油气重大突破及意义[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(2): 21-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202102003.htm HU Dongfeng, WEI Zhihong, LIU Ruobing, et al. Major breakthrough of shale oil and gas in well Taiye 1 in Bashansi Syncline in the Sichuan Basin and its significance[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021, 26(2): 21-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202102003.htm
[3]	胡宗全, 王濡岳, 刘忠宝, 等. 四川盆地下侏罗统陆相页岩气源储特征及耦合评价[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(1): 261-272. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY202101027.htm HU Zongquan, WANG Ruyue, LIU Zhongbao, et al. Source-reservoir characteristics and coupling evaluations for the Lower Jurassic lacustrine shale gas reservoir in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2021, 28(1): 261-272. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY202101027.htm
[4]	郭旭升, 胡东风, 李宇平, 等. 海相和湖相页岩气富集机理分析与思考: 以四川盆地龙马溪组和自流井组大安寨段为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(2): 18-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201602005.htm GUO Xusheng, HU Dongfeng, LI Yuping, et al. Analyses and thoughts on accumulation mechanisms of marine and lacustrine shale gas: a case study in shales of Lonamaxi Formation and Da'anzhai Section of Ziliujing Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 32(2): 18-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201602005.htm
[5]	魏祥峰, 黄静, 李宇平, 等. 元坝地区大安寨段陆相页岩气富集高产主控因素[J]. 中国地质, 2014, 41(3): 970-981. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI201403022.htm WEI Xiangfeng, HUANG Jing, LI Yuping, et al. The main factors controlling the enrichment and high production of Da'anzhai member continental shale gas in Yuanba area[J]. Geology in China, 2014, 41(3): 970-981. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI201403022.htm
[6]	王庆波, 刘若冰, 魏祥峰, 等. 陆相页岩气成藏地质条件及富集高产主控因素分析: 以元坝地区为例[J]. 断块油气田, 2013, 20(6): 698-703. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT201306005.htm WANG Qingbo, LIU Ruobing, WEI Xiangfeng, et al. Geologic condition of shale gas accumulation in continental facies and main controlling factors of enrichment and high production: taking Yuanba District as an example[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2013, 20(6): 698-703. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT201306005.htm
[7]	王炜, 刘若冰, 倪凯. 川东北侏罗系千佛崖组页岩气勘探潜力分析[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 27(6): 36-41. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XASY201206009.htm WANG Wei, LIU Ruobing, NI Kai. Analysis of the exploration potential of shale gas in Jurassic Qianfoya Formation in northeast Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition), 2012, 27(6): 36-41. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XASY201206009.htm
[8]	郭旭升, 胡东风, 段金宝. 中国南方海相油气勘探展望[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(5): 675-686. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202005675 GUO Xusheng, HU Dongfeng, DUAN Jinbao. Marine petroleum exploration in South China[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(5): 675-686. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202005675
[9]	李廷微, 姜振学, 宋国奇, 等. 陆相和海相页岩储层孔隙结构差异性分析[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(1): 65-71. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201901007.htm LI Tingwei, JIANG Zhenxue, SONG Guoqi, et al. Analysis of differences in pore structure between continental and marine shale reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(1): 65-71. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201901007.htm
[10]	朱彤. 四川盆地陆相页岩油气富集主控因素及类型[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(3): 345-354 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD202003006.htm ZHU Tong. Main controlling factors and types of continental shale oil and gas enrichment in Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(3): 345-354. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD202003006.htm
[11]	胡见义, 黄第藩. 中国陆相石油地质理论基础[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1991. HU Jianyi, HUANG Difan. The bases of nonmarine petroleum geology in China[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1991.
[12]	CURTIS M E, CARDOTT B J, SONDERGELD C H, et al. Deve-lopment of organic porosity in the Woodford shale with increasing thermal maturity[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2012, 103: 26-31. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166516212002005
[13]	LÖHR S C, BARUCH E T, HALL P A, et al. Is organic pore development in gas shales influenced by the primary porosity and structure of thermally immature organic matter?[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2015, 87: 119-132. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146638015001527
[14]	ZHANG Wentao, HU Wenxuan, BORJIGIN T, et al. Pore characteristics of different organic matter in black shale: a case study of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in the southeast Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2020, 111: 33-43.
[15]	腾格尔, 卢龙飞, 俞凌杰, 等. 页岩有机质孔隙形成、保持及其连通性的控制作用[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(4): 687-699. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202104003.htm BORJIGIN Tenger, LU Longfei, YU Lingjie, et al. Formation, preservation and connectivity control of organic pores in shale[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(4): 687-699. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202104003.htm
[16]	魏志红. 富有机质页岩有机质孔发育差异性探讨: 以四川盆地五峰组—龙马溪组笔石页岩为例[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自科版), 2015, 42(3): 361-365. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202301016.htm WEI Zhihong. Difference of organic pores in organic matter: a case from graptolite shales of Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation in Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2015, 42(3): 361-365. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202301016.htm
[17]	王玉满, 董大忠, 杨桦, 等. 川南下志留统龙马溪组页岩储集空间定量表征[J]. 中国科学(地球科学), 2014, 44(6): 1348-1356. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK201406025.htm WANG Yuman, DONG Dazhong, YANG Hua, et al. Quantitative characterization of reservoir space in the Lower Silurian Longmaxi shale, southern Sichuan, China[J]. Science China(Earth Sciences), 2014, 57(2): 313-322. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK201406025.htm
[18]	张全林, 邓虎成, 熊亮, 等. 四川盆地龙马溪组页岩储层特征差异性探讨: 以威远与涪陵地区为例[J]. 长江大学学报(自科版), 2016, 13(17): 1-7. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJDL201617001.htm ZHANG Quanlin, DENG Hucheng, XIONG Liang, et al. Analysis of shale reservoir difference of Longmaxi Formation in Sichuan Basin: by taking Weiyuan and Fuling areas for example[J]. Journal of Yangtze University (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 13(17): 1-7. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJDL201617001.htm
[19]	蒋启贵, 黎茂稳, 钱门辉, 等. 不同赋存状态页岩油定量表征技术与应用研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2016, 38(6): 842-849. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD201606020.htm JIANG Qigui, LI Maowen, QIAN Menhui, et al. Quantitative characterization of shale oil in different occurrence states and its application[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2016, 38(6): 842-849. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD201606020.htm
[20]	郭彤楼, 刘若冰. 复杂构造区高演化程度海相页岩气勘探突破的启示: 以四川盆地东部盆缘JY1井为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(4): 643-651. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201304000.htm GUO Tonglou, LIU Ruobing. Implications from marine shale gas exploration breakthrough in complicated structural area at high thermal stage: taking Longmaxi Formation in well JY1 as an example[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2013, 24(4): 643-651. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201304000.htm
[21]	闫建萍, 张同伟, 李艳芳, 等. 页岩有机质特征对甲烷吸附的影响[J]. 煤炭学报, 2013, 38(5): 805-811. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201305017.htm YAN Janping, ZHANG Tongwei, LI Yanfang, et al. Effect of the organic matter characteristics on methane adsorption in shale[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2013, 38(5): 805-811. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201305017.htm
[22]	MATHIA E J, BOWEN L, THOMAS K M, et al. Evolution of porosity and pore types in organic-rich, calcareous, Lower Toarcian posidonia shale[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2016, 75: 117-139.
[23]	于炳松. 页岩气储层孔隙分类与表征[J]. 地学前缘, 2013, 20(4): 211-220. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201304020.htm YU Bingsong. Classification and characterization of gas shale pore system[J]. Earth Science frontiers, 2013, 20(4): 211-220. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201304020.htm
[24]	程鹏, 肖贤明. 很高成熟度富有机质页岩的含气性问题[J]. 煤炭学报, 2013, 38(5): 737-741. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201305004.htm CHENG Peng, XIAO Xianming. Gas content of organic-rich shales with very high maturities[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2013, 38(5): 737-741. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201305004.htm

Relative Articles

[1]	QIAN Ji'an, JIANG Yuqiang, LUO Tongtong, YANG Yixiao, FU Yonghong, CHEN Weiming, SUN Chaoya, WANG Zhanlei. Microscopic pore and fracture evolution characteristics and influencing factors during imbibition process of shale reservoirs: a case study of the first section of the first member of Longmaxi Formation, western Chongqing area, Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2024, 46(6): 1336-1348. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2024061336
[2]	WANG Liangjun, YUE Xinxin, LI Liansheng, WANG Yanpeng. Pore development characteristics and main controlling factors of tight oil reservoir in the seventh member of Triassic Yanchang Formation, Xunyi area, Ordos Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2024, 46(6): 1135-1144. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2024061135
[3]	WANG Daojun, CHEN Chao, LIU Zhujiang, YANG Shufan, LIU Miaomiao, XIE Jiatong. Main controlling factors for oil and gas enrichment in Jurassic laminated shale in Fuxing area of Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2024, 46(2): 319-332. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202402319
[4]	WANG Pengwei, SHEN Baojian, LIU Zhongbao, LI Min, LI Qianwen, RONG Jia, WANG Qianru. Characteristics and main controlling factors of organic pore development in continental shales of the Lianggaoshan Formation in the Fuxing area, Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2024, 46(3): 499-509. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202403499
[5]	LI Jiarui, YANG Zhi, WANG Zhaoyun, TANG Yong, ZHANG Hong, JIANG Wenqi, WANG Xiaoni, WEI Qizhao. Quantitative characterization and main controlling factors of shale oil occurrence in Permian Fengcheng Formation, Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2023, 45(4): 681-692. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202304681
[6]	XIA Wenqian, ZHU Xiang, JIN Mindong, ZHANG Lei, LIU Yanting, ZHANG Siyao. Characteristics and controlling factors of volcanic clastic rock reservoirs in Wujiaping Formation of Upper Permian in northern Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2023, 45(2): 307-316. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202302307
[7]	JIANG Zhili, ZHU Xiang. Hydrocarbon accumulation characteristics and main controlling factors for Permian Maokou Formation in Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2022, 44(4): 639-646. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202204639
[8]	NI Kai, WANG Mingfa, LI Xiang. Enrichment model of shale gas in southeastern Sichuan Basin: a case study of Upper Ordovician Wufeng and Lower Silurian Longmaxi formations in Dingshan area[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(4): 580-588. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202104580
[9]	SUN Ziming, SUN Wei, LIN Juanhua, MA Qiang. Hydrocarbon accumulation conditions and main controlling factors of the Middle-Upper Cambrian Xixiangchi Group in the eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(6): 933-940. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202106933
[10]	DUAN Wenshen. Exploration potential and favorable direction of tight gas in Middle Jurassic Xiashaximiao Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2021, 43(3): 424-431. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202103424
[11]	LIANG Feng, QIU Xunxi, DAI Yun, ZHANG Qin, LU Bin, CHEN Peng, MA Chao, QI Lin, HU Xi. Characteristics and main controls of nano-pores in the Lower Silurian Longmaxi shale, Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2020, 42(3): 451-458. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202003451
[12]	FANG Dongliang, MENG Zhiyong. Main controlling factors of shale gas enrichment and high yield: a case study of Wufeng-Longmaxi formations in Fuling area, Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2020, 42(1): 37-41. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202001037
[13]	ZHU Tong. Main controlling factors and types of continental shale oil and gas enrichment in Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2020, 42(3): 345-354. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202003345
[14]	YANG Wenxin, LI Jiqing, ZHAO Jiangyan, HUANG Zhihong. Qualitative and quantitative study of micro-pore structures of Longmaxi Formation shale in Fuling area, Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2018, 40(1): 97-102. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201801097
[15]	Yan Jihong, Li Qigui, Zhu Xiang. Main factors controlling shale gas accumulation and exploration targets in the Lower Cambrian, Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2016, 38(4): 445-452. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201604445
[16]	Fan Xiaojun. Genetic analysis of high-yield wells of ultra-deep reef-shoal lithologic gas reservoirs：A case study of reef-shoal facies reservoirs in Changxing Formation, Yuanba area, northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2014, 36(1): 70-76. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201401070
[17]	Fan Zhiwei. Distribution of ancient ditches in Leikoupo Formation and its control over gas accumulations in Yuanba Gas Field[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2014, 36(5): 562-566. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201405562
[18]	Chen Gang, Lin Liangbiao, Wang Wei, Chen Hongde, Guo Tonglou. Diagenesis and porosity evolution of sandstones in Xujiahe Formation, Yuanba area[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2014, 36(4): 405-410. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201404405
[19]	Wang Wei. Characteristics of high-energy channel sandstone and its exploration significance: A case from Xujiahe Formation in Yuanba area[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2013, 35(6): 657-661. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201306657
[20]	WU He-yong, XIN Ren-chen, YANG Jian-guo. THE MIDDLE JURASSIC SEDIMENTARY EVOLUTION AND PETROLEUM POTENTIAL OF THE MOHE BASIN[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2003, 25(2): 116-121. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200302116

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(32)

1.	魏志红，石文斌，魏祥峰，刘苗苗，陈超，王道军，谢佳彤. 四川盆地复兴地区侏罗系页岩源——储耦合特征及页岩油气甜点优选. 天然气工业. 2025(01): 37-52 .
2.	秦春雨，张少敏，韩璐媛，周红飞，吕龑，姜瀚，余凯，谢强，洪海涛，邱玉超. 四川盆地侏罗系凉高山组沉积演化特征及页岩油气有利勘探区带. 天然气工业. 2025(01): 53-67 .
3.	李雄，舒逸，刘皓天，陈绵琨，彭伟. 四川盆地东部侏罗系陆相页岩优质储层发育机理及其油气地质意义. 天然气工业. 2025(01): 80-93 .
4.	胡东风，魏志红，魏祥峰，石文斌，王道军，刘晓晶. 四川盆地复兴地区侏罗系凉高山组陆相页岩油气勘探突破及启示. 天然气工业. 2025(01): 1-13 .
5.	赵吉儿，冉崎，谢冰，赖强，白利，朱迅. 四川盆地凉高山组全尺寸孔隙半径分布表征方法. 新疆石油地质. 2025(02): 181-191 .
6.	王道军，刘珠江，陈超，刘晓晶，刘苗苗. 川南綦江地区下侏罗统凉高山组岩相特征与页岩油气富集条件. 地质论评. 2024(02): 609-623 .
7.	彭军，张新怡，许天宇，程立雪，张昆，李斌. 四川盆地元坝地区千佛崖组二段细粒沉积岩岩相特征及储集性分析. 石油实验地质. 2024(02): 247-262 . 本站查看
8.	郭贵安，唐青松，蒋裕强，朱讯，方锐，周亚东，洪海涛，张连进，张新宇. 夹层型页岩油突破及其油气地质意义——以四川盆地中部G119H井为例. 天然气工业. 2024(03): 53-63 .
9.	舒志国，舒逸，陈绵琨，彭伟，刘皓天，肖雄. 陆相页岩岩相非均质性及储层孔隙发育特征：以四川盆地自流井组东岳庙段页岩为例. 地质科技通报. 2024(02): 1-15 .
10.	蒋代琴，李平平，邹华耀. 川东北元坝地区侏罗系陆相页岩天然裂缝发育特征及其对页岩油气富集和保存的影响. 现代地质. 2024(02): 362-372 .
11.	刘忠宝. 四川盆地自流井组页岩油气地质特征及富集规律. 世界石油工业. 2024(03): 35-47 .
12.	郭旭升，黄仁春，张殿伟，李双建，申宝剑，刘天甲. 四川盆地海相碳酸盐岩全油气系统成藏特征与有序分布规律. 石油勘探与开发. 2024(04): 743-758 .
13.	GUO Xusheng，HUANG Renchun，ZHANG Dianwei，LI Shuangjian，SHEN Baojian，LIU Tianjia. Hydrocarbon accumulation and orderly distribution of whole petroleum system in marine carbonate rocks of Sichuan Basin, SW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development. 2024(04): 852-869 .
14.	胡宗全，刘忠宝，李倩文，吴舟凡. 基于变尺度岩相组合的陆相页岩源-储耦合机理探讨——以四川盆地侏罗系页岩层段为例. 石油与天然气地质. 2024(04): 893-909 .
15.	鲜成钢，李国欣，李曹雄，申颍浩，葛洪魁，文恒，雷征东. 陆相页岩油效益开发的若干问题. 地球科学. 2023(01): 14-29 .
16.	陈新军，丁一，易晶晶，陈刚. 氦气资源的分类、特征及富集主控因素分析. 石油实验地质. 2023(01): 41-48 . 本站查看
17.	李志明，孙中良，鲍云杰，徐二社，周勇水，张云献. 冀北坳陷中元古界洪水庄组页岩油勘探前景探讨. 石油实验地质. 2023(01): 29-40 . 本站查看
18.	郭旭升，魏志红，魏祥峰，刘珠江，陈超，王道军. 四川盆地侏罗系陆相页岩油气富集条件及勘探方向. 石油学报. 2023(01): 14-27 .
19.	周卓明. 陆相泥页岩源—储协同演化特征分析——以松辽盆地长岭断陷沙河子组为例. 石油实验地质. 2023(02): 243-251 . 本站查看
20.	王濡岳，胡宗全，赖富强，刘粤蛟，邬忠虎，何建华，邹冠贵，王鹏威，李治昊. 川东北地区下侏罗统自流井组大安寨段陆相页岩脆性特征及其控制因素. 石油与天然气地质. 2023(02): 366-378 .
21.	胡东风，李真祥，魏志红，段金宝，缪志伟，潘磊，黎承银，段华. 四川盆地北部地区巴中1HF井侏罗系河道砂岩油气勘探突破及意义. 天然气工业. 2023(03): 1-11 .
22.	郭秋麟，米石云，张倩，王建. 中国页岩油资源评价方法与资源潜力探讨. 石油实验地质. 2023(03): 402-412 . 本站查看
23.	欧成华，李航，史百强，张峙岳，贺健. 川北典型陆相页岩—砂岩油气潜力表征与评价. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(03): 61-71 .
24.	张洪安，彭君，王学军，李进. 四川盆地普陆页1井侏罗系页岩气勘探突破及意义. 石油学报. 2023(09): 1500-1516+1551 .
25.	舒逸，郑有恒，包汉勇，徐尚，刘皓天，陈绵琨，彭伟，张梦吟，肖雄. 四川盆地复兴地区下侏罗统页岩油气富集高产主控因素. 世界石油工业. 2023(05): 26-38 .
26.	李进. 湖相高黏土泥页岩储层差异化水赋存模式——以普光气田千佛崖组一段为例. 断块油气田. 2023(06): 925-932 .
27.	刘苗苗，付小平，谢佳彤. 四川盆地中侏罗统页岩储层特征及其影响因素. 断块油气田. 2023(06): 905-913 .
28.	康华，周勇水，徐田武，张云献，姜鹏，张莹莹，郭金兰，李潇，陈帆. 普光地区千佛崖组一段流体包裹体特征及其地质意义. 断块油气田. 2023(06): 947-953+990 .
29.	王濡岳，胡宗全，龙胜祥，杜伟，吴靖，邬忠虎，聂海宽，王鹏威，孙川翔，赵建华. 四川盆地上奥陶统五峰组-下志留统龙马溪组页岩储层特征与演化机制. 石油与天然气地质. 2022(02): 353-364 .
30.	吴因业，李国欣，吴洛菲，徐兆辉，龙国徽，方向，付蕾，张天舒，陶士振. 中国中西部大型湖盆沉积体系域研究进展及页岩油气勘探. 古地理学报. 2022(04): 728-741 .
31.	王学军，周勇水，彭君，李进，李红磊，王亚明，周凯，陈帆. 川东北普光地区侏罗系千佛崖组页岩气重大突破. 中国石油勘探. 2022(05): 52-61 .
32.	李进，王学军，王睿，何岩，周凯. 普光地区千佛崖组半深湖相页岩含气性特征及影响因素. 断块油气田. 2022(06): 736-743 .

Other cited types(9)

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Figures(8) / Tables(2)

Citation

XML

PDF-CN

Article Metrics

Article views (963) PDF downloads(130)